Forums: Climbing Information: General:
Why Purposely Run-out Routes?
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for General

Premier Sponsor:

 


itakealot


Jul 19, 2004, 8:11 PM
Post #1 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 8, 2003
Posts: 382

Why Purposely Run-out Routes?
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I see some climbers run out routes by skipping clips or not placing pro at bomber placement opportunities and was wondering what the point was.


billcoe_


Jul 19, 2004, 8:15 PM
Post #2 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Sometimes the pro isn't needed for safety, and sometimes stopping and putting it in will pump you out, so you pass it over to go to the next rest stance. Depends how high up you are and what are the risks of augering in.

When in doubt, put it in though.


boltdude


Jul 19, 2004, 8:15 PM
Post #3 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 30, 2002
Posts: 685

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

If you're going fast over comfortable terrain or linking pitches, running it out saves time and rope drag. Can be essential to doing long routes especially alpine stuff where you have to be off before the 1pm thunderstorm.

But if you're talking about your local short crag, it's probably just someone showing off...


jt512


Jul 19, 2004, 8:16 PM
Post #4 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I see some climbers run out routes by skipping clips or not placing pro at bomber placement opportunities and was wondering what the point was.

Too pumped to stop.

The climbing is easy for them.

Mental training.

-Jay


jakedatc


Jul 19, 2004, 8:16 PM
Post #5 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Sometimes it's easier to skip a bolt that is in a bad spot than to waste the energy to clip.. same with gear i suppose but i'd leave both to folks with quite a lot of experience to judge weather or not it's safe to do so... and if you're not sure.. you are not in that group so clip or plug gear


Partner euroford


Jul 19, 2004, 8:16 PM
Post #6 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 26, 2002
Posts: 2913

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

placing pro on lead takes time and causes ropedrag, removing pro while following also takes time and perpetuates said rope drag, all increasing the pump and taking more time. so, if you want to move fast and feel comfy at the grade, run it out.

a couple weeks ago, my buddy got tired of messing with it, slapped in a black alien and pulled through the crux to run it out ~25 feet. pretty balzy but it kept the pump clock at bay, sometimes its harder to hang out and mess with gear than it is to just send.


davidji


Jul 19, 2004, 8:19 PM
Post #7 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 30, 2003
Posts: 1776

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I see some climbers run out routes by skipping clips or not placing pro at bomber placement opportunities and was wondering what the point was.
I've seen people place gear in places they could walk up, no hands, and prematurely run out of gear, and be unable to finish the pitch. Not saying we should never place gear on easy terrain, but we need to be mindful of how much gear we have, where we might need it, etc.

Mostly when I skip bolts it's because I didn't see them. I've skipped a couple on purpose once when rearranging the pitches meant I was short of slings. Couldda just used a biner, but I figured the climbing was pretty easy, and I didn't mind running it out a little. I've repeated that pitch a couple of times, and was plenty happy for all the bolts and had no inclination to skip any. I guess perspectives change...


Partner rrrADAM


Jul 19, 2004, 8:19 PM
Post #8 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17553

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I see some climbers run out routes by skipping clips or not placing pro at bomber placement opportunities and was wondering what the point was.

They don't take a lot. J/K :lol:

When climbers are cl.imbing well within their abilities, they tend to climb quickly, and placing what is deemed as un-necessary pro is inefficient. It's akin to not using a crashpad when on a warmup problem well within your abilities.


As for FAs establishing Trad routes like that... Trad can have bolts, but the ethic of Trad is to have as little impact on the rock as possible, so many times Trad routes with bolts tend to be runout, like those in Tuolumne. If the slab sections were bolted every 6-10 feet, they would not bew Trad routes, they'd be Sport routes.


jt512


Jul 19, 2004, 8:25 PM
Post #9 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
a couple weeks ago, my buddy got tired of messing with it, slapped in a black alien and pulled through the crux to run it out ~25 feet. pretty balzy but it kept the pump clock at bay, sometimes its harder to hang out and mess with gear than it is to just send.

Euroford, unless you want to go the way of the Edsel, you might want to consider not running out a climb above a single piece of body weight pro.

-Jay


mother_sheep


Jul 19, 2004, 8:26 PM
Post #10 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 18, 2002
Posts: 3984

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Sport: I rarely skip a bolt!!! If I do it's because I'm in a spot where I'd pump out tring to clip the bolt so I move on.

Trad: If the climbing is easy/mental training (like Jay said)

Alpine: To save time, I place less gear. Lots of run outs on my alpine leads.


slablizard


Jul 19, 2004, 8:28 PM
Post #11 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 5558

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Always thought that TRADITIONAL climbing involved the placement of gear on lead...
A runout bolted route is a runout sport route...Or no?

Did they developed all those routes ground up? I s that that makes them traditional? Or is the fact that thy're runout?


jt512


Jul 19, 2004, 8:34 PM
Post #12 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Always thought that TRADITIONAL climbing involved the placement of gear on lead...
A runout bolted route is a runout sport route...Or no?

Did they developed all those routes ground up? I s that that makes them traditional? Or is the fact that thy're runout?

Leaders have been placing bolts long before sport climbing was invented. If the bolts are placed minimally and by hand on lead, the route is a trad route.

-Jay


climb_plastic


Jul 19, 2004, 8:56 PM
Post #13 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 24, 2003
Posts: 706

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I always forget to clip in and my belay partner doesn't say anything either. I think he wants to see how far I'd go before I realize anything.


flipnfall


Jul 19, 2004, 8:58 PM
Post #14 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 18, 2004
Posts: 717

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

TRUE STORIES

Because these people are like my freind, who's name (Dan) I won't mention, purposely ran out and placed only one size 4 nut on the entire 70-foot climb because, I'm not making this up, "It wouldn't have been any fun to place more pro." He then proceded to take a 30-foot whipper and the nut held. He replied, "Wow, I'm suprised that held because it wasn't a good placement."

He also likes to take corners on his crotch-rocket as fast as he "possibly can without spilling." This is the same guy who traversed 50 feet without placing any pro so that when I seconded I had nothing to protect me from taking a giant swing into a rock column below.

It's interesting to climb with him.

GT


benpullin


Jul 19, 2004, 9:09 PM
Post #15 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 14, 2003
Posts: 360

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Sometimes on really hard sport routes (cutting edge 14s, etc.) you'll see climbers skip clips because some of the bolts are "working bolts." These are only used for working the route and not needed on redpoint attempts.


Partner euroford


Jul 19, 2004, 9:10 PM
Post #16 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 26, 2002
Posts: 2913

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
a couple weeks ago, my buddy got tired of messing with it, slapped in a black alien and pulled through the crux to run it out ~25 feet. pretty balzy but it kept the pump clock at bay, sometimes its harder to hang out and mess with gear than it is to just send.

Euroford, unless you want to go the way of the Edsel, you might want to consider not running out a climb above a single piece of body weight pro.

-Jay

agreed. but where does the term 'when in doubt run it out' come from? if you were stuck with a tricky placement at a pumpy stance and could only plug in a black alien, would it be better to risk actually testing that placement and spend more time faffing about with gear or would it be better to run it out to a better stance? i guess this doesn't fall into the topic of 'purposely running out', it was a valid case for doing so. on the other hand, after pulling the rope i took my turn, having watched him lead it first and having followed him afterwords to clean i had a better game plan and set more better pro (we were also climbing with diffrent racks), but perhaps if i was attempting to flash the route i would have been in a simular situation for my lead.

i should also add, that despite the fall being very long, the fall factor would have been very low. the alien was as bomber as could be, in a near perfect placement on very solid quartzite. if ever a situation existing for a success story of a huge whipper on a micro cam this was it.


vegastradguy


Jul 19, 2004, 9:13 PM
Post #17 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

it really depends.

sport- i'll never skip a bolt, but then i havent been climbing overhanging routes much. i imagine that may change when the overhangs become more popular.

trad- usually its in the interest of speed when on easy ground. however, i'll always protect so that if a fall should occur, i wont hit anything. of course, most of the time when i'm running it out its because the guy who did the FA thought it would be fun to climb 40' between bolts on a 5.9 slab. heh. good stuff!

bouldering- i regularly free solo in this category. :P


jt512


Jul 19, 2004, 9:29 PM
Post #18 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
a couple weeks ago, my buddy got tired of messing with it, slapped in a black alien and pulled through the crux to run it out ~25 feet. pretty balzy but it kept the pump clock at bay, sometimes its harder to hang out and mess with gear than it is to just send.

Euroford, unless you want to go the way of the Edsel, you might want to consider not running out a climb above a single piece of body weight pro.

-Jay

agreed. but where does the term 'when in doubt run it out' come from?

From the mouths of sarcastic climbers, mainly. Unless you are really sure about your gear, then the opposite is true: when in doubt, back it up. Even if placing the additional piece causes you to pump out and fall, you'll be falling on good, backed-up gear.

In reply to:
if you were stuck with a tricky placement at a pumpy stance and could only plug in a black alien, would it be better to risk actually testing that placement and spend more time faffing about with gear or would it be better to run it out to a better stance?

First of all, you can't just "plug in" a micro cam. Micro cams must be meticulously placed if you want them to hold a fall.

You said you ran it out 25' feet above a black Alien that you just "plugged in." So if you fell, you'd be taking a 50-footer onto a piece that probably would not have held. Presumably, you'd have decked, and been seriously injured or killed. Finding yourself in such a situation is prima facie evidence of having done something wrong.

In reply to:
on the other hand, after pulling the rope i took my turn, having watched him lead it first and having followed him afterwords to clean i had a better game plan and set more better pro (we were also climbing with diffrent racks)...

I think that that is a hint. I think you were in a little over your head leading this route, and ended up getting yourself unnecessarily into a life-or-death situation. With more experience, it sounds like you would have been able to plan out your gear placements better, so as to avoid having to take such a risk.

In reply to:
i should also add, that despite the fall being very long, the fall factor would have been very low.

Even if you were at the end of a 200' pitch, a 50' fall would be a factor-.25. That's not "very low."

In reply to:
the alien was as bomber as could be, in a near perfect placement on very solid quartzite. if ever a situation existing for a success story of a huge whipper on a micro cam this was it.

I've never risked such a fall, and I've been climbing a lot longer than you. The last time I found myself in the position of having only a single black Alien between me and a death fall, I backed off.

-Jay


Partner euroford


Jul 19, 2004, 9:37 PM
Post #19 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 26, 2002
Posts: 2913

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

okay, replace the word "plug in" and "slapped in" with "place" :roll:

anyways, the alien was frikin solid, anyways, who gives a shit! i don't need to justify my friends lead to you. it was a bold clean lead, one that i'm sure he's very proud of. i truly believe that if he had taken the whip it would have been of little consiquence, even if the alien had pulled, there were pieces below it obviously. its simply a case of a leader climbing within his abilities and making the gear choices which he feels are best.


jt512


Jul 19, 2004, 9:42 PM
Post #20 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
okay, replace the word "plug in" and "slapped in" with "place" :roll:

anyways, the alien was frikin solid, anyways, who gives a s---! i don't need to justify my friends lead to you.

Based on the last couple of threads I've seen you post in, I think you may be the next recipient of the MHR2000 Memorial Award Know-It-All Gumby Award.

-Jay


jakedatc


Jul 19, 2004, 9:45 PM
Post #21 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I always forget to clip in and my belay partner doesn't say anything either. I think he wants to see how far I'd go before I realize anything.
You're partner is a dumbass and should probably be replaced

In reply to:
This is the same guy who traversed 50 feet without placing any pro so that when I seconded I had nothing to protect me from taking a giant swing into a rock column below.
It's interesting to climb with him.
why would you want to put yourself in that situation... it's not ballsy or badass when you leave your second out to dry like that.. i'd have a talk with them too. jeesh


Partner euroford


Jul 19, 2004, 9:46 PM
Post #22 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 26, 2002
Posts: 2913

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Based on the last couple of threads I've seen you post in, I think you may be the next recipient of the MHR2000 Memorial Award Know-It-All Gumby Award.

-Jay

it would be an honor.


billcoe_


Jul 19, 2004, 9:54 PM
Post #23 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I don't think JT read GT's post.

Jake may have already tolen your thunder on that one JT! :lol: :lol: :lol:

GT, an expert can and will chose to put in a #4 nut in a 70 foot pitch as they have the experiance and mind control to make a safe decision, even if we mortals think it's crazy. Dean Potter can almost fly up a 5.11 route. He puts in little pro when cranking for speed. I won't even try to judge that.

However, for your friend - or anybody- to make the choice for you on a 50" traverse with fatal potential is unforgivable unless there is some mitigating factors you haven't mentioned yet. (Like it was 5.5 and starting to get dark with lots of ground before it got flat, and you are a solid 5.10 leader blah blah -that would be one of those examples)

Thats my opinion, yup, get a new partner.

PS, no awards Euro, sorry, but JT's not on the awards committee.

edited for spelling too.


Partner euroford


Jul 19, 2004, 10:02 PM
Post #24 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 26, 2002
Posts: 2913

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I don't think JT read GT's post.

i'm sure he read it. but him and i are having some kind of weird love afair on the forums and he can't help but make huge involving replies to my posts. i think he should be more honest with his feelings, but everybody expresses in diffrent ways :P


jt512


Jul 19, 2004, 10:04 PM
Post #25 of 49 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
...he can't help but make huge involving replies to my posts.

Some people call that "being helpful."

-Jay


Partner euroford


Jul 19, 2004, 10:06 PM
Post #26 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 26, 2002
Posts: 2913

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
...he can't help but make huge involving replies to my posts.

Some people call that "being helpful."

-Jay

i love you to man!!







okay anyways. back on topic.


tripperjm


Jul 19, 2004, 10:17 PM
Post #27 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2002
Posts: 10650

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Sometimes on really hard sport routes (cutting edge 14s, etc.) you'll see climbers skip clips because some of the bolts are "working bolts." These are only used for working the route and not needed on redpoint attempts.

This is the tactic I used to do the fa on the "Twist of Fate", of course I took a number of long but safe falls before sending... and...ummm... it wasn't 5.14. I never could figure out how to clip that bolt


gambler


Jul 19, 2004, 11:05 PM
Post #28 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 2, 2002
Posts: 85

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

vegastradguy wrote:

In reply to:
"that may change when the overhangs become more popular"


do you really thing overhangs will become popular? :wink:

gambler


tripperjm


Jul 19, 2004, 11:30 PM
Post #29 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2002
Posts: 10650

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

[quote="gambler"]vegastradguy wrote:

In reply to:
"that may change when the overhangs become more popular"


do you really thing overhangs will become popular? :wink:

gambler

Not likely, too strenuous and scary for most.


itakealot


Jul 20, 2004, 1:10 AM
Post #30 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 8, 2003
Posts: 382

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Mental training.

-Jay

With all the flaming going on, I am suprised no one flamed Jay on this statement.


tripperjm


Jul 20, 2004, 2:00 AM
Post #31 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2002
Posts: 10650

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Mental training.

-Jay

With all the flaming going on, I am suprised no one flamed Jay on this statement.

Craig ????? I don't get it. Given that 90% of climbing is mental, training to do moves above gear is a great excercise. I often skip clips on moderate ground for just this reason. While projecting, on work runs, I have also jumped from the bolt(instead of clipping it) above a crux runout to get mentaly prepared for red point.

That why I DONT take a lot. HAHAHA!!!1


mheyman


Jul 20, 2004, 3:07 AM
Post #32 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 25, 2002
Posts: 607

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
anyways, the alien was frikin solid, anyways, who gives a s---! i don't need to justify my friends lead to you.

No you didn't, but you posted it so now you get to read what we think.

In reply to:
it was a bold clean lead, one that i'm sure he's very proud of. i truly believe that if he had taken the whip it would have been of little consiquence, even if the alien had pulled, there were pieces below it obviously.

If the alien had pulled with little energy absorption, what would the fall factor have been?

In reply to:
its simply a case of a leader climbing within his abilities and making the gear choices which he feels are best.

Despite what I have written above, if your friend was capable of easily soloing this route, then perhaps it wasn't as dumb a thing to do as you have made it sound.


beesty511


Jul 20, 2004, 4:15 AM
Post #33 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 4, 2004
Posts: 336

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

This is another possible result when running it out on easy terrain:

from the NPS site
http://data2.itc.nps.gov/morningreport/

In reply to:
Yosemite National Park (CA)
Climbing Fatality on Lower Cathedral Rock

On the morning of Saturday, May 31st, Chris Hampson, 25, of Breckenridge, Colorado, died while climbing the Overhang Bypass route on Lower Cathedral Rock in Yosemite Valley. Climbing a considerable distance above his last protection, Hampson took a leader fall of at least 80 feet and was caught by his partner, Sybille Hechtel. Hampson ended up around a corner from Hechtel and did not respond to her yells. Minutes after the fall another climber, Bob Jensen, happened upon Hechtel while free soloing the same route. Jensen climbed up to a point on the route where he could see Hampson hanging more than 40 feet below. Jensen called out to Hampson and encouraged him to try to climb back up. Hampson could not climb and appeared disoriented to Jensen. Hampson also said that he could not see. Without gear to descend to Hampson, Jensen down-climbed the route and then drove to the Valley SAR cache, where he reported the incident at 12:15 p.m. SAR team members responded and a paramedic was with Hampson by 1:57 p.m. Medical control at the Yosemite Medical Clinic pronounced Hampson dead via the radio at 2:12 p.m. Hampson’s body was lowered about 300 feet to a ledge. From there he was transported by long line under the park helicopter to the Crane Flat Helibase. Hampson received severe trauma to his head in the fall. He was not wearing a helmet.
(Submitted by Jack Hoeflich, IC)
In reply to:
My apologies for not posting about this tragedy earlier. The NPS report posted by Melissa and freeclimber explains the basics of what happened last Saturday (thanks for posting that information). Chris’s death has been hard on everyone, and I want to make sure other climbers have the right information about how he died, or at least the best information we have. I work as a climbing ranger in Yosemite Valley and assisted with the rescue effort.

For those who are not familiar with the Overhang Bypass route, Sybille was belaying at the base of a long low angle ramp/corner called the “Hog Trough” that ends with a moderately difficult mantle move (5.8 of 5.9) where a large block fell off the route a number of years ago. Based on where Chris stopped after taking his fall, he likely fell while climbing in easier terrain well above this “crux” move.

After leaving the belay he clipped his rope into a runner on a tree part way up the trough. He then continued up past another tree, likely climbed through the mantle, and then fell somewhere higher on the pitch. The second tree that he passed on the trough (but did not clip with a runner) was what caught his fall when his rope ran over its trunk.

He was not wearing a helmet on the route and likely sustained a serious head injury during his fall.

After Bob Jensen reported the accident Keith Lober and I simul-climbed the route as an initial blitz while others followed with additional equipment. By the time we reached a high point above Chris and lowered to his location he had already died. Sybille has worked with Yosemite’s rescue team for decades, and she did all that she could have done in this situation. Two additional climbers were also on the route, and I’d like to thank them again for their help.

Though I only met Chris briefly a few weeks ago, over the last few days I have learned from others what an amazing and inspirational person he was. My condolences to his friends and family, and I’m glad that some of those friends are now friends of my own.

I can’t guarantee how often I will be checking this forum over the next week, but I will do my best to answer questions and provide information when I can.

My thanks to all who joined in Camp 4 Sunday morning.

-Link


Partner tim


Jul 20, 2004, 5:51 PM
Post #34 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 4, 2002
Posts: 4861

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

whoa, I'm starting to really like Beesty.

I hate having to justify why I'm putting in a couple pieces before a hard, delicate, or hazardous move. I climb to have fun, not to prove that I'm dumb enough to become a paraplegic (or an organ donor).

The flip side to this is that if I'm really willing to run it out, way way out, I'll either solo the damn thing or let my partner know that I'm going to die if I come off. At least that's honest. (this is when I'm past the point of no return and discover that no, I'm not going to get anything until the belay). Same thing with alpine terrain -- it's pretty much a given that you're going to get hurt, badly, if you blow it on an alpine route.

'Mental training' is fine with a clean fall and some solid pro, but some of the examples -- running it out on a black alien, whipping 30' on a bad nut -- do not represent 'training' so much as 'a snap judgement on what your life is worth'. I'm guilty of the same -- a few weeks ago I jumped on Broomsticks at the Needles and realized at some point that if I came off, I was probably going to deck from 100' up. I had one decent piece in. Bold or stupid, I don't know, but the objective risk is hard to downplay.

I climb like an old man because I'm really warming up to the idea of making it that far ;-)


brownbear


Jul 20, 2004, 6:15 PM
Post #35 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 8, 2004
Posts: 17

Re: Why Purposely Run-out Routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Stupidity


skinnyjim


Jul 20, 2004, 6:26 PM
Post #36 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 1, 2003
Posts: 138

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

that is just ignorance.. not wearing a helmet and running it out 40 ft....


adamtd


Jul 20, 2004, 7:12 PM
Post #37 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 11, 2002
Posts: 187

Re: Why Purposely Run-out Routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

since I climb in an alpine setting usally, I skip placements for two reasons usually. 1. Speed - it takes time to place gear and the faster you climb the less time you are exposed to danger, on the same note though, you need ot be on terrain you know you aren't going to fall on, and that in teh event of an accident, the minimal gear you do have in will hold. 2. Decrease rope drag - on routes that wander, clipping every intermediate piece can increase rope drag to teh point that teh rope is pulling you off teh route.

My philosophy is that if you are doing it consciously and not just ignorant... go for it.


Partner hosh


Jul 20, 2004, 7:38 PM
Post #38 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2003
Posts: 1662

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yeah, I try and place gear when I can and avoid the run out. The last time I ran anything out was on a 5.10 line and it wasn't really even a real run-out. And I always wear a helmet. Always.


alpnclmbr1


Jul 20, 2004, 7:51 PM
Post #39 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 10, 2002
Posts: 3060

Re: Why Purposely Run-out Routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post



These scenarios depend on where the next good gear is below the bad/small gear.

A black alien can be a reasonable piece when it is at waist or foot level. Go much beyond that and it is a "bad" piece, pretty much by definition.

It is generally a bad idea to run it out off a known bad piece.

Free soloing, dragging a rope and a partner along with you is stupid.

Running it out can be a useful technique, but it can also be overdone.

"If in doubt, run it out." Effectively, it comes down to meaning, “don't stop to place gear in the middle of the crux move” or “don’t place gear in less then ideal places.”

For another example, starting a trad line it is often safer to go a little past the first place you feel like you need gear, before you place it. It seems and feels less safe but on balance, it ends up being safer.


Sport climbing/skipping bolts
Moderate: It can be good practice to skip bolts in order to practice focusing on the holds instead of the bolts. (actually falling while doing this would be stupid)

At your limit: Way useful in terms of energy conservation on steep safe routes. I skip bolts all the time on my projects.


petsfed


Jul 20, 2004, 10:27 PM
Post #40 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 8599

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
that is just ignorance.. not wearing a helmet and running it out 40 ft....

Would you believe that if you whip from 40 feet above a placement, the little shock absorption a helmet provides in wall+head impact is minimal at best? Helmets can and do save lives, but an 80 foot fall that involves head injuries, helmet or no, will end with a permanent wheel chair, if you're lucky.

As far as running it out goes, what do we deem moderate ground? I ran it out 100 feet today. It was 5.2, but I didn't need any more rope drag. Am I irresponsible? I didn't have to run it out. I could've protected if I wanted. But it was after the 5.7 section that started the pitch (which I also partially ran out for shear lack of good pro). But I must be playing with fire. Next time I'll rope up when I go downstairs to do laundry.


tradmanclimbs


Jul 23, 2004, 4:55 PM
Post #41 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 24, 2003
Posts: 2599

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It is crucial to look ahead when alpine or long trad rt climbing. If you skip a placement on the easy ground and then end up totaly gripped on a hard move with no gear you will be in big do do. running it out on easy ground is good to facilitate speed but you must be 100% on that terraine and you MUST look ahead and plan were your next piece is going to go. Example. Self to Self. ' ok this is cool, keep moveing, be smooth, don't pull on that it looks loose, ok looks like it gets hard up there lets get somthing in before we get there so we arnt placeing 60ft out on hard ground, ok thatstopper is bomber lets get up into the buisness there, $hit this is hard , glad i placed before i got into it, ok green alien ok lets go, smooth, climb like a kitty, don't pull on that block, ok bomber gold camalot looks like its cruise the last 40 feet to that bundel of tat up there, must be the belay, hot dam that was sick, OFF BELAY8^)


onbelay007


Jul 26, 2004, 11:51 PM
Post #42 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 20, 2004
Posts: 107

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It's easy to criticize when the whole situation has not been presented. First of all, I believe Euroford meant the fall would have been a total of 25 ft including rope stretch as I was about 10 ft above the black alien. My next piece was a bomber nut about 16 ft above the alien because 10 ft above it is a 18 inch standing ledge. Also, 2 ft below the alien was a bomber hex. In addition the climb was a stiff 5.6 (if you've ever climbed at Devil's Lake yes, there really are stiff 5.6s). Also, this was a climb I had toproped with ease several times. So, would I like to back up the alien? Sure, I would have loved to pop in a small nut two feet above it. I'm fully capable of climbing the crux so why take my first leader fall trying to pop in a piece in order to sew it up? After struggling with the pro for a few moments I just said screw it and took off without too much difficulty. I know my climbing ability. You know yours.


tradmanclimbs


Jul 27, 2004, 2:35 AM
Post #43 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 24, 2003
Posts: 2599

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

If there was a bomber hex 2 ft below the alien it was in fact backed up. End of conversation.


onbelay007


Jul 27, 2004, 2:52 AM
Post #44 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 20, 2004
Posts: 107

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Well 2 ft was probably exaggerating but yeah, there was a good piece below it. Just trying to explain a situation where I felt confident being above a small piece.


timpanogos


Jul 27, 2004, 3:56 AM
Post #45 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 17, 2002
Posts: 935

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I did a grade II supposedly 5.6 route with Alpinerocket in BCC last Saturday, Called Standard Ridge.

There was one full 60’ meter face pitch – guide book noted it – something like – steep section can be by-passed on the west.

There were a few possible lines on the by-pass – all had lots of pro, and it looked like plenty of 5.6 jugs/stances.

The face being by-passed – way too pretty for John! He wanted that lead. Run out – heck yea, rating – who knows – under vertical – plenty of edges – biggest being first knuckle type of deal. All the moves were there and solid – not pumpy, but who was to know what the next section would bring? – DFU and super focus because very little pro – and what there was had to be creative (tri-cams – very small nuts/tcu’s – wonder-a-bit for placements).

Like Jay is saying – way mental – 5.7 maybe 5.8 but DON’t FU, and there is NO turning back.

So it turned out a NBD (no big deal) for technical/hardness of climbing – but a super proud lead – based on needed focus, guts and commitment – run-out after run-out, on marginal placements for what did go in – the full 200’

Way proud lead!

Oh, that’s one reason you run it out.

Chad


kalcario


Jul 27, 2004, 4:13 AM
Post #46 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 1601

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

*Like Jay is saying – way mental – 5.7 maybe 5.8 but DON’t FU, and there is NO turning back.*

NO turning back. Really. Can't downclimb 5.7-5.8? That's your standard downclimb from the Josh free solo circuit.

Try that runout when it's actually hard climbing, runout 5.8 is what BEGINNERS crow about


timpanogos


Jul 27, 2004, 5:23 AM
Post #47 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 17, 2002
Posts: 935

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

yea, yea - thanks for the hardman input.

I'm a newby noob, never claimed any different. I've seen some run out, but never seen a full 200' of it.

stupid newby question, but does j-tree have 60 meter slabs/face climbs? Don't know never been there. I’d love to see you down climb 200’ of 5.8 however.

This was more of an alpine - only no 5 mile approach - lots of route finding, down climbing, simul climbing etc.

The point was – several lines of way easy/jugging by-pass, as suggested by guide book, or go for the harder run-out – because of the mental challenge – yes, sometimes you purposefully – run-it out.

If your mental is not pushed until some 5.10a slab or something – good on ya - for me, I was impressed with the 5.8 – it would have pushed my mental for sure.

I was also real impressed reading about Dwight Bishop’s climbing resume. Even with a climber as strong and experienced as him

DFU even if it’s NBD seems it better/should be a mental for all of us.


jcshaggy


Jul 27, 2004, 10:11 AM
Post #48 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 4, 2004
Posts: 340

Re: Why Purposely Run-out Routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yep! Sometimes I save energy skipping a bolt or two and i can actually finish the route.

When in doubt,clip in. I reckon you get a feel of what you can and cannot do over time. Experience plays a big part but hey, that's just my opinion!
Drink lots of beer in reflection!


itakealot


Jul 27, 2004, 10:56 PM
Post #49 of 49 (6014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 8, 2003
Posts: 382

Re: why purposely run out routes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
...he can't help but make huge involving replies to my posts.

Some people call that "being helpful."

-Jay

i love you to man!!

okay anyways. back on topic.

All of us who have gotten to know Jay over the years as feel the same.


Forums : Climbing Information : General

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook