Forums: Climbing Disciplines: Bouldering:
The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us!
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Bouldering

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next page Last page  View All


shurafa


Sep 28, 2007, 11:55 PM
Post #51 of 241 (24374 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 21, 2005
Posts: 58

Re: [sdkbcassidy] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sdkbcassidy wrote:
8flood8 wrote:
if its too hard then use some of the other holds with different colored tape on it, until you can make the move that is spitting you off.

cmon now... don't tell me you are getting shut down by a little piece of tape...

The bouldering police get you for that. You also cannot, under any circumstances, do a single move on a route graded 5.X without being tied into a rope - not even if you just do the moves up to the bouldering height limit. It just isn't done.

That is a GREAT idea? You think most gyms will be cool with that? Just drag a crash pad over i guess. Ill give it a try.

We have gotten a lot of really great ideas so far thank you!


dta95b7r


Sep 29, 2007, 1:13 AM
Post #52 of 241 (24366 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2007
Posts: 74

Re: [8flood8] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Bouldering is meant to be hard nasty agro stuff workers at any gym should tell new people what different parts of the gym are all about "stick to the green tape" and its all good


jt512


Sep 29, 2007, 3:05 AM
Post #53 of 241 (24344 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [dta95b7r] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

dta95b7r wrote:
Bouldering is meant to be hard nasty agro stuff workers at any gym should tell new people what different parts of the gym are all about "stick to the green tape" and its all good

No periods between sentences? Into the killfile you go.

*plonk*


hiyapokey


Oct 1, 2007, 11:12 PM
Post #54 of 241 (24279 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 6, 2006
Posts: 315

Re: [shurafa] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

I get to be the first to agree with the OP on this. I started out bouldering because I'm too shy to find a belay partner. After two years of climbing I find V0- is tough and have only done a couple clean. It sucks to go up to a VB and not be able to get started. I have always had to work hard to get little in athletics. So I guess by everyone's answers I should just sit on the couch and get fat like I was doing two years ago. Some folks probably will flame me for agreeing with the OP, but who cares. I have learned to really enjoy bouldering and am glad that some gyms had the sense enough to set some easier routes. I see a direct corrolation of how much business a gym does to the diversity of their routes.

My gym sets V0s very close to how they set their 5.10s on top ropes. They use the 5.7-5.9 nominclature to show the easier routes. They just switched to this and I think its great. I like the idea of X5-X9 better because it makes the statement that this is a bouldering route and will probably take some kind of specialist skill to complete the problem be it power, balance, toe jams, drop knees etc. For all of you that can't handle change. You should read "Who Moved My Cheese".

For those who say just climb rainbow. I know from experience that climbing rainbow doesn't work most of the time. Its fun to complete a climb as marked from a real sit start. I'm glad the gym I started at had auto belays and bouldering comp routes less than 50 or I wouldn't have come back. To those of you that say you don't want me because I'm not a good climber, there are other things about me that make me valuable to the community.

When a community integrates diversity it succeeds. The gym is where begginers go to learn this great sport. There's nothing wrong with having good feelings about an accomplishment while at the same time keeping it real. V0 should look like the crux on a modern 5.10 route. Make some routes harder and rate them V1-14. Make some routes easier and rate them X1-9.

There's my rant I feel better now.


rx_7addict


Oct 2, 2007, 5:46 AM
Post #55 of 241 (24255 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 12, 2005
Posts: 64

Re: [hiyapokey] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Everyone needs to read John Shermans book. And then realize that gyms are completely different than climbing outside. Everyone has a different opinion as to how the "community" should be. Every gym is full of different attitudes toward what is acceptable inflation or deflation of consistent grades for the area that the gym is located. I have spent many hours in many gyms around the country and they all offer something different. I know that for myself V0 can be a very wide range of difficulties. You can't compare sport climbing grades with bouldering grades. They really don't relate. I've been on 5.8's that I guarantee you had no move harder than a V0 on it but gave me a run for my money based on its explotation of my climbing weakness (crack climbing). Most gyms are dead vertical or overhung thus increasing the difficulty for any new climber. What shurafa is asking cant happen. Most bouldering areas CAN'T make the climbs any easier. If you can't climb a gently overhanging ladder you shouldn't be in the climbing gym bouldering in the first place. Most gyms I've been in have bouldering problems in the V0 and VB range that are horribly easier than climbing a ladder. Climbing isn't good for people who don't have some type of athletic ability. You can't expect (or ask) the climbing community to ever be consistent. Its never going to happen. Climbing is very very elitist and it always will be. Especially in gyms. I think gyms are far less consistent that grades outdoors.


freezorburn


Oct 2, 2007, 4:09 PM
Post #56 of 241 (24234 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 19, 2005
Posts: 228

Re: [jt512] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post



jt512---> I'd add you to Killfile but you invented the damn thing, and if I add you I'll never hear about any updates....


LaddRaine


Oct 2, 2007, 4:34 PM
Post #57 of 241 (24219 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 19, 2007
Posts: 11

Re: [shurafa] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Just rate boulder probelms by their roped grade.

eg if a problem is less than V0 just rate it as a 5.5 (duh)


hiyapokey


Oct 2, 2007, 5:45 PM
Post #58 of 241 (24194 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 6, 2006
Posts: 315

Re: [rx_7addict] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I appreciate you pointing out what I can't do. When I first became interested in climbing someone close to me said that I couldn't do it. I went to City Beach gym in Fremont CA and everyone there was inclusive and friendly.

I couldn't climb the easiest auto-belay there which was like 5.3. After working on it for a while I could climb that. After that I worked my way up to being able to do the rest of the auto-belays there. Then I started working on the 5.6s in that gym. All along I've had a great time and met cool people in the gym. My fitness level is much better now than 2 years ago. Now I am pretty solid on 5.8 and have given a couple of 5.9s a run for their money. I've taken my beginning climbing course with the Arizona Mountaineering Club and will take the Anchors class in November. I go to Phoenix Rock Gym and mostly boulder because its so much fun. PRG has climbs that most anyone can do if they work at it. Even if they aren't athletic.

Climbing used to be elitist. Now that there are gyms, people can work their way up from couch potato to Yosemite hard man. Its the Amercan way.

I'm not saying this to justify my place in the community. I just want someone like me out there to know that if I can do it, you can too.

Your right about the consistency of gyms and the ones that are elitist don't do any business. There's a hell of a lot more of me at gyms than there are elite climbers. The more consistent and diverse a gym is the more money they will make. What would it hurt to have a couple of X8 routes in the bouldering area anyway?


robbovius


Oct 2, 2007, 5:47 PM
Post #59 of 241 (24193 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: [LaddRaine] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

thsi entire thread is about an imagined grading problem indoors? OP, why are you introducing people to climbing indoors? Do you live in Flatlandia?


(This post was edited by robbovius on Oct 2, 2007, 5:50 PM)


Partner cracklover


Oct 2, 2007, 6:16 PM
Post #60 of 241 (24180 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [rx_7addict] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rx_7addict wrote:
Everyone needs to read John Shermans book. And then realize that gyms are completely different than climbing outside.

I've read (and met) Sherman. Cool guy. And yes they are. I don't see how that has much to do with the OP's concern, though.

In reply to:
Everyone has a different opinion as to how the "community" should be. Every gym is full of different attitudes toward what is acceptable inflation or deflation of consistent grades for the area that the gym is located. I have spent many hours in many gyms around the country and they all offer something different.

Okay, so far, so good!

In reply to:
I know that for myself V0 can be a very wide range of difficulties. You can't compare sport climbing grades with bouldering grades. They really don't relate. I've been on 5.8's that I guarantee you had no move harder than a V0 on it but gave me a run for my money based on its explotation of my climbing weakness (crack climbing).

Huh? Just because you such at crack climbing doesn't mean V0 isn't somewhat equivalent to 5.10. Your point makes no sense. Bouldering grades have nothing to do with it. I hope you realize that bouldering does not mean face climbing. There are tons of boulder problems on crack!

In reply to:
Most gyms are dead vertical or overhung thus increasing the difficulty for any new climber. What shurafa is asking cant happen. Most bouldering areas CAN'T make the climbs any easier. If you can't climb a gently overhanging ladder you shouldn't be in the climbing gym bouldering in the first place. Most gyms I've been in have bouldering problems in the V0 and VB range that are horribly easier than climbing a ladder.

I'd agree with this. Emphasis on the word *most*. Many gyms cater to the birthday crowd. They have lots of easy routes. If this is what you want, then you should either seek out a gym that has it, or ask your gym owner/manager if they will do so. As the poster above intimates, for some gyms, based on the structures they built, it may not be possible. For other gyms, it's just not in their core business plan. Like it or not, gym climbing is a pretty wide umbrella, and every gym will not be able to satisfy every part of the gym-climbing community.

In reply to:
Climbing isn't good for people who don't have some type of athletic ability. You can't expect (or ask) the climbing community to ever be consistent. Its never going to happen. Climbing is very very elitist and it always will be. Especially in gyms. I think gyms are far less consistent that grades outdoors.

I do agree that gym grades vary wildly (although gyms that hold comps probably have a narrower range?). But as for elitism? I dunno definitely somewhat, but compared to what? When I was starting out, I found an enormous willingness in the community to help me out. Yes, I had to put in a lot of effort myself. But in how many sports where you hold another person's life in your hands is it a standard practice for folks to be able to just walk up to someone and ask if they'd be up for "trading a belay"?

If you are an elitist, go ahead and claim it for yourself, but don't paint all climbers with that brush.

GO
(edited to fix quotes)


(This post was edited by cracklover on Oct 2, 2007, 6:18 PM)


gqsmooth


Oct 2, 2007, 6:36 PM
Post #61 of 241 (24171 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 10, 2005
Posts: 572

Re: [cracklover] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
As the poster above intimates, for some gyms, based on the structures they built, it may not be possible.

? Huh? I'm only an elitist when picking out the correct word s for my posts. Got panties on the brain crack? That's cool. Though I still am not sure whether you were for or against the OP and whether or not you agree or not with rx_7. I still think this is a waste and it amuses me that this thing has gotten 60+ responses.


Partner angry


Oct 2, 2007, 6:42 PM
Post #62 of 241 (24166 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405

Re: [gqsmooth] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Just reading this thread, I'm kinda wishing the OP never got off the ground his first time.

That's how I see it.


gqsmooth


Oct 2, 2007, 6:44 PM
Post #63 of 241 (24165 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 10, 2005
Posts: 572

Re: [angry] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

He HAD to get off the ground. That way he could tell all of his friends, "Nope, better give up. This gravity thing I can handle, I think it might be to difficult for you to overcome."


Partner cracklover


Oct 2, 2007, 7:37 PM
Post #64 of 241 (24144 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [gqsmooth] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gqsmooth wrote:
cracklover wrote:
As the poster above intimates, for some gyms, based on the structures they built, it may not be possible.

? Huh? I'm only an elitist when picking out the correct word s for my posts. Got panties on the brain crack? That's cool.

Don't know what a word means? Look it up. Intimate, when used as a verb has a completely different meaning (different prononciation, too). And while you're at it, look up troglodyte.

In reply to:
Though I still am not sure whether you were for or against the OP and whether or not you agree or not with rx_7. I still think this is a waste and it amuses me that this thing has gotten 60+ responses.

Glad you're amused. That makes two of us. Oh, and I'm neither "for" nor "against" the OP. I think his mission is misguided, but that's okay. As for rx, well I think my post states pretty clearly what I think. If you don't get it, try looking up some more of the words.

GO


rx_7addict


Oct 3, 2007, 1:34 AM
Post #65 of 241 (24110 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 12, 2005
Posts: 64

Re: [cracklover] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

We are on the same side of the fence (whatever that means) I just didn't express what i meant to say correctly.

Elitist isn't bad and it doesn't mean that you disown or ignore the rest of the community. "My view" of an elitist climber in a gym has more to do with his or her view of climbing itself (the outdoor kind). The elitist's in my mind (which is definitly not the view of everyone) see the gym as a means to an end.

Climbing rocks!!!!!!!


yanqui


Oct 3, 2007, 3:58 PM
Post #66 of 241 (24067 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 24, 2004
Posts: 1559

Re: [shurafa] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

This thread is funny and strangely reminiscent of "Question 52":

"Deinde quaeritur de loco Angeli. Et circa hoc quaeruntur tria. Primo, utrum Angelus sit in loco. Secundo, utrum possit esse in pluribus locis simul. Tertio, utrum plures Angeli possint esse in eodem loco."


(This post was edited by yanqui on Oct 3, 2007, 4:07 PM)


matterunomama


Oct 3, 2007, 10:49 PM
Post #67 of 241 (24022 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2005
Posts: 419

Re: [yanqui] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

yanqui wrote:
This thread is funny and strangely reminiscent of "Question 52":

"Deinde quaeritur de loco Angeli. Et circa hoc quaeruntur tria. Primo, utrum Angelus sit in loco. Secundo, utrum possit esse in pluribus locis simul. Tertio, utrum plures Angeli possint esse in eodem loco."

Can you translate please? I only got the First...second..third.


sidepull


Oct 3, 2007, 11:39 PM
Post #68 of 241 (24010 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2001
Posts: 2335

Re: [hiyapokey] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hiyapokey wrote:
I get to be the first to agree with the OP on this. I started out bouldering because I'm too shy to find a belay partner. After two years of climbing I find V0- is tough and have only done a couple clean. It sucks to go up to a VB and not be able to get started. I have always had to work hard to get little in athletics. So I guess by everyone's answers I should just sit on the couch and get fat like I was doing two years ago. Some folks probably will flame me for agreeing with the OP, but who cares. I have learned to really enjoy bouldering and am glad that some gyms had the sense enough to set some easier routes. I see a direct corrolation of how much business a gym does to the diversity of their routes.

My gym sets V0s very close to how they set their 5.10s on top ropes. They use the 5.7-5.9 nominclature to show the easier routes. They just switched to this and I think its great. I like the idea of X5-X9 better because it makes the statement that this is a bouldering route and will probably take some kind of specialist skill to complete the problem be it power, balance, toe jams, drop knees etc. For all of you that can't handle change. You should read "Who Moved My Cheese".

For those who say just climb rainbow. I know from experience that climbing rainbow doesn't work most of the time. Its fun to complete a climb as marked from a real sit start. I'm glad the gym I started at had auto belays and bouldering comp routes less than 50 or I wouldn't have come back. To those of you that say you don't want me because I'm not a good climber, there are other things about me that make me valuable to the community.

When a community integrates diversity it succeeds. The gym is where begginers go to learn this great sport. There's nothing wrong with having good feelings about an accomplishment while at the same time keeping it real. V0 should look like the crux on a modern 5.10 route. Make some routes harder and rate them V1-14. Make some routes easier and rate them X1-9.

There's my rant I feel better now.

I think most people here are happy you're trying out climbing - climbers introduce others to climbing because I think humans enjoy watching each other succeed. However, just because you enjoy climbing doesn't mean the sport should change. In most sports the elite set the standard. In some ways this argument is similar to someone arguing that basketball rims should all be lowered, football fields should be shortened, soccer goals should be widened, etc. Sports are fun because of the challenge - you "intimate" as much in your posts. So why lessen the challenge? Why waste time creating an additional grading scale simply to satisfy a psychological desire to accomplish something without the stigma of "VB" or a minus sign? Isn't the new system as equally degrading (e.g. "yeah, look at that noob flailing on those X5 problems")?

There is some serious doublethink going on here.


hiyapokey


Oct 4, 2007, 10:57 PM
Post #69 of 241 (23944 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 6, 2006
Posts: 315

Re: [sidepull] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

What I'm saying is there should be a place for everyone in the sport. I realize that the elite group usually lead the way in a sport. The problem is that it is discouraging to flail away on 10 V0s before you come to one that you have a chance on. Any nOOb could climb an X3 or at least make a valid attempt at it even if he/she was climbing out of a wheel chair. I want to be able to aspire to climbing V10 so V10s should be available too. The problem with the grading system is that they forgot about the unskilled when they made it. If they had X3-9 then V0 would not need to have such a range and thereby as in your soccer analogy the goal post won't be widened as it is now. That's what the OP is saying and this is how it "affects the rest of us". Your V7 gets easier because V0 has to be 5.5 like as well as 5.10 like. So someone says man the V1 is waaay harder than the V0 it must be a V3. Eventually the whole system gets diluted except at the highest grades. As well as scaring away potential climbing advocates.


curt


Oct 5, 2007, 4:53 AM
Post #70 of 241 (23923 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [hiyapokey] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hiyapokey wrote:
What I'm saying is there should be a place for everyone in the sport. I realize that the elite group usually lead the way in a sport. The problem is that it is discouraging to flail away on 10 V0s before you come to one that you have a chance on. Any nOOb could climb an X3 or at least make a valid attempt at it even if he/she was climbing out of a wheel chair. I want to be able to aspire to climbing V10 so V10s should be available too. The problem with the grading system is that they forgot about the unskilled when they made it. If they had X3-9 then V0 would not need to have such a range and thereby as in your soccer analogy the goal post won't be widened as it is now. That's what the OP is saying and this is how it "affects the rest of us". Your V7 gets easier because V0 has to be 5.5 like as well as 5.10 like. So someone says man the V1 is waaay harder than the V0 it must be a V3. Eventually the whole system gets diluted except at the highest grades. As well as scaring away potential climbing advocates.

I agree that there should be room for everyone in the sport, but I disagree that "dumbing down" bouldering ratings is a good idea. The "V" system, by the way, already does that, to a certain extent. In the good old days B1 (where the bouldering rating scale began) denoted a boulder problem with moves as hard as the most difficult roped climbs of the day. B2 was something harder than that.

Curt


climbsomething


Oct 5, 2007, 5:18 AM
Post #71 of 241 (23920 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588

Re: [hiyapokey] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hiyapokey wrote:
The problem with the grading system is that they forgot about the unskilled when they made it.
I don't think "they" forgot anything.


yanqui


Oct 5, 2007, 1:38 PM
Post #72 of 241 (23900 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 24, 2004
Posts: 1559

Re: [matterunomama] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Have you heard the reference to debating about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin? The quote is from The Treatise on Angles by Aquinas where he asks three questions about the characteristics of angels. He then sets about answering those questions. In case you're interested, here's the full treatment in English:

http://www.sacred-texts.com/...nas/summa/sum060.htm


yanqui


Oct 5, 2007, 2:46 PM
Post #73 of 241 (23886 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 24, 2004
Posts: 1559

Re: [hiyapokey] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hiyapokey wrote:
What I'm saying is there should be a place for everyone in the sport. I realize that the elite group usually lead the way in a sport. The problem is that it is discouraging to flail away on 10 V0s before you come to one that you have a chance on. Any nOOb could climb an X3 or at least make a valid attempt at it even if he/she was climbing out of a wheel chair. I want to be able to aspire to climbing V10 so V10s should be available too. The problem with the grading system is that they forgot about the unskilled when they made it. If they had X3-9 then V0 would not need to have such a range and thereby as in your soccer analogy the goal post won't be widened as it is now. That's what the OP is saying and this is how it "affects the rest of us". Your V7 gets easier because V0 has to be 5.5 like as well as 5.10 like. So someone says man the V1 is waaay harder than the V0 it must be a V3. Eventually the whole system gets diluted except at the highest grades. As well as scaring away potential climbing advocates.

I don't want to come across as one of those groovy, grades are absurd and they mostly suck kinda guys, but hey, as far as I'm concerned, especially when it comes to bouldering, grades are fairly absurd and they do pretty much suck. They do have their point, I guess. For example, I find them useful for identifying boulders, since I could care even less about naming boulder problems than grading them. And they give us something to waste time arguing about, when we have nothing better to do (like actually climbing).

But dude, you can tell what's "difficult" or "easy" without a grade. It's the experience that matters. I agree that V-grades pretty much suck. and that the system starts at the wrong place. But I bouldered for years without any grades at all, and had a blast. I just don't see how anything gets fixed by adding more grades to the 16 or 17 V-grades we already have. But anyways, if you wanna add more grades, go ahead. After all, from what I hear, the V-grade system was invented by a a beer sucking vermin for his own purposes, so how could another system be any worse?

So here's my idea (OK, it's kinda of a joke): go with V-negative grades. A little easier than V0? Must be V negative one (write as V-1). This has the advantage of being an open ended system. Boulder problems can approach negative infinity in their "easiness". We can imagine serious discussions in the gym about the nature of noob boulder problems. A heated debate, for example, about whether a given problem is V-16 or V-17. I imagine overhearing someone claim: "that boulder problem is actually easier than my staircase at home, so it can't be V-37". And so on.


sidepull


Oct 5, 2007, 3:47 PM
Post #74 of 241 (23866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2001
Posts: 2335

Re: [sdkbcassidy] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I have no problem with negative grades, but others here are concerned that putting a minus sign is so psychologically traumatic that it ruins the experience. It's that coddled, entitled mentality that has crept (or did it sprint) into this thread that is unsettling. People aren't arguing for easier grades, they're arguing for easier grades with a different system so that they feel good about themselves.

But honestly, how is an X any better than a "-"??? Do you really want to be the person in the gym that masters all of the x problems but can't climb in the v ratings - doesn't that make breaking into V0 even a larger psychological leap?


dingus


Oct 5, 2007, 4:24 PM
Post #75 of 241 (16581 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [sidepull] The V0 Dilema for New Climbers and its Effects on the Rest of Us! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Actually this seems to be more about feelings than grades. Grades seem to serve a chuff puffery effect of enabling folks to feel better about themselves.

I like the old Guild Approach... you are not even worthy of feelings until you've made the grade. Noobs don't get to complain. Complaining noobs were culled lilke ripping a tick from a blood hound's ear.

It worked for a thousand years, till Phil Donahue showed up. Then men started talking about feelings and emotiuons. Yuk!

The Rise of the Metrosexuals.

DMT

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Disciplines : Bouldering

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook