|
king_rat
Oct 17, 2005, 2:45 PM
Post #1 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 365
|
All beginners should learn to climb outdoors on trad climbs. Climbing indoors promotes to many bad habits, it does not instil the kind of knowledge and experience about safety as one gets form trad climbing, it does not give a wider understanding about climbing and rope work. It does not give any appreciation for the outdoors and the environment. It kills all ideas of adventure, of independence, of taking responsibility for your own actions, learning indoors you hand over all these things to an unknown person. Trad is the only true way! PS I’m bored
|
|
|
|
|
marc801
Oct 17, 2005, 2:54 PM
Post #2 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806
|
Yawn. Now, we are, too.
|
|
|
|
|
moose_droppings
Oct 17, 2005, 2:55 PM
Post #3 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371
|
That be my guess
|
|
|
|
|
overlord
Oct 17, 2005, 2:55 PM
Post #4 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 25, 2002
Posts: 14120
|
i disagree. a) following trad wont teach you a anything but how to belay and remove pro. you can teach that on a sport climb too, plus the beginner can start learning to lead sooner. b) trad by itself does not promote enviromental consciousness. a good mentor does. the same goes for adventure.
|
|
|
|
|
angry
Oct 17, 2005, 3:37 PM
Post #5 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405
|
He who believes trad is just and pure is as the snow along the footpath. What was once pure has now been dirtied by the feet of so many who have walked. He who seeks purity through trad will be equally disappointed. Purity will be lost in the pursuit of that which is pure. Seldom is the man who does not seek purity. This man does not know what he seeks. Upon accident (or higher intervention) he discovers the way of trad. For him, making his own path, not traveling a road, he finds what he never knew was missing. For this special man, trad is pure. Efforts toward enlightenment will be in vain.
|
|
|
|
|
rockkid55
Oct 17, 2005, 3:41 PM
Post #6 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 16, 2005
Posts: 40
|
If anything, indoor climbing gives you horrid footwork. You learn to campus everything, which never works outside. And, really, it IS all about trad climbing, if climbing is to be more than a sport. I mean, I thought everyone started climbing with the hopes of becoming a Himalayan mountaineer one day. That's why I do it! And trad is the first step toward the goal. I still don't understand why people are satisfied to climb sport all their lives.
|
|
|
|
|
king_rat
Oct 17, 2005, 3:42 PM
Post #7 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 365
|
In reply to: i disagree. a) following trad wont teach you a anything but how to belay and remove pro. you can teach that on a sport climb too, plus the beginner can start learning to lead sooner. belaying a trad leader will teach you far more about good belaying practice, then belaying someone on fixed gear. Being on a long trad route, and being part of the decision making, even as a beginner, gives you ownership of your own safety and is a essential part of becoming a safe and competent climber. There is no reason why a beginner should serve a long apprenticeship seconding, before they start leading, Having said learning to climb on trad does take a bit longer but it should do and is good for a beginner to take on the responsibilities of trade leading.
In reply to: b) trad by itself does not promote enviromental consciousness. a good mentor does. the same goes for adventure. Indoors? realy
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Oct 17, 2005, 3:51 PM
Post #8 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
In reply to: All beginners should learn to climb outdoors on trad climbs. Climbing indoors promotes to many bad habits, After you learn outdoors, then you can go indoors to learn your bad habits - you'll have fewer things to learn all at once.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Oct 17, 2005, 4:03 PM
Post #9 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
I think it is a very bad idea and here's why. 20+ years ago, this was the way to go. Find a mentor and learn the tricks of the trade from them. All there was was trad. With the boom in the sport, there are way too many beginners for the "experienced" to mentor. Which means, if all the beginners were going out and learning trad, there would be far more accidents then there are now. Gyms serve a purpose. To many (including myself), it is training. To many more, it is the gym climbing that many strive for. Then for others it is a way to get started, meet other climbers and hopefully eventually learn that they don't know what climbing is all about but would like to learn more. Then they will begin to seek out the more learned climbers and go from there. If you send them all out on there own in the beginning without the honeymoon phase, then you will probably be sending a lot of them to their death. Josh
|
|
|
|
|
king_rat
Oct 17, 2005, 4:06 PM
Post #10 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 365
|
Very eloquent.
|
|
|
|
|
reg
Oct 17, 2005, 4:06 PM
Post #11 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 1560
|
well for one "trad" or traditional techniques are relatively new to climbing - 70's i believe. so it is not the "pure" form. you'd have to start with free solo (i don't think caveman had rope), then aid climbing. i'm not sure i got the whole point fo the original post. also i don't think learning to belay by belaying a trad leader is the best ideaunless there is a back up belayer on site. gym's test n00b's before they belay so you got to learn outside, right? so top roping with a expierenced friend or guide seems to me to be the way to learn.
|
|
|
|
|
saxfiend
Oct 17, 2005, 4:31 PM
Post #12 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 31, 2004
Posts: 1208
|
In reply to: Trad is the only true way! I'd always heard the Tao is the only true way . . . JL
|
|
|
|
|
onsight_endorphines
Oct 17, 2005, 4:34 PM
Post #13 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2004
Posts: 226
|
To say that gyms teach bad climbing skill, take away important responsibilities, etc. isn't comparing apples to apples. Gyms are a totally different environment than a windy 200' cliff. To the OP: What, do you think that noobs don't know the difference? Most noobs I talk to are scared of climbing outside. They know what's real and what's not. It might not be as hardcore trad bad-ass, but I think (in contrast to your point) that starting indoors is probably safer. Oh, and it's all in what people want. If people want their entire climbing experience to be within 4 walls --- SO BE IT. It's definately not what I'd choose to do, but at least they're not slobbering in front of a TV.
|
|
|
|
|
fishbelly
Oct 17, 2005, 4:39 PM
Post #14 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2004
Posts: 273
|
I'd always heard the Tao is the only true way . . . JL The Tao that can be named is not Tao
|
|
|
|
|
fishbelly
Oct 17, 2005, 4:40 PM
Post #15 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2004
Posts: 273
|
I'd always heard the Tao is the only true way . . . JL The Tao that can be named is not Tao
|
|
|
|
|
clayman
Oct 17, 2005, 4:49 PM
Post #16 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 20, 2004
Posts: 296
|
Certainly the gym is a great place for beginners. A much more controlled environment, a place where they can hone some of the basic rope and knot skills. With a view towards trad though, a new climber shouldn't be using a Gri-Gri ,IMO, she/he should learn from the get-go ho to master an ATC or the like. In my gym a lot of the ropes have Gri-Gris already on them, but I usually just slide them down to the end of the rope and use my ATC. By the way, wouldn't free soloing (naked without shoes and chalk) be the only TRUE way, not trad?
|
|
|
|
|
king_rat
Oct 17, 2005, 4:50 PM
Post #17 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 365
|
In reply to: well for one "trad" or traditional techniques are relatively new to climbing - 70's i believe. my friend how wrong can you be, the basics of trad climbing go a long way back there are climbs from the 19th century which were done in a traditional way(all be it with a hemp rope and pebbles as chockstones)
In reply to: also i don't think learning to belay by belaying a trad leader is the best ideaunless there is a back up belayer on site. . belaying is not brain surgery, I taught my girlfriend to belay in about ten minutes, then lead something I was quite happy soloing, a friend of mine stood next to her to make sure she was happy. Job done.
In reply to: gym's test n00b's before they belay so you got to learn outside, right?. This is exactly the point I’m making, there is a mentality instilled in to new climbers by a gyms, they are safe belayers because the gym has tested them and they say they’re safe. In doing this you are failing to take responsibility for your own safety. Your not asking yourself “am I safe, am I competent in this situation” instead your thinking can I pass the gym safety test. A piece of paper saying your safe does not make you a safe climber.
In reply to: so top roping with a expierenced friend or guide seems to me to be the way to learn no no no no!!!! this is exactly one of the bad habits im talking about, toproping anything is the worst things you can do.
|
|
|
|
|
styndall
Oct 17, 2005, 5:03 PM
Post #18 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 29, 2002
Posts: 2741
|
In reply to: my friend how wrong can you be, the basics of trad climbing go a long way back there are climbs from the 19th century which were done in a traditional way( all be it with a hemp rope and pebbles as chockstones) I think you mean 'albeit.' It's a single word. I've been seeing a lot of this kind of confusion in internet writing recently. On this site the other day there was someone who wrote 'for all intensive purposes' instead of 'for all intents and purposes.' It's kinda funny how ears and heads work together.
|
|
|
|
|
overlord
Oct 17, 2005, 5:07 PM
Post #19 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 25, 2002
Posts: 14120
|
In reply to: In reply to: i disagree. a) following trad wont teach you a anything but how to belay and remove pro. you can teach that on a sport climb too, plus the beginner can start learning to lead sooner. belaying a trad leader will teach you far more about good belaying practice, then belaying someone on fixed gear. Being on a long trad route, and being part of the decision making, even as a beginner, gives you ownership of your own safety and is a essential part of becoming a safe and competent climber. There is no reason why a beginner should serve a long apprenticeship seconding, before they start leading, Having said learning to climb on trad does take a bit longer but it should do and is good for a beginner to take on the responsibilities of trade leading. it will teach you about the same as belaying a sport climber will. offcourse IF you have a good mentor. and leading trad requires a lot more skill than leading sport or bouldering and is as such not really suited for teaching someone to climb. they should be focusing on good technique not how to place gear. that can come later.
In reply to: In reply to: b) trad by itself does not promote enviromental consciousness. a good mentor does. the same goes for adventure. Indoors? realy i never said anything about gyms. read carefully. i just said that the same values can be taught by other "forms" of climbing, again IF you have a good mentor. i just disagree with the OPs position about trad being "the only pure and above all".
|
|
|
|
|
thrmaln
Oct 17, 2005, 5:16 PM
Post #20 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 4, 2005
Posts: 160
|
Hello Kingrat, While I have found that Trad is the type of climbing I would like to spend my time doing, I still am thankfull for the Gym and sport climbing. I only started climbing in March of this year when I found that there was a gym near my work. I climbed there about 1 or 2 times a week (never joined due to cost) and learned the basics. While at the gym I met some amazing people and a lot of us were learning together. I then met someone who showed me the propper way to set up TR's and we moved to climbing outside as well. I started a group of people who would meet after work once a week and we would TR until dark and then food and drinks afterward. Somewhere along the line, a friend took me to Williamson and showed me what sport climbing was all about. I bought my draws and spent a good deal of time this summer climbing sport and learning to lead up to about 5.9. Then a friend took me to Tahquitz and I was immediately hooked. I have found I like nothing more then sitting at 400' eating lunch on a ledge mid way through a multi pitch climb. I just started to lead trad as well. I did an easy 5.2 in Jtree and just led a 5.5 in Ojai yetserday. Woo Hoo! While I do very much enjoy trad, I would never be where I am today if not for the skills I learned along the way over the progression from Gym to TR to Sport to Trad. I would not trade the skills I have learned or the people I have met due to climbing for anything. Also, taking a person out with prior gym and sport experience for their first trad climb seems like a much better and safer idea then someone completely new to climbing just in case the leader gets hurt. Chances are a hurt leader would have a much better chance of survival hanging from a sport belayer with a clue then the newbie being introduced to their first climb. Best regards, Marc Webster
|
|
|
|
|
speedywon
Oct 17, 2005, 5:16 PM
Post #21 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 5, 2005
Posts: 182
|
:troll:
|
|
|
|
|
fowler214
Oct 17, 2005, 5:17 PM
Post #22 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2005
Posts: 42
|
Wow this is some great information. Today I learned that all the time I have spent learning how to climb in the past several months was useless as it was all in a gym. Being as the nearest place to do any trad is around 4 hours away and I have a job that demands around 14 hours of my day and the majority of my weekend I guess I should just give up now. King rat your words are true inspiration to those of us who have no other choice. I would like to commend you and I hope to spread your word to the masses (those of us in a gym). Now I can take the hours I have spent trying to perfect feet and hand placement and put those skills to use in a new and more appropriate environment. If you can suggest a sport you think I would be better suited for please do. I am sure with your extensive understanding of the world you are just full of pointless and useless ideas. All hail the King Rat
|
|
|
|
|
chrisparedes
Oct 17, 2005, 5:19 PM
Post #23 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 4, 2004
Posts: 211
|
Trad is the only true way! - whatever
|
|
|
|
|
grk10vq
Oct 17, 2005, 5:20 PM
Post #24 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 7, 2004
Posts: 527
|
you have to crawl before you walk.
|
|
|
|
|
stabla
Oct 17, 2005, 6:21 PM
Post #25 of 91
(9086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 29, 2005
Posts: 139
|
I think climbing in the gym/sport climbing in general is a good way to get introduced into climbing, but its DEFINITELY NOT NECESSARY!!!! Learning to climb on trad would be an awesome way to "get into" climbing. I think the ethics of climbers overall COULD be much more prone to not bolting if everyone started with trad. This "pure" introduction to climbing would last the rest of the climber's life. Luckily i started sport and learned it is not the "true" way. cheers
|
|
|
|
|
bobruef
Oct 17, 2005, 6:33 PM
Post #26 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 22, 2005
Posts: 884
|
live and let live
|
|
|
|
|
geckoboy
Oct 17, 2005, 6:49 PM
Post #27 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 10, 2005
Posts: 17
|
In reply to: ....snip a whole bunch of interesting stuff. I'm a complete noob at climbing but I'm an advanced scuba diver (technical diver and 20 years of experience) and I recognize something in the things you're saying. It's coming across to me as if you may have forgotten what it's like to be a complete noob. (so let me take a moment to refresh your memory) :) Divers do it too by making silly claims like "beginners need to understand the subtleties of decompression theory to be called real divers" when in fact beginners have much more pressing issues to deal with when they first start. In terms of climbing, it seems to me that you first need to build up confidence in a few things. Like: - Building up confidence in your knots. - Building up confidence in belaying - Just getting used to the feeling the forces at work - Getting used to the material and building up a little bit of a routine with it. - Building up muscle tone, balance and some basic footwork - Learning how to fall and trust the gear. To suddenly add a bunch of complexities like all kinds of different, techniques, slings, do-dads, gizmos, unknown hazards, beginners mistakes, rescue and emergency procedures and what not would actually inhibit learning for a lot of people. There's simply so much to learn that it has to me modularized or you can't take it all in. It's as simple as that. I do think I understand what you're saying, however, which is that by the time you get to Trad that you will need to *unlearn* a bunch of stuff but I take that as a given. It's the same in any sport where risk and skill are in the balance. To me, looking at it from the point of view of a Noob, the logical "progression" is gym, sport and then trad as some kind of "pure" form to work towards as your skill level increases. Rob
|
|
|
|
|
ambler
Oct 17, 2005, 6:51 PM
Post #28 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 27, 2002
Posts: 1690
|
In reply to: I think it is a very bad idea and here's why. 20+ years ago, this was the way to go. Find a mentor and learn the tricks of the trade from them. Um, not necessarily. Lots of us more or less taught ourselves, soon heading up easy multipitch climbs with equally untrained partners. "Find a mentor" is a relatively new mantra. Decades ago the people attracted to climbing, and motivated enough to start learning, tended to be more independent-minded, more capable of figuring things out or coping with the jams they got into, than beginners tend to be now that climbing is a mass sport -- at least, that's my guess from watching the kind of elementary questions people ask every day on this site. You couldn't post a forum question then, but you could read a book. Yet even with trial-and-error learning, the earlier beginners were not dying like flies.
In reply to: well for one "trad" or traditional techniques are relatively new to climbing - 70's i believe. A lot of things changed in the 70s, but that wasn't the start of traditional climbing -- it goes way way back. The term "trad climbing" itself is an invention of the sport era, when we suddenly needed a name for all those older routes that did not have large bolts every few moves for protection.
|
|
|
|
|
thrmaln
Oct 17, 2005, 6:55 PM
Post #29 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 4, 2005
Posts: 160
|
Not wanting to turn this thread into a bolt verses trad thread. I do believe that Gyms have their place, as do Bolted sport routes. In my area, most sport climbing locations are bolted due to their inability to protect with standard Pro. Williamson rock for instance has a bunch of climbs that would be unclimbable if not for the bolts. The rock has great hand and footholds, but very few cracks and features that would accept pro. However there are exceptions to this rule and some climbs could be climbed Trad at Williamson, but definitely not all. I myself would not turn my nose up at someone setting bolts but rather take the time to possibly learn myself from someone willing to teach. Does that mean I will become a Bolt setting Whore! Probably not, but learning all aspects of climbing is what it is all about. The trad climb I did yesterday had bolts for the anchors and rappel station at the end of both pitches. There was also another rappel station mid way off to the side to allow people to ascend pitch one while people rappel off of pitch 2. So is this impure trad? Not all trad climbs have a walk-off or trees to sling, so how do all these pure trad climbers get back down? Best regards, Marc Webster
|
|
|
|
|
drector
Oct 17, 2005, 7:02 PM
Post #30 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 1037
|
In reply to: Climbing indoors promotes to many bad habits ... It does not give any appreciation for the outdoors and the environment. ... It kills all ideas of adventure, of independence, ...of taking responsibility for your own actions First, a bad habit is driving your car on the wrong side of the road. If a person has good gym habits and never leaves the gym, that's great. It is also none of your business. Next, Who the hell cares about their appreciation for the outdoors. What you think is important might not be the same for others. What they appreciate is none of your business. Then kills adventure. For many people, climbing in a gym is more adventure then they could have imagined in their lives. There are many people who have desk jobs who meet with their book club, eat lunch out on the same day every week, and have nothing in their lives that meets your "adventure" requirement. I'm sure they would be sad to know that they are not valid as human beings. And last, why does climbing in a gym cause people to not have resonsibility for their own actions. There are lots of dirtbag trad climbers who shoplift and lots of gym climbers who save others lives on a daily basis. What the hell does a gym have to do with personal responsibility either way. Now try changing your stupid post to suggest that an excercise gym, the kind with weights and stationary bikes, somehow has these effects on people and you'll see just how dumb it is to suggest that a climbing gym as control over people and their thoughts and actions. I will concede that if a person wants to eventually move to trad climbing then a climbing gym might not be the best training ground. But if not, everything you suggest seems a litle dumb to me. Dave
|
|
|
|
|
davidji
Oct 17, 2005, 7:06 PM
Post #31 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 30, 2003
Posts: 1776
|
In reply to: In reply to: All beginners should learn to climb outdoors on trad climbs. Climbing indoors promotes to many bad habits, After you learn outdoors, then you can go indoors to learn your bad habits - you'll have fewer things to learn all at once. Wish I could give out trophies today. I can't, so this will have to do.
|
|
|
|
|
deserteaglle
Oct 17, 2005, 7:17 PM
Post #32 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 21, 2005
Posts: 1617
|
Kingrat, I don't know that I really disagree with what you're saying. I can understand it. But I do know that I believe you are a complete dumbass for posting that. :D Have fun alienating the non-losers that might have been your friends had you not broadcasted your retardedness by opening your mouth. I hate to have to flame, bad karma and all, but this was just too hard to resist.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Oct 17, 2005, 7:39 PM
Post #33 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
In reply to: In reply to: I think it is a very bad idea and here's why. 20+ years ago, this was the way to go. Find a mentor and learn the tricks of the trade from them. Um, not necessarily. Lots of us more or less taught ourselves, soon heading up easy multipitch climbs with equally untrained partners. "Find a mentor" is a relatively new mantra. Decades ago the people attracted to climbing, and motivated enough to start learning, tended to be more independent-minded, more capable of figuring things out or coping with the jams they got into, than beginners tend to be now that climbing is a mass sport -- at least, that's my guess from watching the kind of elementary questions people ask every day on this site. You couldn't post a forum question then, but you could read a book. Yet even with trial-and-error learning, the earlier beginners were not dying like flies. But were you in the majority or the minority. And you have to admit, the way climbing is made available today, it attracts more than just the self-motivated few that you are talking about. There are plenty of people who could just go out and learn as they go, and to some extent I think all climbers do that at one time or another, but to make that a rule rather than an exception would not be good for most who take up climbing today.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Oct 17, 2005, 7:45 PM
Post #34 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
In reply to: In reply to: Climbing indoors promotes to many bad habits ... It does not give any appreciation for the outdoors and the environment. ... It kills all ideas of adventure, of independence, ...of taking responsibility for your own actions First, a bad habit is driving your car on the wrong side of the road. If a person has good gym habits and never leaves the gym, that's great. It is also none of your business. Next, Who the hell cares about their appreciation for the outdoors. What you think is important might not be the same for others. What they appreciate is none of your business. Then kills adventure. For many people, climbing in a gym is more adventure then they could have imagined in their lives. There are many people who have desk jobs who meet with their book club, eat lunch out on the same day every week, and have nothing in their lives that meets your "adventure" requirement. I'm sure they would be sad to know that they are not valid as human beings. And last, why does climbing in a gym cause people to not have resonsibility for their own actions. There are lots of dirtbag trad climbers who shoplift and lots of gym climbers who save others lives on a daily basis. What the hell does a gym have to do with personal responsibility either way. Now try changing your stupid post to suggest that an excercise gym, the kind with weights and stationary bikes, somehow has these effects on people and you'll see just how dumb it is to suggest that a climbing gym as control over people and their thoughts and actions. I will concede that if a person wants to eventually move to trad climbing then a climbing gym might not be the best training ground. But if not, everything you suggest seems a litle dumb to me. Dave And, you, sir, although rude and abrupt, would get a trophy, if I had one.
|
|
|
|
|
sumo
Oct 17, 2005, 8:02 PM
Post #35 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 28, 2005
Posts: 176
|
thank you speedwrong SP? I was hoping someone would call the troll out. When I took my drivers test I took it in a manual. Cleary everyone should learn to drive on a manual blah blah blah. The only thing that is really pure is the coke you snorted before you posted (to the OP). Have fun in whatever you do. To me that is what climbing is about (yes I know same old argument) I'm not going to be some guide or anything like that. I learned to climb in the gym made some great friends. I enjoy climbing sport or trad. I will boulder on occassion. I love climbing but don't enjoy being cold or getting up really really early to go climb 30 min away. end ramble S
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Oct 17, 2005, 9:34 PM
Post #36 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
I started in the gym, and yet somehow I'm still alive. Frankly, it's the most visible and accessible corner of climbing to most non-climbers who live in an urban environment. I was just working out, lifting weights at my gym, and then one day I looked over and noticed that they were building a climbing wall. I tried it out, and it was as if I was born to do it. For me, gym climbing was a doorway. I opened it, walked through it, and it led to room after room. I'm still exploring new rooms now, seven years later (this year I did my first mini "big" wall, my first long solo-aid route, and I leave for my first climbing trip abroad in two weeks). Might I have found another doorway sometime in my life? Perhaps, but I was already 28 years old. I'm terribly grateful to that little rock-wall in the YMCA. 28 years was plenty long enough to wait. GO
|
|
|
|
|
abmelim
Oct 17, 2005, 9:52 PM
Post #37 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 28, 2005
Posts: 8
|
What's really silly is that the first traditional climbers would laugh at your present day idea of what constitutes traditional. Your post was so ridiculous that I've been in stitches for the past 15 minutes. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
jimfix
Oct 17, 2005, 10:06 PM
Post #38 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 18, 2004
Posts: 314
|
In reply to: Trad is the only true way! No no no, bouldering is the only true way! Baa hahahahahaha
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Oct 17, 2005, 10:15 PM
Post #39 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
In reply to: In reply to: Trad is the only true way! No no no, bouldering is the only true way! Baa hahahahahaha Nah, milk is the only true whey. What were we talking about again? GO
|
|
|
|
|
tisakson
Oct 17, 2005, 10:59 PM
Post #40 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 14, 2005
Posts: 75
|
Geez, just climb and have fun people. Trad, sport, bouldering, gym, it's all fun and that's what I like to have. I enjoy it all to be honest, it all has it's own plusses and minuses. Just make sure you're having fun with whatever you do, that's all.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Oct 17, 2005, 11:00 PM
Post #41 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
In reply to: In reply to: In reply to: Trad is the only true way! No no no, bouldering is the only true way! Baa hahahahahaha Nah, milk is the only true whey. What were we talking about again? GO I think you were telling us about your new house and how you like to explore all the rooms.... or something like that.
|
|
|
|
|
shanz
Oct 17, 2005, 11:21 PM
Post #42 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 18, 2004
Posts: 702
|
Gyms take money away from building your rack For us broke people anyway
|
|
|
|
|
shanedms
Oct 17, 2005, 11:24 PM
Post #43 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 23, 2005
Posts: 39
|
To the OP: I'm not going to give you the "don't be so quick to judge" speech or the "find your own way" speech because they've been posted on this site countless times before. Let me just say that in my context as producer of Climber's Federation Radio I've gotten to speak with some of the greats, from Florine to Hill to Largo. And I've asked about the so-called "corruption" of the sport, and what has been lost. What I've realized is that the elite are seldom zealots. Great climbers have their ethics, it is only the mediocre who become ideologues. Carrying a torch can easily become a needed crutch or a convenient rationalization. Declaring vendetta on bolts with condescension and bravado spares weak, scared cimbers the humiliation of failure on face climbs. Talk is cheap. The great welcome all comers to the sport and speak with their actions.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Oct 18, 2005, 1:16 AM
Post #44 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
In reply to: If anything, indoor climbing gives you horrid footwork. You learn to campus everything, which never works outside. You've made three assertions above and gotten all of them wrong. First of all, gym climbing doesn't "give you" anything. You get out of your gym training what you put into it. If, when you climb in the gym, you make an effort to learn good footwork, then you will learn good footwork in the gym; otherwise, you won't. Secondly, you don't learn to campus everything unless you campus everything. Stop campusing and maybe you'll learn how to use your feet. Finally, while campus moves outside are uncommon, you will occasionally come accross legitimate foot-off moves. -Jay
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Oct 18, 2005, 1:20 AM
Post #45 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
In reply to: I taught my girlfriend to belay in about ten minutes... If you think you can teach someone to belay in 10 minutes, then you don't have much to teach. -Jay
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Oct 18, 2005, 1:21 AM
Post #46 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
In reply to: I taught my girlfriend to belay in about ten minutes... If you think you can teach someone to belay in 10 minutes, then you don't have much to teach. -Jay
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Oct 18, 2005, 1:28 AM
Post #47 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
In reply to: Then for others [the] is a way to get started, meet other climbers and hopefully eventually learn that they don't know what climbing is all about but would like to learn more. The problem is they don't necessarily seek out knowledgeable partners before venturing outdoors. Most of who have been around for a while would agree, I think, that the overall population of climbers has become less safe since the advent of gym climbing. Most gym climbers don't even belay safely, much less understand the additional complexities of outdoor climbing. -Jay
|
|
|
|
|
saxfiend
Oct 18, 2005, 3:04 AM
Post #48 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 31, 2004
Posts: 1208
|
In reply to: In reply to: If anything, indoor climbing gives you horrid footwork. You learn to campus everything, which never works outside. You've made three assertions above and gotten all of them wrong. First of all, gym climbing doesn't "give you" anything. You get out of your gym training what you put into it. If, when you climb in the gym, you make an effort to learn good footwork, then you will learn good footwork in the gym; otherwise, you won't. Secondly, you don't learn to campus everything unless you campus everything. Stop campusing and maybe you'll learn how to use your feet. Finally, while campus moves outside are uncommon, you will occasionally come accross legitimate foot-off moves. -Jay Too bad you couldn't have posted this earlier before I ran out of trophies . . . I wonder if rockkid has ever actually been in a climbing gym. JL
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Oct 18, 2005, 3:54 AM
Post #49 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
In reply to: In reply to: If anything, indoor climbing gives you horrid footwork. You learn to campus everything, which never works outside. You've made three assertions above and gotten all of them wrong. First of all, gym climbing doesn't "give you" anything. You get out of your gym training what you put into it. If, when you climb in the gym, you make an effort to learn good footwork, then you will learn good footwork in the gym; otherwise, you won't. Secondly, you don't learn to campus everything unless you campus everything. Stop campusing and maybe you'll learn how to use your feet. Finally, while campus moves outside are uncommon, you will occasionally come accross legitimate foot-off moves. -Jay I'm going to pick on another pet peeve of yours, Jay, and say that steep gym climbing is to footwork as Gri Gris are to belaying. That is to say - it's not so much that you're "forced" to develop poor footwork by climbing first in the gym, any more than you're "forced" to develop poor belay skills when belaying first with a Gri Gri. However, if someone just says - here you go, have at it, the climber outside on a slab is forced to develop some rudimentary footwork immediately, and the user of an ATC is forced to acknowledge that locking off and keeping a hand on the brake strand is important. Know what I'm saying? I'm not bashing either the gym or the gri-gri. I like and use both a great deal! I'm just pointing out that without the proper training which you often point out is so vital, both provide exceptionally fertile ground for breeding bad habits. GO
|
|
|
|
|
moose_droppings
Oct 18, 2005, 4:37 AM
Post #50 of 91
(8132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371
|
In reply to: Not all trad climbs have a walk-off or trees to sling, so how do all these pure trad climbers get back down? Seriously, you don't know?
|
|
|
|
|
wetyeti
Oct 18, 2005, 5:03 AM
Post #51 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 1, 2003
Posts: 56
|
learn to climb stairs
|
|
|
|
|
sumo
Oct 18, 2005, 8:40 AM
Post #52 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 28, 2005
Posts: 176
|
In reply to: I'm going to pick on another pet peeve of yours, Jay, and say that steep gym climbing is to footwork as Gri Gris are to belaying. That is to say - it's not so much that you're "forced" to develop poor footwork by climbing first in the gym, any more than you're "forced" to develop poor belay skills when belaying first with a Gri Gri. However, if someone just says - here you go, have at it, the climber outside on a slab is forced to develop some rudimentary footwork immediately, and the user of an ATC is forced to acknowledge that locking off and keeping a hand on the brake strand is important. Know what I'm saying? I'm not bashing either the gym or the gri-gri. I like and use both a great deal! I'm just pointing out that without the proper training which you often point out is so vital, both provide exceptionally fertile ground for breeding bad habits. GO worst argument / analogy yet who can top that?
|
|
|
|
|
geckoboy
Oct 18, 2005, 9:24 AM
Post #53 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 10, 2005
Posts: 17
|
In reply to: In reply to: If anything, indoor climbing gives you horrid footwork. You learn to campus everything, which never works outside. ...snip... you don't learn to campus everything unless you campus everything. Stop campusing and maybe you'll learn how to use your feet. I'm not familiar with this term "to campus". What do you mean by that? Rob
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Oct 18, 2005, 12:43 PM
Post #54 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
In reply to: In reply to: Then for others [the] is a way to get started, meet other climbers and hopefully eventually learn that they don't know what climbing is all about but would like to learn more. The problem is they don't necessarily seek out knowledgeable partners before venturing outdoors. Most of who have been around for a while would agree, I think, that the overall population of climbers has become less safe since the advent of gym climbing. Most gym climbers don't even belay safely, much less understand the additional complexities of outdoor climbing. -Jay I agree with you to some degree. I am not so sure that it is the gym which has created this unsafe atmosphere, rather than just the larger volume of climbers. I think it is just because climbing's door is open to a larger audience than it used to be, and with that has brought a lot of different type of people, some careful and smart, and some the opposite. If the only way to obtain your driver's liscence was to go out and teach yourself and earn your car in the process, there would be fewer drivers and the streets would be safer, with only the best drivers on the road. I guess my point is that gyms have made it easier to progress, and in turn easier to skip a few important steps along the way. It's easy to blame the gyms, but these people have got to take responsibilty for themselves. Every mistake I have made thus far, is my fault, not any gym's. Josh
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Oct 18, 2005, 1:07 PM
Post #55 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
In reply to: In reply to: I'm going to pick on another pet peeve of yours, Jay, and say that steep gym climbing is to footwork as Gri Gris are to belaying. That is to say - it's not so much that you're "forced" to develop poor footwork by climbing first in the gym, any more than you're "forced" to develop poor belay skills when belaying first with a Gri Gri. However, if someone just says - here you go, have at it, the climber outside on a slab is forced to develop some rudimentary footwork immediately, and the user of an ATC is forced to acknowledge that locking off and keeping a hand on the brake strand is important. Know what I'm saying? I'm not bashing either the gym or the gri-gri. I like and use both a great deal! I'm just pointing out that without the proper training which you often point out is so vital, both provide exceptionally fertile ground for breeding bad habits. GO worst argument / analogy yet who can top that? And you have what to contribute?
In reply to: thank you speedwrong SP? I was hoping someone would call the troll out. Congratulating someone for calling out a troll. Gee, that's impressive.
In reply to: When I took my drivers test I took it in a manual. Cleary everyone should learn to drive on a manual blah blah blah. Um, just because you don't have a point to make doesn't mean you have to tell us you have nothing to say. Oh wait, is this your point?
In reply to: The only thing that is really pure is the coke you snorted before you posted (to the OP). No, that's not saying much. Maybe this is it:
In reply to: Have fun in whatever you do. To me that is what climbing is about (yes I know same old argument) I'm not going to be some guide or anything like that. I learned to climb in the gym made some great friends. I enjoy climbing sport or trad. I will boulder on occassion. I love climbing but don't enjoy being cold or getting up really really early to go climb 30 min away. end ramble S Ah, finally, your point! I see that you like to have fun. Climbing is fun for you. That is very good. Hooray for Sumo! He likes to climb! Also enlightening to the issue of trad and gym climbing are the facts that Sumo does not like to be cold, and he doesn't like to get up really really early to go climb 30 min away. Um... All kidding aside, Sumo, I'm glad you get enjoyment out of your climbing. I get a lot out of my climbing, too. I think that's why we do what we do. But vis a vis this thread, 1 - if you don't like it, no-one's forcing you to read it or post to it, and 2 - You don't seem to be in any position to criticize my argument/analogy. If you did have a point other than "climb whatever you like, who cares" you certainly didn't get it across. GO
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Oct 18, 2005, 1:16 PM
Post #56 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
In reply to: In reply to: In reply to: If anything, indoor climbing gives you horrid footwork. You learn to campus everything, which never works outside. ...snip... you don't learn to campus everything unless you campus everything. Stop campusing and maybe you'll learn how to use your feet. I'm not familiar with this term "to campus". What do you mean by that? Rob It means to ascend without the use of your feet, meaning to just pull yourself up from hold to hold. Some really, really macho guys like to do it even when they don't need to. THey are really macho...did I mention that?
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Oct 18, 2005, 3:58 PM
Post #57 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
In reply to: In reply to: In reply to: If anything, indoor climbing gives you horrid footwork. You learn to campus everything, which never works outside. ...snip... you don't learn to campus everything unless you campus everything. Stop campusing and maybe you'll learn how to use your feet. I'm not familiar with this term "to campus". What do you mean by that? Rob "Campusing" is doing moves with the feet off. -Jay
|
|
|
|
|
112
Oct 18, 2005, 4:29 PM
Post #58 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 15, 2004
Posts: 432
|
That's it, I am going to the gym to climb some trad!
|
|
|
|
|
geckoboy
Oct 18, 2005, 5:37 PM
Post #59 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 10, 2005
Posts: 17
|
In reply to: "Campusing" is doing moves with the feet off. I see. I think this must come down to one of those things where you get out of it what you put into it. I suspect that learning good footwork is as much a question of commitment as location.... Rob
|
|
|
|
|
fishbelly
Oct 18, 2005, 5:50 PM
Post #60 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2004
Posts: 273
|
In reply to: In reply to: Not all trad climbs have a walk-off or trees to sling, so how do all these pure trad climbers get back down? Seriously, you don't know? They must get down some how. Or there would be skeletons of trad climbers at the top of a lot of routes
|
|
|
|
|
seabee
Oct 18, 2005, 5:57 PM
Post #61 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 7, 2002
Posts: 136
|
Am I the only one that has noticed that King Rat's ranking is "Sport Climber" :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
schveety
Oct 18, 2005, 6:28 PM
Post #62 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 3, 2005
Posts: 98
|
In regards to the "how do we get down if we're pure trad climbers question", sometimes I like to just go ahead and base-jump, maybe parachute, but mostly I rappel off of the bolts growing out of the rock----- funny how those things grow in just the right places :shock:
|
|
|
|
|
sumo
Oct 18, 2005, 9:24 PM
Post #63 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 28, 2005
Posts: 176
|
To crack lover I really enjoyed your first post. I started climbing in some what of a similar fashion.
In reply to: Nah, milk is the only true whey. What were we talking about again? GO ___ as for stuff like this? Lets face it its a forum. Most of the time I say sarcastic or cynical remarks and its all in fun and games. I still agree that it is a horrible analogy and here is why. Let me first give you my understanding (please let me know if I'm way off) Gym climbing is to footwork as Gri gris are to belaying Wow does this feel like SATs Your two arguments are that gym climbing creates bad footwork? And grigris are ruining belaying. People shouldn't learn to belay with a gri gri they should learn on a tube belay device, hip belay, or if you are curt a foot belay. The reason why I don't think it makes that much sense is because it is only taking one side. Sure I've seen a lot of bad footwork in the gym, and contributed my share also. But I don't think see the connection between your analogy. Lets go take a look at the argument for gri gris. Why do some gyms have these $50-$70 devices on all of their ropes (i.e. vertical world in Seattle)? It is because it significantly lowers insurance costs. While other gyms like Stone Gardens don't have gri gris attached to any of their ropes. Certain people just want certain things out of climbing (dub no shit) well its the same for the gym rats. While some people might display poor footwork or never learn to lead, use a belay device and so forth, they are content with where they are. Its a fun sociable "hip" maybe way to work out. While for others, probably the majority so who have responded in this thread, either hate gyms or use them to train. Perhaps they live in an area that gets a lot of rain or the nearest climb is 4 hours away. I dunno? One more thing while I'm still typing To the comment about, gyms taking away money that could go towards a rack. That is great if you can climb year round. Maybe you have a woody, train with something, or are able to get out a lot. I know a lot of people who don't $40 a month to throw around to climb at a gym, so instead they belay at the gym in exchange for a free membership. It s a pretty win-win deal. S Edit: I still don't like waking up early or the cold Ok after re reading that it still doesn't make sense bottom line your analogy works if you view them both as negative things I'm just saying their is another side to both of those. That is why I don't think it works as an analogy ok this is my last edit (hmm or maybe it was too push 100...) The reason why I didn't make an argument earlier is If someone wants to believe trad is the only way to go, I don't really care. Go ahead, live in your bubble. USA is the greatest country in the world #1 #1. Yeah look at our GDP >20% of world GDP. It is ignoring a lot of facts and is just showing my ignorance.
|
|
|
|
|
rufusandcompany
Oct 18, 2005, 9:39 PM
Post #64 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 4, 2005
Posts: 2618
|
In reply to: I think it is a very bad idea and here's why. 20+ years ago, this was the way to go. Find a mentor and learn the tricks of the trade from them. All there was was trad. With the boom in the sport, there are way too many beginners for the "experienced" to mentor. Which means, if all the beginners were going out and learning trad, there would be far more accidents then there are now. Gyms serve a purpose. To many (including myself), it is training. To many more, it is the gym climbing that many strive for. Then for others it is a way to get started, meet other climbers and hopefully eventually learn that they don't know what climbing is all about but would like to learn more. Then they will begin to seek out the more learned climbers and go from there. If you send them all out on there own in the beginning without the honeymoon phase, then you will probably be sending a lot of them to their death. Josh I read about far more accidents now, than when there weren't gyms. Some of this could be a result of the increased number of climbers out there, although some of it is the result of people gaining a certain level of false confidence in their skills, from what they've learned in gyms. Handling a sixty foot coil of rope and a Grigri, in a climate controlled environment will teach one very little about rope management. A qualified instructor and some exposure to the real elements will teach a new climber much more about the realities of what they will face in nature. It will also give them a better sense of how seriously they should take the inherent dangers that will inevitably confront them in a natural environment.
|
|
|
|
|
slablizard
Oct 18, 2005, 9:39 PM
Post #65 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 5558
|
I agree! More people shoud do trad instead of crowding all my sport routes. Long live to trad
In reply to: All beginners should learn to climb outdoors on trad climbs. Climbing indoors promotes to many bad habits, it does not instil the kind of knowledge and experience about safety as one gets form trad climbing, it does not give a wider understanding about climbing and rope work. It does not give any appreciation for the outdoors and the environment. It kills all ideas of adventure, of independence, of taking responsibility for your own actions, learning indoors you hand over all these things to an unknown person. Trad is the only true way! PS I’m bored
|
|
|
|
|
rockrat_co
Oct 18, 2005, 9:42 PM
Post #66 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 26, 2004
Posts: 194
|
Wow, I saw the thread title and my firs thought was: " Oh Boy; this is going to raise some havic!". All the diferent types have allredy been introduced, as long as a new one doesnt come along which makes destroying nature mandatory, I'd say climbing is climbing! -rockrat_co-
|
|
|
|
|
grovehunter
Oct 18, 2005, 10:57 PM
Post #67 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 227
|
I just read this thread, Damn. "Can't we just all get along!" I learned to climb outdoors then had a serious accident. When I healed and made a decision to climb again I went to a gym. Things had changed in ten years and I have forgotten a lot of stuff. The gym was a nice way to confirm that this is a part of my lifestyle I want back. The guy at the gym failed me on my first belay test. I HAVE SAFELY BEALYED A LOT OF PEOPLE AND NEVER DROPPED ANYONE!!! The guy said it was great that my break hand never left the rope but, that I was a little slow at taking in slack. Glad I caught this in a totally controlled environment than when someone is hanging a hundred plus feet off the deck. They kept an eye on me that day and told me to focus on belaying. By the time I had left the gym I was confident I could pass thier test. I just climbed outdoors this past weekend and I nearly climbed to my previous limit. My point is that I'm out of shape and rusty and haven't climbed outdoors in over ten years. I even cleaned two routes on my first time back out. The gym is helpful in some ways, but I do have to admit that it gets old fast and the outdoors is what seperates the badasses from the wannabees. Everything in moderation folks!! As long as someone is enjoying themself at no expense to you it shouldn't rent space in your head Kingrat; despite how cheap the rent may be..... :roll: :P
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Oct 19, 2005, 1:02 AM
Post #68 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
In reply to: To crack lover I really enjoyed your first post. I started climbing in some what of a similar fashion. In reply to: Nah, milk is the only true whey. What were we talking about again? GO ___ as for stuff like this? Lets face it its a forum. Most of the time I say sarcastic or cynical remarks and its all in fun and games. I still agree that it is a horrible analogy and here is why. Let me first give you my understanding (please let me know if I'm way off) Gym climbing is to footwork as Gri gris are to belaying Wow does this feel like SATs Your two arguments are that gym climbing creates bad footwork? And grigris are ruining belaying. People shouldn't learn to belay with a gri gri they should learn on a tube belay device, hip belay, or if you are curt a foot belay. The reason why I don't think it makes that much sense is because it is only taking one side. Sure I've seen a lot of bad footwork in the gym, and contributed my share also. But I don't think see the connection between your analogy. Lets go take a look at the argument for gri gris. Why do some gyms have these $50-$70 devices on all of their ropes (i.e. vertical world in Seattle)? It is because it significantly lowers insurance costs. While other gyms like Stone Gardens don't have gri gris attached to any of their ropes. Certain people just want certain things out of climbing (dub no s---) well its the same for the gym rats. While some people might display poor footwork or never learn to lead, use a belay device and so forth, they are content with where they are. Its a fun sociable "hip" maybe way to work out. While for others, probably the majority so who have responded in this thread, either hate gyms or use them to train. Perhaps they live in an area that gets a lot of rain or the nearest climb is 4 hours away. I dunno? One more thing while I'm still typing To the comment about, gyms taking away money that could go towards a rack. That is great if you can climb year round. Maybe you have a woody, train with something, or are able to get out a lot. I know a lot of people who don't $40 a month to throw around to climb at a gym, so instead they belay at the gym in exchange for a free membership. It s a pretty win-win deal. S Edit: I still don't like waking up early or the cold Ok after re reading that it still doesn't make sense bottom line your analogy works if you view them both as negative things I'm just saying their is another side to both of those. That is why I don't think it works as an analogy ok this is my last edit (hmm or maybe it was too push 100...) The reason why I didn't make an argument earlier is If someone wants to believe trad is the only way to go, I don't really care. Go ahead, live in your bubble. USA is the greatest country in the world #1 #1. Yeah look at our GDP >20% of world GDP. It is ignoring a lot of facts and is just showing my ignorance. At least the analogy was coherent. -Jay
|
|
|
|
|
areyoumydude
Oct 19, 2005, 2:15 AM
Post #69 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 28, 2003
Posts: 1971
|
In reply to: In reply to: To crack lover I really enjoyed your first post. I started climbing in some what of a similar fashion. In reply to: Nah, milk is the only true whey. What were we talking about again? GO ___ as for stuff like this? Lets face it its a forum. Most of the time I say sarcastic or cynical remarks and its all in fun and games. I still agree that it is a horrible analogy and here is why. Let me first give you my understanding (please let me know if I'm way off) Gym climbing is to footwork as Gri gris are to belaying Wow does this feel like SATs Your two arguments are that gym climbing creates bad footwork? And grigris are ruining belaying. People shouldn't learn to belay with a gri gri they should learn on a tube belay device, hip belay, or if you are curt a foot belay. The reason why I don't think it makes that much sense is because it is only taking one side. Sure I've seen a lot of bad footwork in the gym, and contributed my share also. But I don't think see the connection between your analogy. Lets go take a look at the argument for gri gris. Why do some gyms have these $50-$70 devices on all of their ropes (i.e. vertical world in Seattle)? It is because it significantly lowers insurance costs. While other gyms like Stone Gardens don't have gri gris attached to any of their ropes. Certain people just want certain things out of climbing (dub no s---) well its the same for the gym rats. While some people might display poor footwork or never learn to lead, use a belay device and so forth, they are content with where they are. Its a fun sociable "hip" maybe way to work out. While for others, probably the majority so who have responded in this thread, either hate gyms or use them to train. Perhaps they live in an area that gets a lot of rain or the nearest climb is 4 hours away. I dunno? One more thing while I'm still typing To the comment about, gyms taking away money that could go towards a rack. That is great if you can climb year round. Maybe you have a woody, train with something, or are able to get out a lot. I know a lot of people who don't $40 a month to throw around to climb at a gym, so instead they belay at the gym in exchange for a free membership. It s a pretty win-win deal. S Edit: I still don't like waking up early or the cold Ok after re reading that it still doesn't make sense bottom line your analogy works if you view them both as negative things I'm just saying their is another side to both of those. That is why I don't think it works as an analogy ok this is my last edit (hmm or maybe it was too push 100...) The reason why I didn't make an argument earlier is If someone wants to believe trad is the only way to go, I don't really care. Go ahead, live in your bubble. USA is the greatest country in the world #1 #1. Yeah look at our GDP >20% of world GDP. It is ignoring a lot of facts and is just showing my ignorance. At least the analogy was coherent. -Jay ______________________ I am a dork Love the sig.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Oct 19, 2005, 3:17 AM
Post #70 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
In reply to: I really enjoyed your first post. I started climbing in some what of a similar fashion. Thanks! Yeah, these days, I think a lot of people do.
In reply to: Let me first give you my understanding (please let me know if I'm way off) Gym climbing is to footwork as Gri gris are to belaying Wow does this feel like SATs Your two arguments are that gym climbing creates bad footwork? And grigris are ruining belaying. People shouldn't learn to belay with a gri gri they should learn on a tube belay device, hip belay, or if you are curt a foot belay. Sorry, nope. You're not *way* off, but you are a *little* wacked! :) It's true, you get out of it what you put into it. But people rarely go to the gym, find the one slab in the place, and say - cool, a slab, I'll try to do the hard route here with all the dime edges so I can learn footwork. And yet outside, folks tend to be attracted to the lower angle faces to start out. I guess I'm just saying that the ATC and the outdoor slab provide a tighter feedback loop, so the neophyte tends to learn better, faster. But what the fuck do I know. The first six months of my roped technical climbing took place exclusively inside on a short exactly 90 degree wall, wearing sneakers. (That's me wearing sneakers, not the wall). And let me tell you, my footwork was horrible! I bought my first pair of climbing shoes only after I'd worn holes through the toes of my sneakers! :lol: GO
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Oct 19, 2005, 4:26 AM
Post #71 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
In reply to: In reply to: In reply to: To crack lover I really enjoyed your first post. I started climbing in some what of a similar fashion. In reply to: Nah, milk is the only true whey. What were we talking about again? GO ___ as for stuff like this? Lets face it its a forum. Most of the time I say sarcastic or cynical remarks and its all in fun and games. I still agree that it is a horrible analogy and here is why. Let me first give you my understanding (please let me know if I'm way off) Gym climbing is to footwork as Gri gris are to belaying Wow does this feel like SATs Your two arguments are that gym climbing creates bad footwork? And grigris are ruining belaying. People shouldn't learn to belay with a gri gri they should learn on a tube belay device, hip belay, or if you are curt a foot belay. The reason why I don't think it makes that much sense is because it is only taking one side. Sure I've seen a lot of bad footwork in the gym, and contributed my share also. But I don't think see the connection between your analogy. Lets go take a look at the argument for gri gris. Why do some gyms have these $50-$70 devices on all of their ropes (i.e. vertical world in Seattle)? It is because it significantly lowers insurance costs. While other gyms like Stone Gardens don't have gri gris attached to any of their ropes. Certain people just want certain things out of climbing (dub no s---) well its the same for the gym rats. While some people might display poor footwork or never learn to lead, use a belay device and so forth, they are content with where they are. Its a fun sociable "hip" maybe way to work out. While for others, probably the majority so who have responded in this thread, either hate gyms or use them to train. Perhaps they live in an area that gets a lot of rain or the nearest climb is 4 hours away. I dunno? One more thing while I'm still typing To the comment about, gyms taking away money that could go towards a rack. That is great if you can climb year round. Maybe you have a woody, train with something, or are able to get out a lot. I know a lot of people who don't $40 a month to throw around to climb at a gym, so instead they belay at the gym in exchange for a free membership. It s a pretty win-win deal. S Edit: I still don't like waking up early or the cold Ok after re reading that it still doesn't make sense bottom line your analogy works if you view them both as negative things I'm just saying their is another side to both of those. That is why I don't think it works as an analogy ok this is my last edit (hmm or maybe it was too push 100...) The reason why I didn't make an argument earlier is If someone wants to believe trad is the only way to go, I don't really care. Go ahead, live in your bubble. USA is the greatest country in the world #1 #1. Yeah look at our GDP >20% of world GDP. It is ignoring a lot of facts and is just showing my ignorance. At least the analogy was coherent. -Jay ______________________ I am a dork Love the sig. How pathetic is it that the only way you can come out ahead is to fabricate your opponent's comments.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Oct 19, 2005, 12:32 PM
Post #72 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
In reply to: In reply to: I think it is a very bad idea and here's why. 20+ years ago, this was the way to go. Find a mentor and learn the tricks of the trade from them. All there was was trad. With the boom in the sport, there are way too many beginners for the "experienced" to mentor. Which means, if all the beginners were going out and learning trad, there would be far more accidents then there are now. Gyms serve a purpose. To many (including myself), it is training. To many more, it is the gym climbing that many strive for. Then for others it is a way to get started, meet other climbers and hopefully eventually learn that they don't know what climbing is all about but would like to learn more. Then they will begin to seek out the more learned climbers and go from there. If you send them all out on there own in the beginning without the honeymoon phase, then you will probably be sending a lot of them to their death. Josh I read about far more accidents now, than when there weren't gyms. Some of this could be a result of the increased number of climbers out there, although some of it is the result of people gaining a certain level of false confidence in their skills, from what they've learned in gyms. Handling a sixty foot coil of rope and a Grigri, in a climate controlled environment will teach one very little about rope management. A qualified instructor and some exposure to the real elements will teach a new climber much more about the realities of what they will face in nature. It will also give them a better sense of how seriously they should take the inherent dangers that will inevitably confront them in a natural environment. It's a cause and effect thing, or a chicken and egg thing, if you will. I don't think anyone will argue that there are more accidents now. I wasn't even around "back in the day", and I know that there are far more accidents now. But, is it because of gyms, or does the advent of gyms just coincide with it. Yes, there is some poor instruction in gyms, but there is also some excellent instruction. There is also very poor instruction outside. A few months ago, I had to come to some poor girl's rescue, because her "experienced" friend was trying to teach her how to clean an anchor and rappel 60 feet below her. After watching and listening for a couple minutes, I stepped in and offered to climb up and help her. When I went up, she had misunderstood and somehow had tied herself to the rappel rings. She was safe but she certainly wasn't rappelling anywhere. After re-explaining it, she was down in a few seconds. What if she had misunderstood a different way and ended up at the bottom a lot faster? My point is that the way climbing is so accessible to the common man is a good thing, but because of this, some people think they are more experienced than they are. Are gyms to blame for this? No. They may help contribute to it, but to say that Gyms teach bad habits is wrong. They are there to provide an easy outlet to learn. If you learn bad habits, it is your own fault. Josh
|
|
|
|
|
nebkhat
Oct 19, 2005, 1:01 PM
Post #73 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 18, 2005
Posts: 5
|
Here's my two cents. $.01 The gym is a great place to exercise but does give one the feeling of being close to nature. $.02 Gyms are to damned dirty, breathing all that dust sucks. $.03 I prefer the rock to escape the concrete jungle (also see the first penny) $.04 I can trad climb a 5.8 but sport climb a 5.11 I do not believe I could possibly trad climb a 5.11 though I enjoy trad climbing and sport climbing 5.9-5.11. $.05 The bottom line.... I prefer rock over wood and plastic, and find much enjoyment in a difficult problem on a 5.10 or 11 but would rather not carry all of the nuts and cams while doing it. It appears that I have spent an extra three cents. 150% tax I suppose. You never can be to safe. ;-)
|
|
|
|
|
rufusandcompany
Oct 19, 2005, 3:52 PM
Post #74 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 4, 2005
Posts: 2618
|
In reply to: In reply to: In reply to: I think it is a very bad idea and here's why. 20+ years ago, this was the way to go. Find a mentor and learn the tricks of the trade from them. All there was was trad. With the boom in the sport, there are way too many beginners for the "experienced" to mentor. Which means, if all the beginners were going out and learning trad, there would be far more accidents then there are now. Gyms serve a purpose. To many (including myself), it is training. To many more, it is the gym climbing that many strive for. Then for others it is a way to get started, meet other climbers and hopefully eventually learn that they don't know what climbing is all about but would like to learn more. Then they will begin to seek out the more learned climbers and go from there. If you send them all out on there own in the beginning without the honeymoon phase, then you will probably be sending a lot of them to their death. Josh I read about far more accidents now, than when there weren't gyms. Some of this could be a result of the increased number of climbers out there, although some of it is the result of people gaining a certain level of false confidence in their skills, from what they've learned in gyms. Handling a sixty foot coil of rope and a Grigri, in a climate controlled environment will teach one very little about rope management. A qualified instructor and some exposure to the real elements will teach a new climber much more about the realities of what they will face in nature. It will also give them a better sense of how seriously they should take the inherent dangers that will inevitably confront them in a natural environment. It's a cause and effect thing, or a chicken and egg thing, if you will. I don't think anyone will argue that there are more accidents now. I wasn't even around "back in the day", and I know that there are far more accidents now. But, is it because of gyms, or does the advent of gyms just coincide with it. Yes, there is some poor instruction in gyms, but there is also some excellent instruction. There is also very poor instruction outside. A few months ago, I had to come to some poor girl's rescue, because her "experienced" friend was trying to teach her how to clean an anchor and rappel 60 feet below her. After watching and listening for a couple minutes, I stepped in and offered to climb up and help her. When I went up, she had misunderstood and somehow had tied herself to the rappel rings. She was safe but she certainly wasn't rappelling anywhere. After re-explaining it, she was down in a few seconds. What if she had misunderstood a different way and ended up at the bottom a lot faster? My point is that the way climbing is so accessible to the common man is a good thing, but because of this, some people think they are more experienced than they are. Are gyms to blame for this? No. They may help contribute to it, but to say that Gyms teach bad habits is wrong. They are there to provide an easy outlet to learn. If you learn bad habits, it is your own fault. Josh I agree with you, and I believe that we are saying basically the same thing. I will elaborate on what I meant by instruction, because your example of it clearly does not state my case. I was suggesting that anyone serious about climbing outdoors should consider hiring a professional instructor/guide for at least few lessons, so that they are given a solid foundation of the very basics of safety and rope management. You are obviously siting an example of a non-certified person teaching a neophyte. I was a certified guide, and I can say, with confidence, that it is extremely unlikely that a properly certified instructor would ever put a student in the position that you described. KC
|
|
|
|
|
logicflash
Oct 20, 2005, 4:21 PM
Post #75 of 91
(8114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 8, 2005
Posts: 19
|
Rufus, I enjoyed your last post, and I completely agree with you, having been in that exact situation not long ago. I only recently got out to Devil's Lake WI to try some trad with a few friends. Two of them are very experienced trad climbers, and were teaching our group the basics of it. After a few hours, we had a pretty solid understanding of all the gear and placement techniques. When it came to be my turn to go up, I refused. I was honestly too scared, and still not comfortable enough with the techniques to go up a route and set my own protection. Although I trust those friends with my life, I strongly believe that several lessons with a certified intructor is the only safe way to learn. There's a high degree of personal responsibility on the climber to know and respect their limits, and not to cross them in an overly dangerous situation. As an employee of a college climbing gym, I would have to say that gyms aren't all bad. We have new climbers everyday, and even a few experienced ones who need a lot of instruction. I know some gyms are too busy to provide that one on one, but we always make an effort to help out the noobs. Bad footwork can be learned anywhere, indoor or outdoor. Most of my time is spent helping people out with that. But, there are a lot of good training techniques that work only in a gym, and we try to promote those for interested climbers who can't get outdoors all the time. Living in Minnesota, that's only a few months of the year anyway, what with the regularly occuring Ice Ages. Love for the outdoors is entirely a personal matter. If you don't connect with nature while climbing trad, that doesn't make you a bad climber or a bad person. Some people focus on the sport, and appreciate the aesthetics later. Personally, I do feel that connection, but not everyone will, and that's ok. -He who is fearless in being bold will meet with his death; He who is fearless in being timid will stay alive. Of the two, one leads to good, the other to harm.- -Te Ching-
|
|
|
|
|
rufusandcompany
Oct 20, 2005, 4:46 PM
Post #76 of 91
(7734 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 4, 2005
Posts: 2618
|
In reply to: Love for the outdoors is entirely a personal matter. If you don't connect with nature while climbing trad, that doesn't make you a bad climber or a bad person. Some people focus on the sport, and appreciate the aesthetics later. Personally, I do feel that connection, but not everyone will, and that's ok. This is an important statement, as it addresses the unnecessary polarization of climbers by their personal styles. Climbing is a recreation. Here is Webster's definition of recreation: refreshment of strength and spirits after work; also : a means of refreshment or diversion Could it be anymore clear? The point is to climb because you enjoy it, and always make sure that you have the proper tools to do it in relative safety. Cheers, KC
|
|
|
|
|
areyoumydude
Oct 21, 2005, 12:33 AM
Post #77 of 91
(7734 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 28, 2003
Posts: 1971
|
In reply to: How pathetic is it that the only way you can come out ahead is to fabricate your opponent's comments. You're not my opponent and I have many ways of coming out ahead. What comment did I fabricate? I just interpreted your sig as I saw it.
|
|
|
|
|
shanz
Oct 21, 2005, 12:58 AM
Post #78 of 91
(7734 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 18, 2004
Posts: 702
|
Gym climbing causing bad footwork??????? Ive never climbed in a gym and my footwork sucks Im working on it :D
|
|
|
|
|
forjoke
Oct 21, 2005, 11:18 AM
Post #79 of 91
(7734 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2005
Posts: 13
|
Climbing indoor and outside are different games, both have fun.
|
|
|
|
|
booger
Oct 21, 2005, 11:54 AM
Post #80 of 91
(7734 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 23, 2003
Posts: 1163
|
trying.... very .... hard ... not ... to ... make comment ........ about... HAM SAMMICHES ... er ... oops. Seriously - where is subtle when he's needed!? :lol: :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Oct 21, 2005, 3:34 PM
Post #81 of 91
(7734 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
In reply to: In reply to: How pathetic is it that the only way you can come out ahead is to fabricate your opponent's comments. You're not my opponent... You seem to think I am. You've been taking shots at me ever since I dared to assert that your beloved slacklining is worthless as a training medium for rock climbing. Grow up already. You act like you're in junior high. -Jay
|
|
|
|
|
logicflash
Oct 21, 2005, 4:02 PM
Post #82 of 91
(7734 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 8, 2005
Posts: 19
|
Whoa whoa whoa! I will suffer no slandering of slacklining! Alliteration aside, how can you say that it has no basis for training in climbing? It was invented for that very purpose, and is good at what it does. Most people never train their legs and ankles for balance, they normally just lift weights for strength, but that's only half of what you need to improve your footwork and flexibility. Slacklining accomplishes more than standing on a pillow, calf raises, or any number of other leg and ankle exercises commonly used. And it's a hell of a lot more fun. The movements a slackliner goes through when on a line also train the core muscles that many climbers miss out on in their training. Since starting slacklining a few years ago, my climbing has taken huge leaps, most notably in footwork and (dare I say it?) balance. Toe hooks, lay backs, and control during big static moves all benefit from slacklining's exercise. I'm not trying to gang up on you or anything, I actually never heard what you said about slacklining in the first place. I didn't get to read that thread, but I'm interested in why you feel that way. Peace, -T-
|
|
|
|
|
areyoumydude
Oct 21, 2005, 4:35 PM
Post #83 of 91
(7734 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 28, 2003
Posts: 1971
|
In reply to: Grow up already. You act like you're in junior high. -Jay Better than having a mid-life crisis. Why don't you lighten up already. OK, shake hands and go back to your corner. Ding, ding.
|
|
|
|
|
paganmonkeyboy
Oct 21, 2005, 5:05 PM
Post #84 of 91
(7734 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 30, 2003
Posts: 663
|
In reply to: Quote : Be vigilant of your testicles. Watch for swelling, bruising, continued pain, or bleeding. --Reno Best part of the whole thread, IMHO... One question I could never figure out, trad or sport - How Does The Rope Get Up There ?
|
|
|
|
|
logicflash
Oct 23, 2005, 9:16 PM
Post #85 of 91
(7734 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 8, 2005
Posts: 19
|
Special magic rope faeries that live in the trees, and only come out when the hardest of the hardcore come to the crags. That...or ponies. Just regular ponies, not magic ones.
|
|
|
|
|
crimpergirl
Oct 23, 2005, 10:26 PM
Post #86 of 91
(7734 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 11, 2004
Posts: 1128
|
I'm going to request a refund from the gym tomorrow. I've been a member for years and I still can't campus for sh*t.
|
|
|
|
|
tradrenn
Oct 25, 2005, 1:24 AM
Post #87 of 91
(7734 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 16, 2005
Posts: 2990
|
In reply to: I read about far more accidents now, than when there weren't gyms. Some of this could be a result of the increased number of climbers out there, although some of it is the result of people gaining a certain level of false confidence in their skills, from what they've learned in gyms. Handling a sixty foot coil of rope and a Grigri, in a climate controlled environment will teach one very little about rope management. A qualified instructor and some exposure to the real elements will teach a new climber much more about the realities of what they will face in nature. It will also give them a better sense of how seriously they should take the inherent dangers that will inevitably confront them in a natural environment. Good point. Also Did anybody questioned the inteligence of the N00b ? That has something to do with all the accidents.
|
|
|
|
|
billcoe_
Oct 25, 2005, 3:13 AM
Post #88 of 91
(7734 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694
|
In reply to: All beginners should learn to climb outdoors on trad climbs. Climbing indoors promotes to many bad habits, it does not instil the kind of knowledge and experience about safety as one gets form trad climbing, it does not give a wider understanding about climbing and rope work. It does not give any appreciation for the outdoors and the environment. It kills all ideas of adventure, of independence, of taking responsibility for your own actions, learning indoors you hand over all these things to an unknown person. Trad is the only true way! PS I’m bored Everytime I've ever hear this variant, which summed up is "My way or the highway", the speaker has been wrong. Such is the case still I'm afraid. ps, Larry, you are correct in walking away from someone who has always insisted on getting that last word/last post/last thought. :wink:
|
|
|
|
|
areyoumydude
Oct 26, 2005, 2:14 AM
Post #89 of 91
(7734 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 28, 2003
Posts: 1971
|
Yo Bill, When are you going to make it down. Plenty of firsts to do here. I have this killer chimney climb I've been looking at. :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
billcoe_
Oct 26, 2005, 2:49 AM
Post #90 of 91
(7734 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694
|
In reply to: Yo Bill, When are you going to make it down. Plenty of firsts to do here. I have this killer chimney climb I've been looking at. :lol: :lol: :lol: Hi Larry! You know, some dudes were talking about big bros and valley giants: turns out they make pro for stuff that big after all! :D
|
|
|
|
|
kricir
Oct 26, 2005, 3:47 AM
Post #91 of 91
(7734 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 15, 2005
Posts: 434
|
In reply to: All beginners should learn to climb outdoors on trad climbs. Climbing indoors promotes to many bad habits, it does not instil the kind of knowledge and experience about safety as one gets form trad climbing, it does not give a wider understanding about climbing and rope work. It does not give any appreciation for the outdoors and the environment. It kills all ideas of adventure, of independence, of taking responsibility for your own actions, learning indoors you hand over all these things to an unknown person. Trad is the only true way! said king_rat RIGHT ON BRO! My first ever outside lead was on trad, and my first sport climb didn’t come until 3 years of trad\alpine. Although my first lead was a complete disaster, I set up a 5.7 slab (I would now solo) with nothing but a hand full of nuts. After almost pissing my self half way up I rapped of one nut (this was before I knew how to really place a nut, or what a good placement was). Its like learning to swim by throwing your self into the deep end, and is a good reality check, just be smarter than I was.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|