|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 16, 2008, 7:34 PM
Post #1 of 107
(6861 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
I train relentlessly. I do not like to fall on trad gear but it happens as the grade gets pushed. I like to believe that the knowledge of, proper use of, and understanding the limitations of my PPE, with constant training will keep me from and my partner getting fucked up in the event of a fall. I am always trying to correct and prefect my form . Making the movements cleaner, more fluid, burning the least amount of energy possible, and placing gear for relative max efficiency and comfort for the grade. I understand that in almost all cases, as long as my legs are outside the line the chance of getting caught on a line and spun is minimal. (I learned that the hard way years ago) I recently had someone say to me in a Gym, “the line is in the way most of the time on overhangs, so you can’t keep clean of the line“.( I disagree 100% as you can shorten the runners to keep the line closer to the crack if needed or scan ahead, then anticipate good placement or potential problems beforehand, to then plan a couple ways to compensate for such) He then went on to state that he had been climbing for 20 years and that one should also practice taking F/2 falls in a gym to get use to falling and spinning, and then some BS about dynamic belays all the time to soften a fall. I said to him, The dynamic properties of the rope take place of the dynamic belays once used in the past for a more static line, and the only times you should walk in or allow more slack to a falling partner is if there is an obstruction that those actions will help the climber to avoid and make a cleaner fall. He continued to argue with me. The thing that really pissed me off , he was teaching others that BS… For those in the area who know who I am talking about. Please use some common sense, and if you have none…. read. Start with “Freedom of the hills 7th ed.” before I read about you in Accidents & Injuries ….
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Dec 16, 2008, 8:02 PM
Post #2 of 107
(6814 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
jaablink wrote: I train relentlessly. I do not like to fall on trad gear but it happens as the grade gets pushed. I like to believe that the knowledge of, proper use of, and understanding the limitations of my PPE, with constant training will keep me from and my partner getting fucked up in the event of a fall. I am always trying to correct and prefect my form . Making the movements cleaner, more fluid, burning the least amount of energy possible, and placing gear for relative max efficiency and comfort for the grade. I understand that in almost all cases, as long as my legs are outside the line the chance of getting caught on a line and spun is minimal. (I learned that the hard way years ago) I recently had someone say to me in a Gym, “the line is in the way most of the time on overhangs, so you can’t keep clean of the line“.( I disagree 100% as you can shorten the runners to keep the line closer to the crack if needed or scan ahead, then anticipate good placement or potential problems beforehand, to then plan a couple ways to compensate for such) He then went on to state that he had been climbing for 20 years and that one should also practice taking F/2 falls in a gym to get use to falling and spinning, and then some BS about dynamic belays all the time to soften a fall. I said to him, The dynamic properties of the rope take place of the dynamic belays once used in the past for a more static line, and the only times you should walk in or allow more slack to a falling partner is if there is an obstruction that those actions will help the climber to avoid and make a cleaner fall. He continued to argue with me. The thing that really pissed me off , he was teaching others that BS… For those in the area who know who I am talking about. Please use some common sense, and if you have none…. read. Start with “Freedom of the hills 7th ed.” before I read about you in Accidents & Injuries …. invite Angry to your gym so he could kick his as*
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Dec 16, 2008, 8:06 PM
Post #3 of 107
(6804 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
Well, I don't know how you would practice factor 2 falls, especially in a gym setting. I am, however, a huge fan of soft catch. Hard catches hurt like hell! The dynamic stretch of a rope can in no way substitute for a nice soft catch.
|
|
|
|
|
pylonhead
Dec 16, 2008, 8:11 PM
Post #4 of 107
(6786 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 9, 2004
Posts: 283
|
I predict this thread is going to be long and painful to read
|
|
|
|
|
kennoyce
Dec 16, 2008, 8:12 PM
Post #5 of 107
(6785 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2001
Posts: 1338
|
I have to agree with the guy you were talking to on one point. I think giving dynamic belays is still very important. While a dynamic belay isn't always necessary, you should always give one on overhanging terrain as long as it won't cause the climber to deck or hit a ledge or something like that. On overhanging terrain a fall without a dynamic belay can slingshot the climber into the rock and broken ankles are common in this situation. Dynamic belays are also important if the gear is sketchy because a rope is only so dynamic, and the extra dynamic belay can be the difference between a piece holding or not. Once again I am not saying that I agree with this dude on any point other than that dynamic belays are still an important part of climbing, and you should know when to use them, and when not to.
|
|
|
|
|
curt
Dec 16, 2008, 8:13 PM
Post #6 of 107
(6784 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275
|
wonderwoman wrote: Well, I don't know how you would practice factor 2 falls, especially in a gym setting. I am, however, a huge fan of soft catch. Hard catches hurt like hell! The dynamic stretch of a rope can in no way substitute for a nice soft catch. Indeed. For starters, you would need access to a multi-pitch gym climb. Curt
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 16, 2008, 8:14 PM
Post #7 of 107
(6778 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
The last clipped point is one above midpoint , he goes to the top and drops.
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 16, 2008, 8:21 PM
Post #8 of 107
(6764 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
As I stated it is relative to the situation. If its not needed it should not be used. Also I have seen pieces zipper and pop because of a dynamic belay.
|
|
|
|
|
hafilax
Dec 16, 2008, 8:26 PM
Post #9 of 107
(6752 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025
|
Factor 1 fall. If you have a gym that allows people to do that they are Miss judge that and you'll be going splat. Maybe a factor 1/2 fall. A friend badly sprained his ankle from a hard catch. Dynamic belays are important.
|
|
|
|
|
nkane
Dec 16, 2008, 8:28 PM
Post #10 of 107
(6743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 12, 2006
Posts: 143
|
jaablink wrote: The last clipped point is one above midpoint , he goes to the top and drops. That's not a factor 2 fall.
|
|
|
|
|
nkane
Dec 16, 2008, 8:29 PM
Post #11 of 107
(6737 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 12, 2006
Posts: 143
|
jaablink wrote: As I stated it is relative to the situation. If its not needed it should not be used. Also I have seen pieces zipper and pop because of a dynamic belay. Because of or despite? How could a soft catch make pieces more likely to pull? were you jumping way off to the side? Or was it a running belay?
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Dec 16, 2008, 8:31 PM
Post #12 of 107
(6733 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
jaablink wrote: The last clipped point is one above midpoint , he goes to the top and drops. That's a practice whipper. That's not a factor 2 fall. A factor 2 fall is when you fall past the belayer on a multi pitch route and the force of the fall goes directly onto the person belaying you. Here's the page on factor 2 falls from Freedom of the Hills: http://books.google.com/...;ct=result#PPA158,M1 And a more basic description from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_factor
|
|
|
|
|
marebear
Dec 16, 2008, 8:34 PM
Post #13 of 107
(6716 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 15, 2008
Posts: 166
|
In reply to: some BS about dynamic belays all the time to soften a fall. I said to him, The dynamic properties of the rope take place of the dynamic belays once used in the past for a more static line, and the only times you should walk in or allow more slack to a falling partner is if there is an obstruction that those actions will help the climber to avoid and make a cleaner fall. He continued to argue with me. The thing that really pissed me off , he was teaching others that BS… I agree with his "BS" too. I would take a 20 foot fall with a soft catch over a 15 foot fall with a hard catch any day. The only reason to NOT give a dynamic catch is if there is an obstruction that the belayer is keeping the climber away from-- like the ground, or a ledge.
|
|
|
|
|
elcapinyoazz
Dec 16, 2008, 8:37 PM
Post #14 of 107
(6713 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 8, 2003
Posts: 93
|
I think the only "WTF" here is WTF are you doing spouting off about issues you don't understand. First: The fall you described is slightly less than factor 1. FF=fall distance/rope out. Second: Soft catch/dynamic belay on steep terrain can save you from smashing back into the wall at speed and trashing your feet or ankles when you penj, and it's less of a jolt on the body of the falling climber. Maybe less training and reading for you and more real world climbing experience.
(This post was edited by elcapinyoazz on Dec 16, 2008, 8:38 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
elcapinyoazz
Dec 16, 2008, 8:40 PM
Post #15 of 107
(6695 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 8, 2003
Posts: 93
|
jaablink wrote: Also I have seen pieces zipper and pop because of a dynamic belay. You're an idiot.
|
|
|
|
|
vegastradguy
Dec 16, 2008, 8:43 PM
Post #16 of 107
(6690 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919
|
all else aside, i'm shocked the gym owner allows that practice to happen- sounds like an accident waiting to happen.
|
|
|
|
|
vegastradguy
Dec 16, 2008, 8:46 PM
Post #17 of 107
(6676 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919
|
jaablink wrote: As I stated it is relative to the situation. If its not needed it should not be used. Also I have seen pieces zipper and pop because of a dynamic belay. pieces popping out of the wall have no correlation whatsoever to the type of belay given- dynamic or otherwise. gear blowing is a consequence of not slinging properly, poor placement, directional placement, rock quality, belayer stance, or some combination of the above.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Dec 16, 2008, 8:47 PM
Post #18 of 107
(6672 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
jaablink wrote: As I stated it is relative to the situation. If its not needed it should not be used. Also I have seen pieces zipper and pop because of a dynamic belay. Was the belayer standing under the piece? If the first piece was not multidirectional, it could pop and zipper because of an upward pull on the gear.
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Dec 16, 2008, 8:48 PM
Post #19 of 107
(6667 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
I have a hard time imagining taking an F2 fall in the gym, but otherwise, I'd prefer a soft catch over a hard one. Hard catches jostle the innards a bit too much for my liking.
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Dec 16, 2008, 9:03 PM
Post #20 of 107
(6610 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
vegastradguy wrote: jaablink wrote: As I stated it is relative to the situation. If its not needed it should not be used. Also I have seen pieces zipper and pop because of a dynamic belay. pieces popping out of the wall have no correlation whatsoever to the type of belay given- dynamic or otherwise. gear blowing is a consequence of not slinging properly, poor placement, directional placement, rock quality, belayer stance, or some combination of the above. Is that true? I'm asking seriously here because I wonder why anyone would use a Screamer then if softening the fall makes no difference. Is it possible that a belayor can possibly re-enact what a Screamer would do if one wasn't used? Sorry if that seems n00bish, but I'm curious to know the difference.
|
|
|
|
|
shimanilami
Dec 16, 2008, 9:05 PM
Post #21 of 107
(6604 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 24, 2006
Posts: 2043
|
If trolling, then well done. If not, then you should seek counseling.
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 16, 2008, 9:08 PM
Post #22 of 107
(6597 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
elcapinyoazz wrote: jaablink wrote: Also I have seen pieces zipper and pop because of a dynamic belay. You're an idiot. Watch it there , you are talking a lot of shit for someone who has no profile.... I misunderstood the factor 2 fall but now understand. I should have said repetitive near 50/50 falls on gym lines. And line running through placed gear up can zipper not well set pieces or where the only placements are marginal, mainly chocks.
|
|
|
|
|
blakegt
Dec 16, 2008, 9:10 PM
Post #23 of 107
(6594 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 4, 2007
Posts: 57
|
One time, one of the employees of the gym I was working at brought in one the via ferrata things that slip, and of course we wanted to make it slip. We set up an anchor using four bolts on the lead wall that were all close to the ground. Then, we clove hitched a piece of rope to a carabiner attached to the anchor. Of course, we dropped onto the anchor from various places, starting from well below the anchor and moving up. The goal was to eventually to drop from as high up as you could climb above the anchor, which would have been a factor two fall. However, despite the fact the the falls were only 5 or 6 ft no one would take above about a factor 1.5 fall because it started to hurt pretty bad. In hind sight this was kind of stupid and luckily the management had no idea what was going on, but it illustrates how you could set up a factor two in gym. By the way, we never got the via ferrata thing to slip, and I learned that short high factor falls onto a static anchor hurt pretty bad.
|
|
|
|
|
kennoyce
Dec 16, 2008, 9:26 PM
Post #24 of 107
(6555 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2001
Posts: 1338
|
i'm really confused as to how you can have a profile like you do, and not know what a factor 2 fall is, and also not understand that a dynamic belay is a good thing, unless it will cause the leader to deck. Pieces can not zipper and pop because of a dynamic belay, if they zipper, they would zipper with a non-dynamic belay as well.
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 16, 2008, 9:53 PM
Post #26 of 107
(3759 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
I did not say you should never use a dynamic belay. I said, use when applicable. And pieces can pop using a dynamic belay. I’m in Redrocks January 9th if you get out there, or I will be out in SL Utah in March for a week then Park City. If you want to meet up I would be more than happy to show you.
|
|
|
|
|
apeman_e
Dec 16, 2008, 10:03 PM
Post #27 of 107
(3746 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2008
Posts: 212
|
jaablink wrote: I did not say you should never use a dynamic belay. I said, use when applicable. And pieces can pop using a dynamic belay. I’m in Redrocks January 9th if you get out there, or I will be out in SL Utah in March for a week then Park City. If you want to meet up I would be more than happy to show you. and they'd pop without one too
|
|
|
|
|
j_ung
Dec 16, 2008, 10:12 PM
Post #28 of 107
(3731 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: vegastradguy wrote: jaablink wrote: As I stated it is relative to the situation. If its not needed it should not be used. Also I have seen pieces zipper and pop because of a dynamic belay. pieces popping out of the wall have no correlation whatsoever to the type of belay given- dynamic or otherwise. gear blowing is a consequence of not slinging properly, poor placement, directional placement, rock quality, belayer stance, or some combination of the above. Is that true? I'm asking seriously here because I wonder why anyone would use a Screamer then if softening the fall makes no difference. Is it possible that a belayor can possibly re-enact what a Screamer would do if one wasn't used? Sorry if that seems n00bish, but I'm curious to know the difference. I read VTG's post as talking only about pieces zippering from the bottom, not necessarily the top piece. A dynamic belay can help the top piece.
|
|
|
|
|
vegastradguy
Dec 16, 2008, 10:15 PM
Post #29 of 107
(3719 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919
|
j_ung wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: vegastradguy wrote: jaablink wrote: As I stated it is relative to the situation. If its not needed it should not be used. Also I have seen pieces zipper and pop because of a dynamic belay. pieces popping out of the wall have no correlation whatsoever to the type of belay given- dynamic or otherwise. gear blowing is a consequence of not slinging properly, poor placement, directional placement, rock quality, belayer stance, or some combination of the above. Is that true? I'm asking seriously here because I wonder why anyone would use a Screamer then if softening the fall makes no difference. Is it possible that a belayor can possibly re-enact what a Screamer would do if one wasn't used? Sorry if that seems n00bish, but I'm curious to know the difference. I read VTG's post as talking only about pieces zippering from the bottom, not necessarily the top piece. A dynamic belay can help the top piece. yup- should have specified that one. also, you use a screamer because the rock quality and/or placement is bad in the first place- in which case, obviously a dynamic belay in addition to a screamer can help the situation (but obviously, a dynamic belay needs to be used with caution as well- depending on whats in the fall line)
|
|
|
|
|
elcapinyoazz
Dec 16, 2008, 10:18 PM
Post #30 of 107
(3712 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 8, 2003
Posts: 93
|
jaablink wrote: Watch it there , you are talking a lot of shit for someone who has no profile.... Quite right. The ultimate measure of climbing experience and knowledge is clearly the existence of an extensive profile on rc.n00b. Maybe I should have spent the last 15 years spraying incorrect bs on the interwebs and working on my "profile" instead of actually going climbing.
jaablink wrote: And line running through placed gear up can zipper not well set pieces or where the only placements are marginal, mainly chocks. Which has exactly nothing to do with the belay being dynamic and everything to do with the integrity of those placements and the location of the belayer in relation to the pieces. Again, you're an idiot.
|
|
|
|
|
socalclimber
Dec 16, 2008, 10:34 PM
Post #31 of 107
(3696 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 27, 2001
Posts: 2437
|
pylonhead wrote: I predict this thread is going to be long and painful to read You're right. It started with the initial post and went down hill from there.
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 16, 2008, 10:51 PM
Post #32 of 107
(3676 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
Whatever; I travel the world and spend at least 4 months every year doing so. I am not afraid to explore. And More, I am not afraid to speak my mind, weather I am correct or in need of enlightenment. See I will learn something either way. You hide your face so you can talk shit like a cowered. Your fear most likely reflects your climbing . Running scared , overpowering through moves , lacking control with poor form. Its OK, I understand why you fear, and your right to be afraid and a cowered.
(This post was edited by jaablink on Dec 16, 2008, 10:56 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
nivlac
Dec 16, 2008, 11:16 PM
Post #33 of 107
(3650 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2003
Posts: 141
|
jaablink wrote: Whatever; I travel the world and spend at least 4 months every year doing so. I am not afraid to explore. And More, I am not afraid to speak my mind, weather I am correct or in need of enlightenment. See I will learn something either way. You hide your face so you can talk shit like a cowered. Your fear most likely reflects your climbing . Running scared , overpowering through moves , lacking control with poor form. Its OK, I understand why you fear, and your right to be afraid and a cowered. Definitely a troll. Otherwise, I hope you don't write code as poorly as you've written here.
|
|
|
|
|
camhead
Dec 16, 2008, 11:24 PM
Post #34 of 107
(3644 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939
|
hey jaablink, nice profile, but what 13a trad lines have you done?
|
|
|
|
|
hafilax
Dec 16, 2008, 11:32 PM
Post #35 of 107
(3634 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025
|
Don't type angry. It's never pretty.
|
|
|
|
|
shockabuku
Dec 16, 2008, 11:47 PM
Post #36 of 107
(3621 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868
|
jaablink wrote: Whatever; I travel the world and spend at least 4 months every year doing so. I am not afraid to explore. And More, I am not afraid to speak my mind, weather I am correct or in need of enlightenment. See I will learn something either way. You hide your face so you can talk shit like a cowered. Your fear most likely reflects your climbing . Running scared , overpowering through moves , lacking control with poor form. Its OK, I understand why you fear, and your right to be afraid and a cowered. "Cowered" is the past tense of a verb, as in: to draw back and crouch in fear. "Coward" is the word I assume you meant. Arrogant dumbass is the phrase that rings in my mind in regards to this thread.
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 16, 2008, 11:51 PM
Post #37 of 107
(3614 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
Local to me: There are 5 solid 13+ trad 8 sport (Gunks Grades) come here and I will show you. At the Gunks closest trad to 13 ,Scary Area in 4 tries. Tears for fears is only 12a ,first try with only some gear bata. Twilight Zone this spring. In the Red Welcome to ol Kentucky in pebble beach, I see you know the area. Greece was all sport but I played in the 11. To 13+ range and will do so again this year when I go to my vacation home for some r&r. There is a nice group coming with me this year.
|
|
|
|
|
elcapinyoazz
Dec 16, 2008, 11:57 PM
Post #38 of 107
(3608 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 8, 2003
Posts: 93
|
jaablink wrote: I am not afraid to explore Clearly not, given that you are currently exploring the untamed wilds of the State of WRONG, located in the Kingdom of FAIL.
jaablink wrote: And More, I am not afraid to speak my mind, weather I am correct or in need of enlightenment. So, not an idiot, but a loudmouthed cocky idiot. I stand corrected.
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 17, 2008, 12:02 AM
Post #39 of 107
(3601 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
Corrected: coward LOLHAHAHAHAHAHALOL
|
|
|
|
|
camhead
Dec 17, 2008, 12:06 AM
Post #41 of 107
(3598 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939
|
heh, you sent Welcome to Ol Kentuck? Nice work! I failed to get it this season, hope to in the spring. I disagree with your original thoughts about dynamic belays causing zippering, however. that is all.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Dec 17, 2008, 12:08 AM
Post #42 of 107
(3597 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
jaablink, don't take offense, but you really do come across as a complete idiot. If you're not, learn to write a little better. GO
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 17, 2008, 12:08 AM
Post #43 of 107
(3596 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
Sorry, I am in a mood . And I am pretty sure Angry did Welcome to ol Kentucky too.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Dec 17, 2008, 12:16 AM
Post #44 of 107
(3588 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
No problem. By the way, Scary Area is a 5.10. So Gunks 10s are equivalent to 5.13 now? Huh????? And you sent Twilight Zone at the Gunks? Holy crap, dude, that's pretty sweet. Or are you saying you *plan* to do it in the spring? GO
|
|
|
|
|
taydude
Dec 17, 2008, 12:21 AM
Post #45 of 107
(3583 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 25, 2006
Posts: 531
|
jaablink wrote: The last clipped point is one above midpoint , he goes to the top and drops. that's not factor 2.
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 17, 2008, 12:42 AM
Post #46 of 107
(3567 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
that’s OK… I still use a dynamic belay when it is called for. Just not all the time.. I saw a someone pop 3 pieces in a row on a dynamic belay last season. All were wire nuts on signal clips. I know pieces can zipper regardless. So its situational prudence...(done) I'm sure you will get it next season. I may be down there for a long weekend in the spring . There are loads of ice in the Dacks now, so we have been up and around Keene as often as we can.
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 17, 2008, 12:49 AM
Post #47 of 107
(3561 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
Twilight is a spring project. And Scary Area is 12.c on pitch 2 and 11.a pitch 1
|
|
|
|
|
curt
Dec 17, 2008, 12:50 AM
Post #48 of 107
(3561 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275
|
taydude wrote: jaablink wrote: The last clipped point is one above midpoint , he goes to the top and drops. that's not factor 2. Nope, not even FF=1. Curt
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 17, 2008, 12:53 AM
Post #49 of 107
(3553 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
Your late. I get it…
|
|
|
|
|
curt
Dec 17, 2008, 12:57 AM
Post #50 of 107
(3550 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275
|
jaablink wrote: Your late. I get it… I'm late. You're stupid. I win. Curt
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Dec 17, 2008, 1:12 AM
Post #51 of 107
(2547 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
jaablink wrote: I did not say you should never use a dynamic belay. I said, use when applicable. And pieces can pop using a dynamic belay. I’m in Redrocks January 9th if you get out there, or I will be out in SL Utah in March for a week then Park City. If you want to meet up I would be more than happy to show you. You said this:
In reply to: The dynamic properties of the rope take place of the dynamic belays once used in the past for a more static line, and the only times you should walk in or allow more slack to a falling partner is if there is an obstruction that those actions will help the climber to avoid and make a cleaner fall. Although you are correct in stating that you can help the climber avoid obstacles by giving a softer catch, you are way off by saying that you shouldn't otherwise. On steep climbs, giving a soft catch prevents the climber from swinging into the wall. I don't understand why you would think otherwise. Second, as far as zippering pieces, if you are going to make a claim like that that not one person has agreed with yet, then you need to say a little more than asking people to fly across the country so you can "show" them. What causes pieces to zipper is if the first piece is subjected to an upward and outward force which it is not prepared to handle. If anything, softening the catch would lessen that impact, not increase it. More likely though, it would have no effect on it whatsoever. Josh
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Dec 17, 2008, 1:18 AM
Post #52 of 107
(2536 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
curt wrote: jaablink wrote: Your late. I get it… I'm late. You're stupid. I win. Curt
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Dec 17, 2008, 1:26 AM
Post #53 of 107
(2532 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
kennoyce wrote: i'm really confused as to how you can have a profile like you do, and not know what a factor 2 fall is, A climber could go a whole career, and thousands have done just that... without knowing what the precise definition of FF2 may be, and not suffer one iota for that lack. All this fall factor bullshit is nice for math and arguing but the precise[/i[] meaning of any given fall factor is largely irrelevant WHEN IN THE FIELD. A climber only needs to know thatr falling directly on the belay subjects the belay and belayer with tremendous force... I btechya jaablink knows that just fine. DMT
(This post was edited by dingus on Dec 17, 2008, 1:27 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Dec 17, 2008, 1:29 AM
Post #54 of 107
(2526 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
dingus wrote: I btechya jaablink knows that just fine. DMT Are you sure about that? You may be right Dingus, but total ignorance in one area is usually not in isolation.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Dec 17, 2008, 1:32 AM
Post #55 of 107
(2521 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: ...you are correct in stating that you can help the climber avoid obstacles by giving a softer catch... He is? Jay
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Dec 17, 2008, 1:38 AM
Post #56 of 107
(2518 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: dingus wrote: I btechya jaablink knows that just fine. DMT Are you sure about that? You may be right Dingus, but total ignorance in one area is usually not in isolation. It doesn't really matter. What matters here is definitions. Not much more than than either. DMT
|
|
|
|
|
shockabuku
Dec 17, 2008, 1:40 AM
Post #57 of 107
(2517 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868
|
dingus wrote: kennoyce wrote: i'm really confused as to how you can have a profile like you do, and not know what a factor 2 fall is, A climber could go a whole career, and thousands have done just that... without knowing what the precise definition of FF2 may be, and not suffer one iota for that lack. All this fall factor bullshit is nice for math and arguing but the precise[/i[] meaning of any given fall factor is largely irrelevant WHEN IN THE FIELD. A climber only needs to know thatr falling directly on the belay subjects the belay and belayer with tremendous force... I btechya jaablink knows that just fine. DMT
Irregardless, one should know what one decides to talk about or one should keep one's mouth shut. And one should also learn how to close italics, one should!
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Dec 17, 2008, 1:43 AM
Post #58 of 107
(2514 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
shockabuku wrote: dingus wrote: kennoyce wrote: i'm really confused as to how you can have a profile like you do, and not know what a factor 2 fall is, A climber could go a whole career, and thousands have done just that... without knowing what the precise definition of FF2 may be, and not suffer one iota for that lack. All this fall factor bullshit is nice for math and arguing but the precise[/i[] meaning of any given fall factor is largely irrelevant WHEN IN THE FIELD. A climber only needs to know thatr falling directly on the belay subjects the belay and belayer with tremendous force... I btechya jaablink knows that just fine. DMT Irregardless, one should know what one decides to talk about or one should keep one's mouth shut. And one should also learn how to close italics, one should! One should take a luvin spoonful of one's own medicine. Daily. DMT
|
|
|
|
|
shockabuku
Dec 17, 2008, 1:45 AM
Post #59 of 107
(2513 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868
|
dingus wrote: shockabuku wrote: dingus wrote: kennoyce wrote: i'm really confused as to how you can have a profile like you do, and not know what a factor 2 fall is, A climber could go a whole career, and thousands have done just that... without knowing what the precise definition of FF2 may be, and not suffer one iota for that lack. All this fall factor bullshit is nice for math and arguing but the precise[/i[] meaning of any given fall factor is largely irrelevant WHEN IN THE FIELD. A climber only needs to know thatr falling directly on the belay subjects the belay and belayer with tremendous force... I btechya jaablink knows that just fine. DMT Irregardless, one should know what one decides to talk about or one should keep one's mouth shut. And one should also learn how to close italics, one should! One should take a luvin spoonful of one's own medicine. Daily. DMT And LIKE IT! We loves it.
|
|
|
|
|
shimanilami
Dec 17, 2008, 1:54 AM
Post #60 of 107
(2506 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 24, 2006
Posts: 2043
|
Wow. This troll has more legs than I ever would have imagined. Kudos.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Dec 17, 2008, 1:58 AM
Post #61 of 107
(2513 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
dingus wrote: shockabuku wrote: dingus wrote: kennoyce wrote: i'm really confused as to how you can have a profile like you do, and not know what a factor 2 fall is, A climber could go a whole career, and thousands have done just that... without knowing what the precise definition of FF2 may be, and not suffer one iota for that lack. All this fall factor bullshit is nice for math and arguing but the precise[/i[] meaning of any given fall factor is largely irrelevant WHEN IN THE FIELD. A climber only needs to know thatr falling directly on the belay subjects the belay and belayer with tremendous force... I btechya jaablink knows that just fine. DMT Irregardless, one should know what one decides to talk about or one should keep one's mouth shut. And one should also learn how to close italics, one should! One should take a luvin spoonful of one's own medicine. Daily. One should avoid using the pompous phrase "one should." In fact, two should. Jay
(This post was edited by jt512 on Dec 17, 2008, 1:59 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
moose_droppings
Dec 17, 2008, 2:01 AM
Post #62 of 107
(2509 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371
|
altelis wrote: hafilax wrote: Don't type angry. It's never pretty. its too bad Angry isn't part of this disscusion, because with the addition of a little comma, the meaning is totally different! "don't type , angry. its never pretty" Or with one letter missing. "its too bad Angry isn't part of this disscusion, because with the addition of a little coma, the meaning is totally different!
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 17, 2008, 2:01 AM
Post #63 of 107
(2507 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
Wonderwoman sent me this link on the first page to Freedom of the hills, I did not see anything about “On steep climbs, giving a soft catch prevents the climber from swinging into the wall”as I stated its situational prudence....on page 159 (dynamic lines) i did find reference to benefits of dynamic belays on weak anchors. Page 161 http://books.google.com/...;ct=result#PPA158,M1 As for the zipper effect, I think in the case I saw the belay was too far back. When the climber fell he fed line that causes friction on the first clip pulling it up and popping the nut then the next 2 popped in succession leaving 2 cams he had places higher in the crack. At the Spider Web last spring.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Dec 17, 2008, 2:07 AM
Post #64 of 107
(2502 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
jt512 wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: ...you are correct in stating that you can help the climber avoid obstacles by giving a softer catch... He is? Jay If you consider the lip of a roof an obstacle.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Dec 17, 2008, 2:09 AM
Post #65 of 107
(2494 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
jaablink wrote: As for the zipper effect, I think in the case I saw the belay was too far back. When the climber fell he fed line that causes friction on the first clip pulling it up and popping the nut then the next 2 popped in succession leaving 2 cams he had places higher in the crack. At the Spider Web last spring. What caused the nut to pop was the belayer being too far back and the nut not being able to withstand the upward pull. Whether he fed rope out jor not was insignificant.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Dec 17, 2008, 2:10 AM
Post #66 of 107
(2491 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
jaablink wrote: Wonderwoman sent me this link on the first page to Freedom of the hills, I did not see anything about “On steep climbs, giving a soft catch prevents the climber from swinging into the wall”as I stated its situational prudence....on page 159 (dynamic lines) i did find reference to benefits of dynamic belays on weak anchors. Page 161 http://books.google.com/...;ct=result#PPA158,M1 As for the zipper effect, I think in the case I saw the belay was too far back. When the climber fell he fed line that causes friction on the first clip pulling it up and popping the nut then the next 2 popped in succession leaving 2 cams he had places higher in the crack. At the Spider Web last spring. Strong but stupid. Apparently, Pennsylvania does not discriminate on the basis of climbing ability. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 17, 2008, 2:16 AM
Post #67 of 107
(2490 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
That depends on where the last gear is placed and how far above it I am. If I would hit my head on the lip because there is not enough line to clear it , I would most certainly want a DB.
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 17, 2008, 2:20 AM
Post #68 of 107
(2488 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
So you are saying you would like a dynamic blay on a slab…. And Spider's Web is in ,NY.
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Dec 17, 2008, 2:26 AM
Post #69 of 107
(2484 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
jaablink wrote: So you are saying you would like a dynamic blay on a slab…. And Spider's Web is in ,NY. ...That's a stupid retort. Obviously no one does. I don't think you're an idiot; but I do think your posts are ill-informed and you should conceed and move on.
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 17, 2008, 2:35 AM
Post #70 of 107
(2477 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
Its been easy and fun…but your right I concede. Sweet dreams everyone. OXOXOXO
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Dec 17, 2008, 2:44 AM
Post #71 of 107
(2469 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: jt512 wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: ...you are correct in stating that you can help the climber avoid obstacles by giving a softer catch... He is? Jay If you consider the lip of a roof an obstacle. When the climber is over a roof, you want extra slack in the rope so that he free falls clear of the lip. That has nothing to do with whether the belay is dynamic or not. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
shockabuku
Dec 17, 2008, 2:59 AM
Post #73 of 107
(2457 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868
|
jt512 wrote: dingus wrote: shockabuku wrote: dingus wrote: kennoyce wrote: i'm really confused as to how you can have a profile like you do, and not know what a factor 2 fall is, A climber could go a whole career, and thousands have done just that... without knowing what the precise definition of FF2 may be, and not suffer one iota for that lack. All this fall factor bullshit is nice for math and arguing but the precise[/i[] meaning of any given fall factor is largely irrelevant WHEN IN THE FIELD. A climber only needs to know thatr falling directly on the belay subjects the belay and belayer with tremendous force... I btechya jaablink knows that just fine. DMT Irregardless, one should know what one decides to talk about or one should keep one's mouth shut. And one should also learn how to close italics, one should! One should take a luvin spoonful of one's own medicine. Daily. One should avoid using the pompous phrase "one should." In fact, two should. Jay I guess you missed the fact that we changed to we.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Dec 17, 2008, 3:13 AM
Post #74 of 107
(2448 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
jt512 wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: jt512 wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: ...you are correct in stating that you can help the climber avoid obstacles by giving a softer catch... He is? Jay If you consider the lip of a roof an obstacle. When the climber is over a roof, you want extra slack in the rope so that he free falls clear of the lip. That has nothing to do with whether the belay is dynamic or not. Jay Yes, I reckon you are correct. Now, what say you about this nonsense of a dynamic catch contributing to the zipper effect. I would hope this would be more of an argument than whether the lip of a roof is or is not an obstacle or whether it takes any dynamics in any situation to clear a climber of it.
|
|
|
|
|
angry
Dec 17, 2008, 3:19 AM
Post #75 of 107
(2441 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405
|
It's pretty cool to read a thread I'm not involved in and find someone spraying for me. Carry on.
|
|
|
|
|
Valarc
Dec 17, 2008, 3:28 AM
Post #76 of 107
(2776 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 1473
|
I have nothing constructive to add, but I must say it's pretty fucking funny to hear someone bitching about how stupid some gym gumby is, and still sound so clueless on so many things. It somehow makes me feel better about myself to know that while I can't climb hard at all, I'm not a complete fucking idiot. Apparently, even people who pull hard can be stupid as hell. Reminds me why I moved out of PA in the first place
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 17, 2008, 3:45 AM
Post #77 of 107
(2761 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
Ah , are you in a mood too. Would you like a hug sweety. >:D<
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Dec 17, 2008, 4:19 AM
Post #78 of 107
(2734 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: Now, what say you about this nonsense of a dynamic catch contributing to the zipper effect. It sounds like nonsense to me, along with everything else jaablink has said in this thread. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
joeforte
Dec 17, 2008, 4:21 AM
Post #79 of 107
(2733 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 9, 2005
Posts: 1093
|
So did the guy from the gym get to read this post yet? I think he would find it amusing. If you saw a guy zipper 3 nuts, it is because the first could not handle an outward/upward pull. It has nothing to do with a dynamic belay. Use a multi-directional placement as the first piece to avoid the zipper. The ropes in most gyms are so beat that they have little to no dynamic effect left. I definitely appreciate a dynamic belay on those things! I actually prefer a dynamic belay anytime I'm taking a lead fall, except in the rare case that it puts me in danger of decking or ledging out.
|
|
|
|
|
joeforte
Dec 17, 2008, 4:25 AM
Post #80 of 107
(2728 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 9, 2005
Posts: 1093
|
And BTW, John is definitely not a troll. This is a genuine heart to heart rc.com rant. Isn't that right Mr. Anderson?
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 17, 2008, 4:32 AM
Post #81 of 107
(2725 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
Thanks Joe, I love you too. OXOXO
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 17, 2008, 4:36 AM
Post #83 of 107
(2720 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
Yes you are …. Joe messed it up. He is actually Mr. Anderson.
|
|
|
|
|
shockabuku
Dec 17, 2008, 4:42 AM
Post #84 of 107
(2714 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868
|
jaablink wrote: Yes you are …. Joe messed it up. He is actually Mr. Anderson. Thanks. I can feel not crazy for a little longer.
|
|
|
|
|
joeforte
Dec 17, 2008, 4:47 AM
Post #85 of 107
(2708 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 9, 2005
Posts: 1093
|
Hey, where are these local 5.13 trad lines? I could use some winter projects. Names/Areas?
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 17, 2008, 4:55 AM
Post #86 of 107
(2706 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
If you promise not to put a bolt in any the tradable ones, I will take you to one of the spots. What are you doing now that the bugs are not around? Do you have the winter off?
|
|
|
|
|
joeforte
Dec 17, 2008, 5:04 AM
Post #87 of 107
(2693 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 9, 2005
Posts: 1093
|
Yeah, I have the winter off. So these are all super secret 5.13's? You can't name even ONE?
|
|
|
|
|
the_leech
Dec 17, 2008, 5:10 AM
Post #88 of 107
(2688 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 8, 2007
Posts: 392
|
curt wrote: jaablink wrote: Your late. I get it… I'm late. You're stupid. I win. Curt Best succinct retort ever!
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 17, 2008, 5:16 AM
Post #89 of 107
(2684 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
First, I lost 3 members of my immediate family in less then the same amount of months. I am in no mood. don’t piss me off. I don’t actually believe you can pull 13... But if you want to prove to me you can you have my number. Give me a call and we can go out to play.
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Dec 17, 2008, 5:17 AM
Post #90 of 107
(2684 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
the_leech wrote: curt wrote: jaablink wrote: Your late. I get it… I'm late. You're stupid. I win. Curt Best succinct retort ever! Dead Horse.
|
|
|
|
|
the_leech
Dec 17, 2008, 5:28 AM
Post #91 of 107
(2678 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 8, 2007
Posts: 392
|
Lazlo wrote: the_leech wrote: curt wrote: jaablink wrote: Your late. I get it… I'm late. You're stupid. I win. Curt Best succinct retort ever! Dead Horse. Nah, it's timeless. Even if it was posted a whole four hours ago.
|
|
|
|
|
jaablink
Dec 17, 2008, 5:35 AM
Post #92 of 107
(2671 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 537
|
Its short, to the point, and too funny. I wanted to come back with something but I was just too proud of him.
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Dec 17, 2008, 6:06 AM
Post #93 of 107
(2656 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
How the hell do you take ff2 falls in a gym? I don’t know any gym owner that would allow you to try such. Also I would not count on the bolts to hold a FF2 fall in a gym. Although most people don’t know it, the "bolts" on a gym wall aren’t usually attached to a big strong steel I-beam or something similar. They are usually only held by the wood that makes up the wall. There is generally a steel plate in the back of the wall that disperses the load of a fall along the wooden panel that makes up that section of the wall. Taking a ff2 fall on one of those wooden panels is a very bad idea. Although he is right about providing a dynamic belay. It is important to provide a dynamic belay if a leader takes a ff2 fall. However it does not really matter because if a leader takes a ff2 fall, the rope will slip through your hands and you will be providing a dynamic belay regardless if you want to or not. And using a GriGir or Cinch will not provide an exception to this statement either because those devices slip when loaded to 4 - 7 kN.
|
|
|
|
|
vegastradguy
Dec 17, 2008, 7:01 AM
Post #94 of 107
(2636 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919
|
USnavy wrote: How the hell do you take ff2 falls in a gym? I don’t know any gym owner that would allow you to try such. Also I would not count on the bolts to hold a FF2 fall in a gym. Although most people don’t know it, the "bolts" on a gym wall aren’t usually attached to a big strong steel I-beam or something similar. They are usually only held by the wood that makes up the wall. There is generally a steel plate in the back of the wall that disperses the load of a fall along the wooden panel that makes up that section of the wall. Taking a ff2 fall on one of those wooden panels is a very bad idea. this may be true of older gyms, and perhaps some newer gyms built by the owners, but gyms built by actual gym builders (eldo walls, rockwerx) have the lead bolts as part of the main skeleton of the gym- for obvious reasons.
In reply to: It is important to provide a dynamic belay if a leader takes a ff2 fall. However it does not really matter because if a leader takes a ff2 fall, the rope will slip through your hands and you will be providing a dynamic belay regardless if you want to or not. And using a GriGir or Cinch will not provide an exception to this statement either because those devices slip when loaded to 4 - 7 kN. its late enough that i dont feel like picking this one apart, but i'll say that while you have the basic ideas correct, the reasoning doesn't quite add up. hopefully someone will have more energy than me and explain why.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Dec 17, 2008, 7:04 AM
Post #95 of 107
(2634 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
USnavy wrote: How the hell do you take ff2 falls in a gym? I think we've already come to a consensus on that, but thanks for you input.
In reply to: Although most people don’t know it, the "bolts" on a gym wall aren’t usually attached to a big strong steel I-beam or something similar. They are usually only held by the wood that makes up the wall. Do you ever actually know what you are talking about? Jay
|
|
|
|
|
rgold
Dec 17, 2008, 8:06 AM
Post #96 of 107
(2622 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 3, 2002
Posts: 1804
|
Majid (and any other readers) this account is mathematically correct but would be very misleading without careful interpretation. Dr. Curtis is apparently unaware of the work that has already been done on this subject, dating back to at least 1946 with the work of Richard M. Leonard and Arnold Wexler, and, in bursting through doors already long open, has chosen a non-standard definition of the fall factor that does not correspond to the quantity universally used by climbers. His choice is not only different than the one we use, it is also wrong-headed from a practical standpoint, if one may use the word "practical" when referring to the results of such simple models. The non-standard definition of fall factor used by Dr. Curtis is the ratio (length of fall + rope stretch)/(total amount of rope out). The universally accepted definition is (length of fall)/(total amount of rope out). By making rope stretch part of the fall factor (let's call it the C-fall factor in honor of the inventor), Dr. Curtis introduces a ratio that cannot be computed until the fall has happened and one has somehow managed to measure the amount of rope stretch at the instant of maximum elongation. (Note, worst-case scenario falls now have fall factors greater than 2.) This makes the C-fall factor apparently unknowable a priori. Even worse, the C-fall factor no longer depends on just the fall and the amount of rope in the system---now you have to know the specific characteristics of the rope too; exactly the same fall will have different C-fall factors depending on how stretchy the rope is, so one can no longer characterize any particular fall by its C-fall factor, and in this sense Dr. Curtis' formulation is of no practical utility. So there are two maximum-tension formulas, one using the C-fall factor and one using the regular fall factor. Either formula can be derived rather simply from the other, so they are mathematically equivalent, but worlds apart when one tries to analyze any particular climbing situation. There is no shortage of accounts using the "correct" definition of fall factor available on the web nowadays. For example, I myself have posted one on this very site, another one by Stephen W. Attaway has been available for perhaps ten years. As for the issue of dynamic belays, one might note that for high fall-factor falls they are not something you either choose or don't choose to do unless there is a lot of carabiner and/or rock friction. In the absence of a lot of friction, rope is going to run through any tube-style belay device; the loads are simply too high to be held without rope slippage.
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Dec 17, 2008, 8:21 AM
Post #97 of 107
(2616 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
jt512 wrote: USnavy wrote: How the hell do you take ff2 falls in a gym? In reply to: Although most people don’t know it, the "bolts" on a gym wall aren’t usually attached to a big strong steel I-beam or something similar. They are usually only held by the wood that makes up the wall. Do you ever actually know what you are talking about? Jay Speaking of which, why don’t you continue to elaborate on how every dynamic rope ever made is the same. I think Beal and Sterling would find it interesting on how their marketing claims are no longer valid because "all ropes are the same" and their ropes aren’t any different then any others.
(This post was edited by USnavy on Dec 17, 2008, 8:27 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Dec 17, 2008, 10:53 AM
Post #98 of 107
(2581 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
jt512 wrote: dingus wrote: shockabuku wrote: dingus wrote: kennoyce wrote: i'm really confused as to how you can have a profile like you do, and not know what a factor 2 fall is, A climber could go a whole career, and thousands have done just that... without knowing what the precise definition of FF2 may be, and not suffer one iota for that lack. All this fall factor bullshit is nice for math and arguing but the precise[/i[] meaning of any given fall factor is largely irrelevant WHEN IN THE FIELD. A climber only needs to know thatr falling directly on the belay subjects the belay and belayer with tremendous force... I btechya jaablink knows that just fine. DMT Irregardless, one should know what one decides to talk about or one should keep one's mouth shut. And one should also learn how to close italics, one should! One should take a luvin spoonful of one's own medicine. Daily. One should avoid using the pompous phrase "one should." In fact, two should. Jay Thou shalt not use one. DMT
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Dec 17, 2008, 11:06 AM
Post #99 of 107
(2576 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
angry wrote: It's pretty cool to read a thread I'm not involved in and find someone spraying for me. Carry on. We worship you Adonis! DMT
|
|
|
|
|
Valarc
Dec 17, 2008, 1:26 PM
Post #100 of 107
(2556 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 1473
|
USnavy wrote: Although most people don’t know it, the "bolts" on a gym wall aren’t usually attached to a big strong steel I-beam or something similar. They are usually only held by the wood that makes up the wall. There is generally a steel plate in the back of the wall that disperses the load of a fall along the wooden panel that makes up that section of the wall. What piece of shit gym are you climbing in? I've set routes at quite a few gyms, and been behind their walls at one point or another to fix spinners or the like, and I've never once seen a lead bolt installed in the way you claim. Methinks you're full of shit, or climbing at the most ghetto gym in the country.
|
|
|
|
|
lodi5onu
Dec 17, 2008, 1:26 PM
Post #101 of 107
(1073 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 26, 2006
Posts: 335
|
wonderwoman wrote: Well, I don't know how you would practice factor 2 falls, especially in a gym setting. I am, however, a huge fan of soft catch. Hard catches hurt like hell! The dynamic stretch of a rope can in no way substitute for a nice soft catch. + 1
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Dec 17, 2008, 1:31 PM
Post #102 of 107
(1069 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
Valarc wrote: USnavy wrote: Although most people don’t know it, the "bolts" on a gym wall aren’t usually attached to a big strong steel I-beam or something similar. They are usually only held by the wood that makes up the wall. There is generally a steel plate in the back of the wall that disperses the load of a fall along the wooden panel that makes up that section of the wall. What piece of shit gym are you climbing in? I've set routes at quite a few gyms, and been behind their walls at one point or another to fix spinners or the like, and I've never once seen a lead bolt installed in the way you claim. Methinks you're full of shit, or climbing at the most ghetto gym in the country. I am not a gym rat, I climb outside. I haven’t stepped foot inside a gym in over four years. However when I did climb in gyms, the gyms I climbed in were configured in the manner listed in my previous post and when I asked the owners about the reliability of their design, they said it was standard practice. I would hope its no longer standard practice to do that. None the less taking an intentional factor two fall in a gym or anywhere else for that matter is completely idiotic.
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Dec 17, 2008, 2:22 PM
Post #103 of 107
(1053 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
vegastradguy wrote: j_ung wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: vegastradguy wrote: jaablink wrote: As I stated it is relative to the situation. If its not needed it should not be used. Also I have seen pieces zipper and pop because of a dynamic belay. pieces popping out of the wall have no correlation whatsoever to the type of belay given- dynamic or otherwise. gear blowing is a consequence of not slinging properly, poor placement, directional placement, rock quality, belayer stance, or some combination of the above. Is that true? I'm asking seriously here because I wonder why anyone would use a Screamer then if softening the fall makes no difference. Is it possible that a belayor can possibly re-enact what a Screamer would do if one wasn't used? Sorry if that seems n00bish, but I'm curious to know the difference. I read VTG's post as talking only about pieces zippering from the bottom, not necessarily the top piece. A dynamic belay can help the top piece. yup- should have specified that one. also, you use a screamer because the rock quality and/or placement is bad in the first place- in which case, obviously a dynamic belay in addition to a screamer can help the situation (but obviously, a dynamic belay needs to be used with caution as well- depending on whats in the fall line) Got it, thanks. Didn't catch that. Thanks for the clarification.
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Dec 17, 2008, 2:41 PM
Post #104 of 107
(1041 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
God Dammit!!!! Now I have popcorn stuck in my teeth, and it's only 9:40am!!!
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Dec 17, 2008, 6:11 PM
Post #105 of 107
(1012 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
USnavy wrote: jt512 wrote: USnavy wrote: How the hell do you take ff2 falls in a gym? In reply to: Although most people don’t know it, the "bolts" on a gym wall aren’t usually attached to a big strong steel I-beam or something similar. They are usually only held by the wood that makes up the wall. Do you ever actually know what you are talking about? Jay Speaking of which, why don’t you continue to elaborate on how every dynamic rope ever made is the same. I never said anything even remotely like that; in fact, I'm usually the one arguing the exact opposite. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Dec 18, 2008, 4:39 PM
Post #106 of 107
(950 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
USnavy wrote: Valarc wrote: USnavy wrote: Although most people don’t know it, the "bolts" on a gym wall aren’t usually attached to a big strong steel I-beam or something similar. They are usually only held by the wood that makes up the wall. There is generally a steel plate in the back of the wall that disperses the load of a fall along the wooden panel that makes up that section of the wall. What piece of shit gym are you climbing in? I've set routes at quite a few gyms, and been behind their walls at one point or another to fix spinners or the like, and I've never once seen a lead bolt installed in the way you claim. Methinks you're full of shit, or climbing at the most ghetto gym in the country. I am not a gym rat, I climb outside. I haven’t stepped foot inside a gym in over four years. However when I did climb in gyms, the gyms I climbed in were configured in the manner listed in my previous post and when I asked the owners about the reliability of their design, they said it was standard practice. I would hope its no longer standard practice to do that. Really? Can you name one of these gyms? Because I'm betting that you misunderstood what you thought you were seeing. Either that, or they are not only the most ghetto gyms in the country, but they'll have insanely high upkeep. Repeated lead falls on wood panels would most definitely destroy the panels, and replacing them regularly would be very expensive. GO
|
|
|
|
|
|