Forums: Climbing Disciplines: Sport Climbing:
How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12?
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Sport Climbing

Premier Sponsor:

 


togden


Feb 2, 2009, 7:37 PM
Post #1 of 106 (15494 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 3, 2008
Posts: 5

How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12?
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (8 ratings)  
Can't Post

I guess I'm just a little confused... I always hear that 5.12's are crazy hard and you have to train for years to be able to do them. I have yet to lead a 5.12 all the way, but I've gotten really close, and fully expect to get my first 5.12 in the next few weeks. I've been climbing for almost a year exactly, and I skipped top roping and just jumped straight to lead.

I guess what I'm saying is I'm confused by this self defeatist mentality surrounding 5.12's. They are certainly hard climbs, no doubt, but not impossible. My climbing buddy has been climbing for close to 4 years, and hasn't gotten a .12 either. I see a .12, know I can't do it, and try anyway. He says, "Naw, it's too hard, lets try something else."

What gives?


lodi5onu


Feb 2, 2009, 7:41 PM
Post #2 of 106 (15487 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 26, 2006
Posts: 335

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

togden wrote:
I guess I'm just a little confused... I always hear that 5.12's are crazy hard and you have to train for years to be able to do them. I have yet to lead a 5.12 all the way, but I've gotten really close, and fully expect to get my first 5.12 in the next few weeks. I've been climbing for almost a year exactly, and I skipped top roping and just jumped straight to lead.

I guess what I'm saying is I'm confused by this self defeatist mentality surrounding 5.12's. They are certainly hard climbs, no doubt, but not impossible. My climbing buddy has been climbing for close to 4 years, and hasn't gotten a .12 either. I see a .12, know I can't do it, and try anyway. He says, "Naw, it's too hard, lets try something else."

What gives?

pussy


(This post was edited by lodi5onu on Feb 2, 2009, 7:42 PM)


togden


Feb 2, 2009, 7:46 PM
Post #3 of 106 (15478 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 3, 2008
Posts: 5

Re: [lodi5onu] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Okay, thanks for that...

But seriously, what's up with this mentality surrounding 5.12s?


krusher4


Feb 2, 2009, 8:20 PM
Post #4 of 106 (15436 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 17, 2005
Posts: 997

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

well you only have 14 posts...so no matter how long you've climbed I would say that's the thing holding you back.


Valarc


Feb 2, 2009, 8:24 PM
Post #5 of 106 (15430 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 1473

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

Spray spray spray spray.

Some people climb hard right away, some people work their way up slowly. Some people never get there period.

Personally, I don't care which route folks take, but the little pissants who spray about it get on my nerves.


johnwesely


Feb 2, 2009, 8:39 PM
Post #6 of 106 (15414 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

It took me about two years. If you think that you might be able to do a route then try it.


cush


Feb 2, 2009, 8:44 PM
Post #7 of 106 (15405 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 2, 2008
Posts: 320

Re: [johnwesely] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

it's all a matter of whether or not youre motivated to do it. i've been climbing less than a year and although i haven't sent a 5.12 i've sent numerous 5.11s. i have friends that have been climbing for years longer than i have but they stick to nothing tougher than an easy .10. if you get on the rock and try things out of your skill level you will improve. apparently you have been doing this. more power to you.


shimanilami


Feb 2, 2009, 8:45 PM
Post #8 of 106 (15401 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 24, 2006
Posts: 2043

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

About 7 minutes.


jeepnphreak


Feb 2, 2009, 8:50 PM
Post #9 of 106 (15394 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 29, 2008
Posts: 1259

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

I climbed for about 2 years before I was able to make it up my first .12a.
my fingers hurt for two days afterward. can I lead a 5.12 yep if I give all I have, and I kill my hands for a day.
rember that some people are bulit for climbing and some are not. I am not one of those gifted few that naturally can send a 5.12, you may not either.
go climb things are a difficult, push your shelf and have fun but dont destroy your body in the process.


troutboy


Feb 2, 2009, 8:55 PM
Post #10 of 106 (15387 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 25, 2003
Posts: 903

Re: [cush] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Well, the question may be spray or perhaps the OP is just a kid who really is curious and does realize the spray factor...

However, I think there is a reasonable answer. I have had this discussion with several folks who climb much harder than I do (i.e. 5.12 is a warm up for them) and we all had the same conclusion. YMMV and it may be way off base.

Essentially, almost anyone, given a reasonable amount of training, positive attitude, reasonable body dimensions (w/ regard to weight, not height), can climb 5.12. Assuming a person fits the above (sounds as if the OP's friend may not have the "attitude" part down yet), the difference between 5.10-5.11 and 5.12 is foot work. Essentially, you can brute force your way through any 5.10, and many 5.11s. So many of them are merely overhanging jug hauls that super precise foot work is secondary. But there are very few 5.12s where precise footwork and body control are not required.

Essentially, those who develop good foot work at an early stage can advance rapidly to climb 5.12. Those who develop foot work later may eventually get to 5.12. Those who progress rapidly through 5.10 based solely on gym training and strength, likely will not be able to climb a 5.12 until they master precise foot work.

Other opinions ?

TS


granite_grrl


Feb 2, 2009, 9:03 PM
Post #11 of 106 (15374 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

5.12 is kind of the grade where almos any average person can get to, but can take a hell of a lot of work. Many people who climb don't have the drive, time or desire to reach that grade, but for most that do you know that they've worked for it.

Of course, there are always exceptions.


togden


Feb 2, 2009, 9:37 PM
Post #12 of 106 (15337 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 3, 2008
Posts: 5

Re: How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

I never meant to come off as a pompous jerk or anything... I just really am baffled as to why people convince themselves they can't do 5.12s.

And for the record, I have worked quite hard to get where I'm at, and I'm not trying to discount the work that others put in as well. I know very well that there are thousands of other climbers who are better than me.

I am fortunate enough to live within 20 minutes of Little and Big Cottonwood Canyons in Utah and I was climbing there 2 or 3 times a week from last March till the snow kept me indoors. Now I climb at the local gym, Momentum (Where they just had the SCS Open National Comp) once or twice a week.


(This post was edited by togden on Feb 2, 2009, 9:38 PM)


Myxomatosis


Feb 2, 2009, 10:12 PM
Post #13 of 106 (15313 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 12, 2007
Posts: 1063

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

I think it just really depends on how much you want it.... Some people are just happy to top rope 5.9's all day long.. some people want to find there limit. A big factor is how oftern you get injured or take time out from climbing

The faster you get on lead and off top roping from a beginner the faster I think you improve.

Also there are some easy 5.12's around, one move wonders with safe fall's... they are hardly worth saying you can climb 5.12's.

Personally I try find a line that inspires me, something with a hard sequence of moves that really push's me and my abilities.

I guess I am more inspired to work my projects than go around finding 5.12's I can climb.


Valarc


Feb 3, 2009, 2:55 AM
Post #14 of 106 (15260 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 1473

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

togden wrote:
I never meant to come off as a pompous jerk or anything... I just really am baffled as to why people convince themselves they can't do 5.12s.

I am fortunate enough to live within 20 minutes of Little and Big Cottonwood Canyons in Utah and I was climbing there 2 or 3 times a week

I think your proximity to great climbing has colored your vision. A lot of those folks who "convinced themselves" that they can't climb 5.12 also can't hit up a destination crag three times a week.


curt


Feb 3, 2009, 5:24 AM
Post #15 of 106 (15217 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

togden wrote:
I guess I'm just a little confused... I always hear that 5.12's are crazy hard and you have to train for years to be able to do them. I have yet to lead a 5.12 all the way, but I've gotten really close, and fully expect to get my first 5.12 in the next few weeks. I've been climbing for almost a year exactly, and I skipped top roping and just jumped straight to lead.

I guess what I'm saying is I'm confused by this self defeatist mentality surrounding 5.12's. They are certainly hard climbs, no doubt, but not impossible. My climbing buddy has been climbing for close to 4 years, and hasn't gotten a .12 either. I see a .12, know I can't do it, and try anyway. He says, "Naw, it's too hard, lets try something else."

What gives?

Any reasonably fit retard can climb 5.12 sport climbs. Grab the rack and try a few 5.12s in the Gunks--then report back.

Curt


Partner angry


Feb 3, 2009, 6:30 AM
Post #16 of 106 (15182 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405

Re: [curt] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
Any reasonably fit retard can climb 5.12 sport climbs. Grab the rack and try a few 5.12s in the Gunks--then report back.

Curt

5.12a is the new 10c


USnavy


Feb 3, 2009, 9:00 AM
Post #17 of 106 (15165 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667

Re: [angry] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

1 1/4 years. I knew a girl that made it to 5.12 in 4 months. I know another that can redpoint 12d after two years of climbing. Then again I also know those who have been climbing for 5 years and only top rope 5.8's. You can do 5.12 if you push yourself. If you actually take the time to work at it you should be able to climb 5.12. Its possible for the average person to make 5.12 if they are dedicated enough to getting there.


(This post was edited by USnavy on Feb 3, 2009, 9:12 AM)


lena_chita
Moderator

Feb 3, 2009, 3:22 PM
Post #18 of 106 (15112 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

togden wrote:
I never meant to come off as a pompous jerk or anything... I just really am baffled as to why people convince themselves they can't do 5.12s.

And for the record, I have worked quite hard to get where I'm at, and I'm not trying to discount the work that others put in as well. I know very well that there are thousands of other climbers who are better than me.

I am fortunate enough to live within 20 minutes of Little and Big Cottonwood Canyons in Utah and I was climbing there 2 or 3 times a week from last March till the snow kept me indoors. Now I climb at the local gym, Momentum (Where they just had the SCS Open National Comp) once or twice a week.

I'm guessing that you are a guy in your early 20s?
Then yeah, sure, 5.12 is not that hard, and given your access to good climbing and training gym, and your obvious drive to do it, you will probably climb it within the next year and keep on climbing harder stuff.

I hang-dogged my first 5.12 during my second season of climbing outside, and redpointed my first 5.12 during the third season. I started climbing at the age of 32, after having two kids, and I cannot climb as much as I'd like to. I do not think that 5.12 is particularly hard, or that I have reached the plateau and won't be able to climb anything harder, but it isn't easy for me either.

I think that given the time and proper training, an average person can climb 5.12. Not everyone wants to put the effort, mental or physical, into doing it.


dingus


Feb 3, 2009, 3:30 PM
Post #19 of 106 (15108 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

togden wrote:
I guess I'm just a little confused... I always hear that 5.12's are crazy hard and you have to train for years to be able to do them. I have yet to lead a 5.12 all the way, but I've gotten really close, and fully expect to get my first 5.12 in the next few weeks. I've been climbing for almost a year exactly, and I skipped top roping and just jumped straight to lead.

I guess what I'm saying is I'm confused by this self defeatist mentality surrounding 5.12's. They are certainly hard climbs, no doubt, but not impossible. My climbing buddy has been climbing for close to 4 years, and hasn't gotten a .12 either. I see a .12, know I can't do it, and try anyway. He says, "Naw, it's too hard, lets try something else."

What gives?

Bolts and hang dogging, that's what gives.

Without them the Giving Tree would be much harder to climb.

DMT


subantz


Feb 3, 2009, 4:09 PM
Post #20 of 106 (15090 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 7, 2007
Posts: 1247

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Never climbed a 12. I still struggle on hard 10's but thats not why I climb I climb to get away from the citys B/S, and to enjoy what I am doing not for a grade. Time with friends in a great environment.


Vicar


Feb 3, 2009, 9:51 PM
Post #21 of 106 (15034 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 26, 2009
Posts: 16

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

It took me many years. Climbing for me for a long time was a social thing that I did with a large group of friends. We were the most consistent bunch of 5.9 to 5.10- climbers on the planet.

One day something snapped mentally for me and climbing more challenging things became more important. I'd guess from that moment to my first 5.12 redpoint was a year or so. That said, I took the traditional pyramid approach and climbed zillions of 5.10+ and 5.11 routes before even trying 5.12.


dynosore


Feb 3, 2009, 10:18 PM
Post #22 of 106 (15011 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 29, 2004
Posts: 1768

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

togden wrote:
I guess I'm just a little confused... I always hear that 5.12's are crazy hard and you have to train for years to be able to do them. I have yet to lead a 5.12 all the way, but I've gotten really close, and fully expect to get my first 5.12 in the next few weeks. I've been climbing for almost a year exactly, and I skipped top roping and just jumped straight to lead.

I guess what I'm saying is I'm confused by this self defeatist mentality surrounding 5.12's. They are certainly hard climbs, no doubt, but not impossible. My climbing buddy has been climbing for close to 4 years, and hasn't gotten a .12 either. I see a .12, know I can't do it, and try anyway. He says, "Naw, it's too hard, lets try something else."

What gives?

Yawn. I was climbing 11's after about 1-1/2 years, then I hurt myself and coupled with injuries from a car accident I had to seriously evaluate why I climb. I climb to get outdoors, and enjoy the mountains. So I will never climb 12's, and I only like trad climbing, and I'm ok with that.

Like the other poster said, try balancing a family, career, volunteering, and any other activity with climbing then tell me how easy it is.


blueeyedclimber


Feb 4, 2009, 3:29 PM
Post #23 of 106 (14939 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: [curt] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
togden wrote:
I guess I'm just a little confused... I always hear that 5.12's are crazy hard and you have to train for years to be able to do them. I have yet to lead a 5.12 all the way, but I've gotten really close, and fully expect to get my first 5.12 in the next few weeks. I've been climbing for almost a year exactly, and I skipped top roping and just jumped straight to lead.

I guess what I'm saying is I'm confused by this self defeatist mentality surrounding 5.12's. They are certainly hard climbs, no doubt, but not impossible. My climbing buddy has been climbing for close to 4 years, and hasn't gotten a .12 either. I see a .12, know I can't do it, and try anyway. He says, "Naw, it's too hard, lets try something else."

What gives?

Any reasonably fit retard can climb 5.12 sport climbs. Grab the rack and try a few 5.12s in the Gunks--then report back.

Curt

All right, here's a hypothetical question. What if you are an exceptionally fit retard. I don't mean to spray or anything, but my buns and abs of steel glisten in the sunlight. Can i expect to climb 13a? b maybe? Just askin'. Cool

Josh


dingus


Feb 4, 2009, 4:51 PM
Post #24 of 106 (14910 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [blueeyedclimber] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Your buns of steel are hypothetical?

DMT


AlexCV


Feb 4, 2009, 8:02 PM
Post #25 of 106 (14853 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 25, 2008
Posts: 283

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

The key to getting to 5.12 as early as possible is to try as many of them as possible until your find the most ridiculously soft 5.12 so you can actually send it and then spray about climbing 5.12 to anyone who'll ear.


seatbeltpants


Feb 4, 2009, 10:15 PM
Post #26 of 106 (11434 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 9, 2008
Posts: 581

Re: [AlexCV] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

AlexCV wrote:
The key to getting to 5.12 as early as possible is to try as many of them as possible until your find the most ridiculously soft 5.12 so you can actually send it and then spray about climbing 5.12 to anyone who'll ear.

dammit, you're onto me.

i think age has to have something to do with any assessment of this. i've only been climbing for a year and can grovel up 5.10s, but figure that's not the end of the world cos i started when i was 30. if i was 16, however, that might be rubbish. hell, i've seen 12 or 13 year olds cruise up harder stuff than i've ever tried and i figure that strength to weight ratio has to have something to do with that.

meh.

steve


dingus


Feb 4, 2009, 10:19 PM
Post #27 of 106 (11431 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [AlexCV] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

AlexCV wrote:
The key to getting to 5.12 as early as possible is to try as many of them as possible until your find the most ridiculously soft 5.12 so you can actually send it and then spray about climbing 5.12 to anyone who'll ear.

That's what I did!

DMT


roadstead


Feb 4, 2009, 10:54 PM
Post #28 of 106 (11419 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 17, 2004
Posts: 248

Re: [curt] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:

Any reasonably fit retard can climb 5.12 sport climbs.

Curt

Curt,

That really Hurts!


Partner drector


Feb 4, 2009, 11:05 PM
Post #29 of 106 (11415 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 1037

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Maybe that 5.12 that you are close to sending has all of the 5.12 moves somewhere beyond the part you've climbed already. Maybe it's 5.6 or something where you are climbing and the whole route is 5.12 because of some wicked hard move later on.

or maybe you are the top dog, big cheese, A-number-1, best climber out there and do what only others dream of.

And BTW, 5.12 is impossible for me and I will never climb one. It's being realistic to think that harder stuff is harder.

Dave


swoopee


Feb 5, 2009, 3:28 AM
Post #30 of 106 (11391 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 17, 2008
Posts: 560

Re: [dingus] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
AlexCV wrote:
The key to getting to 5.12 as early as possible is to try as many of them as possible until your find the most ridiculously soft 5.12 so you can actually send it and then spray about climbing 5.12 to anyone who'll ear.

That's what I did!

DMT

I mostly top-rope 5.8 - 5.9 with a rare 5.10, and spray about the 5.13d that I imagine I can climb. Wink


Partner jammer


Feb 12, 2009, 12:43 AM
Post #31 of 106 (11323 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2002
Posts: 3472

How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'm not qualified to post in this elitist thread ...


caughtinside


Feb 12, 2009, 1:48 AM
Post #32 of 106 (11313 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

Re: [jammer] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

3 years.

If you break it down, most .12a sport routes will have a crux that's v2, v3 at the max. Can you climb v2 when you're really pumped? voila. 5.12.


Partner angry


Feb 12, 2009, 2:18 AM
Post #33 of 106 (11300 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405

Re: [caughtinside] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I first climbed in 96'. I didn't really get into it until about 2001. I sent my first 5.12 in 2003 or January 04'. It was trad and an onsight.

Also, where I came up, there was a HUGE stigma around 5.12. Being an old school trad area and all.

In about 99 I tried a sport 5.12 and nearly got it. I didn't get back on another sport 5.12 untll maybe 3 years ago. It's not that bad, basically V2 while you're pumped.


hafilax


Feb 12, 2009, 3:06 AM
Post #34 of 106 (11285 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [angry] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I can boulder about V3 so there's hope for me yet. (8 years of climbing so far). Pirate


pfwein


Feb 12, 2009, 3:09 AM
Post #35 of 106 (11283 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 8, 2009
Posts: 353

Re: [caughtinside] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Can someone post examples of these 5.12 sport climbs that are "V2 when you're pumped?" I'd appreciate examples around Colo. front range, but anywhere is fine as maybe other people are interested.
I've got an alternate theory: what y'all think are 5.12 are super-light new school softies and not real 5.12, but maybe I'm wrong.
And isn't 5.12 sport the same difficulty as 5.12 trad, just the difference is the gear?
Thx


Partner angry


Feb 12, 2009, 3:14 AM
Post #36 of 106 (11277 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405

Re: [pfwein] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The difference should be the gear, however, it rarely is. On toprope many 5.12 crack climbs are harder than 5.12 sport. This is because a lot of those were done when 5.12 meant something.

For your V2 list.

Off the top of my head,

Wet Dream (CCC)
Road Rash Roof (CCC)
Psuedo Bullet (Table)

There's also a lot (A LOT) of really fucking easy 12's in Boulder Canyon. I rarely climb there but almost every one I've done is pretty casual. Just hit the MP database for sport routes and look for newer ones than 1998. They're pretty much all the same, easy climbing ->crimps -> easy climbing.

Enjoy.


pfwein


Feb 12, 2009, 3:21 AM
Post #37 of 106 (11273 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 8, 2009
Posts: 353

Re: [angry] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Thanks, I'll try to check those out when I recover from a finger injury. I've done several Boulder Canyon so-called 5.12a climbs, and I would agree they are about V2 or V3 (with a little pump, as they're pretty short), but I'm not sure I would agree that they are really 5.12 (of and letter grade). Strange cuz I think the BC trad ratings are right on, and a little stiff in some cases.


Partner angry


Feb 12, 2009, 3:29 AM
Post #38 of 106 (11268 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405

Re: [pfwein] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

pfwein wrote:
I'm not sure I would agree that they are really 5.12

I'm certainly not the one who gave them the 5.12 rating. All the routes I've mentioned are probably also 11c/d. That's the whole point, right?

Most of the trad in BC is way old. Many of them were the first routes of that grade in the country, expect them to be solid. Thunderdome (can't remember the crag, avalon? vampire?) is a trad route rated 12a, it's 11b.


curt


Feb 12, 2009, 4:43 AM
Post #39 of 106 (11254 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [roadstead] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

roadstead wrote:
curt wrote:

Any reasonably fit retard can climb 5.12 sport climbs.

Curt

Curt,

That really Hurts!

You used to climb hard trad--and are thus exempt from my comment. Cool

Curt


Vicar


Feb 12, 2009, 3:24 PM
Post #40 of 106 (11213 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 26, 2009
Posts: 16

Re: [pfwein] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

pfwein wrote:
Can someone post examples of these 5.12 sport climbs that are "V2 when you're pumped?"
From my home crag, Smith Rock, here is an example: Appian Way - 5.12a. It is a V3 boulder problem off the ground with a 5.9 finish to the top. If you stick clip the first bolt, you can essentially toprope the crux.

There are a number of routes at Smith where the single hardest move defines the rating and the rest of the climb is much easier. There are a lot of .11a's and b's that fit that bill.


pfwein


Feb 12, 2009, 5:09 PM
Post #41 of 106 (11183 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 8, 2009
Posts: 353

Re: [Vicar] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

OK, thanks. but based on what you said, I don't think that 12a rating is valid. (I think Angry would agree with me on this.) If the crux is off the ground, there's no pump when you do it. And a 5.9 finish will add nothing to the difficulty of a 12a sport climb.
While bouldering ratings can't totally translate to route ratings, a V3, under the circumstances you describe (off the ground, so no pump) does not have enough kick for a 12a. Maybe your notion of how hard a V3 is is different from mine--I've seen the grades applied inconsistently so in one place a V3 is good for decent noobs, in another (think some J-Tree ratings) you've got to be pretty darn good to make it up.
Standard ratings discussion disclaimer--plz don't tell me to ignore the ratings and just climb for fun--I do just climb for fun, but I'm not climbing now Tongue


hafilax


Feb 12, 2009, 5:56 PM
Post #42 of 106 (11171 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [pfwein] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

pfwein wrote:
OK, thanks. but based on what you said, I don't think that 12a rating is valid. (I think Angry would agree with me on this.) If the crux is off the ground, there's no pump when you do it. And a 5.9 finish will add nothing to the difficulty of a 12a sport climb.
While bouldering ratings can't totally translate to route ratings, a V3, under the circumstances you describe (off the ground, so no pump) does not have enough kick for a 12a. Maybe your notion of how hard a V3 is is different from mine--I've seen the grades applied inconsistently so in one place a V3 is good for decent noobs, in another (think some J-Tree ratings) you've got to be pretty darn good to make it up.
Standard ratings discussion disclaimer--plz don't tell me to ignore the ratings and just climb for fun--I do just climb for fun, but I'm not climbing now Tongue
And thus you have the fundamental difficulty in rating endurance and the hardest move with a single grade. Some climbs are easier than others at the same grade and different people will find the opposite.


krusher4


Feb 12, 2009, 6:24 PM
Post #43 of 106 (11160 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 17, 2005
Posts: 997

Re: [pfwein] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

pfwein wrote:
Thanks, I'll try to check those out when I recover from a finger injury. I've done several Boulder Canyon so-called 5.12a climbs, and I would agree they are about V2 or V3 (with a little pump, as they're pretty short), but I'm not sure I would agree that they are really 5.12 (of and letter grade). Strange cuz I think the BC trad ratings are right on, and a little stiff in some cases.

If your talking about "Sport Park 5.12" those don't count LOL.


Alphaboth


Feb 12, 2009, 6:56 PM
Post #44 of 106 (11145 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 2, 2008
Posts: 116

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

A lot of factors go into it. One being, that there are places where it's a hell of a lot easier to climb 5.12 than others. Some people just don't have the body type to climb hard too, even if they're in shape. Some people think they're training hard when they are really doing very little to raise they're grade. I've been climbing 3 years now, only in the last year have I been climbing seriously, though I wouldn't consider it "training" I've climbed either in the gym or outside probably close to 300 days within the last year. Some days are as simple as working a few problems in the gym or working on a hangboard or doing pullups. My goal at this point isn't to climb 5.12, I'm confident I could redpoint some 5.12s out there If I worked them, but that shouldn't really be your goal. If your a solid 5.10-5.11 that's great, be happy and confident about that. You can go to just about any climbing area and have a great time. Building climbing experience has really been a goal of mine, trying to climb in a bunch of different locations. In my social network I only know a handful of climbers who can climb 5.12 and most of them I've never seen them actually do it.

The grading of most of the climbs is kinda screw up, in my opinion. I starting climbing in an area that is noted for being sandbagged and I don't know exactly how much, I'd say a full number grade in my experience.

Also there's probably only a month or two out of the year, where I feel I can truely climb my hardest. The rest of the time I spend sending 5.10s and enjoying that.


alwaysclimbing07


Feb 12, 2009, 7:31 PM
Post #45 of 106 (11131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 1, 2006
Posts: 61

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

i think it's funny how hard people make things seem. About a month ago, i overheard some people saying that climbing 5.13 comes down to genetics. What a joke. Honestly ANYONE can climb 5.13 sport if they wanted to.
I've got a friend who's forty four, has a wife, job, kids, and his goal for this year is to send his first 14 before he turns forty five. He's not sponsered, and no one's ever really heard of him. He just wants it more than most people.
Honestly, some of the best days of climbing i've ever had was just going out and doing easy trad and enjoying the experiance and surroundings. And i can see how that's really apealing to so many people, but i get a lot more psyched climbing at my limit(on sport) and constantly making progression.

5.14 is the new 5.12


crazy_fingers84


Feb 12, 2009, 10:14 PM
Post #46 of 106 (11100 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 11, 2006
Posts: 418

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hooray. I can finally post on this thread. Last week I sent my first 5.12. Actually it was a 5.12c. WTF? I have been climbing for about 3.5 years. I have tried several 5.12a/b and never had any luck. I feel like I will be able to finish some of these routes when I have an opportunity to return to the area in the spring.

This route in particular, I worked over 4 days and tried about 10 times. I think it is soft for the grade (though I have never climbed anything within 3 grades of this prior). I have climbed mid 11's that felt harder.

Anyway, it was originally a gear route. . . but was retro bolted . . . and now it is a sport route with a really high first bolt right at the crux. Actually, the same day I sent this route, I climbed an 11a right next to it that had shut me down for a year. I am more proud of finishing the 11 than the 12 because I feel like it was more of an accomplishment. The 11 was sustained while the 12 really only had one difficult move.


jrathfon


Feb 12, 2009, 10:47 PM
Post #47 of 106 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2006
Posts: 494

Re: [curt] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
togden wrote:
I guess I'm just a little confused... I always hear that 5.12's are crazy hard and you have to train for years to be able to do them. I have yet to lead a 5.12 all the way, but I've gotten really close, and fully expect to get my first 5.12 in the next few weeks. I've been climbing for almost a year exactly, and I skipped top roping and just jumped straight to lead.

I guess what I'm saying is I'm confused by this self defeatist mentality surrounding 5.12's. They are certainly hard climbs, no doubt, but not impossible. My climbing buddy has been climbing for close to 4 years, and hasn't gotten a .12 either. I see a .12, know I can't do it, and try anyway. He says, "Naw, it's too hard, lets try something else."

What gives?

Any reasonably fit retard can climb 5.12 sport climbs. Grab the rack and try a few 5.12s in the Gunks--then report back.

Curt

Haha, I was scrolling down the thread waiting for this comment. Hell, try an 11 at the Gunks for that matter, Yellow Wall??


jrathfon


Feb 12, 2009, 10:54 PM
Post #48 of 106 (11081 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2006
Posts: 494

Re: [AlexCV] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

AlexCV wrote:
The key to getting to 5.12 as early as possible is to try as many of them as possible until your find the most ridiculously soft 5.12 so you can actually send it and then spray about climbing 5.12 to anyone who'll ear.

And then there is the difference that I think most people forget these days. Climbing A 5.12 is not the same thing as CLIMBING 5.12.

I have a buddy who consistently onsights hard 10 trad. Along walks a typical new climber who's typical first question out of their mouth is "how hard do you climb?" My buddy's answer? 5.8. Why? Because he considers climbing 5.8 as he could walk up to ANY climb ANYWHERE rated 5.8 and be able to comfortably/consistently onsight it/them.

I climb about as hard as my buddy, and I agree with his sentiment. I just tried onsighting "Bambi meets Godzilla" 8+ at J-Tree and sat. So I don't think I'm ready to say I'm a 5.10 climber.

p.s. i have led 12a sport before! spray!
p.p.s. trad routes ARE harder


kriso9tails


Feb 12, 2009, 11:56 PM
Post #49 of 106 (11066 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [jrathfon] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jrathfon wrote:
p.p.s. trad routes ARE harder

Nah, they're just graded wrong.


gosharks


Feb 13, 2009, 1:25 AM
Post #50 of 106 (11042 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 7, 2004
Posts: 268

Re: [pfwein] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

pfwein wrote:
OK, thanks. but based on what you said, I don't think that 12a rating is valid. (I think Angry would agree with me on this.) If the crux is off the ground, there's no pump when you do it. And a 5.9 finish will add nothing to the difficulty of a 12a sport climb.
IIRC, I've been on Appian Way. The start was harder for me to do than any move on Churning in the Wake (13a). I didn't even finish the climb, just bailed off after doing the start. Granted though, it was the last climb after 4 days on.


jrathfon


Feb 13, 2009, 3:08 PM
Post #51 of 106 (9325 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2006
Posts: 494

Re: [kriso9tails] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kriso9tails wrote:
jrathfon wrote:
p.p.s. trad routes ARE harder

Nah, they're just graded wrong.

Old school ratings were first, therefore, they have to be correct. Besides that's one of the principle factors in defining the term "sport weenies", the soft grades that is.


krusher4


Feb 13, 2009, 3:40 PM
Post #52 of 106 (9315 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 17, 2005
Posts: 997

Re: [jrathfon] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

5.13 is very hard I don't think most people can climb at this grade with any amount of work.


kriso9tails


Feb 13, 2009, 4:31 PM
Post #53 of 106 (9300 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [jrathfon] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jrathfon wrote:
kriso9tails wrote:
jrathfon wrote:
p.p.s. trad routes ARE harder

Nah, they're just graded wrong.

Old school ratings were first, therefore, they have to be correct. Besides that's one of the principle factors in defining the term "sport weenies", the soft grades that is.

First therefor correct? Like the theory of a flat earth and a geocentric universe? Good to know.


jrathfon


Feb 13, 2009, 4:34 PM
Post #54 of 106 (9297 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2006
Posts: 494

Re: [kriso9tails] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kriso9tails wrote:
jrathfon wrote:
kriso9tails wrote:
jrathfon wrote:
p.p.s. trad routes ARE harder

Nah, they're just graded wrong.

Old school ratings were first, therefore, they have to be correct. Besides that's one of the principle factors in defining the term "sport weenies", the soft grades that is.

First therefor correct? Like the theory of a flat earth and a geocentric universe? Good to know.

That may explain the space-time shifting island in LOST.

No, first meaning, new grades (and therefore graders) are soft.


kriso9tails


Feb 13, 2009, 4:53 PM
Post #55 of 106 (9288 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [jrathfon] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jrathfon wrote:
No, first meaning, new grades (and therefore graders) are soft.

Ah, so long as I don't grade anything then I'm not soft? Got it. Cool.


jrathfon


Feb 13, 2009, 5:47 PM
Post #56 of 106 (9266 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2006
Posts: 494

Re: [kriso9tails] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kriso9tails wrote:
jrathfon wrote:
No, first meaning, new grades (and therefore graders) are soft.

Ah, so long as I don't grade anything then I'm not soft? Got it. Cool.

Unless you grade it old-school (i.e. trad grades) than you can be a hardman.


hafilax


Feb 13, 2009, 6:06 PM
Post #57 of 106 (9255 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [jrathfon] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

My understanding of the evolution of the YDS is that 5.9 was originally intended to be the top of the scale. For a while 5.9 meant everything up to the mid 11's. That is part of the reason why 'old school' seems hard. Does that make it correct?

A good scale is a consistent one and as long as it's consistent within a region that's fine by me. You just recalibrate your relative scale when traveling. You climb as hard as you climb. If you have to attach a number to it that's too bad for you.

So yeah... 5.12... It's time to get back to training to get there. Any advice from those that made a winter time gym program to be as strong as possible when getting back on the rock?


dingus


Feb 13, 2009, 6:20 PM
Post #58 of 106 (9246 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [hafilax] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

hafilax wrote:
My understanding of the evolution of the YDS is that 5.9 was originally intended to be the top of the scale. For a while 5.9 meant everything up to the mid 11's. That is part of the reason why 'old school' seems hard. Does that make it correct?

A good scale is a consistent one and as long as it's consistent within a region that's fine by me. You just recalibrate your relative scale when traveling. You climb as hard as you climb. If you have to attach a number to it that's too bad for you.

So yeah... 5.12... It's time to get back to training to get there. Any advice from those that made a winter time gym program to be as strong as possible when getting back on the rock?

Celebrate the inconsistencies my friends. Revel in the confusion, because all too soon it will be so regulated and homogenized that no grade drift will be possible or tolerated.

The lineage of our sport is one of madmen and nutbergers, genuis and atheletes; many of whom were spontaneously acting in virtual vacuums. Of COURSE their rating systems were wildly divergent.

CELEBRATE THAT FACT!

A Gunks 5.7 is so goddamned different from a Yosemite 5.7 its nearly an insult to compare them at all.

Sure spraying about grades is fun. Soft, stout, chickenshit and bold - we got it all.

Sandbags are cool and SHOULD NEVER BE OUTLAWED.

Soft ratings are cool too, as numbers chasing is one giant ALL ABOUT ME EGO TRIP anyway... so why NOT have some ego - soothing routes? Huh?

HUH?

The first egoless climber to post that fact here (yes THEY chase number for EGO... but I do so for aesthetics and the purity of my perfect body hahahahahahahahahaha!) SUCK IT!!!111111

Consistent ratings are for gymbees and emasculated sport climbers.

DMT


dynosore


Feb 13, 2009, 7:37 PM
Post #59 of 106 (9226 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 29, 2004
Posts: 1768

Re: [crazy_fingers84] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

crazy_fingers84 wrote:
Anyway, it was originally a gear route. . . but was retro bolted . . . and now it is a sport route with a really high first bolt right at the crux.

This is why number chasing sucks. I can't do a trad 12 so I'll bolt it. I personally can't do 12 sport or trad, but at least I don't need to retrobolt to boost my ego. Sad.


lucaskrajnik


Feb 24, 2009, 9:58 PM
Post #60 of 106 (9153 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2007
Posts: 89

Re: [dynosore] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I like to get up to the 12 range because you have more options to climb..

but I have been climbing since

August of 2007 and i sent my first 12
June of 2008

but when i say i started in 2007, i was already very strong, and i climbed a min. of 5 days a week after that...so...


krusher4


Feb 24, 2009, 10:17 PM
Post #61 of 106 (9142 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 17, 2005
Posts: 997

Re: [lucaskrajnik] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

if you climb harder routes the routes you want to do are never taken ;-) To warm up you might have to wait in line.


yokese


Feb 24, 2009, 11:13 PM
Post #62 of 106 (9120 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 18, 2006
Posts: 672

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

15 years and still counting... Frown
Actually, no, make that 16 and still counting FrownFrownFrown


the_leech


Feb 26, 2009, 4:59 AM
Post #63 of 106 (9074 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 8, 2007
Posts: 392

Re: [curt] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
Any reasonably fit retard can climb 5.12 sport climbs.

How do I become a retard? That must be what's holding me back.

Maybe I need a mentor...

USNavy, can you give me some pointers?


USnavy


Feb 26, 2009, 9:33 AM
Post #64 of 106 (9057 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

togden wrote:
I guess I'm just a little confused... I always hear that 5.12's are crazy hard and you have to train for years to be able to do them. I have yet to lead a 5.12 all the way, but I've gotten really close, and fully expect to get my first 5.12 in the next few weeks. I've been climbing for almost a year exactly, and I skipped top roping and just jumped straight to lead.

I guess what I'm saying is I'm confused by this self defeatist mentality surrounding 5.12's. They are certainly hard climbs, no doubt, but not impossible. My climbing buddy has been climbing for close to 4 years, and hasn't gotten a .12 either. I see a .12, know I can't do it, and try anyway. He says, "Naw, it's too hard, lets try something else."

What gives?

My guess is that 5.12 is the magical number because that’s where the upper half of most committed climbers get stuck at. Not many make it into the 5.13 realm and thus 5.12 is a brick wall for many committed climbers. I am soon going to start my first 5.12c project and judging from what I already know about it, pushing into 5.13 will take some extremely serious commitment and training. More then what the average committed climber is willing to do.


LamontagnedeGatineau


Feb 26, 2009, 1:43 PM
Post #65 of 106 (9039 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2008
Posts: 17

Re: [kriso9tails] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kriso9tails wrote:
jrathfon wrote:
p.p.s. trad routes ARE harder

Nah, they're just graded wrong.

Nah, trad 5.12 existed before sports climbing existed. It's the grades that are going down. 20 years ago I though my on-sight max was 5.10 trad (hang dogging was considered evil then). Today I'm back in climbing and a bunch of those old 5.10's are now graded 5.11!!! Well whadayaknow... I was a 5.11 climber all that time??!! I imagine that a bunch of gunk 5.11's would now be graded 5.12 by the young hotshots that get sandbagged into them...

Anyway, to me the 5.x max factor is less important than having fun and trying new stuff. Particularly on-sight. If you have to work it, hang-dog it, waste your time on it... did you really, REALLY send it???


zeke_sf


Feb 26, 2009, 2:38 PM
Post #66 of 106 (9024 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730

Re: [Myxomatosis] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Myxomatosis wrote:
I think it just really depends on how much you want it.... Some people are just happy to top rope 5.9's all day long.. some people want to find there limit. A big factor is how oftern you get injured or take time out from climbing.

Overrall, a good post.

Personally, I've been tickling the garter line of 5.12 for several years. I was climbing progressively harder when I injured my ring finger pretty badly. So, it's literally taken me several years to Get Back into It™ and I'm essentially where I left off. In the interim, I really discovered the joys of trad climbing which, all in all, I'm pretty damn thankful for.

The sends I'm proudest of are those where I've really pushed my personal limits. Those climbs I really had to persevere to get or the ones I don't consider in my style but I worked through are the ones I remember. But to a lot of people, Just Getting out There™ and Having a Good Time™ are the whole point of climbing. I think the key is to find the lines that inspire you. If you look at something and Have to Climb It™, then, no matter the grade, that's what you should do.


zeke_sf


Feb 26, 2009, 2:42 PM
Post #67 of 106 (9020 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730

Re: [LamontagnedeGatineau] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

LamontagnedeGatineau wrote:
If you have to work it, hang-dog it, waste your time on it... did you really, REALLY send it???

Yes! Yes I did! And because you didn't take your time to work it, hang-dog it, and figure out the sequences, you didn't.


LamontagnedeGatineau


Feb 26, 2009, 3:48 PM
Post #68 of 106 (8996 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2008
Posts: 17

Re: [zeke_sf] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

zeke_sf wrote:
LamontagnedeGatineau wrote:
If you have to work it, hang-dog it, waste your time on it... did you really, REALLY send it???

Yes! Yes I did! And because you didn't take your time to work it, hang-dog it, and figure out the sequences, you didn't.

Good for you!!! I find climbing is a fun waste of time. How you or I choose to use it is a personal choice. You seem to prefer wasting time by gaining intimate knowledge of a few features and how to get over them, while I prefer variety...


Partner cracklover


Feb 26, 2009, 3:50 PM
Post #69 of 106 (8993 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Just because I think a lot of you missed this...

The OP is about to send his first *gym* 12.

Mr. Togden - just so you know, gym grades don't mean shit. I can tell you that from personal experience, as a former gym rat.

togden wrote:
I have yet to lead a 5.12 all the way, but I've gotten really close, and fully expect to get my first 5.12 in the next few weeks.

togden wrote:
I was climbing {in Little and Big Cottonwood} 2 or 3 times a week from last March till the snow kept me indoors. Now I climb at the local gym, Momentum (Where they just had the SCS Open National Comp) once or twice a week.

Cheers,

GO


zeke_sf


Feb 26, 2009, 3:51 PM
Post #70 of 106 (8992 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730

Re: [LamontagnedeGatineau] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

zeke_sf wrote:
LamontagnedeGatineau wrote:
If you have to work it, hang-dog it, waste your time on it... did you really, REALLY send it???

Yes! Yes I did! And because you didn't take your time to work it, hang-dog it, and figure out the sequences, you didn't.

Good for you!!! I find climbing is a fun waste of time. How you or I choose to use it is a personal choice. You seem to prefer wasting time by gaining intimate knowledge of a few features and how to get over them, while I prefer variety...

I actually waste time both ways. Why limit your options to waste it?


zeke_sf


Feb 26, 2009, 3:52 PM
Post #71 of 106 (8990 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730

Re: [cracklover] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
Just because I think a lot of you missed this...

The OP is about to send his first *gym* 12.

Mr. Togden - just so you know, gym grades don't mean shit. I can tell you that from personal experience, as a former gym rat.

togden wrote:
I have yet to lead a 5.12 all the way, but I've gotten really close, and fully expect to get my first 5.12 in the next few weeks.

togden wrote:
I was climbing {in Little and Big Cottonwood} 2 or 3 times a week from last March till the snow kept me indoors. Now I climb at the local gym, Momentum (Where they just had the SCS Open National Comp) once or twice a week.

Cheers,

GO

So? Gym climbing is harder. Just ask Angry.


LamontagnedeGatineau


Feb 26, 2009, 3:59 PM
Post #72 of 106 (8981 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2008
Posts: 17

Re: [zeke_sf] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

zeke_sf wrote:
zeke_sf wrote:
LamontagnedeGatineau wrote:
If you have to work it, hang-dog it, waste your time on it... did you really, REALLY send it???

Yes! Yes I did! And because you didn't take your time to work it, hang-dog it, and figure out the sequences, you didn't.

Good for you!!! I find climbing is a fun waste of time. How you or I choose to use it is a personal choice. You seem to prefer wasting time by gaining intimate knowledge of a few features and how to get over them, while I prefer variety...

I actually waste time both ways. Why limit your options to waste it?

Why do I need to repeat myself? I said, because "How you or I choose to use it is a personal choice."
Just please don't chip holds, retro-bolt or spend the day hogging a classic route. Those are evil deeds.


zeke_sf


Feb 26, 2009, 4:11 PM
Post #73 of 106 (8974 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730

Re: [LamontagnedeGatineau] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

LamontagnedeGatineau wrote:
zeke_sf wrote:
zeke_sf wrote:
LamontagnedeGatineau wrote:
If you have to work it, hang-dog it, waste your time on it... did you really, REALLY send it???

Yes! Yes I did! And because you didn't take your time to work it, hang-dog it, and figure out the sequences, you didn't.

Good for you!!! I find climbing is a fun waste of time. How you or I choose to use it is a personal choice. You seem to prefer wasting time by gaining intimate knowledge of a few features and how to get over them, while I prefer variety...

I actually waste time both ways. Why limit your options to waste it?

Why do I need to repeat myself? I said, because "How you or I choose to use it is a personal choice."
Just please don't chip holds, retro-bolt or spend the day hogging a classic route. Those are evil deeds.

Repeat yourself as you deem necessary, I was just clarifying that I don't, in fact, spend all my time redpointing as you erroneously inferred. Most of my climbing time is spent trying to onsight.

I'm not really buying the "evil deeds" list. It's a little too much of a blanket-statement. Although, good fodder for plenty of flameage.


Partner cracklover


Feb 26, 2009, 6:06 PM
Post #74 of 106 (8948 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [zeke_sf] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

zeke_sf wrote:
cracklover wrote:
Just because I think a lot of you missed this...

The OP is about to send his first *gym* 12.

Mr. Togden - just so you know, gym grades don't mean shit. I can tell you that from personal experience, as a former gym rat.

togden wrote:
I have yet to lead a 5.12 all the way, but I've gotten really close, and fully expect to get my first 5.12 in the next few weeks.

togden wrote:
I was climbing {in Little and Big Cottonwood} 2 or 3 times a week from last March till the snow kept me indoors. Now I climb at the local gym, Momentum (Where they just had the SCS Open National Comp) once or twice a week.

Cheers,

GO

So? Gym climbing is harder. Just ask Angry.

Yeah, but Angry's full of shit. Just ask Majid.

GO


zeke_sf


Feb 26, 2009, 6:10 PM
Post #75 of 106 (9008 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730

Re: [cracklover] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
zeke_sf wrote:
cracklover wrote:
Just because I think a lot of you missed this...

The OP is about to send his first *gym* 12.

Mr. Togden - just so you know, gym grades don't mean shit. I can tell you that from personal experience, as a former gym rat.

togden wrote:
I have yet to lead a 5.12 all the way, but I've gotten really close, and fully expect to get my first 5.12 in the next few weeks.

togden wrote:
I was climbing {in Little and Big Cottonwood} 2 or 3 times a week from last March till the snow kept me indoors. Now I climb at the local gym, Momentum (Where they just had the SCS Open National Comp) once or twice a week.

Cheers,

GO

So? Gym climbing is harder. Just ask Angry.

Yeah, but Angry's full of shit. Just ask Majid.

GO

Well, then I call in Jakedatc!


Wunderkind


Feb 26, 2009, 6:24 PM
Post #76 of 106 (3562 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 7, 2008
Posts: 120

Re: [cracklover] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

For what it is worth:
My judgement, as an out of towner, of SLC gym grades is that they grade boulder problems pretty stiff compared the gyms here on the east coast (almost feel comparable to what little bouldering I've done outside) but the routes at Momentum and Rockreation are soft. I've climbed harder by a number grade at both of those gyms than I have outside. My local gym seems to be just the opposite - soft bouldering and pretty stiff routes. So yes, indoor grades don't mean anything, but some (me included) like having them as goals over the winter. All that being said, I do think both of those gyms are great.


Partner cracklover


Feb 26, 2009, 6:37 PM
Post #77 of 106 (3553 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [zeke_sf] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

FTW!

GO


zeke_sf


Feb 26, 2009, 6:53 PM
Post #78 of 106 (3548 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730

Re: [cracklover] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
FTW!

GO

Heh.


Partner cracklover


Feb 26, 2009, 7:04 PM
Post #79 of 106 (3539 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [zeke_sf] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

zeke_sf wrote:
cracklover wrote:
FTW!

GO

Heh.

I meant both by summoning Jake, and by turning the page.

GO


zeke_sf


Feb 26, 2009, 7:07 PM
Post #80 of 106 (3535 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730

Re: [cracklover] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
zeke_sf wrote:
cracklover wrote:
FTW!

GO

Heh.

I meant both by summoning Jake, and by turning the page.

GO

JFTPTFTW!!!

Oh, I got it. Hence, "heh". The who recs/disses who on rc.knob thing would be a funny thread. Would anybody remain standing in the end?


Tree_wrangler


Feb 26, 2009, 7:34 PM
Post #81 of 106 (3528 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 8, 2007
Posts: 403

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I don't climb 5.12, and I've been loosely in the sport for over 15 years.

I have no interest in just making moves on short 50' routes.

I prefer remote crags, I prefer multi-pitch, and I prefer gear placements to bolts (although I love bolt anchors....)

Does this answer some of your question yet? Grades are subjective. Good for you, you can make dynamic and powerful moves in highly controlled environments.

I'll still bet that you'd shit your pants on some of the backcountry 5.6/5.7's that I've done. It's just less easy to define the skill-set I've had to build to chase my dream.

And yes, I'd like to climb 5.12. But if I can't do it 300'+ up, on gear, in 80 mph wind gusts, with terrible rope drag, in a location where an ankle-break might spell real tragedy, after hiking 60 lbs. of gear in on the bushwhack, it's just a meaningless number.

I can do 5.12 moves in a gym. I climb about 5.7-5.9 "way out there".

And I'm guessing that you're a little younger than I, perhaps not with kiddos, career, house payments.

If that's the case, you're in a good position to invest in the sport and push limits. Good luck.


Tree_wrangler


Feb 26, 2009, 7:38 PM
Post #82 of 106 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 8, 2007
Posts: 403

Re: [seatbeltpants] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
i think age has to have something to do with any assessment of this. i've only been climbing for a year and can grovel up 5.10s, but figure that's not the end of the world cos i started when i was 30. if i was 16, however, that might be rubbish. hell, i've seen 12 or 13 year olds cruise up harder stuff than i've ever tried and i figure that strength to weight ratio has to have something to do with that.

meh.

steve

When I was 17, I'd swagger up to a rock and thrash my way up whatever. I'd push myself way out of my element, gambling on having no consequences.

Now, I'm 33, and if I can't do it in a relaxed style, in control, it's just not right. I had to downgrade myself, and relearn some of the easier grades, to learn how to climb them in control, conciously, without constantly gambling on the unknown risks.


krusher4


Feb 26, 2009, 7:43 PM
Post #83 of 106 (3525 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 17, 2005
Posts: 997

Re: [Wunderkind] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Wunderkind wrote:
For what it is worth:
My judgement, as an out of towner, of SLC gym grades is that they grade boulder problems pretty stiff compared the gyms here on the east coast (almost feel comparable to what little bouldering I've done outside) but the routes at Momentum and Rockreation are soft. I've climbed harder by a number grade at both of those gyms than I have outside. My local gym seems to be just the opposite - soft bouldering and pretty stiff routes. So yes, indoor grades don't mean anything, but some (me included) like having them as goals over the winter. All that being said, I do think both of those gyms are great.


I guess one thing I like about The Spot in Boulder is they have a dot system for their grades...no one really knows how they translate into outside but they are consistant in the gym.


Tree_wrangler


Feb 26, 2009, 7:46 PM
Post #84 of 106 (3522 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 8, 2007
Posts: 403

Re: [zeke_sf] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
So? Gym climbing is harder. Just ask Angry.

It is harder. Harder to be there. Harder to take the stupid sounds of techno music while you climb, harder to *not* take a swing at someone, harder to learn anything.

But it's not harder to leave those places. That's easy.


dingus


Feb 26, 2009, 7:48 PM
Post #85 of 106 (3520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [Tree_wrangler] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Tree_wrangler wrote:
In reply to:
i think age has to have something to do with any assessment of this. i've only been climbing for a year and can grovel up 5.10s, but figure that's not the end of the world cos i started when i was 30. if i was 16, however, that might be rubbish. hell, i've seen 12 or 13 year olds cruise up harder stuff than i've ever tried and i figure that strength to weight ratio has to have something to do with that.

meh.

steve

When I was 17, I'd swagger up to a rock and thrash my way up whatever. I'd push myself way out of my element, gambling on having no consequences.

Now, I'm 33, and if I can't do it in a relaxed style, in control, it's just not right. I had to downgrade myself, and relearn some of the easier grades, to learn how to climb them in control, conciously, without constantly gambling on the unknown risks.

I think you raise a great point TW.

One of my main back country partners, a dude I have praised here online more than once, was an absolute master of control climbing in situations of grave danger.

In the gym, screwing around on top rope, even bouldering? I could if not match him move for move come reasonably close.

But the thing about Stu, the thing that placed him squarely in the elite of our sport, despite the fact he never climbed 5.13 in his life - he could climb under complete mental control right up to his limit, on lead, runnout.

Not could.... DID. For decades. The coolest mind I ever roped up with; Stu.

A few of his leads that I followed, deep in the back country, in the Winds, the Tetons, the Sierra, the Cascades... I was STUNNED by the seriousness coupled with the calm steady reserve. This dude NEVER wigged out, NEVER lost control, not EVER.

A master of his domain.

I always aspired for that sort of mental control. He'd climb stout and fearsome 5.11 pitches a day or two from the nearest car.

Part of it was personality and temperment - he's just a calm and steady man, at the root.

But too, he paid his freakin dues, like all the goodun's do. He earned his self-confidence.

Cheers
DMT


yanqui


Feb 26, 2009, 9:23 PM
Post #86 of 106 (3487 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 24, 2004
Posts: 1559

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

togden wrote:

I am fortunate enough to live within 20 minutes of Little and Big Cottonwood Canyons in Utah and I was climbing there 2 or 3 times a week

There are lots of good, hard, low-level 5.12s in Big and Little Cottonwood. Let us know when you've sent a few of them.


kriso9tails


Feb 27, 2009, 1:14 AM
Post #87 of 106 (3442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [LamontagnedeGatineau] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

LamontagnedeGatineau wrote:
kriso9tails wrote:
jrathfon wrote:
p.p.s. trad routes ARE harder

Nah, they're just graded wrong.

Nah, trad 5.12 existed before sports climbing existed.

I'm aware, but modern climbers can hardly be blamed for the lack of foresight of people back in the sixties and seventies.


jakedatc


Feb 27, 2009, 3:17 AM
Post #88 of 106 (3429 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [zeke_sf] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

zeke_sf wrote:
cracklover wrote:
zeke_sf wrote:
cracklover wrote:
FTW!

GO

Heh.

I meant both by summoning Jake, and by turning the page.

GO

JFTPTFTW!!!

Oh, I got it. Hence, "heh". The who recs/disses who on rc.knob thing would be a funny thread. Would anybody remain standing in the end?

what the fuck do you want? ;)

Took me 7 years since i started climbing.. 4-5 since i started leading to send .12

never sent a .12 in my gym since they sandbag like bastards (which is good cuz it makes you strong haha)

PS many trad 10's are upgraded to .11's because at one point .10 was the "limit" so no one called it an .11

/retrobolts LamontagnedeGatineau's project, flashes it, then sprays about it on 8a.nu Pirate


LamontagnedeGatineau


Feb 27, 2009, 3:56 AM
Post #89 of 106 (3424 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2008
Posts: 17

Re: [jakedatc] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
/retrobolts LamontagnedeGatineau's project, flashes it, then sprays about it on 8a.nu Pirate

First: I never posted anything on 8a.nu: I couldn't care less about the ego trip of the site.
Second: Retro-bolting is like smearing a mustache on the Mona Lisa. It sucks. If you don't have the balls to climb it in the the same style as one how opened it, leave it alone: There are lots of other sport climbs and there are lots of other climbers who may respect it as is.


Partner angry


Feb 27, 2009, 4:00 AM
Post #90 of 106 (3422 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405

Re: [cracklover] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The gym is sick.

Anyone who hasn't sent Brothers in Arms can't rebut (that's a new rule I just made, it's totally sweet).


zeke_sf


Feb 27, 2009, 5:02 AM
Post #91 of 106 (3410 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730

Re: [angry] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Whoo!!! The gym is sick FTW!!!


jakedatc


Feb 27, 2009, 5:08 AM
Post #92 of 106 (3409 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [LamontagnedeGatineau] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

LamontagnedeGatineau wrote:
In reply to:
/retrobolts LamontagnedeGatineau's project, flashes it, then sprays about it on 8a.nu Pirate

First: I never posted anything on 8a.nu: I couldn't care less about the ego trip of the site.
Second: Retro-bolting is like smearing a mustache on the Mona Lisa. It sucks. If you don't have the balls to climb it in the the same style as one how opened it, leave it alone: There are lots of other sport climbs and there are lots of other climbers who may respect it as is.

i added the 8a part for giggles.

i have no issues with reto bolts done by or with permission of the FA... especially at a sport area. (without permission isn't cool) I also climb at an area that does not have the best rock for taking gear. I'm also a fan of mixed routes.. some gear.. some bolts.. go with what the route takes.
my first .12 (still need pics of me on it though.. photos taken were lost :( )



Partner cracklover


Feb 27, 2009, 4:30 PM
Post #93 of 106 (3373 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [angry] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

angry wrote:
The gym is sick.

Anyone who hasn't sent Brothers in Arms can't rebut (that's a new rule I just made, it's totally sweet).

Okay, well since I fell all over BIA just seconding it!!! I won't try to rebut your statement that gym climbing is the shit.

Instead, I'll take that as a given, and remind you that I believe we have established that I was once a stronger gym-weenie than you have ever been. So, what do I win? How about an oversized pink fluffy chalk bag? Seems about right.

GO


zeke_sf


Feb 28, 2009, 4:06 AM
Post #94 of 106 (3338 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730

Re: [cracklover] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
angry wrote:
The gym is sick.

Anyone who hasn't sent Brothers in Arms can't rebut (that's a new rule I just made, it's totally sweet).

Okay, well since I fell all over BIA just seconding it!!! I won't try to rebut your statement that gym climbing is the shit.

Instead, I'll take that as a given, and remind you that I believe we have established that I was once a stronger gym-weenie than you have ever been. So, what do I win? How about an oversized pink fluffy chalk bag? Seems about right.

GO

Pink fluffy chalk bags FTW!!!


desertwanderer81


Mar 2, 2009, 7:49 PM
Post #95 of 106 (3293 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 5, 2007
Posts: 2272

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

you're teh newbz until you're climbing at least 13a's.

Really though, why come here bragging about it? To me and many others climbing is a very personal thing.....the only reason why I would even share it with other people are potential partners so that you can get an idea about the ability of the other person.....


summerprophet


Mar 2, 2009, 8:36 PM
Post #96 of 106 (3288 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 17, 2004
Posts: 764

Re: [lena_chita] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
Not everyone wants to put the effort, mental or physical, into doing it.

And some of us are just happy as pigs in shit, cruising up thousands of feet of 5.10, rather than beating ourselves up over a 30' 5.12.

At the end of the season, it isn't the numbers you remember, but the friends, the views and the pure beauty of the mountains that fill your thoughts.

EDIT: Missed that this was the sport climbers forum...... ignore the above statements. You folks are all about the numbers. I don't get you... you don't get me, lets just agree to disagree.


(This post was edited by summerprophet on Mar 2, 2009, 8:39 PM)


patmay81


Mar 2, 2009, 9:52 PM
Post #97 of 106 (3274 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 3, 2006
Posts: 1081

Re: [Valarc] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Valarc wrote:
Spray spray spray spray.

Some people climb hard right away, some people work their way up slowly. Some people never get there period.

Personally, I don't care which route folks take, but the little pissants who spray about it get on my nerves.
speaking of spray, I thought it was funny in the last issue of Climbing there was a quote from Hannonld (sp?) that was something to the effect of, "I like soloing because you can climb super easy and people are always impressed". The dude is soloing 1000'+ 5.11 and harder. I have a hard time dogging up some of the stuff he would solo, and other stuff he climbs I could only dream about doing.


phillygoat


Mar 4, 2009, 5:14 PM
Post #98 of 106 (3196 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 22, 2004
Posts: 428

Re: [Tree_wrangler] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Tree_wrangler wrote:
I don't climb 5.12, and I've been loosely in the sport for over 15 years.

I have no interest in just making moves on short 50' routes.

I prefer remote crags, I prefer multi-pitch, and I prefer gear placements to bolts (although I love bolt anchors....)

Does this answer some of your question yet? Grades are subjective. Good for you, you can make dynamic and powerful moves in highly controlled environments.

I'll still bet that you'd shit your pants on some of the backcountry 5.6/5.7's that I've done. It's just less easy to define the skill-set I've had to build to chase my dream.

And yes, I'd like to climb 5.12. But if I can't do it 300'+ up, on gear, in 80 mph wind gusts, with terrible rope drag, in a location where an ankle-break might spell real tragedy, after hiking 60 lbs. of gear in on the bushwhack, it's just a meaningless number.

I can do 5.12 moves in a gym. I climb about 5.7-5.9 "way out there".

And I'm guessing that you're a little younger than I, perhaps not with kiddos, career, house payments.

If that's the case, you're in a good position to invest in the sport and push limits. Good luck.


This reminds me of a Chevy truck ad. ^


jakedatc


Mar 4, 2009, 5:39 PM
Post #99 of 106 (3189 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [phillygoat] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sounds like his gym grades are soft Laugh

but really... why bother spewing alpine trad ideals in the sport forum...


ACJ


Mar 5, 2009, 3:26 PM
Post #100 of 106 (3147 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2008
Posts: 162

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hmm, it took me about 2 hours to climb my first 12.

Climbing 12's is hard, for anyone. I skip a lot of 12's because of lack of partners to do them with and getting more joy out of climbing a bunch of 5.9-5.10 instead of working the hard stuff.

Then again, without a seasonal project climbing does get dull for me.


Partner camhead


Mar 5, 2009, 3:30 PM
Post #101 of 106 (1709 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [ACJ] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I don't climb 5.12.

I've done a lot of fluff grade 12s, that I've since downgraded to 11+, though. It works pretty well for me.


kriso9tails


Mar 6, 2009, 3:56 AM
Post #102 of 106 (1674 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [camhead] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
I don't climb 5.12.

I've done a lot of fluff grade 12s, that I've since downgraded to 11+, though. It works pretty well for me.

Better to be a downgrader than a fluffer.


clausti


Apr 1, 2009, 7:38 PM
Post #103 of 106 (1570 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 5, 2004
Posts: 5690

Re: [krusher4] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

krusher4 wrote:
if you climb harder routes the routes you want to do are never taken ;-)

except for at the red. where you routinely have to wait in line for .12s.


clausti


Apr 1, 2009, 7:38 PM
Post #104 of 106 (1569 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 5, 2004
Posts: 5690

Re: [clausti] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

oh, and about two years, after i started climbing outside.


krusher4


Apr 1, 2009, 8:00 PM
Post #105 of 106 (1560 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 17, 2005
Posts: 997

Re: [clausti] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

clausti wrote:
krusher4 wrote:
if you climb harder routes the routes you want to do are never taken ;-)

except for at the red. where you routinely have to wait in line for .12s.

yeah that's true


Alphaboth


Apr 1, 2009, 8:07 PM
Post #106 of 106 (1558 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 2, 2008
Posts: 116

Re: [togden] How long did it take for you to send your first 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I've been climbing for 3 years now, but only starting training within in the last year. I'm still trying to break into that 5.12 relm as well. I couldn't come close on an 11d I wass trying yesturday. Some people just have a natural ability to climb hard I think and some people have the mentality to climb hard. 5.12 is certainly my ultimate goal, to be able to climb hard 5.12s. If your in shape and you want it, you can climb 5.12 it's that simple. that's what i've heard the most people said. and if you really want it you cna climb 5.13 and if you realy want it and you were born to climb than maybe 5.14


Forums : Climbing Disciplines : Sport Climbing

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook