Forums: Climbing Disciplines: Bouldering:
The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us!
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Bouldering

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next page Last page  View All


jomagam


Feb 8, 2011, 3:47 PM
Post #151 of 241 (9532 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2008
Posts: 364

Re: [1904climber] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Re 1904climber: I would ask people working in the gym if I had absolutely no idea about what the inside grades map to outside. They'll give a ballpark estimate, like recreational=below V grade, intermediate=v0-v1, advanced=v2-vwhatever, open=vwhatever+1

Re Jay: My gut says that it's better to have gym and outside grades use a different scale because the two are just different enough and it symbolizes that only outside climbing is real. Anecdotal evidence: search for "best bouldering gym in the US" and you get The Spot in Boulder. They give 1 to 5 dots/spots to their problems.


spikeddem


Feb 8, 2011, 4:09 PM
Post #152 of 241 (9519 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [jomagam] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jomagam wrote:
Re 1904climber: I would ask people working in the gym if I had absolutely no idea about what the inside grades map to outside. They'll give a ballpark estimate, like recreational=below V grade, intermediate=v0-v1, advanced=v2-vwhatever, open=vwhatever+1

1) Why bother mapping indoor grades to outdoor grades? That's not the purpose of grades indoors, as far as I'm concerned. Grades outdoors vary from region to region, so a gym's indoor ratings should focus on being consistent within the gym. If it generally matches up to the local region, then that's great, but not necessary.

2) By saying "whatever" you really made arguing for your rating system easier on yourself. Does V5/V6 and V10 fall into the same category? Sure looks like it does. Does that make sense? Hardly.

In reply to:
Re Jay: My gut says that it's better to have gym and outside grades use a different scale because the two are just different enough and it symbolizes that only outside climbing is real. Anecdotal evidence: search for "best bouldering gym in the US" and you get The Spot in Boulder. They give 1 to 5 dots/spots to their problems.

You still haven't answered how they're different. You mentioned that outdoors there's more freedom, in comparison to taped indoor routes. How exactly does that mean that grading should become less sensitive (i.e., changing from 17 grades (V0-v16) to four our five)?

Your statement that the holds are made out of plastic does make any sense to use as an argument as to why grades shouldn't be used in gyms.

"It symbolizes that only outdoor climbing is real"? What? You do realize that like 85% of this site doesn't even think that outdoor bouldering is real climbing either, right?


Partner cracklover


Feb 8, 2011, 4:12 PM
Post #153 of 241 (9516 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [aprice00] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

aprice00 wrote:
I agree with setting problems for beginner climbers.

I started going to a climbing gym with a friend in 2006 and as a poor college student with too many hobbies already I didn’t see it through. I found that the routes were too hard and after working one out for 30 min. my forearms/grip was shot. *For all you nay sayers try to remember your grip limitations as a beginner*
After a handful of visits i counldt justify spending the $7 to climb a couple of rainbow'd routes. After all $7 was the difference of a burger + beer vs ramen noodles. Anyway, I just never saw the appeal *Read-busting your ass just to be able to pull yourself up a wall of plastic* and my other hobbies + chasing girls was just... more rewarding.
So fast-forward 4.5yrs I have not so much free time, a decent job, a great girl, and a desperate need to reach out for something that offers freedom and now.... I get it.
I get on the wall and everything disappears its just me and the problem. Its not the adrenaline rush that movies like cliff hanger told me I was supposed to be getting. Its not chest pumping while one-uping the boys. Its about the discipline and focus. Its about problem solving and that feeling when you "get it right" This is the shit we are made of and its been stripped out of modern society.
So to get back to the OP, I wish I would have gotten it in the beginning. I think jug routes could be the proverbial carrot that many need.
As far as the proposed ratings system...Implement it where you can. If its good it will catch on. Think of it like evolution. The first step is variation.
Edit: I didnt mean to say we are made of shit ha

So now you get what climbing is all about (believe me, you've barely scratched the surface), and you are proud of the changes it took in your maturity it took to get there. You even credit the climbing itself for helping you get there. You see how the need to push yourself beyond what you thought you were capable of, to really engage your brain - taught you a little about discipline and focus.

And now you want to eliminate that for others. You want to make gym climbing into yet another "well you tried a little bit, and should be rewarded for that" activity.

Fuck that, and shame on you.

My brother-in-law teaches at an inner city school where the students get credit for filling in all the answers - whether they get the answers right or not. That's how bad things have gotten.

We don't need that shit in our gyms, and you should know that.

By the way, welcome to climbing. You have no idea how deep that rabbit hole goes. Most of us will never have what it takes to go all the way down, which is fine. It's about self-exploration, and discovering (not to mention pushing) our own limits. You've started a long and exiting journey!

Cheers,

GO


Partner cracklover


Feb 8, 2011, 4:19 PM
Post #154 of 241 (9511 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [jomagam] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jomagam wrote:
Re 1904climber: I would ask people working in the gym if I had absolutely no idea about what the inside grades map to outside. They'll give a ballpark estimate, like recreational=below V grade, intermediate=v0-v1, advanced=v2-vwhatever, open=vwhatever+1

Re Jay: My gut says that it's better to have gym and outside grades use a different scale because the two are just different enough and it symbolizes that only outside climbing is real. Anecdotal evidence: search for "best bouldering gym in the US" and you get The Spot in Boulder. They give 1 to 5 dots/spots to their problems.

The Spot has the best bouldering because of the quality of the problems they set, not because of the stupid rating system. If they used V grades, they would still have the best bouldering.

Also, you will find precious few VB boulder problems there. If you don't want to just spend all your time climbing up the downclimbs that are the designated descents off the boulders, you'd better learn a thing or two pretty fast.

And you think climbing something labeled "V0" is embarrassing, try fighting with the stream of climbers coming down off a boulder just to get up your "problem". There's some encouragement to get better.

GO


jomagam


Feb 8, 2011, 5:24 PM
Post #155 of 241 (9495 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2008
Posts: 364

Re: [spikeddem] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
jomagam wrote:
Re 1904climber: I would ask people working in the gym if I had absolutely no idea about what the inside grades map to outside. They'll give a ballpark estimate, like recreational=below V grade, intermediate=v0-v1, advanced=v2-vwhatever, open=vwhatever+1

1) Why bother mapping indoor grades to outdoor grades? That's not the purpose of grades indoors, as far as I'm concerned. Grades outdoors vary from region to region, so a gym's indoor ratings should focus on being consistent within the gym. If it generally matches up to the local region, then that's great, but not necessary.

2) By saying "whatever" you really made arguing for your rating system easier on yourself. Does V5/V6 and V10 fall into the same category? Sure looks like it does. Does that make sense? Hardly.

In reply to:
Re Jay: My gut says that it's better to have gym and outside grades use a different scale because the two are just different enough and it symbolizes that only outside climbing is real. Anecdotal evidence: search for "best bouldering gym in the US" and you get The Spot in Boulder. They give 1 to 5 dots/spots to their problems.

You still haven't answered how they're different. You mentioned that outdoors there's more freedom, in comparison to taped indoor routes. How exactly does that mean that grading should become less sensitive (i.e., changing from 17 grades (V0-v16) to four our five)?

Your statement that the holds are made out of plastic does make any sense to use as an argument as to why grades shouldn't be used in gyms.

"It symbolizes that only outdoor climbing is real"? What? You do realize that like 85% of this site doesn't even think that outdoor bouldering is real climbing either, right?

1. Some rough mapping is needed for reasons that spikeddem mentioned. All you need to know is the general V grade equivalent and whether the area you climb outside is soft or hard.

2. I said "whatever" because I haven't sent the hardest Advanced boulder problems, so I haven't the slightest clue.

If you agree that bouldering is a valid form of climbing then you'll agree that doing it outside on real rock is the real thing.


spikeddem


Feb 8, 2011, 5:46 PM
Post #156 of 241 (9492 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [jomagam] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jomagam wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
jomagam wrote:
Re 1904climber: I would ask people working in the gym if I had absolutely no idea about what the inside grades map to outside. They'll give a ballpark estimate, like recreational=below V grade, intermediate=v0-v1, advanced=v2-vwhatever, open=vwhatever+1

1) Why bother mapping indoor grades to outdoor grades? That's not the purpose of grades indoors, as far as I'm concerned. Grades outdoors vary from region to region, so a gym's indoor ratings should focus on being consistent within the gym. If it generally matches up to the local region, then that's great, but not necessary.

2) By saying "whatever" you really made arguing for your rating system easier on yourself. Does V5/V6 and V10 fall into the same category? Sure looks like it does. Does that make sense? Hardly.

In reply to:
Re Jay: My gut says that it's better to have gym and outside grades use a different scale because the two are just different enough and it symbolizes that only outside climbing is real. Anecdotal evidence: search for "best bouldering gym in the US" and you get The Spot in Boulder. They give 1 to 5 dots/spots to their problems.

You still haven't answered how they're different. You mentioned that outdoors there's more freedom, in comparison to taped indoor routes. How exactly does that mean that grading should become less sensitive (i.e., changing from 17 grades (V0-v16) to four our five)?

Your statement that the holds are made out of plastic does make any sense to use as an argument as to why grades shouldn't be used in gyms.

"It symbolizes that only outdoor climbing is real"? What? You do realize that like 85% of this site doesn't even think that outdoor bouldering is real climbing either, right?

1. Some rough mapping is needed for reasons that spikeddem mentioned. All you need to know is the general V grade equivalent and whether the area you climb outside is soft or hard.

2. I said "whatever" because I haven't sent the hardest Advanced boulder problems, so I haven't the slightest clue.

If you agree that bouldering is a valid form of climbing then you'll agree that doing it outside on real rock is the real thing.

OK, well my point with #2 is that if you only have four categories, then each category would have to encompass a huge variety of difficulty. In my gym we have between V0 and V11. With only four categories, each category would have so much variety to he point of being basically useless.

I guess I'm not really sure what you mean by "real thing." Do you mean that it's not climbing on rock? Well, yeah, of course it's not. Yet, that doesn't mean that it can't be graded the same way. At the end of the day, your muscles/tendons do not know the difference between the movement you're doing indoors and the movement you're doing outdoors, even if your skin does.


jomagam


Feb 8, 2011, 5:52 PM
Post #157 of 241 (9486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2008
Posts: 364

Re: [cracklover] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
The Spot has the best bouldering because of the quality of the problems they set, not because of the stupid rating system. If they used V grades, they would still have the best bouldering.

Also, you will find precious few VB boulder problems there. If you don't want to just spend all your time climbing up the downclimbs that are the designated descents off the boulders, you'd better learn a thing or two pretty fast.

And you think climbing something labeled "V0" is embarrassing, try fighting with the stream of climbers coming down off a boulder just to get up your "problem". There's some encouragement to get better.

Obviously the problems set inside are infinitely more important than the scale they're rated on. Having said that, the fact that arguably the best bouldering gym doesn't use V grades shows that it's a valid way to go. It's all personal preference, not like we're arguing whether backclipping is fine or not.

I've only been to The Spot once, but a V0 roughly corresponded to 3 dots iirc. I remember seeing plenty of problems below that.


spikeddem


Feb 8, 2011, 5:58 PM
Post #158 of 241 (9479 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [jomagam] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jomagam wrote:
I've only been to The Spot once, but a V0 roughly corresponded to 3 dots iirc. I remember seeing plenty of problems below that.
Unless they go up to like 10-15 dots, I find that pretty unlikely that you're recalling the situation correctly.


jomagam


Feb 8, 2011, 6:47 PM
Post #159 of 241 (9464 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2008
Posts: 364

Re: [spikeddem] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
Unless they go up to like 10-15 dots, I find that pretty unlikely that you're recalling the situation correctly.

Well, you haven't been there so you'll just have to trust me on that. They go up to 5 dots.


spikeddem


Feb 8, 2011, 7:12 PM
Post #160 of 241 (9452 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [jomagam] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jomagam wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
Unless they go up to like 10-15 dots, I find that pretty unlikely that you're recalling the situation correctly.

Well, you haven't been there so you'll just have to trust me on that. They go up to 5 dots.

So. They have five dots total. 3 dots = v0. V1-v6 = 4 dots. v7-v13 = 5 dots.

This is the reason why I'm finding it unlikely that you're recalling the situation correctly.


Partner cracklover


Feb 8, 2011, 7:13 PM
Post #161 of 241 (9452 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [jomagam] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jomagam wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
Unless they go up to like 10-15 dots, I find that pretty unlikely that you're recalling the situation correctly.

Well, you haven't been there so you'll just have to trust me on that. They go up to 5 dots.

Actually, you don't have to trust him and no he is not recalling correctly. According to The Spot's website: http://spotsettingblog.wordpress.com/spot-grading-system/

3 spots is roughly equivalent to V2.

And to refer back to those who are crying out for 5.6 - 5.8 boulder problems, those are 1 and 1- spots. Those are few and far between at the Spot.

GO


spikeddem


Feb 8, 2011, 7:28 PM
Post #162 of 241 (9444 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [cracklover] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
jomagam wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
Unless they go up to like 10-15 dots, I find that pretty unlikely that you're recalling the situation correctly.

Well, you haven't been there so you'll just have to trust me on that. They go up to 5 dots.

Actually, you don't have to trust him and no he is not recalling correctly. According to The Spot's website: http://spotsettingblog.wordpress.com/spot-grading-system/

3 spots is roughly equivalent to V2.

And to refer back to those who are crying out for 5.6 - 5.8 boulder problems, those are 1 and 1- spots. Those are few and far between at the Spot.

GO
Having read that link, the presence of + and - change the situation entirely. With pluses and minuses, you essentially triple the number of grades you're giving out. Look at the chart, they essentially have 15 grades describing 18 grades ("This means there are 15 grade categories at the Spot."). This is much more understandable.

Moreover, I have to argue that their system is rather silly, just for the fact that seven of the fifteen possible ratings they give out match up one for one with the V-system. Especially more so when taking into account the rarity of 5++, 1-, 1, 1+, 2-, and 2. Therefore, it's more like 7 of 10 that match up perfectly with the V-scale.

I mean, why bother reinventing the wheel?


(This post was edited by spikeddem on Feb 8, 2011, 7:30 PM)


jomagam


Feb 8, 2011, 7:37 PM
Post #163 of 241 (9439 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2008
Posts: 364

Re: [cracklover] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
Actually, you don't have to trust him and no he is not recalling correctly. According to The Spot's website: http://spotsettingblog.wordpress.com/spot-grading-system/

3 spots is roughly equivalent to V2.

And to refer back to those who are crying out for 5.6 - 5.8 boulder problems, those are 1 and 1- spots. Those are few and far between at the Spot.

Does that really coincide with your experience climbing there ? I could clean 4- problems with a few tries, but I was nowhere near to doing a V4 when I climbed at HP40 or JTree. Or leading a 5.12 outside. Wish I was that good.


1904climber


Feb 8, 2011, 7:39 PM
Post #164 of 241 (9438 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 2, 2011
Posts: 51

Re: [jomagam] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jomagam wrote:
Re 1904climber: I would ask people working in the gym if I had absolutely no idea about what the inside grades map to outside. They'll give a ballpark estimate, like recreational=below V grade, intermediate=v0-v1, advanced=v2-vwhatever, open=vwhatever+1
i don't climb routes indoors and i don't care what the routes indoors = outdoors.
i'm not sure why you are telling me to ask the people working at the gym this info.

your post implied that boulder problems outdoor don't need to be rated.
you said that "Bouldering has much less commitment. Just try the moves and see if you can do it."

all i said was bouldering outdoors does need to be graded or else we will all be walking around all day trying to find a problem that challenges us.

what grade do you climb?
right now i'm at a V0
I just started climbing a month ago after a 7 year break and i'm 30 lbs heavier than i used to be.
before my break i was at a V3-V4 level.
I don't think i have ever climbed a boulder route indoors. I climb outdoors on real rock, I am a rock climber


olderic


Feb 8, 2011, 7:45 PM
Post #165 of 241 (9430 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 17, 2003
Posts: 1539

Re: [1904climber] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Spinal Tap could crank it up to 11


spikeddem


Feb 8, 2011, 7:51 PM
Post #166 of 241 (9425 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [jomagam] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jomagam wrote:
cracklover wrote:
Actually, you don't have to trust him and no he is not recalling correctly. According to The Spot's website: http://spotsettingblog.wordpress.com/spot-grading-system/

3 spots is roughly equivalent to V2.

And to refer back to those who are crying out for 5.6 - 5.8 boulder problems, those are 1 and 1- spots. Those are few and far between at the Spot.

Does that really coincide with your experience climbing there ? I could clean 4- problems with a few tries, but I was nowhere near to doing a V4 when I climbed at HP40 or JTree. Or leading a 5.12 outside. Wish I was that good.
There's a lot of other variables. Like the beta you're using to do the routes outdoors. Grades are always assigned with the idea in mind that it the route/problem is being done the easiest possible way.


jomagam


Feb 8, 2011, 8:01 PM
Post #167 of 241 (9416 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2008
Posts: 364

Re: [1904climber] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

1904climber: There's nothing wrong with assigning grades to outdoor climbing/bouldering, since that's the real thing. There is a misunderstanding if you thought I implied that. My point was that it's more dangerous to get on roped climbs without knowing what your level is than trying boulder problems way over your head. Either of these could happen if you're a gym climber getting outside for the first time. That's why I suggested to ask the staff how a gym's non V-grade roughly translates to outside grades.
Heck, I'm sure I'll brag a little when I clean my first 5.12 outside, but would expect a ton of ridicule if I bragged about doing a 12 in a gym.


(This post was edited by jomagam on Feb 8, 2011, 8:04 PM)


spikeddem


Feb 8, 2011, 8:05 PM
Post #168 of 241 (9411 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [jomagam] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jomagam wrote:
1904climber: There's nothing wrong with assigning grades to outdoor climbing/bouldering, since that's the real thing.

I asked you before. What in the world do you mean by this? What is "the real thing?" Why is it inherently legitimate to assign grades to this mystical "real thing" but not an equally contrived idea indoors?

Edit: In your answer, address why the difference arises from the only difference between indoor and outdoor bouldering--the materials out of which the holds are made.


(This post was edited by spikeddem on Feb 8, 2011, 8:07 PM)


jomagam


Feb 8, 2011, 8:12 PM
Post #169 of 241 (9408 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2008
Posts: 364

Re: [spikeddem] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
I asked you before. What in the world do you mean by this? What is "the real thing?" Why is it inherently legitimate to assign grades to this mystical "real thing" but not an equally contrived idea indoors?

I guess that's climbing philosophy; the way I view indoor and outdoor climbing differently. Did my example of bragging about the first 5.11, 5.12 or 5.13 you do outside but never inside not resonate with you ? Sorry but I cannot explain better.


Dip


Feb 8, 2011, 8:13 PM
Post #170 of 241 (9408 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 16, 2009
Posts: 270

Re: [jomagam] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

This thread is hurting my brain as i'm trying to see both sides of the argument. That being said, i can't fathom how eliminating the v scale indoors could attract more people to climbing. Nor do i necessarily want more people attracted to climbing, so maybe i'm biased.

I remember when i started, i thought i'd be happy forever and feel like superman if i could find my way to the top of a V1 bouder problem inside. V2 seemed unattainable. But guess what. That motivated me to try, and try, and try some more until i could climb those grades. Now i tell myself if i could just get V7 i'd be content, even though i know it's not true. Once i get there a new goal will pop up, and i will again work my ass off to get there.

As someone said further up thread, possibly more than three years ago, if you don't have the motivation to work at getting yourself up a V0 boulder problem, whether it be inside or out, then maybe bouldering is not for you.


spikeddem


Feb 8, 2011, 8:38 PM
Post #171 of 241 (9391 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [jomagam] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jomagam wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
I asked you before. What in the world do you mean by this? What is "the real thing?" Why is it inherently legitimate to assign grades to this mystical "real thing" but not an equally contrived idea indoors?

I guess that's climbing philosophy; the way I view indoor and outdoor climbing differently. Did my example of bragging about the first 5.11, 5.12 or 5.13 you do outside but never inside not resonate with you ? Sorry but I cannot explain better.
If you brag to someone about a 12a known to be soft, you'll get "ridiculed" just the same.

If I had climbed the route you were bragging about, then I'd congratulate you whether it was indoor or outdoors. The important point is whether it's a sandbag or a soft grade.

The fact that a climb is indoor or outdoor has no effect on the softness or hardness of the grade. If you're pumped about achieving a grade, then you're excited about climbing something at a certain level of difficulty. Therefore, softness/hardness of the rating of the individual route is the important factor. There are soft ratings indoors, and there are sandbagged ratings indoors just the same.


1904climber


Feb 8, 2011, 8:52 PM
Post #172 of 241 (9382 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 2, 2011
Posts: 51

Re: [spikeddem] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:

The fact that a climb is indoor or outdoor has no effect on the softness or hardness of the grade. If you're pumped about achieving a grade, then you're excited about climbing something at a certain level of difficulty. Therefore, softness/hardness of the rating of the individual route is the important factor. There are soft ratings indoors, and there are sandbagged ratings indoors just the same.
i agree with you, but...
climbs indoors have little tags telling you where the next hold is. when you are outside there isn't anything telling you where to hold on. you gotta figure it out.

so unless the route setters take that into consideration a 5.12 in the gym is going to be easier than one outdoors. i know a few climbers that can climb a grade higher indoor than they can outdoor.


Dip


Feb 8, 2011, 8:56 PM
Post #173 of 241 (9374 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 16, 2009
Posts: 270

Re: [1904climber] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

1904climber wrote:
spikeddem wrote:

The fact that a climb is indoor or outdoor has no effect on the softness or hardness of the grade. If you're pumped about achieving a grade, then you're excited about climbing something at a certain level of difficulty. Therefore, softness/hardness of the rating of the individual route is the important factor. There are soft ratings indoors, and there are sandbagged ratings indoors just the same.
i agree with you, but...
climbs indoors have little tags telling you where the next hold is. when you are outside there isn't anything telling you where to hold on. you gotta figure it out.

so unless the route setters take that into consideration a 5.12 in the gym is going to be easier than one outdoors. i know a few climbers that can climb a grade higher indoor than they can outdoor.

i know a few who are the the other way around...


spikeddem


Feb 8, 2011, 8:56 PM
Post #174 of 241 (9373 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [1904climber] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

1904climber wrote:
spikeddem wrote:

The fact that a climb is indoor or outdoor has no effect on the softness or hardness of the grade. If you're pumped about achieving a grade, then you're excited about climbing something at a certain level of difficulty. Therefore, softness/hardness of the rating of the individual route is the important factor. There are soft ratings indoors, and there are sandbagged ratings indoors just the same.
i agree with you, but...
climbs indoors have little tags telling you where the next hold is. when you are outside there isn't anything telling you where to hold on. you gotta figure it out.

so unless the route setters take that into consideration a 5.12 in the gym is going to be easier than one outdoors. i know a few climbers that can climb a grade higher indoor than they can outdoor.
I'm positive up-thread I mentioned that ratings are given assuming that a climber does the route with the best possible beta.

The difficulty of figuring out the beta is not taken into account in the difficulty of a climb.


johnwesely


Feb 8, 2011, 10:28 PM
Post #175 of 241 (9387 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360

Re: [1904climber] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

1904climber wrote:
spikeddem wrote:

The fact that a climb is indoor or outdoor has no effect on the softness or hardness of the grade. If you're pumped about achieving a grade, then you're excited about climbing something at a certain level of difficulty. Therefore, softness/hardness of the rating of the individual route is the important factor. There are soft ratings indoors, and there are sandbagged ratings indoors just the same.
i agree with you, but...
climbs indoors have little tags telling you where the next hold is. when you are outside there isn't anything telling you where to hold on. you gotta figure it out.

so unless the route setters take that into consideration a 5.12 in the gym is going to be easier than one outdoors. i know a few climbers that can climb a grade higher indoor than they can outdoor.

I really don't think that makes it any harder in most cases.

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Disciplines : Bouldering

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook