Forums: Climbing Information: Gear Heads:
Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Gear Heads

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All


chadnsc


Feb 16, 2011, 8:17 PM
Post #26 of 51 (3698 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

Re: [spikeddem] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
sbaclimber wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
chadnsc wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
I feel like I'm in a dream world where no RC.com'ers remember the exact same problem with the #6 dragon cam by DMM...

Yeah you must be dreaming. I mean the OP and several others referneced the problem with the #6 Dragon cam and how it was similar / identical to the problem with the #5 Dragon. Crazy
I got five stars.
Fleeting was your fortune. Laugh
I've got even more now! Five stars + a couple 1 or 2 star ratings = more than five now! Right??

Nope. It means you suck at math.


sbaclimber


Feb 16, 2011, 8:21 PM
Post #27 of 51 (3693 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118

Re: [spikeddem] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
sbaclimber wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
chadnsc wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
I feel like I'm in a dream world where no RC.com'ers remember the exact same problem with the #6 dragon cam by DMM...

Yeah you must be dreaming. I mean the OP and several others referneced the problem with the #6 Dragon cam and how it was similar / identical to the problem with the #5 Dragon. Crazy
I got five stars.
Fleeting was your fortune. Laugh
I've got even more now! Five stars + a couple 1 or 2 star ratings = more than five now! Right??
Technically, yes.

Edit: d'oh, I'm an idiot...and can't read. It even says, "average"...
Sorry, Chad's right, you(we) suck at math.

Now, watch carefully.......


(This post was edited by sbaclimber on Feb 16, 2011, 8:24 PM)


spikeddem


Feb 16, 2011, 8:24 PM
Post #28 of 51 (3687 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [sbaclimber] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

sbaclimber wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
sbaclimber wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
chadnsc wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
I feel like I'm in a dream world where no RC.com'ers remember the exact same problem with the #6 dragon cam by DMM...

Yeah you must be dreaming. I mean the OP and several others referneced the problem with the #6 Dragon cam and how it was similar / identical to the problem with the #5 Dragon. Crazy
I got five stars.
Fleeting was your fortune. Laugh
I've got even more now! Five stars + a couple 1 or 2 star ratings = more than five now! Right??
Technically, yes.

Watch carefully.......
Technically really just means "duh."

duhhhhhhhh


sbaclimber


Feb 16, 2011, 8:26 PM
Post #29 of 51 (3682 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118

Re: [spikeddem] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
sbaclimber wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
sbaclimber wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
chadnsc wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
I feel like I'm in a dream world where no RC.com'ers remember the exact same problem with the #6 dragon cam by DMM...

Yeah you must be dreaming. I mean the OP and several others referneced the problem with the #6 Dragon cam and how it was similar / identical to the problem with the #5 Dragon. Crazy
I got five stars.
Fleeting was your fortune. Laugh
I've got even more now! Five stars + a couple 1 or 2 star ratings = more than five now! Right??
Technically, yes.

Watch carefully.......
Technically really just means "duh."

duhhhhhhhh
*mimicks*, "duhhhhhhhh" [insert drooling smiley here]

But, hey, look, you're back up to 3 stars! (at least this time I bothered counting)


chadnsc


Feb 16, 2011, 8:30 PM
Post #30 of 51 (3672 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

Re: [sbaclimber] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

And he's back down to two stars. Five votes and two stars. Tongue


majid_sabet


Feb 16, 2011, 8:31 PM
Post #31 of 51 (3670 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390

Re: [erisspirit] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

erisspirit wrote:
chadnsc wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
erisspirit wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
Do I need to get my old ultrasonic aviation aluminum crack checker and start checking everything made in CHINA ?

pay little more, make it in USA or Europe and save so much in recall instead of loosing your reputation.Petzl first now DMM, whats next ?

BD ?

Weren't the Aliens made in USA?

they had their problems too

they had American QA problem not like the modern "Chinese cut the cost /save few penny problem"


Except Dragon Cams are made in Whales, not China so your 'save a few penny problme' doesn't apply here.

Way to overlook the facts midget.

I also actually feel better about this because rather than denying any wrong doing initially, they are immediately putting out the recall. At least they are owning up to mistakes and trying to quickly resolve them.

of course I would prefer no mistakes at all, but as we have seen in the past... It happens ... and not just with DMM

it would very difficult to convenes a climber with mechanical background such as myself that " we just saw a problem" and please send it back for refund.

climbing is already dangerous and what we have left is 7 oz of metal between ourselves and the earth. Better QA, better testing and longer field test should be conducted before dumping tons of climbing gear in the market. One thing MFGs should remember that a lot of these product may end up in other countries where people are not up to date on information nor they are internet addictive like what we got in USA or Europe and informing those climbers will be very difficult. .


sbaclimber


Feb 16, 2011, 8:35 PM
Post #32 of 51 (3663 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118

Re: [chadnsc] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

chadnsc wrote:
And he's back down to two stars. Five votes and two stars. Tongue
Hey, at least I tried....Angelic


spikeddem


Feb 16, 2011, 8:36 PM
Post #33 of 51 (3658 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [sbaclimber] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sbaclimber wrote:
chadnsc wrote:
And he's back down to two stars. Five votes and two stars. Tongue
Hey, at least I tried....Angelic
It just means even MORE than I said before. 5 * 2 = 10.


no_email_entered


Feb 16, 2011, 8:36 PM
Post #34 of 51 (3657 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 1, 2008
Posts: 558

Re: [majid_sabet] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

majid_sabet wrote:
Better QA, better testing and longer field test should be conducted before dumping tons of climbing gear in the market. One thing MFGs should remember that a lot of these product may end up in other countries where people are not up to date on information nor they are internet addictive like what we got in USA or Europe and informing those climbers will be very difficult. .

find any cracks in your duece hammers yet?


chadnsc


Feb 16, 2011, 8:39 PM
Post #35 of 51 (3651 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

Re: [majid_sabet] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

majid_sabet wrote:
it would very difficult to convenes a climber with mechanical background such as myself that " we just saw a problem" and please send it back for refund.

climbing is already dangerous and what we have left is 7 oz of metal between ourselves and the earth. Better QA, better testing and longer field test should be conducted before dumping tons of climbing gear in the market. One thing MFGs should remember that a lot of these product may end up in other countries where people are not up to date on information nor they are internet addictive like what we got in USA or Europe and informing those climbers will be very difficult. .


You were already grossly wrong about DMM having these cams built in China to save money. I have a hard time believing anything you have to say on this subject.


Edit: Cheezed a quote.


(This post was edited by chadnsc on Feb 16, 2011, 8:40 PM)


chadnsc


Feb 16, 2011, 8:42 PM
Post #36 of 51 (3644 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

Re: [spikeddem] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
sbaclimber wrote:
chadnsc wrote:
And he's back down to two stars. Five votes and two stars. Tongue
Hey, at least I tried....Angelic
It just means even MORE than I said before. 5 * 2 = 10.

Nope, just means you suck at math even more than before.


sbaclimber


Feb 16, 2011, 8:43 PM
Post #37 of 51 (3642 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118

Re: [majid_sabet] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

majid_sabet wrote:
erisspirit wrote:
chadnsc wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
erisspirit wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
Do I need to get my old ultrasonic aviation aluminum crack checker and start checking everything made in CHINA ?

pay little more, make it in USA or Europe and save so much in recall instead of loosing your reputation.Petzl first now DMM, whats next ?

BD ?

Weren't the Aliens made in USA?

they had their problems too

they had American QA problem not like the modern "Chinese cut the cost /save few penny problem"


Except Dragon Cams are made in Whales, not China so your 'save a few penny problme' doesn't apply here.

Way to overlook the facts midget.

I also actually feel better about this because rather than denying any wrong doing initially, they are immediately putting out the recall. At least they are owning up to mistakes and trying to quickly resolve them.

of course I would prefer no mistakes at all, but as we have seen in the past... It happens ... and not just with DMM

it would very difficult to convenes a climber with mechanical background such as myself that " we just saw a problem" and please send it back for refund.

climbing is already dangerous and what we have left is 7 oz of metal between ourselves and the earth. Better QA, better testing and longer field test should be conducted before dumping tons of climbing gear in the market.
Although I don't dissagree in principal, please tell us what an "acceptable" and realistic level of testing would be!
Both DMM and BD (who does produce in China) use 3 Sigma testing. Please do tell what you would do better...


tower_climber


Feb 17, 2011, 1:38 AM
Post #38 of 51 (3553 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 25, 2010
Posts: 157

Re: [sbaclimber] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

sbaclimber wrote:
Although I don't dissagree in principal, please tell us what an "acceptable" and realistic level of testing would be!
Both DMM and BD (who does produce in China) use 3 Sigma testing. Please do tell what you would do better...

Majid would never have to test any climbing gear he produced, because with his mechanical background he would never have a product with an issue.

Duh.


jbro_135


Feb 17, 2011, 1:41 AM
Post #39 of 51 (3551 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 15, 2009
Posts: 662

Re: [tower_climber] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

tower_climber wrote:
sbaclimber wrote:
Although I don't dissagree in principal, please tell us what an "acceptable" and realistic level of testing would be!
Both DMM and BD (who does produce in China) use 3 Sigma testing. Please do tell what you would do better...

Majid would never have to test any climbing gear he produced, because with his mechanical background he would never have a product with an issue.

Duh.

also majid will never test any climbing gear because he doesn't climb


patto


Feb 17, 2011, 8:13 AM
Post #40 of 51 (3488 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453

Re: [jbro_135] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

At present there is NO evidence that ANY Dragon Cam has failed below the rated strength.

What is evident is that residual stresses between the axle boss and the stem over a long period of time can sometimes cause fracture cracks in the axle boss.


Chrisrow


Feb 17, 2011, 9:19 AM
Post #41 of 51 (3477 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 16

Re: [spikeddem] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hi Guys ,
Yes we do have a full recall for all Dragon size 4,and 5. The size six recall is still current.

At present we have photographic evidence of three size 5 cams with visible cracks, but as yet no examples of size 4 Dragon Cams. In the circumstances we thought it best to recall both sizes, as climbers safety is paramount here.

We have tried to publish the information through as many channels as possible world wide, and welcome any help in relaying this information to those climbers who mIght not have heard.

The recall does not effect the Dragon size 1,2 and 3, as these have a different construction.

The full details are posted on the recall notice on our site and we try to keep people updated as and when appropriate.

In the meantime we thank Mountain Gear for their vigilance, and also our Distributors in the US, Excalibur for the extra work that this will unfortunately heap upon them.

We have already set in place a system to rebuild/replace the units and will do everything in our power to ensure a quick turnaround.

Thankyou for your help and patience.

Best
Chris Rowlands
Brand Manager DMM


USnavy


Feb 17, 2011, 10:00 AM
Post #42 of 51 (3468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667

Re: [majid_sabet] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

majid_sabet wrote:
erisspirit wrote:
chadnsc wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
erisspirit wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
Do I need to get my old ultrasonic aviation aluminum crack checker and start checking everything made in CHINA ?

pay little more, make it in USA or Europe and save so much in recall instead of loosing your reputation.Petzl first now DMM, whats next ?

BD ?

Weren't the Aliens made in USA?

they had their problems too

they had American QA problem not like the modern "Chinese cut the cost /save few penny problem"


Except Dragon Cams are made in Whales, not China so your 'save a few penny problme' doesn't apply here.

Way to overlook the facts midget.

I also actually feel better about this because rather than denying any wrong doing initially, they are immediately putting out the recall. At least they are owning up to mistakes and trying to quickly resolve them.

of course I would prefer no mistakes at all, but as we have seen in the past... It happens ... and not just with DMM

like what we got in USA or Europe .
What do you mean "we"? You are not even a US citizen, have you even ever visited the USA? And your not in Europe either, I think your lost.


Partner j_ung


Feb 17, 2011, 1:02 PM
Post #43 of 51 (3435 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690

Re: [spikeddem] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
chadnsc wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
I feel like I'm in a dream world where no RC.com'ers remember the exact same problem with the #6 dragon cam by DMM...

Yeah you must be dreaming. I mean the OP and several others referneced the problem with the #6 Dragon cam and how it was similar / identical to the problem with the #5 Dragon. Crazy
I got five stars.

You have seven stars now. Spread out over seven ratings, but still.


majid_sabet


Feb 17, 2011, 4:52 PM
Post #44 of 51 (3381 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390

Re: [USnavy] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

USnavy wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
erisspirit wrote:
chadnsc wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
erisspirit wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
Do I need to get my old ultrasonic aviation aluminum crack checker and start checking everything made in CHINA ?

pay little more, make it in USA or Europe and save so much in recall instead of loosing your reputation.Petzl first now DMM, whats next ?

BD ?

Weren't the Aliens made in USA?

they had their problems too

they had American QA problem not like the modern "Chinese cut the cost /save few penny problem"


Except Dragon Cams are made in Whales, not China so your 'save a few penny problme' doesn't apply here.

Way to overlook the facts midget.

I also actually feel better about this because rather than denying any wrong doing initially, they are immediately putting out the recall. At least they are owning up to mistakes and trying to quickly resolve them.

of course I would prefer no mistakes at all, but as we have seen in the past... It happens ... and not just with DMM

like what we got in USA or Europe .
What do you mean "we"? You are not even a US citizen, have you even ever visited the USA? And your not in Europe either, I think your lost.

No , But I know US history pretty well


erisspirit


Feb 17, 2011, 5:12 PM
Post #45 of 51 (3369 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 3770

Re: [Chrisrow] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Chrisrow wrote:
Hi Guys ,
Yes we do have a full recall for all Dragon size 4,and 5. The size six recall is still current.

At present we have photographic evidence of three size 5 cams with visible cracks, but as yet no examples of size 4 Dragon Cams. In the circumstances we thought it best to recall both sizes, as climbers safety is paramount here.

We have tried to publish the information through as many channels as possible world wide, and welcome any help in relaying this information to those climbers who mIght not have heard.

The recall does not effect the Dragon size 1,2 and 3, as these have a different construction.

The full details are posted on the recall notice on our site and we try to keep people updated as and when appropriate.

In the meantime we thank Mountain Gear for their vigilance, and also our Distributors in the US, Excalibur for the extra work that this will unfortunately heap upon them.

We have already set in place a system to rebuild/replace the units and will do everything in our power to ensure a quick turnaround.

Thankyou for your help and patience.

Best
Chris Rowlands
Brand Manager DMM

Thanks for the quick actions.

WOO! I have sizes 1-3! I'm good Tongue


chadnsc


Feb 17, 2011, 5:52 PM
Post #46 of 51 (3356 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

Re: [majid_sabet] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

majid_sabet wrote:
USnavy wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
erisspirit wrote:
chadnsc wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
erisspirit wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
Do I need to get my old ultrasonic aviation aluminum crack checker and start checking everything made in CHINA ?

pay little more, make it in USA or Europe and save so much in recall instead of loosing your reputation.Petzl first now DMM, whats next ?

BD ?

Weren't the Aliens made in USA?

they had their problems too

they had American QA problem not like the modern "Chinese cut the cost /save few penny problem"


Except Dragon Cams are made in Whales, not China so your 'save a few penny problme' doesn't apply here.

Way to overlook the facts midget.

I also actually feel better about this because rather than denying any wrong doing initially, they are immediately putting out the recall. At least they are owning up to mistakes and trying to quickly resolve them.

of course I would prefer no mistakes at all, but as we have seen in the past... It happens ... and not just with DMM

like what we got in USA or Europe .
What do you mean "we"? You are not even a US citizen, have you even ever visited the USA? And your not in Europe either, I think your lost.

No , But I know US history pretty well


You mean like how well you 'know' where the Dragon cams are made? Like how well you 'know' that the testing done on the Dragon cams wasn't sufficient? Like how well you 'know' what caused the issues with the Dragon cams?

Sure midget, sure.


sbaclimber


Feb 17, 2011, 9:25 PM
Post #47 of 51 (3311 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118

Re: [chadnsc] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

chadnsc wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
USnavy wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
erisspirit wrote:
chadnsc wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
erisspirit wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
Do I need to get my old ultrasonic aviation aluminum crack checker and start checking everything made in CHINA ?

pay little more, make it in USA or Europe and save so much in recall instead of loosing your reputation.Petzl first now DMM, whats next ?

BD ?

Weren't the Aliens made in USA?

they had their problems too

they had American QA problem not like the modern "Chinese cut the cost /save few penny problem"


Except Dragon Cams are made in Whales, not China so your 'save a few penny problme' doesn't apply here.

Way to overlook the facts midget.

I also actually feel better about this because rather than denying any wrong doing initially, they are immediately putting out the recall. At least they are owning up to mistakes and trying to quickly resolve them.

of course I would prefer no mistakes at all, but as we have seen in the past... It happens ... and not just with DMM

like what we got in USA or Europe .
What do you mean "we"? You are not even a US citizen, have you even ever visited the USA? And your not in Europe either, I think your lost.

No , But I know US history pretty well


You mean like how well you 'know' where the Dragon cams are made? Like how well you 'know' that the testing done on the Dragon cams wasn't sufficient? Like how well you 'know' what caused the issues with the Dragon cams?

Sure midget, sure.
Hey, you shouldn't be so hard on Majid. He is just trying to fit in around here... Tongue


chadnsc


Feb 17, 2011, 9:27 PM
Post #48 of 51 (3306 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

Re: [sbaclimber] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

He's been tryin' for a few years now. Wink


sbaclimber


Feb 17, 2011, 9:33 PM
Post #49 of 51 (3301 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118

Re: [chadnsc] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

chadnsc wrote:
He's been tryin' for a few years now. Wink
Yeah, but he's starting to get the hang of it.
Instead of drawings of red and green arrows (I actually miss those Blush), he is now posting suggested information that is either based on ignorance and/or refusal to use Google to check facts before posting, laziness, or an attempt at trolling.
All he needs now is to throw in some gross exaggeration (see thread about traps), and he will fit right in.

@Majid, please never leave! You have recognised your role here and accepted it, and I tip my hat to you for it.


erisspirit


Feb 17, 2011, 9:39 PM
Post #50 of 51 (3297 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 3770

Re: [sbaclimber] Dragon Cam #5 potential probelm [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

sbaclimber wrote:
chadnsc wrote:
He's been tryin' for a few years now. Wink
Yeah, but he's starting to get the hang of it.
Instead of drawings of red and green arrows (I actually miss those Blush), he is now posting suggested information that is either based on ignorance and/or refusal to use Google to check facts before posting, laziness, or an attempt at trolling.
All he needs now is to throw in some gross exaggeration (see thread about traps), and he will fit right in.

@Majid, please never leave! You have recognised your role here and accepted it, and I tip my hat to you for it.

don't forget to add in a couple gud sotries that make you an expert "I had a friend that had a cousin whose neighbor did the same thing.... "

First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : Gear Heads

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook