Forums: Climbing Disciplines: Trad Climbing:
Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Trad Climbing

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 Next page Last page  View All


csproul


Aug 12, 2009, 9:02 PM
Post #51 of 98 (4315 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 4, 2004
Posts: 1769

Re: [suprasoup] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

suprasoup wrote:
csproul wrote:
suprasoup wrote:
csproul wrote:
welle wrote:
csproul wrote:
welle wrote:
and I do carry an extra ATC on my harness, because it's so much easier to rig a rappel with these - it's not that heavy anyway... IIRC, munter is not recommended to for multiple rappels...
Unsure

because of the rope kinks - rappels are usually done when you are mentally and physically tired, mostly at the end of a long day, sometimes with a dark/storm approaching. Less things you have to mentally check on - the better, just my preference...[/quote]For that *once every ten year event* when I actually do drop my belay device, I think I can manage to use a munter to get down (or up). This saves me from looking like a gumby the other 1000 climbing days when I haven't dropped my belay device.

BTW There should be +100 points for anyone who shows up at the crag in the middle of the day with their headlamp attached to their helmet "just in case".

Guess you've never dropped your one and only belay device in the middle of of the night during an ice storm with gale force winds threatening to rip you off your perch and having to do multiple rappels off a munter on frozen ropes. Frown I hope you never ever experience that one. At the risk of looking like a gumby or noob I'm taking that extra atc.
Not quite that bad, but the one and only time I have dropped my belay device was rapping off Notch Top (RMNP) in the middle of a snow storm. The ropes were pretty frozen (it was winter), but it wasn't quite dark yet. We made it back to our tent as the sun went down. This was well over ten years ago, and I haven't dropped one again, so I think I'll take my chances without the extra.

Well, if you and I ever go climbing together and you drop yours I've got your backWink
Awesome...maybe I'm due to drop it now that I've opened my mouth?


rtwilli4


Aug 12, 2009, 9:03 PM
Post #52 of 98 (4315 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867

Re: [welle] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

welle wrote:
rtwilli4 wrote:
What if I don't have any sort of guide at all? Is that plus or minus?

minus at least couple of hundred points - pure onsight, no?

yea or I just steal one ;)


boymeetsrock


Aug 12, 2009, 9:10 PM
Post #53 of 98 (4310 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 11, 2005
Posts: 1709

Re: [csproul] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

csproul wrote:
suprasoup wrote:
csproul wrote:
suprasoup wrote:
csproul wrote:
welle wrote:
csproul wrote:
welle wrote:
and I do carry an extra ATC on my harness, because it's so much easier to rig a rappel with these - it's not that heavy anyway... IIRC, munter is not recommended to for multiple rappels...
Unsure

because of the rope kinks - rappels are usually done when you are mentally and physically tired, mostly at the end of a long day, sometimes with a dark/storm approaching. Less things you have to mentally check on - the better, just my preference...[/quote]For that *once every ten year event* when I actually do drop my belay device, I think I can manage to use a munter to get down (or up). This saves me from looking like a gumby the other 1000 climbing days when I haven't dropped my belay device.

BTW There should be +100 points for anyone who shows up at the crag in the middle of the day with their headlamp attached to their helmet "just in case".

Guess you've never dropped your one and only belay device in the middle of of the night during an ice storm with gale force winds threatening to rip you off your perch and having to do multiple rappels off a munter on frozen ropes. Frown I hope you never ever experience that one. At the risk of looking like a gumby or noob I'm taking that extra atc.
Not quite that bad, but the one and only time I have dropped my belay device was rapping off Notch Top (RMNP) in the middle of a snow storm. The ropes were pretty frozen (it was winter), but it wasn't quite dark yet. We made it back to our tent as the sun went down. This was well over ten years ago, and I haven't dropped one again, so I think I'll take my chances without the extra.

Well, if you and I ever go climbing together and you drop yours I've got your backWink
Awesome...maybe I'm due to drop it now that I've opened my mouth?

Cheesetits +200


csproul


Aug 12, 2009, 9:11 PM
Post #54 of 98 (4306 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 4, 2004
Posts: 1769

Re: [boymeetsrock] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Blushguilty


suprasoup


Aug 12, 2009, 9:14 PM
Post #55 of 98 (4302 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 7, 2005
Posts: 309

Re: [boymeetsrock] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I am a noob Frown


boymeetsrock


Aug 12, 2009, 9:19 PM
Post #56 of 98 (4295 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 11, 2005
Posts: 1709

Re: [suprasoup] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

 
Well, I scored a 32. Ask me to belay with caution...


kheegster


Aug 13, 2009, 1:17 AM
Post #57 of 98 (4271 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 14, 2009
Posts: 30

Re: [welle] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
and I do carry an extra ATC on my harness, because it's so much easier to rig a rappel with these - it's not that heavy anyway... IIRC, munter is not recommended to for multiple rappels...

Carabiner brake. Or better still use the dulfersitz. Tongue

I was near the top of the First Flatiron a few weeks ago when a free soloist came up along the North Arete. He wanted to rap off but didn't have a harness and so I offered to improvise a diaper harness with a runner.....


sbaclimber


Aug 13, 2009, 8:03 AM
Post #58 of 98 (4250 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118

Re: [coolcat83] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Definitely below -20 (sometimes I wear my helmet belaying, sometimes I don't...)

The "Climber has more hardware than home depot" score killed mePirate
....discrimination, I say!Mad
.....just because I show up at a sport crag with a full set each of: micro-wires, nuts, C3s, loweballs, cams to #3, and tricams to #3, because I want to lead the one and only crack there "clean".....doesn't make me a n00b.


Just a crack addict, gear whore, wanna-play-with-shiny things, um.......n00b....Tongue


mikeo


Aug 13, 2009, 8:44 PM
Post #59 of 98 (4194 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 27, 2007
Posts: 16

Re: [sbaclimber] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

+150 for wearing a bicycle or hockey helmet.


jamatt


Aug 13, 2009, 8:51 PM
Post #60 of 98 (4185 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2005
Posts: 160

Re: [squishy654] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

high school never ever ever ends, does it....


Allanon124


Aug 14, 2009, 7:22 AM
Post #61 of 98 (4151 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 19, 2009
Posts: 25

Re: [coolcat83] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

not sure eexactly what to say. maybe something along the lines of "when you see a noob, you know" and "when you first started clmbing i bet you wernt a noob".

i have a good friend who has the oldest, moldiest, craped out set of cams. hes been collecting them for 20 years. i lead, he follows. we use my gear.

a couple thoughts though.

ovals are the cheapest, and quite possibly the oldest shape in carabiners.

rap ring r cool. though, i find pleasure in climbing past someones bail biner and getting booty for accomplishing. plus they are allways super shitty and have a good story to tell. sometimes i do wonder how many times this little beat up guy got dumped on the 5th pitch. on the reverse side, ocasionaly leaving a reward for a luckier or better climber keeps everything flowing smoothly.

sometimes you have to take a noob under your wing........so you can eventualy get a belay.

Peace

o ya the helmut thing.

thats personal bro.

just like wearing a condom.

sometimes you do, sometimes you dont.

if things go wrong without one your in BIG trouble.

though squezing into tight cracks with one is tuffer than with out one. shoot i crack myself up.......

God Bless


(This post was edited by Allanon124 on Aug 14, 2009, 7:25 AM)


LostinMaine


Aug 14, 2009, 2:32 PM
Post #62 of 98 (4127 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 8, 2007
Posts: 539

Re: [mikeo] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Or perhaps -100 if they are still carrying a coil of Goldline.
-100 if they have never heard of a link cam
+25 if they believe the Appies were right and everyone should take a belay test.


dingus


Aug 14, 2009, 3:40 PM
Post #63 of 98 (4106 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [LostinMaine] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

LostinMaine wrote:
everyone should take a belay test.

The appies must have become gym owners and insurance salesmen?

DMT


scrapedape


Aug 14, 2009, 6:22 PM
Post #64 of 98 (4082 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 2392

Re: [csproul] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

+10 for each hex on their rack


mar_leclerc


Aug 17, 2009, 4:35 AM
Post #65 of 98 (4028 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 1, 2008
Posts: 156

Re: [caughtinside] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

nothing but shoes and chalk bag -100


jamincan


Aug 17, 2009, 10:40 AM
Post #66 of 98 (4003 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 1, 2007
Posts: 207

Re: [mar_leclerc] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

I'm not sure I'd want someone with only shoes and a chalkbag belaying me.


mar_leclerc


Aug 17, 2009, 2:55 PM
Post #67 of 98 (3984 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 1, 2008
Posts: 156

Re: [jamincan] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jamincan wrote:
I'm not sure I'd want someone with only shoes and a chalkbag belaying me.

Hip belay


jt512


Aug 17, 2009, 3:11 PM
Post #68 of 98 (3977 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [mar_leclerc] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

mar_leclerc wrote:
jamincan wrote:
I'm not sure I'd want someone with only shoes and a chalkbag belaying me.

Hip belay

I think you meant, "Hip belay, n00b."

Jay


mar_leclerc


Aug 17, 2009, 7:24 PM
Post #69 of 98 (3940 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 1, 2008
Posts: 156

Re: [jt512] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
mar_leclerc wrote:
jamincan wrote:
I'm not sure I'd want someone with only shoes and a chalkbag belaying me.

Hip belay

I think you meant, "Hip belay, n00b."

Jay

Perfect, thats exactly what I meant.


Factor2


Aug 17, 2009, 7:44 PM
Post #70 of 98 (3933 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 17, 2008
Posts: 188

Re: [rschap] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rschap wrote:
And if you don’t carry prussic you’re either bad ass and never fail or you’re a pussy and never push your limits.

you do know that there are ways to ascend without prussic cord right? please tell me you know more than just the prussic


evanwish


Aug 18, 2009, 1:40 AM
Post #71 of 98 (3901 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 23, 2007
Posts: 1040

Re: [coolcat83] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I got -258


(This post was edited by evanwish on Aug 18, 2009, 1:54 AM)


Bag11s


Aug 18, 2009, 2:38 AM
Post #72 of 98 (3883 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 8, 2009
Posts: 98

Re: [coolcat83] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

-3 The cheapest 80's biners: Omega Pacific.
-5 Multiple wads of every make of small wires, nuts, and chocks with suspect kinked & frayed wire with tape wraps at the swages.
-10 Original TCUs with faded multicolored girth hitched slings and gritty yet workable action.
+15 Iron worker’s union hardhat. (poser, albeit a clever one)
-25 The pink swami, for sure.


herbertpowell


Aug 18, 2009, 3:14 PM
Post #73 of 98 (3847 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 3, 2009
Posts: 79

Re: [welle] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

welle wrote:
csproul wrote:
BTW There should be +100 points for anyone who shows up at the crag in the middle of the day with their headlamp attached to their helmet "just in case".

LOL, I've seen that early AM in the Gunks with huge expedition style headlamps - cut them a slack as prolly visiting climbers (or nyc show-offs)...

+100 for Arc'Teryx packs to carry gear (tend to be shiny)
-100 for Cold Cold World or Dana Design packs (tend to be dirty)

How many points if said Arcteryx pack is around 15 years old, frayed, and has a tube worth of seam grip on it? I just washed it, so it isn't too dirty anymore.


cchas


Aug 18, 2009, 7:46 PM
Post #74 of 98 (3806 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 9, 2005
Posts: 344

Re: [coolcat83] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

coolcat83 wrote:
Now this situation is a bit contrived because in my experience trad partners are a close bunch and tend not to just pick up and climb with anyone that walks by but in the interest of fairness I bring you this:

You are meeting your regular partner at the local trad crag when he calls and tells you he will be delayed in traffic but to go ahead and get racked up, you think this is unusual but you go ahead anyway and start to get the gear out of your bag and rack up, you planned to climb on his lead rope. As you get set at the base of your target another climber who's partner is also in the same traffic jamb says hello and engages you in some small talk, then offering to follow you on the first pitch of your climb. Before taking a potential pitch onto your gear at the hands of this unknown belayer, or perhaps worse having the n00b cement your gear trying to clean it you need the:

Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version

Risk factor 1: Helmet
No helmet +50
Climber has a helmet at the crag: -25 points
Climber is wearing a helmet belaying: -20 points
Climber wore a helmet on the approach: +15 points (-15 for 4th+ class and/or alpine approaches)
Climber got out of car wearing helmet: +50 points

Risk factor 2: Climbing shoes
Climber's shoes are made from natural leather: -10 points
Shoes are made of synthetic material that need to be removed like the plague at every belay and smell like death: +30 points
Lace up: -10 points
Aggressively down turned toe: +10 points

Risk factor 3: Harness
Any harness having less than 4 gear loops: +5 points
non-full strength haul loop: +5 points
No evidence of chimney grovelling scrapes or dirt/mud stains: +5 points

Risk factor 4: Belay device(s)
Give the climber 10^n points, where n is the number of belay devices on the climber's harness in excess of one. (you should know the munter)
In addition:
Has a grigri hanging from harness: +20 points
Has a device whose brand name is "ATC" followed by something: -5 points
+150 points for ATC sport

Risk factor 5: Rack
Climber has a good selection of pieces somewhat tailored to the area: -20 points
Climber has more hardware than home depot (and it's not for aid): +40 points, -10 points if it's discovered climber is gear addict when discussing the pros and cons of stacking nuts, in opposed horizontal placements, while run out.
Climber has set of 10 sport draws on him: +30 points

Risk factor 6: Unnecessary(?)/necessary equipment
-2 points for each locker that serves an obvious purpose on harness
-10 points for each rap ring on the climber's harness
Prussic cord on harness: -5 points
No tape when asked: +30points (if you hand jamb without tape ignore)
-10 for duct tape nalgene holder
+5 for every sport draw (unless it looks like it's been run over several times, then -5)
+ 20 for matching draws.
+ 10 for matching cams. +100 if they're shiny.
- 10^n for each item with a chouinard logo on it

Risk factor 7: Topo
+20 for crisp recently published guidebook
- 5 for topos on copy paper
- 10 for guide held together with duct tape
- 30 if their guide is older than you are

Risk factor 8: Clothing
10^n where n = the number of items bearing a Prana logo
+ 10 for jeans
- 10 for carhardts. An additional -5 for each hole.
+5 for crocs

100 or more: Run away.
50–99 points: High n00b probability. Climb with at your own risk.
25–49 points: Possibly a n00b or a visiting trad climber.
0–24 points: Probably a top roper or sport climber.
Less than 0: The climber probably knows more about climbing than you do.

My apologies for any offense I may have caused jt512 while stealing composing this post.

Edited for editing

thanks to knieveltech for the additions.

Sorry, I just went YEGO on this one (your eyes glaze over). The post has to havee come from a NOOB in denial. If you get out and around you'll find people who would solo around most of us who are all types

helmet: I know very good climbers who climb with them on (CrackMD and Lisa) and a lot of great climbers who forgo them.

Climbing Shoes: who gives a crap: I've seen a guy walk "Panic in Detroit" (a gear protected 5.12b/c for those noobs who don't know) in an old pair of his GIRLFRIENDS climbing shoes

harness/ rack, new old: with 2 gear loops with 4 with haul loops: who the shit cares. Hell, Henry Barber wears a swaimi so does that make him an ultra noob. when I was in a phase of doing R/x-rated routes, I'd wear a sporto harness since I was only taking 2 or 3 pieces anyways...

as for more gear then home depot..... I guess you forgot about places like Indian Creek. Showing up there with a gunks rack either means a) you have no clue about the place or b) you are Alex Honnold.


can I say this is pretty moronic


(This post was edited by cchas on Aug 18, 2009, 8:03 PM)


coolcat83


Aug 18, 2009, 8:51 PM
Post #75 of 98 (3783 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2007
Posts: 1007

Re: [cchas] Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cchas wrote:
coolcat83 wrote:
Now this situation is a bit contrived because in my experience trad partners are a close bunch and tend not to just pick up and climb with anyone that walks by but in the interest of fairness I bring you this:

You are meeting your regular partner at the local trad crag when he calls and tells you he will be delayed in traffic but to go ahead and get racked up, you think this is unusual but you go ahead anyway and start to get the gear out of your bag and rack up, you planned to climb on his lead rope. As you get set at the base of your target another climber who's partner is also in the same traffic jamb says hello and engages you in some small talk, then offering to follow you on the first pitch of your climb. Before taking a potential pitch onto your gear at the hands of this unknown belayer, or perhaps worse having the n00b cement your gear trying to clean it you need the:

Screening test for n00bs - Trad Version

Risk factor 1: Helmet
No helmet +50
Climber has a helmet at the crag: -25 points
Climber is wearing a helmet belaying: -20 points
Climber wore a helmet on the approach: +15 points (-15 for 4th+ class and/or alpine approaches)
Climber got out of car wearing helmet: +50 points

Risk factor 2: Climbing shoes
Climber's shoes are made from natural leather: -10 points
Shoes are made of synthetic material that need to be removed like the plague at every belay and smell like death: +30 points
Lace up: -10 points
Aggressively down turned toe: +10 points

Risk factor 3: Harness
Any harness having less than 4 gear loops: +5 points
non-full strength haul loop: +5 points
No evidence of chimney grovelling scrapes or dirt/mud stains: +5 points

Risk factor 4: Belay device(s)
Give the climber 10^n points, where n is the number of belay devices on the climber's harness in excess of one. (you should know the munter)
In addition:
Has a grigri hanging from harness: +20 points
Has a device whose brand name is "ATC" followed by something: -5 points
+150 points for ATC sport

Risk factor 5: Rack
Climber has a good selection of pieces somewhat tailored to the area: -20 points
Climber has more hardware than home depot (and it's not for aid): +40 points, -10 points if it's discovered climber is gear addict when discussing the pros and cons of stacking nuts, in opposed horizontal placements, while run out.
Climber has set of 10 sport draws on him: +30 points

Risk factor 6: Unnecessary(?)/necessary equipment
-2 points for each locker that serves an obvious purpose on harness
-10 points for each rap ring on the climber's harness
Prussic cord on harness: -5 points
No tape when asked: +30points (if you hand jamb without tape ignore)
-10 for duct tape nalgene holder
+5 for every sport draw (unless it looks like it's been run over several times, then -5)
+ 20 for matching draws.
+ 10 for matching cams. +100 if they're shiny.
- 10^n for each item with a chouinard logo on it

Risk factor 7: Topo
+20 for crisp recently published guidebook
- 5 for topos on copy paper
- 10 for guide held together with duct tape
- 30 if their guide is older than you are

Risk factor 8: Clothing
10^n where n = the number of items bearing a Prana logo
+ 10 for jeans
- 10 for carhardts. An additional -5 for each hole.
+5 for crocs

100 or more: Run away.
50–99 points: High n00b probability. Climb with at your own risk.
25–49 points: Possibly a n00b or a visiting trad climber.
0–24 points: Probably a top roper or sport climber.
Less than 0: The climber probably knows more about climbing than you do.

My apologies for any offense I may have caused jt512 while stealing composing this post.

Edited for editing

thanks to knieveltech for the additions.

Sorry, I just went YEGO on this one (your eyes glaze over). The post has to havee come from a NOOB in denial. If you get out and around you'll find people who would solo around most of us who are all types

helmet: I know very good climbers who climb with them on (CrackMD and Lisa) and a lot of great climbers who forgo them.

Climbing Shoes: who gives a crap: I've seen a guy walk "Panic in Detroit" (a gear protected 5.12b/c for those noobs who don't know) in an old pair of his GIRLFRIENDS climbing shoes

harness/ rack, new old: with 2 gear loops with 4 with haul loops: who the shit cares. Hell, Henry Barber wears a swaimi so does that make him an ultra noob. when I was in a phase of doing R/x-rated routes, I'd wear a sporto harness since I was only taking 2 or 3 pieces anyways...

as for more gear then home depot..... I guess you forgot about places like Indian Creek. Showing up there with a gunks rack either means a) you have no clue about the place or b) you are Alex Honnold.


can I say this is pretty moronic

A) you are late to the name calling party
B) this post was based off another post which also had generalizations and was not meant seriously.
C) your points were already made, some of them by me.

I probably don't climb as hard as you, but I've been at it for a long time, maybe longer than you. everyone should hope to have some noob in them always because when you think you know it all you get dangerous.

meh, serves me for posting things that I thought were amusing late night.

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Disciplines : Trad Climbing

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook