|
CrazyPetie
Dec 8, 2009, 6:55 AM
Post #1 of 56
(14329 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 31, 2008
Posts: 407
|
I was reading this article today:http://www.climbing.com/...ue_-_heels_of_steel/ And this picture struck me odd. Wouldn't you want your center of gravity over your feet and not behind them? I think the picture is exaggerating the technique. I mean, i get what they are saying about leaning back and stuff, but that picture just seems wrong. Please enlighten me, i know you will.
(This post was edited by CrazyPetie on Dec 8, 2009, 6:56 AM)
|
Attachments:
|
techtip-slab280-6-125.jpg
(3.50 KB)
|
|
|
|
|
Samiam277
Dec 8, 2009, 7:11 AM
Post #2 of 56
(14308 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 24, 2007
Posts: 51
|
when it is a matter of friction (as is the case with slab climbing), you want as much surface area contact as possible. Sitting back like that helps create more contact between your shoes and the rock (to a degree.)
|
|
|
|
|
curt
Dec 8, 2009, 7:14 AM
Post #3 of 56
(14303 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275
|
CrazyPetie wrote: I was reading this article today: http://www.climbing.com/...ue_-_heels_of_steel/ And this picture struck me odd. Wouldn't you want your center of gravity over your feet and not behind them? I think the picture is exaggerating the technique. I mean, i get what they are saying about leaning back and stuff, but that picture just seems wrong. Please enlighten me, i know you will. The helmet is all wrong. Curt
|
|
|
|
|
CrazyPetie
Dec 8, 2009, 7:17 AM
Post #4 of 56
(14300 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 31, 2008
Posts: 407
|
Samiam277 wrote: when it is a matter of friction (as is the case with slab climbing), you want as much surface area contact as possible. Sitting back like that helps create more contact between your shoes and the rock (to a degree.) I understand that part. I know what they are trying to say, but the drawing is what i have problems with. Hes not even standing on his feet, he looks more like hes sitting down. You can have your center of gravity positioned over top of your feet and still make alot of contact by droping your heels. Or am i completely crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
testpilot
Dec 8, 2009, 7:40 AM
Post #5 of 56
(14280 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 11, 2009
Posts: 25
|
It appears that you have answered your own question in your post. If you look at your picture, that guy is falling off. It is exagerated to make a point of increasing surface area as much as possible with your feet. That picture looks a lot like "your buddie" Mike as he was peeling ropeless off of "Grab Your Balls."
|
|
|
|
|
rainman0915
Dec 8, 2009, 7:48 AM
Post #6 of 56
(14274 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 11, 2008
Posts: 233
|
its just an artists rendering, that does not look like he spent a long time on, and its really hard to portray a gesture like slab climbing in a quick drawing.
|
|
|
|
|
CrazyPetie
Dec 8, 2009, 8:19 AM
Post #7 of 56
(14253 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 31, 2008
Posts: 407
|
testpilot wrote: It appears that you have answered your own question in your post. If you look at your picture, that guy is falling off. It is exagerated to make a point of increasing surface area as much as possible with your feet. That picture looks a lot like "your buddie" Mike as he was peeling ropeless off of "Grab Your Balls." Yea the guy in that picture doesn't have a rope either
|
|
|
|
|
kriso9tails
Dec 8, 2009, 8:44 AM
Post #8 of 56
(14245 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772
|
Wearing shorts is a good call. You will get lighter with each successive fall due to skin and blood loss. That means less weight to haul off those micro crimps. With sufficient blood loss, your head will get lighter too!
|
|
|
|
|
Hooky
Dec 8, 2009, 11:24 AM
Post #9 of 56
(14202 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 6, 2009
Posts: 29
|
One observation: The general idea is not to maximize the contact surface area (feet vs. rock) but the normal (=perpendicular) contact force (friction happens to be independent of the surface area). Therefore, if you lean backwards as in the picture, you press with your feet to the rock much harder and much more perpendicular. As a negative side effect, your arms are under more stress. In my opinion, the rule of the thumb on o slab or vertical rock is: if you have good feet and poor hands, stand straight up wih your weight above your feet (unlike in the picture). If you have poor or no feet and relatively good hands, lean backwards and stand somewhat as in the picture. A minor drawback is that 90% of time you have poor feet and poor hands.
|
|
|
|
|
stagg54
Dec 8, 2009, 12:43 PM
Post #10 of 56
(14166 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2005
Posts: 190
|
CrazyPetie wrote: I was reading this article today: http://www.climbing.com/...ue_-_heels_of_steel/ And this picture struck me odd. [image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=post_attachment;postatt_id=4400;[/image] Wouldn't you want your center of gravity over your feet and not behind them? I think the picture is exaggerating the technique. I mean, i get what they are saying about leaning back and stuff, but that picture just seems wrong. Please enlighten me, i know you will. I thought you were bragging about climbing 5.12 Shouldn't you have figured this out already?
|
|
|
|
|
gerbil
Dec 8, 2009, 1:58 PM
Post #11 of 56
(14118 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 7, 2009
Posts: 54
|
slab climbers dont wear shorts.
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 8, 2009, 2:31 PM
Post #12 of 56
(14084 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
The arrow points the proper orientation of the gas propulsion system to propel you into the wall when on slabs… you just need the correct fuel…..
|
|
|
|
|
jcrew
Dec 8, 2009, 3:23 PM
Post #13 of 56
(14027 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 11, 2006
Posts: 673
|
it looks as if the climber is taking a dump or getting lowered.
|
|
|
|
|
cantbuymefriends
Dec 8, 2009, 3:28 PM
Post #14 of 56
(14019 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2003
Posts: 670
|
I don't know where that dude's CoG is, but it's not anywhere near vertical to his feet. This "style" would require really good handholds, in which case you don't need any slabclimbing technique anyway...
|
|
|
|
|
rockforlife
Dec 8, 2009, 3:36 PM
Post #15 of 56
(14008 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 14, 2002
Posts: 563
|
testpilot wrote: It appears that you have answered your own question in your post. If you look at your picture, that guy is falling off. It is exagerated to make a point of increasing surface area as much as possible with your feet. That picture looks a lot like "your buddie" Mike as he was peeling ropeless off of "Grab Your Balls." No he is not.
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 8, 2009, 3:40 PM
Post #16 of 56
(14002 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
there is nothing wrong with this guys position....Look closer… CP is just a troll who wants attention….
|
|
|
|
|
dan2see
Dec 8, 2009, 3:47 PM
Post #17 of 56
(13995 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 29, 2006
Posts: 1497
|
I will agree with this...
gerbil wrote: slab climbers dont wear shorts. And I agree with this, too...
rainman0915 wrote: its just an artists rendering, that does not look like he spent a long time on, and its really hard to portray a gesture like slab climbing in a quick drawing. I'm sorry but I don't go along with this drawing at all. My advice is, find some actual photos, and see what their bodies are doing. Here in the Rockies, we encounter an awful lot of slabs and slabby walls. You get used to it, you get to know what it feels like to climb well. That drawing sure doesn't look like how I feel on slab. Sorry I don't have any current snapshots of me, but I remember in an older photo of me, a shot taken from the ground, I was standing straight up on my feet, pretty-well balanced on my spine. (edit to add) No matter where you climb, if it feels good, you're doing it right. I'm sure the caricature feels somewhat off.
(This post was edited by dan2see on Dec 8, 2009, 3:59 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
trenchdigger
Dec 8, 2009, 4:11 PM
Post #18 of 56
(13970 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 9, 2003
Posts: 1447
|
Hooky wrote: One observation: The general idea is not to maximize the contact surface area (feet vs. rock) but the normal (=perpendicular) contact force (friction happens to be independent of the surface area). Therefore, if you lean backwards as in the picture, you press with your feet to the rock much harder and much more perpendicular. As a negative side effect, your arms are under more stress. In my opinion, the rule of the thumb on o slab or vertical rock is: if you have good feet and poor hands, stand straight up wih your weight above your feet (unlike in the picture). If you have poor or no feet and relatively good hands, lean backwards and stand somewhat as in the picture. A minor drawback is that 90% of time you have poor feet and poor hands. Yes... at least someone gets it. Body position with better feet will be more vertical with feet directly below. With decent hands and bad feet, better purchase can be had by pulling out on the holds, pressing your feet into the rock. The problem with the illustration is not his torso position, but his arms and legs. Arms should be straighter and knees should be bent.
|
|
|
|
|
edge
Dec 8, 2009, 4:21 PM
Post #19 of 56
(13953 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 14, 2003
Posts: 9120
|
gerbil wrote: slab climbers dont wear shorts. Well they should certainly wear something. I know the tripod effect may indeed add additional friction, but it is damn unpleasant to climb below.
|
|
|
|
|
CrazyPetie
Dec 8, 2009, 6:00 PM
Post #20 of 56
(13881 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 31, 2008
Posts: 407
|
stagg54 wrote: CrazyPetie wrote: I was reading this article today: http://www.climbing.com/...ue_-_heels_of_steel/ And this picture struck me odd. [image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=post_attachment;postatt_id=4400;[/image] Wouldn't you want your center of gravity over your feet and not behind them? I think the picture is exaggerating the technique. I mean, i get what they are saying about leaning back and stuff, but that picture just seems wrong. Please enlighten me, i know you will. I thought you were bragging about climbing 5.12 Shouldn't you have figured this out already? I thought i figured it out, thats why i was just making sure i was right. I mean, i've never done a move quite like that guy in the picture.
|
|
|
|
|
hafilax
Dec 8, 2009, 6:27 PM
Post #21 of 56
(13841 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025
|
Bad illustration. The description in the article makes more sense in the context of slab climbing. That picture looks more like dealing with friction footholds with good hand holds which isn't slab climbing. For that kind of climbing Perry's Lieback on the Grand Wall in Squamish comes to mind. Steep climbing up a lieback/undercling kind of thing with what seems like glass for footholds. You really need the opposition between your hands and feet to keep you on the wall and it is incredibly pumpy. Stand up too tall and your feet will come skating off.
|
|
|
|
|
fist
Dec 8, 2009, 7:39 PM
Post #22 of 56
(13776 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2008
Posts: 47
|
Hooky wrote: One observation: The general idea is not to maximize the contact surface area (feet vs. rock) but the normal (=perpendicular) contact force (friction happens to be independent of the surface area). Therefore, if you lean backwards as in the picture, you press with your feet to the rock much harder and much more perpendicular. As a negative side effect, your arms are under more stress. In my opinion, the rule of the thumb on o slab or vertical rock is: if you have good feet and poor hands, stand straight up wih your weight above your feet (unlike in the picture). If you have poor or no feet and relatively good hands, lean backwards and stand somewhat as in the picture. A minor drawback is that 90% of time you have poor feet and poor hands. This is a very common misconception. It's taught that way in high school physics but friction in real life is actually dependent on surface area, a long with a number of other variables that usually get generalized out. The position increases the normal force and the surface area, leading to a higher static friction.
|
|
|
|
|
Hooky
Dec 8, 2009, 8:20 PM
Post #23 of 56
(13723 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 6, 2009
Posts: 29
|
fist wrote: Hooky wrote: One observation: The general idea is not to maximize the contact surface area (feet vs. rock) but the normal (=perpendicular) contact force (friction happens to be independent of the surface area). Therefore, if you lean backwards as in the picture, you press with your feet to the rock much harder and much more perpendicular. As a negative side effect, your arms are under more stress. In my opinion, the rule of the thumb on o slab or vertical rock is: if you have good feet and poor hands, stand straight up wih your weight above your feet (unlike in the picture). If you have poor or no feet and relatively good hands, lean backwards and stand somewhat as in the picture. A minor drawback is that 90% of time you have poor feet and poor hands. This is a very common misconception. It's taught that way in high school physics but friction in real life is actually dependent on surface area, a long with a number of other variables that usually get generalized out. The position increases the normal force and the surface area, leading to a higher static friction. You are right. It is difficult to by absolutely accurate when it comes to friction, because most of the knowledge is empirical. It is generally true that friction between rigid bodies (rock) does not depend on the contact area, while friction between deformable materials (climbing shoes) somewhat icreases with the surface area. Although I didn't really measure it, I think that the normal force component still dominates over the surface area component.
|
|
|
|
|
dugl33
Dec 8, 2009, 8:38 PM
Post #24 of 56
(13703 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 6, 2009
Posts: 740
|
Only in the context of great, positive, handholds or an invisible wall that dude is resting his bum on, would this be a realistic drawing of good slab technique. Your basic stance is straightish legs, straight back, and either vertical like a plumb bob or arms length away from the slab. Leaning out beyond vertical implies good handholds, and this doesn't sound much like any true slab climbing I've been on. Perhaps you'll manage a little back arch to survey what's coming. You want heels dropped and "nose over toes", looking for "footholds" that are marginally rougher spots, or have credit card edges to smear the middle of your sole on, dishes and lower angle spots. In short, its subtle. Sometimes your best hope is merely something a little less polished. (Good climbing rubber free of dirt, age hardening, etc will help. Wash it and wire brush it if need be.) Occasionally, you might get a good palm smear where you are pushing with your arm down below your waist level, or a good enough handhold to pop the feet higher than your basic body position. I think the real trick is good gentle momentum shifting from one foot smear to the next, with good surface area on reasonable spots. If you over-reach, getting to close to parallel to the rock surface, you will soon find yourself sliding, sliding, sliding -- trying to remember when you last clipped something down there. Tough friction is brief time delayed failing smears, and you must keep moving. Sometimes you will get to enjoy the unnerving little foot skate on the unweighted foot each time you shift weight to the new higher foot - sometimes for the entire pitch. Enjoy. Pray to stick. And climb when temps are cool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bats
Dec 10, 2009, 1:21 PM
Post #26 of 56
(4114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 27, 2007
Posts: 486
|
Ah Hem! We do wear shorts in Texas in August when the temperature is 100F. Just don't fall thats all...
|
|
|
|
|
dugl33
Dec 10, 2009, 10:24 PM
Post #27 of 56
(4083 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 6, 2009
Posts: 740
|
Good pics and write up. Perhaps the first pic was what the artist was going for. Notice, though, the down palming going on here. Also, scanning for footholds with head close to the plane of the rock. Second pic, heels dropped, legs bent, something small for the hands. COG over feet. Third pic, basic stance with heels dropped, and straight arm keeping climber reasonably vertical. In no pic is the climber stretched out so as to be parallel to the plane of the slab, which is the slab climbers kiss of death. And in no pic does the climber have his ass sticking out with straight legs at the same time. The sketch is lame. Point of fact and QED.
|
Attachments:
|
slabpic1.jpg
(40.0 KB)
|
|
slabpic2.jpg
(43.2 KB)
|
|
slabpic3.jpg
(42.5 KB)
|
|
|
|
|
adatesman
Dec 10, 2009, 10:35 PM
Post #28 of 56
(4076 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479
|
|
|
|
|
|
silascl
Dec 10, 2009, 10:47 PM
Post #29 of 56
(4073 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 14, 2006
Posts: 225
|
adatesman wrote: jaablink wrote: CP is just a troll who wants attention… Why wasn't this quoted yet? Best explanation I've seen so far... Only on RC.com is asking a question about slab technique considered trolling...
|
|
|
|
|
adatesman
Dec 10, 2009, 10:58 PM
Post #30 of 56
(4071 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479
|
|
|
|
|
|
dugl33
Dec 10, 2009, 11:27 PM
Post #31 of 56
(4055 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 6, 2009
Posts: 740
|
adatesman wrote: silascl wrote: adatesman wrote: jaablink wrote: CP is just a troll who wants attention… Why wasn't this quoted yet? Best explanation I've seen so far... Only on RC.com is asking a question about slab technique considered trolling... Obviously you've missed his other threads.... Not sure about the other threads, but the sketch in the original OP is indeed lame. You folks calling troll ever climb a real slab? Try locking your legs out straight, feet dead flat on the rock, holding on to who knows what. Rotate the sketch a bit and its not as bad. Climber less jack-knifed, not as bad. One leg straight, the other bent, not as bad. One arm straight down below the waist, not as bad. COG straight over feet, sure, butt out, sure -- but not like the sketch. The only way to get close to the sketch on a real slab is while down palming, and in that case your legs won't be locked straight. I'm calling Not-Troll. Not this time. The sketch just smells a bit funny, like old chicken or some funk ceviche. Sure, you might give it a go, but you'll regret it.
|
Attachments:
|
techtip_slab.jpg
(3.50 KB)
|
|
|
|
|
silascl
Dec 10, 2009, 11:33 PM
Post #32 of 56
(4049 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 14, 2006
Posts: 225
|
adatesman wrote: silascl wrote: adatesman wrote: jaablink wrote: CP is just a troll who wants attention… Why wasn't this quoted yet? Best explanation I've seen so far... Only on RC.com is asking a question about slab technique considered trolling... Obviously you've missed his other threads.... Which ones? I've seen the free solo one, but must have missed the trolls. I just think it's too bad when reasonable threads go to shit because people want to jump all over the fresh meat. See this one for a better example: http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2249320
|
|
|
|
|
adatesman
Dec 10, 2009, 11:50 PM
Post #33 of 56
(4035 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479
|
|
|
|
|
|
CrazyPetie
Dec 11, 2009, 12:02 AM
Post #34 of 56
(4026 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 31, 2008
Posts: 407
|
adatesman wrote: silascl wrote: Which ones? I've seen the free solo one, but must have missed the trolls. I just think it's too bad when reasonable threads go to shit because people want to jump all over the fresh meat. See this one for a better example: http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2249320 I'll grant that this one is tame in comparison to the others, but I think Jaablink is correct in calling CP out as a troll. If you read the OP there's a hint of troll with the CrazyPetie wrote: Please enlighten me, i know you will. . It's subtle but present, and his responses since then have been quite trollish. Then there's the freesolo clusterfuck thread, the DIY pink anodized grigri thread, various trolling posts in other threads... But let's give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he's not a troll. In that case he's either deranged and/or an idiot, so perhaps it's kinder to simply label him a troll. Wow you are a huge nerd! I pointed out a picture that was incorrect slab technique, in an article that is supposed to be teaching you slab technique. Yep i'm an idiot and a troll. I said "please enlighten me, i know you will", because i know geek balls like yourself are sure to say something stupid. OooOo your a mod, your cool.
|
|
|
|
|
dugl33
Dec 11, 2009, 12:12 AM
Post #35 of 56
(4017 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 6, 2009
Posts: 740
|
Pink GriGris aside, "you were stupid in the past, ergo stupid now" is a weak argument. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. On its own merits, viewed in isolation, I say the thread is ok, perhaps even a little redeeming. Viewing the sketch, assuming COG just above the hips for a dude, draw an imaginary line straight down, and you will find it well behind the feet. Nowhere near over the feet, where it should be. It was probably uploaded by mistake from the "dropping a deuce" image file.
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 11, 2009, 1:03 AM
Post #36 of 56
(3990 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
First, you don’t know shit about climbing , you may think you do, but....… last time you spouted your mouth off to me, I invited you up to the Gunks to join our group and see if you had a set or if you were all talk. Imagine my surprise and disappointment when you did not show…We probably would have picked on you and gotten a laugh or two at your expense, but we would have made it up to you with some beer back at the cabin… In your last post , that mouth and adolescent attitude got your family dragged into it. In the end the bigger man removed the photo, and you were lucky if you ask me… you just don’t know when to stfu…. I am certain that big mouth had a lot to do with your arrest as well. It will no doubt be the cause of future closures and access issues in your area too. you still have not learned any lessons. You are obviously a much more advanced climber than the rest of us to be able to find errors in others climbing technique. Sorry I doubted you oh mighty slab master.
|
|
|
|
|
rocknice2
Dec 11, 2009, 1:07 AM
Post #37 of 56
(3987 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2006
Posts: 1221
|
What slab? He's got a 4 finger pocket on right and a haand crack with the left.
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 11, 2009, 1:23 AM
Post #38 of 56
(3979 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
No , you are right. I have never climbed a slab…
|
|
|
|
|
CrazyPetie
Dec 11, 2009, 4:30 AM
Post #39 of 56
(3960 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 31, 2008
Posts: 407
|
jaablink wrote: First, you don’t know shit about climbing , you may think you do, but....… last time you spouted your mouth off to me, I invited you up to the Gunks to join our group and see if you had a set or if you were all talk. Imagine my surprise and disappointment when you did not show…We probably would have picked on you and gotten a laugh or two at your expense, but we would have made it up to you with some beer back at the cabin… In your last post , that mouth and adolescent attitude got your family dragged into it. In the end the bigger man removed the photo, and you were lucky if you ask me… you just don’t know when to stfu…. I am certain that big mouth had a lot to do with your arrest as well. It will no doubt be the cause of future closures and access issues in your area too. you still have not learned any lessons. You are obviously a much more advanced climber than the rest of us to be able to find errors in others climbing technique. Sorry I doubted you oh mighty slab master. I'm not gonna drive 12 hours just to meet up with some retarded foreigner talking shit on the internet... I'm so sorry i couldn't join you... Oh the "bigger" man removed the photo only after like ten people told him he was a fucking douche bag, i dont think that makes him the bigger man... I'm sorry i asked a legitimite question about slab technique, and i asked for your almighty input to see if I was remotely correct... Obviously i was, so you stfu.
|
|
|
|
|
clmbr
Dec 11, 2009, 8:16 AM
Post #40 of 56
(3932 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 31, 2008
Posts: 29
|
Dugl33. Good post with those photos and technique descriptions. Very helpful, for me anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 11, 2009, 3:41 PM
Post #41 of 56
(3908 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
CrazyPetie wrote: jaablink wrote: First, you don’t know shit about climbing , you may think you do, but....… last time you spouted your mouth off to me, I invited you up to the Gunks to join our group and see if you had a set or if you were all talk. Imagine my surprise and disappointment when you did not show…We probably would have picked on you and gotten a laugh or two at your expense, but we would have made it up to you with some beer back at the cabin… In your last post , that mouth and adolescent attitude got your family dragged into it. In the end the bigger man removed the photo, and you were lucky if you ask me… you just don’t know when to stfu…. I am certain that big mouth had a lot to do with your arrest as well. It will no doubt be the cause of future closures and access issues in your area too. you still have not learned any lessons. You are obviously a much more advanced climber than the rest of us to be able to find errors in others climbing technique. Sorry I doubted you oh mighty slab master. I'm not gonna drive 12 hours just to meet up with some retarded foreigner talking shit on the internet... I'm so sorry i couldn't join you... Oh the "bigger" man removed the photo only after like ten people told him he was a fucking douche bag, i dont think that makes him the bigger man... I'm sorry i asked a legitimite question about slab technique, and i asked for your almighty input to see if I was remotely correct... Obviously i was, so you stfu. Pittsburg to the Gunks is only 6 hours not 12. You are lying again… He is a much bigger man than you give him credit for… I would have sent the link to your uncle, the media, and the prosecution - with no warning to you. With all the people you pissed off. Maybe some user already did…. You cried wolf too many times in the near past. That fucking mouth of yours has gotten you into some shit already. Do you think it wise to keep running it?
(This post was edited by jaablink on Dec 11, 2009, 3:42 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
jcrew
Dec 11, 2009, 3:54 PM
Post #42 of 56
(3898 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 11, 2006
Posts: 673
|
jaablink wrote: CrazyPetie wrote: jaablink wrote: First, you don’t know shit about climbing , you may think you do, but....… last time you spouted your mouth off to me, I invited you up to the Gunks to join our group and see if you had a set or if you were all talk. Imagine my surprise and disappointment when you did not show…We probably would have picked on you and gotten a laugh or two at your expense, but we would have made it up to you with some beer back at the cabin… In your last post , that mouth and adolescent attitude got your family dragged into it. In the end the bigger man removed the photo, and you were lucky if you ask me… you just don’t know when to stfu…. I am certain that big mouth had a lot to do with your arrest as well. It will no doubt be the cause of future closures and access issues in your area too. you still have not learned any lessons. You are obviously a much more advanced climber than the rest of us to be able to find errors in others climbing technique. Sorry I doubted you oh mighty slab master. I'm not gonna drive 12 hours just to meet up with some retarded foreigner talking shit on the internet... I'm so sorry i couldn't join you... Oh the "bigger" man removed the photo only after like ten people told him he was a fucking douche bag, i dont think that makes him the bigger man... I'm sorry i asked a legitimite question about slab technique, and i asked for your almighty input to see if I was remotely correct... Obviously i was, so you stfu. Pittsburg to the Gunks is only 6 hours not 12. You are lying again… He is a much bigger man than you give him credit for… I would have sent the link to your uncle, the media, and the prosecution - with no warning to you. With all the people you pissed off. Maybe some user already did…. You cried wolf too many times in the near past. That fucking mouth of yours has gotten you into some shit already. Do you think it wise to keep running it? fuck dude, take a chill pill!!! you would have turned CP into "dad", you would have called "mommie" on him? you guys are a bunch of fuckin' haters!! maybe it's because it's winter back east and nobody gets to actually climb slab this time of year?
|
|
|
|
|
nate2006
Dec 11, 2009, 4:23 PM
Post #43 of 56
(3886 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 25, 2009
Posts: 70
|
The picture is correct.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Dec 11, 2009, 5:27 PM
Post #44 of 56
(3867 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
CrazyPetie wrote: Yep i'm an idiot and a troll. Edited for brevity. Jay
(This post was edited by jt512 on Dec 11, 2009, 5:28 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
areyoumydude
Dec 11, 2009, 6:07 PM
Post #45 of 56
(3851 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 28, 2003
Posts: 1971
|
CrazyPetie wrote: I said "please enlighten me, i know you will", because i know geek balls like yourself are sure to say something stupid. OooOo your a mod, your cool. I did a search but no luck. What are geek balls?
|
|
|
|
|
areyoumydude
Dec 11, 2009, 6:11 PM
Post #46 of 56
(3847 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 28, 2003
Posts: 1971
|
Maybe he's just waiting for the clown to show up.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Dec 11, 2009, 6:11 PM
Post #47 of 56
(3845 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
jcrew wrote: fuck dude, take a chill pill!!! you would have turned CP into "dad", you would have called "mommie" on him? you guys are a bunch of fuckin' haters!! maybe it's because it's winter back east and nobody gets to actually climb slab this time of year? You should take yoru own advice there Yoda.
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 11, 2009, 6:31 PM
Post #48 of 56
(3780 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
I did not say I did, I said some user may already have. Or at least should have. But you know that may not be a bad idea, thanks for coming up with it. Good thinking. I hope some user calls his mommy and daddy, I mean he is still a child after all… and - act like a child , be treated like a child… same as - act like a criminal , you be treated like one… He brought his family into that last thread. His uncle probably went to school for 10 years and worked his ass off. But shit why not use your uncle to try to intimidate another user, posting all this on public forum I might add. He made physical threats to other users that had to be removed. Then he got his way and the photo was removed. Now instead of being thankful, he still found a way to justify himself and his erroneous actions. He never really learned anything because he has a shield from reality, a safety line, a rope…, weather it is his parents dealing with his mess, the moderators cleaning up his mess, or people like you defending him. There is an actual person on the other side of the forum conversation. Everyone does not always see things the way CP views them, and that is something that he should understand before spouting his mouth off. If you wont say it to someone face. You should not say it to someone online. His actions can very easily have real world consequences with no warning . It would not be me. I am more of the say nothing, then tear off your head and shit down your throat kind of guy, but that is just me… There a lot of people out there who would sooner compound his situation to teach a moral lesson. You never know what you are going to get….
|
|
|
|
|
dugl33
Dec 11, 2009, 8:22 PM
Post #49 of 56
(3747 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 6, 2009
Posts: 740
|
another off topic rcc pissing contest. ::yawn:: ****************************************** anyone take any good slab whippers? what caused it? how did it go? any other good slab climbing tales from the wild side...?
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Dec 11, 2009, 8:31 PM
Post #50 of 56
(3736 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
dugl33 wrote: another off topic rcc pissing contest. ::yawn:: ****************************************** anyone take any good slab whippers? what caused it? how did it go? any other good slab climbing tales from the wild side...? Well while leading some quartzite slab in Oklahoma I managed blow my second clip and slid down 40' to the base of the climb with only some seriously scuffed up toes on my shoes. I have no idea how I managed not to face-plant on the way down. Other than that all I have are stories involving long runouts in the Needles SD.
|
|
|
|
|
jcrew
Dec 12, 2009, 12:19 AM
Post #51 of 56
(1265 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 11, 2006
Posts: 673
|
jaablink wrote: I did not say I did, I said some user may already have. Or at least should have. But you know that may not be a bad idea, thanks for coming up with it. Good thinking. I hope some user calls his mommy and daddy, I mean he is still a child after all… and - act like a child , be treated like a child… same as - act like a criminal , you be treated like one… He brought his family into that last thread. His uncle probably went to school for 10 years and worked his ass off. But shit why not use your uncle to try to intimidate another user, posting all this on public forum I might add. He made physical threats to other users that had to be removed. Then he got his way and the photo was removed. Now instead of being thankful, he still found a way to justify himself and his erroneous actions. He never really learned anything because he has a shield from reality, a safety line, a rope…, weather it is his parents dealing with his mess, the moderators cleaning up his mess, or people like you defending him. There is an actual person on the other side of the forum conversation. Everyone does not always see things the way CP views them, and that is something that he should understand before spouting his mouth off. If you wont say it to someone face. You should not say it to someone online. His actions can very easily have real world consequences with no warning . It would not be me. I am more of the say nothing, then tear off your head and shit down your throat kind of guy, but that is just me… There a lot of people out there who would sooner compound his situation to teach a moral lesson. You never know what you are going to get…. i'm no CP apologist, i just don't tattle to the man, even on my enemies. peace, "we are all brothes an sisters...."
|
|
|
|
|
bradley3297
Dec 12, 2009, 12:31 AM
Post #52 of 56
(1262 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 5, 2008
Posts: 83
|
Hmmmmm funny. crazypetie has got a pic of the same route that retard on youtube fell off soloing.
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 12, 2009, 12:36 PM
Post #53 of 56
(1227 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
jcrew wrote: i'm no CP apologist, i just don't tattle to the man, even on my enemies. peace, "we are all brothes an sisters...." Not too long ago, I remember reading a warning here. Someone was using climbing guidebooks to target and burglarize vehicles for rock gear. I would consider that guy an enemy. According to your statement, this person should have been allowed to continue doing what he was doing . Even if you know his identity you would not say anything to anyone... As far as CP goes.If you went to school for 10 years and worked your ass off building a good reputation. Then some relative you probably don’t even know well ,used your good name to intimidate someone else. I will add that your respected name is being used right next to illegal criminal activity .You are sure as shit right I would want to know. I would be even more upset if someone did not tell me… My guess is you would not say anything because you are selfish and it did not affect you personally. Had it affected you, I am sure your tune would change.
|
|
|
|
|
jcrew
Dec 12, 2009, 8:20 PM
Post #55 of 56
(1177 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 11, 2006
Posts: 673
|
jaablink wrote: jcrew wrote: i'm no CP apologist, i just don't tattle to the man, even on my enemies. peace, "we are all brothes an sisters...." Not too long ago, I remember reading a warning here. Someone was using climbing guidebooks to target and burglarize vehicles for rock gear. I would consider that guy an enemy. According to your statement, this person should have been allowed to continue doing what he was doing . Even if you know his identity you would not say anything to anyone... As far as CP goes.If you went to school for 10 years and worked your ass off building a good reputation. Then some relative you probably don’t even know well ,used your good name to intimidate someone else. I will add that your respected name is being used right next to illegal criminal activity .You are sure as shit right I would want to know. I would be even more upset if someone did not tell me… My guess is you would not say anything because you are selfish and it did not affect you personally. Had it affected you, I am sure your tune would change. dude, some fucks arsoned my truck this summer, poured gas on it and torched the thing; i didn't call the cops. you're posts are so full of (snap)judgements....what's up with your "brothers and sisters" dribble? is there an room in your mind or world for different opinions? cut CP some slack, he's kept us enertained for 5 days at least. by the way, caves are out, slab IS the new black.
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 13, 2009, 1:06 AM
Post #56 of 56
(1154 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
We are all brothers and sisters, one big ,crazy, dysfunctional family. I have had over two dozen dysfunctional climbers like myself share my home here in the hills this year. Some were friends I know, some who emailed me online, and some I met at the crag who were camping in the rain... i see, you know me so well.... You are so right , such dribble… A few years ago someone shot up your truck. Now someone torched it. I don’t believe you would let someone walk all over you like that without doing anything. Not with the attitude you are presenting yourself with here….I don’t believe you , no can be that negligent … not even you… I wonder if you paid the replacement cost out of pocket for the damaged windows, or did you file a police report so you can send a claim to your insurance company? You do understand you need to file a police report to be able to send a claim into the insurance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|