|
stymingersfink
Sep 10, 2008, 5:52 PM
Post #126 of 237
(3436 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 12, 2003
Posts: 7250
|
rtwilli4 wrote: Do you wear special clothes to climb? I mean the really expensive clothes that make you climb better. not always.
rtwilli4 wrote: So... what do you wear when the weather is good?? Um... gloves and boots?
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Sep 10, 2008, 7:34 PM
Post #127 of 237
(3413 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
This post contains nudity or adult content. To protect the innocent we require that you register and turn off your Adult Content Filter to read it.
|
|
|
|
|
k.l.k
Sep 10, 2008, 8:21 PM
Post #128 of 237
(3393 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 9, 2007
Posts: 1190
|
None of us deserved that.
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 10, 2008, 9:05 PM
Post #129 of 237
(3372 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
chadnsc wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: raingod wrote: Forget gas to get to the crag, or SUVs on the I5, Flights to and from Thailand, London and the States have their own class of environmental impact... three flights a year... i think i offset that by not driving for 9 months out of the year. Three round trip flights from say New York to London vs. not driving for nine months (say 8,720 miles) . . .nope they don't offset each other. No... three flights, as is THREE FLIGHTS... not round trips. I don't really know, but I don't think that driving 2000 miles (I have been in the states since May 15 and put less than 2000 miles on my car) and taking three international flights is worse than driving 13,000 miles (average for an American).
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 10, 2008, 9:10 PM
Post #130 of 237
(3368 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
stymingersfink wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: Do you wear special clothes to climb? I mean the really expensive clothes that make you climb better. not always. rtwilli4 wrote: So... what do you wear when the weather is good?? Um... gloves and boots? That pic is hawt.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 10, 2008, 9:11 PM
Post #131 of 237
(3366 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
rtwilli4 wrote: chadnsc wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: raingod wrote: Forget gas to get to the crag, or SUVs on the I5, Flights to and from Thailand, London and the States have their own class of environmental impact... three flights a year... i think i offset that by not driving for 9 months out of the year. Three round trip flights from say New York to London vs. not driving for nine months (say 8,720 miles) . . .nope they don't offset each other. No... three flights, as is THREE FLIGHTS... not round trips. I don't really know, but I don't think that driving 2000 miles (I have been in the states since May 15 and put less than 2000 miles on my car) and taking three international flights is worse than driving 13,000 miles (average for an American). Sorry, still no.
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Sep 10, 2008, 9:12 PM
Post #132 of 237
(3366 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
I heard in the campground that you got banned...
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Sep 10, 2008, 9:26 PM
Post #133 of 237
(3346 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
sungam wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: chadnsc wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: raingod wrote: Forget gas to get to the crag, or SUVs on the I5, Flights to and from Thailand, London and the States have their own class of environmental impact... three flights a year... i think i offset that by not driving for 9 months out of the year. Three round trip flights from say New York to London vs. not driving for nine months (say 8,720 miles) . . .nope they don't offset each other. No... three flights, as is THREE FLIGHTS... not round trips. I don't really know, but I don't think that driving 2000 miles (I have been in the states since May 15 and put less than 2000 miles on my car) and taking three international flights is worse than driving 13,000 miles (average for an American). Sorry, still no. Yup, what Sug said. Nine month of driving: 8,750 miles (assuming a yearly average of 11,000 miles) Three trips to London from New York: 10,380 miles Driving 8,750 miles = 365 gal. of gas (assuming a 24 mpg average) Flying three times from New York to London = 66,000 gal. of gas (assuming using a Boeing 777)
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Sep 10, 2008, 9:44 PM
Post #134 of 237
(3335 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
chadnsc wrote: sungam wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: chadnsc wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: raingod wrote: Forget gas to get to the crag, or SUVs on the I5, Flights to and from Thailand, London and the States have their own class of environmental impact... three flights a year... i think i offset that by not driving for 9 months out of the year. Three round trip flights from say New York to London vs. not driving for nine months (say 8,720 miles) . . .nope they don't offset each other. No... three flights, as is THREE FLIGHTS... not round trips. I don't really know, but I don't think that driving 2000 miles (I have been in the states since May 15 and put less than 2000 miles on my car) and taking three international flights is worse than driving 13,000 miles (average for an American). Sorry, still no. Yup, what Sug said. Nine month of driving: 8,750 miles (assuming a yearly average of 11,000 miles) Three trips to London from New York: 10,380 miles Driving 8,750 miles = 365 gal. of gas (assuming a 24 mpg average) Flying three times from New York to London = 66,000 gal. of gas (assuming using a Boeing 777) Divide by number of passengers.... let's say 400 = 165 gals of jet fuel. DMT
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
Sep 10, 2008, 9:53 PM
Post #135 of 237
(3329 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084
|
dingus wrote: chadnsc wrote: sungam wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: chadnsc wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: raingod wrote: Forget gas to get to the crag, or SUVs on the I5, Flights to and from Thailand, London and the States have their own class of environmental impact... three flights a year... i think i offset that by not driving for 9 months out of the year. Three round trip flights from say New York to London vs. not driving for nine months (say 8,720 miles) . . .nope they don't offset each other. No... three flights, as is THREE FLIGHTS... not round trips. I don't really know, but I don't think that driving 2000 miles (I have been in the states since May 15 and put less than 2000 miles on my car) and taking three international flights is worse than driving 13,000 miles (average for an American). Sorry, still no. Yup, what Sug said. Nine month of driving: 8,750 miles (assuming a yearly average of 11,000 miles) Three trips to London from New York: 10,380 miles Driving 8,750 miles = 365 gal. of gas (assuming a 24 mpg average) Flying three times from New York to London = 66,000 gal. of gas (assuming using a Boeing 777) Divide by number of passengers.... let's say 400 = 165 gals of jet fuel. DMT Car with reasonalbe gas consumptions (say 30mpg) divided by two passengers =~ 145gal. We could go on like this for days!!!!
(This post was edited by granite_grrl on Sep 11, 2008, 12:06 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 10, 2008, 10:30 PM
Post #136 of 237
(3315 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
Lazlo wrote: I heard in the campground that you got banned... listen better next time. If we are going to take on all factors... didn't he say he drove a little? and the flights were thailand->london->ny. I'm still winning, though.
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 10, 2008, 11:02 PM
Post #137 of 237
(3294 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
sungam wrote: If we are going to take on all factors... didn't he say he drove a little? and the flights were thailand->london->ny. I'm still winning, though. Hey someone got it right... I fly from NY to Bangkok to London... sometimes I come back to the states, sometimes I don't. The way I see it, those flights are gonna happen whether I'm on them or not. That is not the case with my driving habits. If we are really getting technical here... I don't use much electricity in Thailand (5 or 6 months per year), and don't create nearly as much trash as I would here. I don't consume anything there other than fresh food. I could go on....
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Sep 10, 2008, 11:06 PM
Post #138 of 237
(3291 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
granite_grrl wrote: We could go on like this for days!!!! Not with our clothes on we couldn't. DMT
|
|
|
|
|
kranney
Sep 10, 2008, 11:48 PM
Post #139 of 237
(3273 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 28, 2005
Posts: 15
|
I'll bite. I do own, and climb in, clothes that could be considered "climbing clothes". The impetus for my decision to buy the clothes has as much do to with how I choose to spend my money as it does aesthetics. I would rather spend the money for organic cotton or some recycled wicking product than I would for traditional cotton products manufactured in a sweat shop. I would also rather support local gear shops than big box chains or online distributors. Kind of like my food choices. Local and organic is most desirable, then local foods, then the organic stuff shipped in from Cali. The way I see it how I spend my money has as big an effect on my ability to see change within our country as how I vote. |
|
|
|
|
Maddhatter
Sep 11, 2008, 12:32 AM
Post #140 of 237
(3259 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2008
Posts: 1752
|
kranney wrote: I'll bite. I do own, and climb in, clothes that could be considered "climbing clothes". The impetus for my decision to buy the clothes has as much do to with how I choose to spend my money as it does aesthetics. I would rather spend the money for organic cotton or some recycled wicking product than I would for traditional cotton products manufactured in a sweat shop. I would also rather support local gear shops than big box chains or online distributors. Kind of like my food choices. Local and organic is most desirable, then local foods, then the organic stuff shipped in from Cali. The way I see it how I spend my money has as big an effect on my ability to see change within our country as how I vote. You might want to start reading the back of those (orgainic) food bags. You might not like what you see. Very few are from the USA and most other places have no laws to make sure they are what they say. ( just say'n )
(This post was edited by Maddhatter on Sep 11, 2008, 12:33 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 11, 2008, 12:39 AM
Post #141 of 237
(3253 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
haha, madhatter, just saw your sig. He's right though, you may be suprised as to what "organic" really means.
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Sep 11, 2008, 12:40 AM
Post #142 of 237
(3250 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
Maddhatter wrote: sungam wrote: I've still never been quoted in a sig, but maybe that's cuz I don't really post anything worth noticing. (happy now?) I think the quote stands well by itself. It's the self-proclaimation that does it for me. Not be'n mean. Just saying it's funnier that way.
|
|
|
|
|
Maddhatter
Sep 11, 2008, 12:42 AM
Post #143 of 237
(3243 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2008
Posts: 1752
|
Lazlo wrote: Maddhatter wrote: sungam wrote: I've still never been quoted in a sig, but maybe that's cuz I don't really post anything worth noticing. (happy now?) I think the quote stands well by itself. It's the self-proclaimation that does it for me. Not be'n mean. Just saying it's funnier that way. It was in no way ment as an insult. Just thought it was a funny thing to quote! lol
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 11, 2008, 12:43 AM
Post #144 of 237
(3241 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
BTW, mad, if you close the quote box he opened up, or just delete it, you post won't be all cheesetitted like it is.
|
|
|
|
|
kranney
Sep 11, 2008, 2:03 AM
Post #145 of 237
(3219 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 28, 2005
Posts: 15
|
I do read the labels on every food product I buy. Like I said in my initial post local and organic is the most desirable to me, then local, then organic. So i read labels and try to make the best decisions accordingly. I'm not saying I wont eat things that aren't local, organic or any combination there of. The majority of the produce I buy comes from my local farmers market, at least when its in season, but I am guilty of buying avocados from Chile and bananas from costa rica on occasion. I think my point was that I try to be mindful and aware of where my money is being spent.
|
|
|
|
|
Maddhatter
Sep 11, 2008, 2:09 AM
Post #146 of 237
(3214 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2008
Posts: 1752
|
kranney wrote: I do read the labels on every food product I buy. Like I said in my initial post local and organic is the most desirable to me, then local, then organic. So i read labels and try to make the best decisions accordingly. I'm not saying I wont eat things that aren't local, organic or any combination there of. The majority of the produce I buy comes from my local farmers market, at least when its in season, but I am guilty of buying avocados from Chile and bananas from costa rica on occasion. I think my point was that I try to be mindful and aware of where my money is being spent. Right on. As it should be. Most people never even look at the back of the bags to see there from china! lol
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 11, 2008, 9:21 AM
Post #147 of 237
(3182 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
on the other end, when I can afford it, my main target is fair trade stuff from abroad. And yes, I know even then the situation is not ideal.
|
|
|
|
|
puerto
Sep 11, 2008, 3:03 PM
Post #148 of 237
(3153 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2005
Posts: 229
|
For such a "rebel", it sure didn't take you very long to backtrack.
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Sep 11, 2008, 3:08 PM
Post #149 of 237
(3150 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
Maddhatter wrote: kranney wrote: I do read the labels on every food product I buy. Like I said in my initial post local and organic is the most desirable to me, then local, then organic. So i read labels and try to make the best decisions accordingly. Right on. As it should be. Most people never even look at the back of the bags to see there from china! lol You can thank democrats for those labels. Republicans fought and continue to fight local, state and national labelling regulations. Most recently they have fought to protect McDonald's ability to sell 1000 calorie milkshakes to unsuspecting customers. Read the label... and thank a democrat. DMT
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Sep 11, 2008, 3:11 PM
Post #150 of 237
(3145 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
PTFTW
|
|
|
|
|
|