|
climber49er
Jun 21, 2003, 2:53 AM
Post #1 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 8, 2003
Posts: 1404
|
or was it V4+?
I'm not sure, can someone tell me when I will be able to call myself a V2 climber for sure?
|
|
|
|
|
flying_dutchman
Jun 21, 2003, 2:58 AM
Post #2 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 708
|
redpont? pretty sad if you have to use a rope on a problem unless its some insane highball.
|
|
|
|
|
qacwac
Jun 21, 2003, 3:00 AM
Post #3 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 25, 2002
Posts: 292
|
For those that don't know what flying dutchman means, redpoint only applies to route climbing. In bouldering you just send it if it's not first try. Congrats anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
climber49er
Jun 21, 2003, 3:03 AM
Post #4 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 8, 2003
Posts: 1404
|
In reply to: redpont? pretty sad if you have to use a rope on a problem unless its some insane highball.
No it's not very high, about 8-9 feet, but the landing is this wierd moss that can give you a wicked ankle twist. I just use the rope as a top rope for safety. I hardly even weight the rope at all so I think it stil coints as a redpoint doesn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
curt
Jun 21, 2003, 3:08 AM
Post #5 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275
|
In reply to: In reply to: redpont? pretty sad if you have to use a rope on a problem unless its some insane highball. No it's not very high, about 8-9 feet, but the landing is this wierd moss that can give you a wicked ankle twist. I just use the rope as a top rope for safety. I hardly even weight the rope at all so I think it stil coints as a redpoint doesn't it?
Hmmm......Well, if you TR-ed it, you must have placed the gear ahead of time. So, at best this is a "pinkpoint" ascent. However, gauging from the likely intent of your initial post, this is more likely what Sherman would call a "brown ring" ascent.
Curt
|
|
|
|
|
climber49er
Jun 21, 2003, 5:14 AM
Post #6 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 8, 2003
Posts: 1404
|
Brown Ring? I haven't heard of that one. Sherman? Who's that?
Wait. I think I just called a bad name by Curt.
|
|
|
|
|
curt
Jun 21, 2003, 5:24 AM
Post #7 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275
|
In reply to: Brown Ring? I haven't heard of that one. Sherman? Who's that? Wait. I think I just called a bad name by Curt.
"Brown ring" being a derogatory term for a less than stellar style of ascent--coined by John Sherman. But, it was a joke, OK?
Curt
|
|
|
|
|
oklahoma
Jun 21, 2003, 5:49 AM
Post #8 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 13, 2003
Posts: 194
|
man what's up with everyone lately...people seem to be a little testy
|
|
|
|
|
neeshman
Jun 21, 2003, 6:04 AM
Post #9 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2002
Posts: 261
|
Ok, I am confused, was it a boulder prob or a route, what is a rope gonna do if the whole segement is only 8-9 feet? Did you have a belayer? Were you wearing a harness, what kin of anchor did you make? A boulder prob or route, it can only be ONE! declares the climbing community... or maybe... perhaps... could it be? :shock: Has Climber49er created a new style of climbing?!?! Hmmm.... tough to say..... only time will tell!!! Rock on Babylon
|
|
|
|
|
calpolyclimber
Jun 21, 2003, 6:34 AM
Post #10 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 26, 2002
Posts: 360
|
Schveet.........
|
|
|
|
|
climber49er
Jun 21, 2003, 7:18 AM
Post #11 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 8, 2003
Posts: 1404
|
neeshmaniac,
It was a boulder prob, V2. I don't like hurting myself, especially my head (thats why I wear a saucepan) so I used a toprope. It was definitely a redpoint ascent. I don't understand why you all are so confused.
I anchored the rope on another boulder, threw it over the top and then used a silent partner to self-belay so I wouldn't hurt myself. Understand now?
|
|
|
|
|
fieldmouse
Jun 21, 2003, 7:40 AM
Post #12 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 25, 2002
Posts: 404
|
now thats funny.
|
|
|
|
|
fieldmouse
Jun 21, 2003, 7:45 AM
Post #13 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 25, 2002
Posts: 404
|
you should also try this new technique that I have been working out--Glue a bunch of C4 to your beanie. using this method I am now able to flash any v4+/v5-/+ in any weather and often many times in a row.
|
|
|
|
|
climber49er
Jun 21, 2003, 7:52 AM
Post #14 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 8, 2003
Posts: 1404
|
Well, next I will try hockey pads cause it seems easier than tying in all the time for such a short boulder route.
I always use my C4 gloves, they are sick!
|
|
|
|
|
badphish
Jun 22, 2003, 12:28 AM
Post #15 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 2, 2003
Posts: 207
|
you used a rope, right? that would mean you weren't
bouldering, right? and besides redpointing doesn't apply
to bouldering, not that it matters!
|
|
|
|
|
michell_e
Jun 22, 2003, 1:38 AM
Post #16 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 22, 2002
Posts: 49
|
this is funny - all those people who actually believe this and are insulting the style are saying a lot more about themselves than about 49er... just goes to show you what kind of mental capacity we have when we sit in front of these monitors for too long - your brains are being fried... quick! GO OUTSIDE!!!
|
|
|
|
|
qacwac
Jun 22, 2003, 2:13 AM
Post #17 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 25, 2002
Posts: 292
|
Not trying to be smart, but here is how I understand it
redpoint - clean climb with no falls on lead
pinkpoint - clean climb with no falls on toprope or pre clipped biners (unless the FA'er did it this way then it would still be a redpoint)
You said you weighted the rope, though hardly, but I still don't think it counts as a send.
I think that's the accepted standards but if you don't care about the standards then don't worry about it. However, if you're going to use a technical term such as 'redpoint' then I think it should be used as the climbing community recognizes it.
|
|
|
|
|
fieldmouse
Jun 22, 2003, 3:50 AM
Post #18 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 25, 2002
Posts: 404
|
wow, youve really got em going, 49er. very respectable, that.
|
|
|
|
|
lox
Jun 22, 2003, 4:09 AM
Post #19 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 2, 2002
Posts: 2307
|
Thanks y'all!
This thread has really cleared up a lot for me...
:)
|
|
|
|
|
climber49er
Jun 22, 2003, 5:01 AM
Post #20 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 8, 2003
Posts: 1404
|
Yeah Baby! :twisted: :twisted: :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
coldclimb
Jun 22, 2003, 5:13 AM
Post #21 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 14, 2002
Posts: 6909
|
I think I'll remove my virtual shoes, cause I'm obviously in the presence of a master troller! :shock: :shock:
Very nice! :wink:
|
|
|
|
|
fieldmouse
Jun 22, 2003, 5:33 AM
Post #22 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 25, 2002
Posts: 404
|
yeah, thats some of the best Ive ever seen. I bet a six pack that even after the last 3 or so posts, another poor sap will bite.
|
|
|
|
|
climber49er
Jun 22, 2003, 6:37 AM
Post #23 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 8, 2003
Posts: 1404
|
Awww shucks guys! I had no idea that I had presented such a masterpiece! :oops:
|
|
|
|
|
thurgood
Jul 8, 2003, 2:47 AM
Post #24 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 8, 2003
Posts: 77
|
i thought a pink point was when you used pre set tick marks, and a red point was done placing the ticks as you climb. is this not accurate, im pretty sure ive seen this posted elseshere
|
|
|
|
|
climbsomething
Jul 8, 2003, 2:56 AM
Post #25 of 90
(15425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588
|
Technical marks: 9.0/10. While the subject has been done before (in far lesser hands, BTW), consistency of tone is good.
Style marks: 9.4/10, with distinction for subtelty, so to speak, in tone.
It is true that trolling here on Are-See-Dawt-Cahm is often "like shooting fish in a barrel" (well, more like putting a cluster bomb in a guppy tank), but this thread is spectakaler. I approve.
And my opinion and approval mean the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
