Forums: Climbing Information: General:
New belay technique
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for General

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 14 Next page Last page  View All


curt


Dec 14, 2004, 3:34 AM
Post #51 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Well well well.

Curt, I am guessing you had at least one carabiner and maybe even three. Here's one more thing you could have done, assuming the rope was long enough.....

The rope wasn't long enough. This was an old maybe 60 foot chunk of rope. There was barely enough rope to tie in with the bowline on a coil and then use the belay we did.

In reply to:
Now, if you are serious and not trolling, I'm willing to TR on your shoe belay, as long as you will share the scotch, because, for one thing I'm betting that you could hold a typical TR 'fall' with no belay method other than two hands on the rope. Assuming you did slip and fall, as long as you did not let go of the rope, no great tragedy would follow, and I'm guessing that YOU and probably your friends have the sense to know that no matter what the belay method is, you just have to do one thing for it to be successful, and that is, DON'T LET GO OF THE ROPE!

We tried that too and you are correct. However, we didn't like that method for a couple reasons. Principally, because the arm strength required to catch a falling climber with that method is quite high and your forearms arms get tired. So, when it is your turn to climb--you're pumped. I do not recommend that method.

In reply to:
So now I have some questions:

Is this a joke or is it serious?

Serious.

In reply to:
If the answer to the last question is, "It's serious.", then,
How did you set the top rope up?

We did have carabiners, a few pieces of gear and a few runners. There are also beefy bolts across the tops of these rocks, from previous Phoenix Bouldering Contests.

In reply to:
What does JT have to say about this new belay method?

I PM'd him as soon as I started the thread and he replied that he thought I would get a bunch of n00b responses. So far, he is on the money with that prediction.

In reply to:
Did you have both hands on the brake side while lowering? Sorry, couldn't resist.

Hahahahahaha.

Curt


kman


Dec 14, 2004, 3:35 AM
Post #52 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 16, 2001
Posts: 2561

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
is quite possible, and in fact easy to move around using this belay--lifting your foot is not a problem and does not fuck up the belay

I will reword it then. While lowering or while catching a fall you can lift your foot up without f'ing the belay? What if your moving and the guy falls? Can't think of a situation for why you would even want to use this.


curt


Dec 14, 2004, 3:39 AM
Post #53 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I will give you an A+ for inventiveness, and creativity. however there just, to me anyway, seems to be too many factors to make this reliably safe dude. I will throw in a quick moment of vertigo in for the list of things that could cause this to fail. I get 'em and I know that I'm not the only ones. lift your foot even just a few inches and you run the risk of the rope slipping off your foot. a hip belay, however waaaaaaaaaay more ungodly uncomfortable, just seems to have less chinks in its safety armor

Congrats on developing a new belay technique that worked for you. I would have to see this in person and in live action to fully discount it as unsafe. afterall I said that the overhand knot for rappel was unsafe until I saw it in action too.

Kman can you see the looks on peoples faces if we were to bring this one out at Grassi Lakes. HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA ah man that would be funnnnnnny

PS curt, I've sent this over to a budddy of mine who is full mountain guide to see what he thinks of it. I'll let you know what the findings are.

Well, it sounds like you may at least have an open mind. I have already suggested a way you can try this for yourself, with no risk at all. Do this and then let me know what your thoughts are. I guarantee that this looks way more hairball than it actually is.

And, I don't aid climb--its cheating, to a free climber, that is. Haha.

Curt


curt


Dec 14, 2004, 3:45 AM
Post #54 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
is quite possible, and in fact easy to move around using this belay--lifting your foot is not a problem and does not f--- up the belay

I will reword it then. While lowering or while catching a fall you can lift your foot up without f'ing the belay? What if your moving and the guy falls?

Yeah, I think so and I don't think that is a huge problem.

In reply to:
Can't think of a situation for why you would even want to use this.

I have already given several reasons. It does seem that you are befuddled by relatively simple things.

Curt


rendog


Dec 14, 2004, 3:50 AM
Post #55 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 2468

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
And, I don't aid climb--its cheating, to a free climber, that is. Haha.
Curt


couldn't agree more with ya. The Route s are called classics, since they were put up in the early days of mountaineering ranging from 1902 to present. in the 50's and 60's the hardest grade for the mountains at the time was 5.9 A2, so it's become a kinda joke if you will, to grade a route like that. 5.9 A2 just means REALLY FUCKING HARD! some of the earlier routes have now been freed most going at solid 5.11a (sic)

In reply to:
Well, it sounds like you may at least have an open mind. I have already suggested a way you can try this for yourself, with no risk at all. Do this and then let me know what your thoughts are. I guarantee that this looks way more hairball than it actually is.


sure it is. I'm on here enough. it has to be, some of the shit that passes through this web site will astound and amaze even the arseholes. plus I just like to see a good fight go on.


"Now lets keep it clean, above the belt (this means no shots at your northern neighbors), go back into your corners and come out swinging" :wink:


dirtineye


Dec 14, 2004, 4:15 AM
Post #56 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 29, 2003
Posts: 5590

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Now, if you are serious and not trolling, I'm willing to TR on your shoe belay, as long as you will share the scotch, because, for one thing I'm betting that you could hold a typical TR 'fall' with no belay method other than two hands on the rope. Assuming you did slip and fall, as long as you did not let go of the rope, no great tragedy would follow, and I'm guessing that YOU and probably your friends have the sense to know that no matter what the belay method is, you just have to do one thing for it to be successful, and that is, DON'T LET GO OF THE ROPE!

We tried that too and you are correct. However, we didn't like that method for a couple reasons. Principally, because the arm strength required to catch a falling climber with that method is quite high and your forearms arms get tired. So, when it is your turn to climb--you're pumped. I do not recommend that method.

My point here was, that if you were using your new method, and a wlid boar suddenly burst out of the woods and bit off your brake leg, as long as you did not let go of the rope, the climber would not hit the ground. What you would do about your missing leg and the now drunk (on good scotch at least) wild boar would be for another thread.

I'll still ride on this belay, given some decent scotch and a wild boar free environment.


kman


Dec 14, 2004, 4:23 AM
Post #57 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 16, 2001
Posts: 2561

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I have already given several reasons.

It's called short term memory. A result of many years of pot smoking and heavy lsd use lol.


In reply to:
While lowering or while catching a fall you can lift your foot up without f'ing the belay? What if your moving and the guy falls?



In reply to:
Yeah, I think so and I don't think that is a huge problem.

I am going to try it and see what happens ( in a safe situation ). I am willing to bet on the following:
1. I will be able to hold a simple tr fall and lower.
2. My 105 pound wife will not be able to hold me.
3. If I take my foot off the ground while lowering I will probably loose control.

I am also curious how hard it is to move a little bit while lowering.


curt


Dec 14, 2004, 4:23 AM
Post #58 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Now, if you are serious and not trolling, I'm willing to TR on your shoe belay, as long as you will share the scotch, because, for one thing I'm betting that you could hold a typical TR 'fall' with no belay method other than two hands on the rope. Assuming you did slip and fall, as long as you did not let go of the rope, no great tragedy would follow, and I'm guessing that YOU and probably your friends have the sense to know that no matter what the belay method is, you just have to do one thing for it to be successful, and that is, DON'T LET GO OF THE ROPE!

We tried that too and you are correct. However, we didn't like that method for a couple reasons. Principally, because the arm strength required to catch a falling climber with that method is quite high and your forearms arms get tired. So, when it is your turn to climb--you're pumped. I do not recommend that method.

My point here was, that if you were using your new method, and a wlid boar suddenly burst out of the woods and bit off your brake leg, as long as you did not let go of the rope, the climber would not hit the ground. What you would do about your missing leg and the now drunk (on good scotch at least) wild boar would be for another thread.

I'll still ride on this belay, given some decent scotch and a wild boar free environment.

Yeah, but you're an old trad climber who actually knows how things work. What are you doing posting in this thread anyway? This thread has long ago turned into a forum for gumbies like kman and others who don't wear long pants yet to expound vacuously on things they have no understanding of. Haha.

Curt


curt


Dec 14, 2004, 4:30 AM
Post #59 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
I have already given several reasons.

It's called short term memory. A result of many years of pot smoking and heavy lsd use lol.


In reply to:
While lowering or while catching a fall you can lift your foot up without f'ing the belay? What if your moving and the guy falls?



In reply to:
Yeah, I think so and I don't think that is a huge problem.

I am going to try it and see what happens ( in a safe situation ). I am willing to bet on the following:
1. I will be able to hold a simple tr fall and lower.
2. My 105 pound wife will not be able to hold me.
3. If I take my foot off the ground while lowering I will probably loose control.

I am also curious how hard it is to move a little bit while lowering.

Well, I guess miracles can happen. I do encourage you to try this--in a safe and controlled environment. The only thing above that I am nor too sure about is your #2. Your wife may or may not be able to hold you, depending on:

1) How much you weigh
2) How much rope friction there is over the rock
3) How you set up the anchor

We used three carabiners side-by-side for the TR anchor. This increased the friction--a little. Also, there was a little friction of the rope running over the rock at the top of the climbs. I would estimate that to hold a 160 pound climber (which we each were) we had to hold about 100 pounds at the belay end. this proved to be no problem with this belay method.

Curt


climbsomething


Dec 14, 2004, 4:42 AM
Post #60 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Whatever. I think you're wearing the Andrea Bocelli t-shirt. Now if THAT don't scream gumby, I don't know what does 8-)


curt


Dec 14, 2004, 4:46 AM
Post #61 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Whatever. I think you're wearing the Andrea Bocelli t-shirt. Now if THAT don't scream gumby, I don't know what does 8-)

Andrea Bocelli is great. Gumbies do not listen to Andrea Bocelli. Anyway, climbing attire-wise, the Prana pants ought to offset the Bocelli t-shirt, don't you think? Haha.

Curt


kman


Dec 14, 2004, 4:48 AM
Post #62 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 16, 2001
Posts: 2561

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
course, you seem to be some sort of expert on this belay technique in spite of your total ignorance of it

O.k. time to clarify things a bit instead of mud slinging.

I never claimed to be any kind of "expert". I never doubted that you could hold a tr fall with it. What I said was if you need to dodge a rock (add:) while under load you'd be screwed. And I still think so. It would be hard to move while under load without losing it. That is all.

I will use 3 biners as you did. The place where I will try it out will have to be so that It will run throught the 3 biners directly to the belayer without touching any rock...since I am doing it at home.

My wife weighs 105 lbs and I am 180. I would be very suprised if she can hold it. It would be possible if enough friction was introduced though.

I still think that when I lift my foot off the ground while under load it's going to be damn sketch to maintain control.

I still think that it is not a "very safe" method. However, I would take a pro using this method over a noob with a gri gri.....in the right situation.


dirtineye


Dec 14, 2004, 4:50 AM
Post #63 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 29, 2003
Posts: 5590

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:

Yeah, but you're an old trad climber who actually knows how things work. What are you doing posting in this thread anyway? This thread has long ago turned into a forum for gumbies like kman and others who don't wear long pants yet to expound vacuously on things they have no understanding of. Haha.

Curt

Oh man have I got you fooled!

But you know if I had three two foot runners and a spare biner, I would just make a pretty nice belay worthy setup out of that. I'd even consider a wasit loop and one leg loop if I only had two two foot runners and a biner.

I still don't follow the logic of that one guy who felt that you would be better off soloing than using this shoe belay. I guess he is the same guy who thinks he can win the lottery without buying a ticket?

I'm posting in this thread because it is amusing, and I was hoping to draw the wrath of SOMEONE, I don't eve ncare who hahahaha. Nobody wanted to pounce on my prussic as belay device idea, what did I do wrong?

FOr the record, I climb in long pants. it keeps my knees from getting so bloody nad it give s me a place to wipe my feet.


climbsomething


Dec 14, 2004, 4:52 AM
Post #64 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Whatever. I think you're wearing the Andrea Bocelli t-shirt. Now if THAT don't scream gumby, I don't know what does 8-)

Andrea Bocelli is great. Gumbies do not listen to Andrea Bocelli. Anyway, climbing attire-wise, the Prana pants ought to offset the Bocelli t-shirt, don't you think? Haha.

Curt
For optimum radness, you should coat the left cheek of your pranas in pink gatorade. I think my berry punch gatorade stain gave me mojo this weekend. Too bad I didn't have a Bocelli shirt, I might have gotten a B1 that way 8-)


curt


Dec 14, 2004, 4:58 AM
Post #65 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
course, you seem to be some sort of expert on this belay technique in spite of your total ignorance of it

O.k. time to clarify things a bit instead of mud slinging.

I never claimed to be any kind of "expert". I never doubted that you could hold a tr fall with it. What I said was if you need to dodge a rock (add:) while under load you'd be screwed. And I still think so. It would be hard to move while under load without losing it. That is all.

I will use 3 biners as you did. The place where I will try it out will have to be so that It will run throught the 3 biners directly to the belayer without touching any rock...since I am doing it at home.

My wife weighs 105 lbs and I am 180. I would be very suprised if she can hold it. It would be possible if enough friction was introduced though.

I still think that when I lift my foot off the ground while under load it's going to be damn sketch to maintain control.

I still think that it is not a "very safe" method. However, I would take a pro using this method over a noob with a gri gri.....in the right situation.

Please do let me know what you think. I do agree that (absent some rope friction over the rock) your wife will probably not be able to hold you. However, she would not be able to hold you with a conventional belay either--unless she was tied in, simply because of the weight delta. You may want to experiment with this belay with a friend who may be closer to your weight, if you can.

Curt


jt512


Dec 14, 2004, 5:00 AM
Post #66 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Form the looks of it, the biggest concern I would have with this as an improvised belay method would be the difficulty moving, say, to dodge a rock, which probably was no factor on that slab.

-Jay


curt


Dec 14, 2004, 5:00 AM
Post #67 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Whatever. I think you're wearing the Andrea Bocelli t-shirt. Now if THAT don't scream gumby, I don't know what does 8-)

Andrea Bocelli is great. Gumbies do not listen to Andrea Bocelli. Anyway, climbing attire-wise, the Prana pants ought to offset the Bocelli t-shirt, don't you think? Haha.

Curt
For optimum radness, you should coat the left cheek of your pranas in pink gatorade. I think my berry punch gatorade stain gave me mojo this weekend. Too bad I didn't have a Bocelli shirt, I might have gotten a B1 that way 8-)

You mean V1 sweetie. You've got a ways to go to get to B1. Haha. BTW, please post photo of said stain on left asscheek. Thanks.

Curt


jimdavis


Dec 14, 2004, 5:01 AM
Post #68 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 1, 2003
Posts: 1935

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

What people have to keep in mind about Curt, is that he is infallible.

Just look at some of his statements:

In reply to:
It does seem that you are befuddled by relatively simple things.
In reply to:
Once again, you are wrong on all counts.
In reply to:
Of course, you seem to be some sort of expert on this belay technique in spite of your total ignorance of it.
In reply to:
The problem here is that neither of you two geniuses even have the slightest idea of what you're talking about.
In reply to:
Canadians aren't smart enough to figure it out.
In reply to:
Also, a gumby is someone who speaks out of their ass about things they have no knowledge of. In other words--you.

You see, Curt is always right! He has to be right. He has consulted 85 years of climbing experience that tells him it's safe; therefor, all of us must be wrong.

How could we possibly argue with "being a gumby" ?

Curt is just right!

We should follow in his example: use "old chunks" of rope to climb on, leave our harnesses, biners, and belay device at home. Climb without helmets, and learn to be as experienced and resourceful as Curt.

We should ignore the critisizms of other "gumby's" who question our superiority, whether they be certified guides or boulder toads new to belay techniques.

Curt has found a way for us to forget almost all of our formerly essential climbing gear at home, and still rope up and climb..."safely"!

How could anyone possibly question him?!?

Take notice here guys...we're witnessing history.


curt


Dec 14, 2004, 5:06 AM
Post #69 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Form the looks of this, the biggest concern I would have would be the difficulty moving, say, to dodge a rock, which probably was no factor on that slab.

-Jay

Well, you have to sort of see the thing work--or try it, to understand all of the ins and outs of it. However, you can (and we did) move around while using this belay method. To move the foot under which the rope runs, you grab the ropes together, in one hand, as one of my photos shows. You then pull up with your hand while you step with the roped foot. this keeps the rope in firm contact with the arch of your foot while you reposition the foot. I believe that if the climber were to fall at that exact moment the belay would still work.

Curt


kman


Dec 14, 2004, 5:09 AM
Post #70 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 16, 2001
Posts: 2561

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
However, she would not be able to hold you with a conventional belay either

She has caught me on many top roped falls. She does not normally anchor in for top roping. She gets pulled up just a very little bit.

I would like to try the lift the foot while loaded part with some one closer to my own weight though.


jimdavis


Dec 14, 2004, 5:09 AM
Post #71 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 1, 2003
Posts: 1935

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
"I believe that if the climber were to fall at that exact moment the belay would still work."

Couldn't get pulled off balance moving around with one leg in the air could you?

naw!


curt


Dec 14, 2004, 5:17 AM
Post #72 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
What people have to keep in mind about Curt, is that he is infallible.

Just look at some of his statements:

In reply to:
It does seem that you are befuddled by relatively simple things.
In reply to:
Once again, you are wrong on all counts.
In reply to:
Of course, you seem to be some sort of expert on this belay technique in spite of your total ignorance of it.
In reply to:
The problem here is that neither of you two geniuses even have the slightest idea of what you're talking about.
In reply to:
Canadians aren't smart enough to figure it out.
In reply to:
Also, a gumby is someone who speaks out of their ass about things they have no knowledge of. In other words--you.

You see, Curt is always right! He has to be right. He has consulted 85 years of climbing experience that tells him it's safe; therefor, all of us must be wrong.

How could we possibly argue with "being a gumby" ?

Curt is just right!

We should follow in his example: use "old chunks" of rope to climb on, leave our harnesses, biners, and belay device at home. Climb without helmets, and learn to be as experienced and resourceful as Curt.

We should ignore the critisizms of other "gumby's" who question our superiority, whether they be certified guides or boulder toads new to belay techniques.

Curt has found a way for us to forget almost all of our formerly essential climbing gear at home, and still rope up and climb..."safely"!

How could anyone possibly question him?!?

Take notice here guys...we're witnessing history.

Wow. Your profile says that you have been climbing for three whole years now. Such vast experience you have. Obviously everyone here should listen to you. Do you really think you look very intelligent putting your climbing credentials up against mine, or Brent Bingham's or Chris Raypole's? They are the other guys who developed this belay technique with me last weekend. Give it a break n00b. Oh, and don't forget to clean off the mirror after you pop your zits before going to bed tonight, kid. There is no reason to leave your mother with that mess to deal with.

Curt


curt


Dec 14, 2004, 5:21 AM
Post #73 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
"I believe that if the climber were to fall at that exact moment the belay would still work."

Couldn't get pulled off balance moving around with one leg in the air could you?

naw!

Only one question for you. Have you actually tried this belay technique? If the answer is "no" you are merely talking out of your ass--which you do seem to do frequently.

Curt


jumpingrock


Dec 14, 2004, 5:27 AM
Post #74 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 5692

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I would use this belay technique if there were no other options. I would never let anybody use it on me (having a fat ass) and a paranoia about being droped.

Hey Curt, this should probably be in the ask Curt a question thread but is Bocelli's new CD any good? I like Romanza and I believe it is his best CD to date. Did you know he is blind?


jimdavis


Dec 14, 2004, 5:28 AM
Post #75 of 345 (28486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 1, 2003
Posts: 1935

Re: New belay technique [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Wow. Your profile says that you have been climbing for three whole years now. Such vast experience you have. Obviously everyone here should listen to you. Do you really think you look very intelligent putting your climbing credentials up against mine, or Brent Bingham's or Chris Raypole's? They are the other guys who developed this belay technique with me last weekend. Give it a break n00b. Oh, and don't forget to clean off the mirror after you pop your zits before going to bed tonight, kid. There is no reason to leave your mother with that mess to deal with.

Curt

Ooops! Nobody should listen to me, I'm a noob. You should all listen to Curt, the master of what's right.

Obiviously Curt is a better climber, and a better mud-slinger, so he must be right.

I forgot about that whole the "authority is always right" thing. Us newer climbers need to stop thinking for ourselves and follow in the older generations footsteps, even if they seem wrong. Right Curt?

Not challenging your climbing resume Curt...just you intelligence, and your character...both of whitch your proven masterfully in this thread.

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 14 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : General

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook