|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 9, 2008, 3:54 AM
Post #1 of 237
(6472 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
Do you wear special clothes to climb? I mean the really expensive clothes that make you climb better. I climb in Thailand most of the time, and whenever I come back here I can't help but laugh at the guy who has a brand new pair of Prana pants for every day of the week. Now, I understand if your big walling, ice or alpine... sure, you need to wear some stuff that is gonna hold up and let you breath, etc. But come on, at a sport crag? Why the hell does it matter what you wear? As long as you can move, why do you have to have $$ pants. More importantly, why not spend your money on gas or gear that saves your life... or some instruction on how to not scream beta and not step on my rope. And if you really have enough money to buy all that stuff that the pro's wear (they get it free guys), then you should probably quit your job and climb more. If you STILL have money left over, then help finish the purchase of the Pendergrass-Murry Reserve, Quees Creek, or one of the thousand or so climbing areas that will be gone before I die. Sorry, just kind of weird. To me if you have money to spend on climbing, you use it to climb more. Not $70 pairs of pants and $30 beenies. So... what do you wear when the weather is good??
|
|
|
|
|
time2clmb
Sep 9, 2008, 4:06 AM
Post #2 of 237
(6459 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 26, 2007
Posts: 473
|
Oh fer fuck sakes. Yeah another "I am so miffed about what other people are wearing thread". Climb more and stop worrying about what people are wearing.
|
|
|
|
|
chossmonkey
Sep 9, 2008, 4:11 AM
Post #3 of 237
(6445 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 28414
|
rtwilli4 wrote: Do you wear special clothes to climb? I mean the really expensive clothes that make you climb better. I climb in Thailand most of the time, and whenever I come back here I can't help but laugh at the guy who has a brand new pair of Prana pants for every day of the week. Now, I understand if your big walling, ice or alpine... sure, you need to wear some stuff that is gonna hold up and let you breath, etc. But come on, at a sport crag? Why the hell does it matter what you wear? As long as you can move, why do you have to have $$ pants. More importantly, why not spend your money on gas or gear that saves your life... or some instruction on how to not scream beta and not step on my rope. And if you really have enough money to buy all that stuff that the pro's wear (they get it free guys), then you should probably quit your job and climb more. If you STILL have money left over, then help finish the purchase of the Pendergrass-Murry Reserve, Quees Creek, or one of the thousand or so climbing areas that will be gone before I die. Sorry, just kind of weird. To me if you have money to spend on climbing, you use it to climb more. Not $70 pairs of pants and $30 beenies. So... what do you wear when the weather is good?? I were $90 baggy jeans. My $40 t-shirt works well for wiping my feet before I climb.
|
|
|
|
|
climbsomething
Sep 9, 2008, 4:27 AM
Post #4 of 237
(6425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588
|
Yes, I wear "climbing clothes." Sometimes just to piss off the DURRRbots in their pegged Carhartts and Goodwill man-blouses. This weekend I went to teh sport crag in $100 techy pants and an old pitted-out T-shirt with the logo of a local brewery. Even though I'm a halfassed boulderer who drinks pink martinis. I'm a walking contradiction and I ain't got no right.
|
|
|
|
|
jakedatc
Sep 9, 2008, 4:39 AM
Post #5 of 237
(6403 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054
|
climbsomething wrote: Yes, I wear "climbing clothes." Sometimes just to piss off the DURRRbots in their pegged Carhartts and Goodwill man-blouses. This weekend I went to teh sport crag in $100 techy pants and an old pitted-out T-shirt with the logo of a local brewery. Even though I'm a halfassed boulderer who drinks pink martinis. I'm a walking contradiction and I ain't got no right. but we love ya anyway... despite the froofy pink drinks ;) i wear usually light weight 3/4 length pants or prana/TNF pants rolled up (get your pants snagged on your shoe during a heel hook or high step on lead and you will roll your cuffs up too) I gave up cotton shirts for doing sports stuff.. wicking breathable "performance" fabric shirts all the way. Find them on clearance (or super discount when i worked at EMS) OP.. does what other people wear hurt you? that's sad.
|
|
|
|
|
currupt4130
Sep 9, 2008, 4:49 AM
Post #6 of 237
(6384 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 7, 2008
Posts: 515
|
Typically I don't even climb with a shirt unless it's below 50ish. Other than that I have some shorts I like to climb in, but shit, they're surf brand... Probably because I surf too.
|
|
|
|
|
Chappy76
Sep 9, 2008, 4:50 AM
Post #7 of 237
(6378 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 13, 2008
Posts: 120
|
I wear Wal-Mart's version of UnderArmour shirts. 6 bucks and they are actually more comfortable, well at least to me. Plus, they are just going to get messed up so why would I spend the money on the expensive stuff. Now shoes and safety gear are a whole different story.
|
|
|
|
|
shockabuku
Sep 9, 2008, 5:09 AM
Post #8 of 237
(6358 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868
|
Yes, I have a $150 pair of shoes that I wear to go climbing. Oh, and yes, I have the rest of the clothes too. Just like I buy good gear, I buy good clothing, and since it's my money I do what I like with it, just as you apparently do with yours. One use is as valid as the other. I suppose you're a damn Republican/Democrat. Take your pick, they both like to tell me what to do with my money.
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 9, 2008, 5:10 AM
Post #9 of 237
(6357 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
In reply to: OP.. does what other people wear hurt you? that's sad. na it doesn't really bother me i was (and still am) just bored. I know everyone can where what they want and it shouldn't bother the rest of us. Just a commentary on how even climbers get wrapped up in irresponsible consumerism.
|
|
|
|
|
the_leech
Sep 9, 2008, 5:10 AM
Post #10 of 237
(6355 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 8, 2007
Posts: 392
|
rtwilli4 wrote: WAAAHHHHH!!! You're poor. And bitter. And can't buy nice things. That sucks. I know how it is. I've been there before. You'll feel better once you upgrade your socioeconomic status.
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 9, 2008, 5:14 AM
Post #11 of 237
(6350 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
the_leech wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: WAAAHHHHH!!! You're poor. And bitter. And can't buy nice things. That sucks. I know how it is. I've been there before. You'll feel better once you upgrade your socioeconomic status. I'm poor... and I'm better off that way. I'm certainly not bitter... just aggravated when I see how much money people spend... on anything, not just clothes. I really don't plan on upgrading my "socioeconomic status" any time soon. Haven't paid taxes in over a year and don't see a reason for that to change.
(This post was edited by rtwilli4 on Sep 9, 2008, 5:15 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Sep 9, 2008, 5:17 AM
Post #12 of 237
(6347 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
ryeveezy wrote: avid climbing is a new climbing apparel company who is offering sponsorships to 10 ppl who think theyve got what it takes to be sponsored. go to avidclimbing.com for more info NEVER LET UP! I was trying to get avid to send me some of their dope shit panz, but alas they didn't. So I wear whatever I've picked up at Walmart/Target.
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 9, 2008, 5:55 AM
Post #13 of 237
(6324 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
shockabuku wrote: Yes, I have a $150 pair of shoes that I wear to go climbing. Oh, and yes, I have the rest of the clothes too. Just like I buy good gear, I buy good clothing, and since it's my money I do what I like with it, just as you apparently do with yours. One use is as valid as the other. I suppose you're a damn Republican/Democrat. Take your pick, they both like to tell me what to do with my money. it's a waste of time to be either one of those.
|
|
|
|
|
asiaclimber
Sep 9, 2008, 6:06 AM
Post #14 of 237
(6314 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 21, 2007
Posts: 214
|
i wear Prana clothes because i like the fact that most of the stuff is organic cotton poly blend, it's comfortable and cut well for climbing, i like the way it looks and because i can buy last years designs for the price of regular clothing. i also don't own any clothes i don't climb in.
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 9, 2008, 6:09 AM
Post #15 of 237
(6309 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
asiaclimber wrote: i wear Prana clothes because i like the fact that most of the stuff is organic cotton poly blend, it's comfortable and cut well for climbing, i like the way it looks and because i can buy last years designs for the price of regular clothing. i also don't own any clothes i don't climb in. i like that answer
|
|
|
|
|
timd
Sep 9, 2008, 8:10 AM
Post #16 of 237
(6272 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 21, 2003
Posts: 862
|
Concentrate less on what people are wearing and concentrate more on your spelling.
|
|
|
|
|
PatMcGinn
Sep 9, 2008, 10:31 AM
Post #17 of 237
(6221 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 11, 2007
Posts: 61
|
Whatevers comfortable and doesn't get in the way of my feet for pants and for shirts (who cares?)
|
|
|
|
|
brownie710
Sep 9, 2008, 10:42 AM
Post #18 of 237
(6217 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 25, 2007
Posts: 531
|
nope. i'd rather spend my cash on cams and ropes i wear whatever, cotton, synth, i rarely do backcountry climbing so the car is usually 30 minutes away at most. i'm married so i don't need to impress the ladies
|
|
|
|
|
tb69hikeclimb
Sep 9, 2008, 10:50 AM
Post #19 of 237
(6211 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 22, 2006
Posts: 158
|
I wear a one piece skin tight suit made from "sticky rubber". It allows me to throw myself at the rock and stick to it. I can then undgulate up the face like a giant black slug. I must admit it does have some draw backs... I once got stuck in an off width and had to have a partner lower some vasaline and a giant nut tool down to me so I could get unstuck.
|
|
|
|
|
rhythm164
Sep 9, 2008, 11:56 AM
Post #22 of 237
(6173 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 28, 2005
Posts: 964
|
rtwilli4 wrote: As long as you can move, why do you have to have $$ pants. how ya gonna get laid without $$ pants? seriously though, it sort of depends on the area. the local crag that we go to on the weekend, the 'approach' is about a 3 minute walk up a paved road, any shirt will do. for some of the areas up in the Adirondacks, the appraoches can be pretty long and sweaty, so yea, at least a Capilene shirt or something helps you stay comfortable all day.
|
|
|
|
|
lwilson
Sep 9, 2008, 12:08 PM
Post #23 of 237
(6164 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 28, 2006
Posts: 101
|
Ok, I'll bite.... Yes, I do wear "climbing clothes", when I am not climbing and when I am climbing. When I have to go to work, well then that's a different story. I turn old work clothes into "climbing clothes" as well. So why buy expensive "climbing clothes"? Cause I found them on a great sale, they fit my big hips and bubble butt, and I still have money left over to give to the Red, Farley Ledge, and Al Hospers who runs NEClimbs.com. And why does it make a difference if I like to put on crampons, freeze my ass off, and hike up iced-over scree to climb a piece of beautiful ice? Does that make me more privileged to wear these brands? Just curious.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 9, 2008, 12:11 PM
Post #24 of 237
(6162 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
I only own 3 paits of jeans and "climbing clothes" so unless I wanna wear jeans... Oh, I also wear my Marmot M3 trousers to work. They look good as suit trousers, no one ever notices. Very comfy.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 9, 2008, 12:12 PM
Post #25 of 237
(6162 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
donald949 wrote: ryeveezy wrote: avid climbing is a new climbing apparel company who is offering sponsorships to 10 ppl who think theyve got what it takes to be sponsored. go to avidclimbing.com for more info NEVER LET UP! I was trying to get avid to send me some of their dope shit panz, but alas they didn't. So I wear whatever I've picked up at Walmart/Target. I laughed, man. That whole thing was funny. NEVER LET UP.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 9, 2008, 12:13 PM
Post #26 of 237
(3158 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
lwilson wrote: And why does it make a difference if I like to put on crampons, freeze my ass off, and hike up iced-over scree to climb a piece of beautiful ice? Does that make me more privileged to wear these brands? Just curious. I think he was accepting that you can't really climb ice in cut-off dickies.
|
|
|
|
|
Valarc
Sep 9, 2008, 1:25 PM
Post #27 of 237
(3127 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 1473
|
I absolutely wear "climbing clothes". Whatever I can find in the clearance bin at REI, or at the scratch-n-dent sales, I scoop up. I used to climb in cheap wal-mart and old navy shit, but they fell apart quickly. The higher end stuff has proven to be more durable, and things like gusseted crotches are mighty handy for those nasty high steps... More importantly, though, moisture control is a big deal. I wear a lot of wicking underwear, breathable fabrics, and stuff with vents. I am a big fat fucker, and I sweat like crazy... high end clothes contribute greatly to the prevention of swamp ass and crotch rot. When I was climbing in my Hanes cotton boxers, I was worlds less comfortable than I am in a pair of REI wicking shorts. High end athletic clothes are well worth the price, but I am still a cheap bastard and only buy the heavily discounted stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
lwilson
Sep 9, 2008, 1:37 PM
Post #28 of 237
(3119 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 28, 2006
Posts: 101
|
haha ! Ok, I see that's what he meant now, my bad. But, what happens if at the bar afterwards, I change into my comfy 'climbing clothes'? Does it still make a difference?
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 9, 2008, 1:40 PM
Post #29 of 237
(3115 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
lwilson wrote: haha ! Ok, I see that's what he meant now, my bad. But, what happens if at the bar afterwards, I change into my comfy 'climbing clothes'? Does it still make a difference? Yeah, it makes a difference. The difference is you don't have a bar full of people wishing that the stinky guy in the dirty cloaths with the talcum on his hands would leave.
|
|
|
|
|
happiegrrrl
Sep 9, 2008, 1:52 PM
Post #30 of 237
(3108 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660
|
I boycott Walmart and their type for nearly all purchases.(I have bought propane, styro coolers/ice and a cheap pillow for destinations I flew to); the pillow is, by tradition, passed on to someone staying at the camp area when I leave, as are any other items that can't get back on the plane, like the fuel and foods that cannot travel). So - even though my income is probably a lot less that many people who shop those stores, I won't use their goods for ethical reasons(I have seen how they come to their retail prices and it is predatory). I can't really afford Prana/North Face/Patagonia, etc. at whim, but I do prefer to have pants that are cut for the flexibility, and so they are my choice when I do purchase. Of course, all those brands sell styles that don't offer that flexibility, and I don't buy those styles. I haven't really been in a clothing store other that the outdoor gear stores in....a few years. Even though I live in the retail mecca of the US, I just cannot stand the energy in most stores. So....those venues are out. Thrift shops - I ain't into the time spent sifting through the thrift. It's very similar to the energy of any retail store, for me, and therefore distasteful. I prefer to spend my time elsewhere(like pecking away at internet boards.....oy veh). Clothes purchasing is sort of done as needed, not as a fix. I actually need a few new items soon, but I don't know if I can spring the cash for them. We'll see. p.s - I like Prana capris on guys. The looseness at the hips, and then the bare lower legs,,,,Show off those sexy calf muscles men!
|
|
|
|
|
i_h8_choss
Sep 9, 2008, 2:15 PM
Post #31 of 237
(3094 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 2, 2007
Posts: 694
|
i usually wear......uhhh.....whatever the hell i want too! my shoes are my favorite piece though.
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Sep 9, 2008, 2:22 PM
Post #32 of 237
(3086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
I won't leave the house without my Mountain Hardware shirt and Prana zip-offs. Yeah. You read that right. Zip-offs. Deal with it.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 9, 2008, 2:24 PM
Post #33 of 237
(3080 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
I only wear Liz Claiborne, oops, I mean Prana.
(This post was edited by wonderwoman on Sep 9, 2008, 2:25 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Sep 9, 2008, 2:29 PM
Post #34 of 237
(3072 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
Its the city people with their bright colors and complicated shoes. They really should issue visas. DMT
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 9, 2008, 2:34 PM
Post #35 of 237
(3064 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
dingus wrote: Its the city people with their bright colors and complicated shoes. It's true! My clothes seem to attract hummingbirds. At least I think it's my clothes because it can't be my smell.
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Sep 9, 2008, 2:45 PM
Post #36 of 237
(3048 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
I think the real issue is 'what clothes better facilitate oneness with the rock?' ...foolish me. We've covered this. Nekedness.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 9, 2008, 2:46 PM
Post #37 of 237
(3044 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
Just don't fall on slab.
|
|
|
|
|
shockabuku
Sep 9, 2008, 2:56 PM
Post #38 of 237
(3029 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868
|
Valarc wrote: More importantly, though, moisture control is a big deal. I wear a lot of wicking underwear, breathable fabrics, and stuff with vents. I am a big fat fucker, and I sweat like crazy... high end clothes contribute greatly to the prevention of swamp ass and crotch rot. When I was climbing in my Hanes cotton boxers, I was worlds less comfortable than I am in a pair of REI wicking shorts. None is better than wicking - that's what you learn in the jungle where swamp ass ends you up with cotton candy growing out of your crack (for real - just not so sweet and pretty colored).
|
|
|
|
|
markc
Sep 9, 2008, 3:05 PM
Post #39 of 237
(3019 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481
|
An August trip to the Daks some years ago changed my tune on technical clothing, at least to a degree. For the first day of hiking about, I wore a pair of cotton cargo shorts. As the day wore on, they were increasingly sweaty, heavy, and uncomfortable. I bought a pair of Royal Robbins shorts at the end of the day, and wore them for the rest of the trip. I'm not going to suggest I climbed any better, but I was certainly more comfortable. I still wear a decent bit of cotton when cragging, but my collection of technical clothing has expanded over the years. I've bought much of it for multipitch climbing and trips. (I recently bought a few more wicking shirts and wind shirt I didn't need for my first trip to Yosemite this summer.) If I own it, I might as well get my use out of it. What doesn't register for me is purchasing really expensive, non-technical clothing. That said, to each their own.
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
Sep 9, 2008, 3:15 PM
Post #40 of 237
(3012 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
As long as people don't dress like sluts, i'm cool.
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Sep 9, 2008, 3:18 PM
Post #41 of 237
(3008 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
We LIKE our technical clothing round these parts... Complicated shoes and ALL! DMT
(This post was edited by dingus on Sep 9, 2008, 3:18 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 9, 2008, 3:20 PM
Post #42 of 237
(3003 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
carabiner96 wrote: As long as people don't dress like sluts, i'm cool. But I get a mean heel hook in stilettos. What's the problem?
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Sep 9, 2008, 3:24 PM
Post #43 of 237
(2997 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
wonderwoman wrote: carabiner96 wrote: As long as people don't dress like sluts, i'm cool. But I get a mean heel hook in stilettos. What's the problem? If aid is your gig, it's fine. Otherwise I'd get the ethics-police on the case. Believe me, they exist. They exist.
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
Sep 9, 2008, 3:25 PM
Post #44 of 237
(2995 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
wonderwoman wrote: carabiner96 wrote: As long as people don't dress like sluts, i'm cool. But I get a mean heel hook in stilettos. What's the problem? That depends if they're Mudd heels or manolo blahnik.
|
|
|
|
|
Maddhatter
Sep 9, 2008, 3:26 PM
Post #45 of 237
(2995 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2008
Posts: 1752
|
Valarc wrote: I absolutely wear "climbing clothes". Whatever I can find in the clearance bin at REI, or at the scratch-n-dent sales, I scoop up. I used to climb in cheap wal-mart and old navy shit, but they fell apart quickly. The higher end stuff has proven to be more durable, and things like gusseted crotches are mighty handy for those nasty high steps... More importantly, though, moisture control is a big deal. I wear a lot of wicking underwear, breathable fabrics, and stuff with vents. I am a big fat fucker, and I sweat like crazy... high end clothes contribute greatly to the prevention of swamp ass and crotch rot. When I was climbing in my Hanes cotton boxers, I was worlds less comfortable than I am in a pair of REI wicking shorts. High end athletic clothes are well worth the price, but I am still a cheap bastard and only buy the heavily discounted stuff. Wow!! Maybe your not a complete moron. This is the best post in this tread. 2x he makes some very good points.
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 9, 2008, 3:56 PM
Post #47 of 237
(2958 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
happiegrrrl wrote: I boycott Walmart and their type for nearly all purchases.(I have bought propane, styro coolers/ice and a cheap pillow for destinations I flew to); the pillow is, by tradition, passed on to someone staying at the camp area when I leave, as are any other items that can't get back on the plane, like the fuel and foods that cannot travel). So - even though my income is probably a lot less that many people who shop those stores, I won't use their goods for ethical reasons(I have seen how they come to their retail prices and it is predatory). I can't really afford Prana/North Face/Patagonia, etc. at whim, but I do prefer to have pants that are cut for the flexibility, and so they are my choice when I do purchase. Of course, all those brands sell styles that don't offer that flexibility, and I don't buy those styles. I haven't really been in a clothing store other that the outdoor gear stores in....a few years. Even though I live in the retail mecca of the US, I just cannot stand the energy in most stores. So....those venues are out. Thrift shops - I ain't into the time spent sifting through the thrift. It's very similar to the energy of any retail store, for me, and therefore distasteful. I prefer to spend my time elsewhere(like pecking away at internet boards.....oy veh). Clothes purchasing is sort of done as needed, not as a fix. I actually need a few new items soon, but I don't know if I can spring the cash for them. We'll see. p.s - I like Prana capris on guys. The looseness at the hips, and then the bare lower legs,,,,Show off those sexy calf muscles men! that's kind of the answer i was looking for. we could probably hang out. I hate wal-mart and certainly understand the benefit (to me and the environment) of buying clothes at outdoor shops.
|
|
|
|
|
Valarc
Sep 9, 2008, 4:02 PM
Post #48 of 237
(2952 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 1473
|
shockabuku wrote: None is better than wicking - that's what you learn in the jungle where swamp ass ends you up with cotton candy growing out of your crack (for real - just not so sweet and pretty colored). In the jungle, perhaps, but climbing? When wearing loose garments, I've gotten my gigantic balls squished by a harness on several occasions. For me, it's snug-fitting wicking drawers to keep the boys under control, and loose-fitting pants to give me freedom of movement. I guess I could go with the lycra, but I'll stick with my poseur REI-purchased gear, thank ya very much. Next to the spandex tights, prana manpris suddenly don't look so ghey.
|
|
|
|
|
acorneau
Sep 9, 2008, 5:01 PM
Post #49 of 237
(2913 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889
|
I've been climbing the last two weekends in 95+ heat/70%+ humidity, so wicking layers are a must. As far as buying "climbing clothes"; I have some REI wicking underwear that I paid full-price for, cheap wicking shirts from Academy, and Prana Mojo shorts (very light-weight) that I bought with my 30% coupon from REI. I try to catch thing on the sale racks at REI or on Steep&Cheap.
|
|
|
|
|
ckirkwood9
Sep 9, 2008, 5:09 PM
Post #50 of 237
(2906 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 262
|
it's got little to do with climbing better or looking a certain way... it's all about function and comfort. People who've not worn/used technical gear don't understand until they've actually tried it. I used to snowboard in a thick cotton hoodie, scorning all those snobs who wore "fancy" wicking tops and breathable shells and pants.... i was fine in my soaking wet cotton hoodie and old-school 5-dollar-wallmart hunter's waffle-thermals ... UNTIL i received a pair of thermax base layers and a technical fleece with pit zips as a gift. The first time i stopped for lunch and realized that i was DRY and didn't have to peel a cotton layer off my wet body.. i realized how ridiculous it was that i was judging all those 'posers'. There's a reason prana sells so well... the sheite works! Try on a pair of stretchy prana pants with a gusseted crotch then do a hanging belay and you'll immediately KNOW the difference.... your nutz won't be split in two by the seam in the middle (like they are by a pair of cheap pair of cargo pants from the Old Navy) and the legs won't get stuck on your knees every time you try to high-step. Sure there are posers out there who don't climb but like to look the part but so what... for as many posers there are, there are hard-core climbes who like to be comfortable, dry and not look like a homeless person. *laugh* Besides if the cost is the issue... hit up rei, ems, gear-x or any of the web stores every now and again and you'll eventually find all the supposedly poser-gear on super sale. I've never paid more than $30 for mountain hardware or prana pants. and just to support his thought: check this out: prana knickers retail for 60, on sale for 30. http://www.ems.com/..._id=2534374302889362 garamacci pants retail 60 sale 30 http://www.ems.com/..._id=2534374302889362 ems crag pants retail 50 sale 23 http://www.ems.com/..._id=2534374302889362 men's ems techwick shirt retail 35 sale 15. (you can't get a decent t-shirt for 15, let alone something tech) http://www.ems.com/..._id=2534374302889362 you MAY have to buy stuff off season tho. Try it once... you'll feel the difference. Will you suddenly climb a 5.12, of course not ... BUT you WILL be damn comfortable when you try!
|
|
|
|
|
climbsomething
Sep 9, 2008, 5:09 PM
Post #51 of 237
(2796 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588
|
Nothing screams "I'm poor" like an American who travels to Thailand to climb rocks. Or a guy who is gonna go on a cruise with his parents and is concerned about the on-ship climbing wall. Yep, you're too poor but most importantly too real for that fruityass backpacker's underwear.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 9, 2008, 5:16 PM
Post #52 of 237
(2788 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
wonderwoman wrote: Just don't fall on slab. Just had a really, really, bad image..
|
|
|
|
|
patmay81
Sep 9, 2008, 5:19 PM
Post #53 of 237
(2782 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 3, 2006
Posts: 1081
|
I wear $10 Walmart cargo pants and a Hanes t shirt- occasionally one of my grandpas old logging shirts if its cool out. Usually when I see people at the crag wearing Prana, Patagonia, or NorthFace they either make their living climbing (guides/instructors), or they are yuppies who only climb once or twice a year outside a gym. I do agree that it is dumb to spend a lot of money on clothes that are just going to get trashed thrutching up some dirty crack, but I wont bag on the yuppies for what they wear- if they can afford to trash a $200 pair of pataguchi pants every trip to the crag, more power to them!
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Sep 9, 2008, 5:19 PM
Post #54 of 237
(2782 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
ckirkwood9 wrote: it's got little to do with climbing better or looking a certain way... it's all about function and comfort. People who've not worn/used technical gear don't understand until they've actually tried it. I used to snowboard in a thick cotton hoodie, scorning all those snobs who wore "fancy" wicking tops and breathable shells and pants.... i was fine in my soaking wet cotton hoodie and old-school 5-dollar-wallmart hunter's waffle-thermals ... UNTIL i received a pair of thermax base layers and a technical fleece with pit zips as a gift. The first time i stopped for lunch and realized that i was DRY and didn't have to peel a cotton layer off my wet body.. i realized how ridiculous it was that i was judging all those 'posers'. There's a reason prana sells so well... the sheite works! Try on a pair of stretchy prana pants with a gusseted crotch then do a hanging belay and you'll immediately KNOW the difference.... your nutz won't be split in two by the seam in the middle (like they are by a pair of cheap pair of cargo pants from the Old Navy) and the legs won't get stuck on your knees every time you try to high-step. Sure there are posers out there who don't climb but like to look the part but so what... for as many posers there are, there are hard-core climbes who like to be comfortable, dry and not look like a homeless person. *laugh* Besides if the cost is the issue... hit up rei, ems, gear-x or any of the web stores every now and again and you'll eventually find all the supposedly poser-gear on super sale. I've never paid more than $30 for mountain hardware or prana pants. and just to support his thought: check this out: prana knickers retail for 60, on sale for 30. http://www.ems.com/..._id=2534374302889362 garamacci pants retail 60 sale 30 http://www.ems.com/..._id=2534374302889362 ems crag pants retail 50 sale 23 http://www.ems.com/..._id=2534374302889362 men's ems techwick shirt retail 35 sale 15. (you can't get a decent t-shirt for 15, let alone something tech) http://www.ems.com/..._id=2534374302889362 you MAY have to buy stuff off season tho. Try it once... you'll feel the difference. Will you suddenly climb a 5.12, of course not ... BUT you WILL be damn comfortable when you try! A wee bit defensive? DMT
|
|
|
|
|
ckirkwood9
Sep 9, 2008, 5:20 PM
Post #55 of 237
(2782 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 262
|
*laugh*.... of course once a non-poser swaps out their froot-of-the-looms for a pair of frooty Ex-Officio Wicking undies and realizes that they don't need to have clamy-ass... they'll be a believer.
|
|
|
|
|
Valarc
Sep 9, 2008, 5:49 PM
Post #56 of 237
(2767 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 1473
|
climbsomething wrote: Nothing screams "I'm poor" like an American who travels to Thailand to climb rocks. Or a guy who is gonna go on a cruise with his parents and is concerned about the on-ship climbing wall. Yep, you're too poor but most importantly too real for that fruityass backpacker's underwear. Best reply yet. You win 9000 internets.
|
|
|
|
|
Valarc
Sep 9, 2008, 6:18 PM
Post #58 of 237
(2750 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 1473
|
shockabuku wrote: Valarc wrote: When wearing loose garments, I've gotten my gigantic balls squished by a harness on several occasions. Either your leg loops are too loose or those things aren't as big as you think. How can I put this delicately? Oh, fuck delicately... There are two main kinds of testicular squishage that can occur. One is between the leg loops and the leg. This is the type that can occur if your loops are too loose. However, there is a second type, that is what I like to call the "push pop" effect. This is when you're wearing loose clothing which allows your yambag to shift around, and your sack gets squeezed between your two leg loops, pulling it down and away from your body. If everything is kept high and tight, your meatsack won't get low enough to get sucked betwixt the leg loops of genital mutilation, but if you're freeballin it, there is always the opportunity for things to go horribly, horribly wrong. Unless you have tiny balls, which I suggest may be your source of confusion on this matter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
markc
Sep 9, 2008, 6:23 PM
Post #60 of 237
(2747 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481
|
rtwilli4 wrote: shockabuku wrote: I suppose you're a damn Republican/Democrat. Take your pick, they both like to tell me what to do with my money. it's a waste of time to be either one of those. Off-topic, but I'll bite. I live in a closed primary state. In closed primaries, you can only vote for a candidate from your party. If you're registered as independent, it means you're sitting on the sidelines for a part of the process. If you live in a closed-primary state, it makes sense to be registered with one of the two major parties regardless of your political views.
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Sep 9, 2008, 6:24 PM
Post #61 of 237
(2744 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
Hmmm, with such large balls WHY THE HARNESS??? DMT
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 9, 2008, 6:24 PM
Post #62 of 237
(2744 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
climbsomething wrote: Nothing screams "I'm poor" like an American who travels to Thailand to climb rocks. Or a guy who is gonna go on a cruise with his parents and is concerned about the on-ship climbing wall. Yep, you're too poor but most importantly too real for that fruityass backpacker's underwear. I WORK in Thailand bro. I make just enough money to pay for my plane ticket. Then I go work for cash in London to be with my girlfriend and barely pay for that plane ticket. Then I come to the states and do landscaping and barely make enough money to climb a bit while I'm here. Yea... my parents took my family on a cruise but that's their money, not mine. I only went because it was the last family vacation I'll ever have with them. I have a college degree that I (notice how I said I) paid for. I'm not in any debt, and could get a good job whenever I want. Fact is, I don't want to live in this plastic country full of clones and pay taxes to a government that only cares about taking care of their friends and tries to pass it off as being the leader of the free world. Say what you want, but I'm not vacationing... I'm opting out of this fake existence that so many americans blindly fall into. In three years I'll have citizenship in the UK AND the Philippines and living in paradise while most of the people on this site will be working 9 to 5 so they can look cool in their name brands that they got on sale.
(This post was edited by rtwilli4 on Sep 9, 2008, 6:27 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 9, 2008, 6:26 PM
Post #63 of 237
(2738 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
markc wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: shockabuku wrote: I suppose you're a damn Republican/Democrat. Take your pick, they both like to tell me what to do with my money. it's a waste of time to be either one of those. Off-topic, but I'll bite. I live in a closed primary state. In closed primaries, you can only vote for a candidate from your party. If you're registered as independent, it means you're sitting on the sidelines for a part of the process. If you live in a closed-primary state, it makes sense to be registered with one of the two major parties regardless of your political views. That makes sense... as I live in a closed primary state as well. However, I think you completely missed my point.
|
|
|
|
|
markc
Sep 9, 2008, 6:27 PM
Post #64 of 237
(2735 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481
|
extreme_actuary wrote: I go all out when it comes to climbing clothing. When you look good, you feel good. And when you feel good, you climb good. A nice warm vest like this helps also: That makes sense. Why reach behind you to chalk up when you can just shake some in those little pockets?
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Sep 9, 2008, 6:28 PM
Post #65 of 237
(2734 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
rtwilli4 wrote: climbsomething wrote: Nothing screams "I'm poor" like an American who travels to Thailand to climb rocks. Or a guy who is gonna go on a cruise with his parents and is concerned about the on-ship climbing wall. Yep, you're too poor but most importantly too real for that fruityass backpacker's underwear. I WORK in Thailand bro. I make just enough money to pay for my plane ticket. Then I go work in for cash in London to be with my girlfriend and barely pay for that plane ticket. Then I come to the states and do landscaping and barely make enough money to climb a bit while I'm here. Yea... my parents took my family on a cruise but that's their money, not mine. I only went because it was the last family vacation I'll ever have with them. I have a college degree that I (notice how I said I) paid for. I'm not in any debt, and could get a good job whenever I want. Fact is, I don't want to live in this plastic country full of clones and pay taxes to a government that only cares about taking care of their friends and tries to pass it off as being the leader of the free world. Say what you want, but I'm not vacationing... I'm opting out of this fake existence that so many americans blindly fall into. In three years I'll have citizenship in the UK AND the Philippines and living in paradise while most of the people on this site will be working 9 to 5 so they can look cool in their name brands that they got on sale. Wow! WANKING on the ROAD TO NIRVANA! Who KNEW???!!!111 DMT ps. Well done btw. Have a nice life.
(This post was edited by dingus on Sep 9, 2008, 6:29 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
Valarc
Sep 9, 2008, 6:28 PM
Post #66 of 237
(2732 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 1473
|
dingus wrote: Hmmm, with such large balls WHY THE HARNESS??? Because I need something to use to belay the chick who's climbing with me. I tried just wrapping the rope around my giant pouch of man-gravy, but she was so distracted in awe that she couldn't focus on the rock. Also, I need a place to clip the Spirit carabiner that holds my keys. Gotta keep it real, brosef.
|
|
|
|
|
markc
Sep 9, 2008, 6:28 PM
Post #67 of 237
(2730 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481
|
rtwilli4 wrote: markc wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: shockabuku wrote: I suppose you're a damn Republican/Democrat. Take your pick, they both like to tell me what to do with my money. it's a waste of time to be either one of those. Off-topic, but I'll bite. I live in a closed primary state. In closed primaries, you can only vote for a candidate from your party. If you're registered as independent, it means you're sitting on the sidelines for a part of the process. If you live in a closed-primary state, it makes sense to be registered with one of the two major parties regardless of your political views. That makes sense... as I live in a closed primary state as well. However, I think you completely missed my point. Fine. What's your point?
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 9, 2008, 6:38 PM
Post #68 of 237
(2713 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
markc wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: markc wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: shockabuku wrote: I suppose you're a damn Republican/Democrat. Take your pick, they both like to tell me what to do with my money. it's a waste of time to be either one of those. Off-topic, but I'll bite. I live in a closed primary state. In closed primaries, you can only vote for a candidate from your party. If you're registered as independent, it means you're sitting on the sidelines for a part of the process. If you live in a closed-primary state, it makes sense to be registered with one of the two major parties regardless of your political views. That makes sense... as I live in a closed primary state as well. However, I think you completely missed my point. Fine. What's your point? they are both the same
|
|
|
|
|
markc
Sep 9, 2008, 6:41 PM
Post #69 of 237
(2703 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481
|
rtwilli4 wrote: climbsomething wrote: Nothing screams "I'm poor" like an American who travels to Thailand to climb rocks. Or a guy who is gonna go on a cruise with his parents and is concerned about the on-ship climbing wall. Yep, you're too poor but most importantly too real for that fruityass backpacker's underwear. I WORK in Thailand bro. I make just enough money to pay for my plane ticket. Then I go work for cash in London to be with my girlfriend and barely pay for that plane ticket. Then I come to the states and do landscaping and barely make enough money to climb a bit while I'm here. Yea... my parents took my family on a cruise but that's their money, not mine. I only went because it was the last family vacation I'll ever have with them. I have a college degree that I (notice how I said I) paid for. I'm not in any debt, and could get a good job whenever I want. Fact is, I don't want to live in this plastic country full of clones and pay taxes to a government that only cares about taking care of their friends and tries to pass it off as being the leader of the free world. Say what you want, but I'm not vacationing... I'm opting out of this fake existence that so many americans blindly fall into. In three years I'll have citizenship in the UK AND the Philippines and living in paradise while most of the people on this site will be working 9 to 5 so they can look cool in their name brands that they got on sale. I get it. You're in the, "I'm way too fucking hip to be cool, bro!" camp. I'm a relatively new member of the, "I'm old to worry about it, chief!" camp. The beauty and struggle of life is that we all have to determine what brings us joy (and thus what is of value). You may find that you don't have to degrade the choices of others to promote your own. Then again, you may not. So tell me, do you climb on the cheapest possible climbing gear? You know, name-brand cams dangling off people's harnesses really screams bourgeoisie. Czech-made cams are the symbol of the proletariat.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 9, 2008, 6:44 PM
Post #70 of 237
(2697 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
rtwilli4 wrote: climbsomething wrote: Nothing screams "I'm poor" like an American who travels to Thailand to climb rocks. Or a guy who is gonna go on a cruise with his parents and is concerned about the on-ship climbing wall. Yep, you're too poor but most importantly too real for that fruityass backpacker's underwear. I WORK in Thailand bro. I make just enough money to pay for my plane ticket. Then I go work for cash in London to be with my girlfriend and barely pay for that plane ticket. Then I come to the states and do landscaping and barely make enough money to climb a bit while I'm here. Yea... my parents took my family on a cruise but that's their money, not mine. I only went because it was the last family vacation I'll ever have with them. I have a college degree that I (notice how I said I) paid for. I'm not in any debt, and could get a good job whenever I want. Fact is, I don't want to live in this plastic country full of clones and pay taxes to a government that only cares about taking care of their friends and tries to pass it off as being the leader of the free world. Say what you want, but I'm not vacationing... I'm opting out of this fake existence that so many americans blindly fall into. In three years I'll have citizenship in the UK AND the Philippines and living in paradise while most of the people on this site will be working 9 to 5 so they can look cool in their name brands that they got on sale. I can't help but think of 'Into the Wild'. Only I hope there's a happier ending!
|
|
|
|
|
patmay81
Sep 9, 2008, 6:49 PM
Post #71 of 237
(2690 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 3, 2006
Posts: 1081
|
nice, sweet threads man! bet you can climb splitter in those pants!
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 9, 2008, 6:50 PM
Post #72 of 237
(2686 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
markc wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: climbsomething wrote: Nothing screams "I'm poor" like an American who travels to Thailand to climb rocks. Or a guy who is gonna go on a cruise with his parents and is concerned about the on-ship climbing wall. Yep, you're too poor but most importantly too real for that fruityass backpacker's underwear. I WORK in Thailand bro. I make just enough money to pay for my plane ticket. Then I go work for cash in London to be with my girlfriend and barely pay for that plane ticket. Then I come to the states and do landscaping and barely make enough money to climb a bit while I'm here. Yea... my parents took my family on a cruise but that's their money, not mine. I only went because it was the last family vacation I'll ever have with them. I have a college degree that I (notice how I said I) paid for. I'm not in any debt, and could get a good job whenever I want. Fact is, I don't want to live in this plastic country full of clones and pay taxes to a government that only cares about taking care of their friends and tries to pass it off as being the leader of the free world. Say what you want, but I'm not vacationing... I'm opting out of this fake existence that so many americans blindly fall into. In three years I'll have citizenship in the UK AND the Philippines and living in paradise while most of the people on this site will be working 9 to 5 so they can look cool in their name brands that they got on sale. I get it. You're in the, "I'm way too fucking hip to be cool, bro!" camp. I'm a relatively new member of the, "I'm old to worry about it, chief!" camp. The beauty and struggle of life is that we all have to determine what brings us joy (and thus what is of value). You may find that you don't have to degrade the choices of others to promote your own. Then again, you may not. So tell me, do you climb on the cheapest possible climbing gear? You know, name-brand cams dangling off people's harnesses really screams bourgeoisie. Czech-made cams are the symbol of the proletariat. You know, I'm not trying to say that there is anything wrong with having money, and/or choosing to spend it on nice clothes. I was simply commenting on the guy who we ALL know who busts his ass just to look the part. It's just not what this sport is about. At least it's not what this sport used to be about. I get pissed sometimes and say/write dumb stuff but I think most of the people on here knew what my original post was getting at and decided to give me shit anyways, even if they understood what I was talking about. And for the record: No, I don't buy the cheapest gear possible. I work to get what I want and pray that some asshole won't book it. I understand this goes the same for clothes. I 'm asking for it here, but I even have one pair of expensive pants. My point was not that it's dumb to buy expensive clothes or that they are not worth it. I know they are better for what we do. My point was that I don't like seeing people buy them just to look like a climber and I think we can all agree with that.
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 9, 2008, 6:52 PM
Post #73 of 237
(2682 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
wonderwoman wrote: I can't help but think of 'Into the Wild'. Only I hope there's a happier ending! I never said i was going to go live by myself and I certainly won't go burning my money. I got my degree because I plan on using it someday and I would never leave so many people that loved me as that kid selfishly did. But I think the guy made some good points. Did you read the book?
(This post was edited by rtwilli4 on Sep 9, 2008, 6:55 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
k.l.k
Sep 9, 2008, 6:54 PM
Post #74 of 237
(2678 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 9, 2007
Posts: 1190
|
Valarc wrote: dingus wrote: Hmmm, with such large balls WHY THE HARNESS??? Because I need something to use to belay the chick who's climbing with me. I tried just wrapping the rope around my giant pouch of man-gravy, but she was so distracted in awe that she couldn't focus on the rock. Also, I need a place to clip the Spirit carabiner that holds my keys. Gotta keep it real, brosef. Suck it up, cupcake, and pull yr swami out of the closet. Better yet, tie in with a boac. Nothing screams yuppie gymbo eurotrash poseur worse than a harness.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 9, 2008, 6:56 PM
Post #75 of 237
(2675 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
rtwilli4 wrote: wonderwoman wrote: I can't help but think of 'Into the Wild'. Only I hope there's a happier ending! I never said i was going to go live by myself and I certainly won't go burning my money. But I think the guy made some good points. Did you read the book? A long, long time ago... And,
rtwilli4 wrote: My point was that I don't like seeing people buy them just to look like a climber and I think we can all agree with that. Why do you care what other people wear? Why not just climb?
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 9, 2008, 6:59 PM
Post #76 of 237
(2928 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
I can't help but notice that there is also a conversation about someones balls going on. Maybe we should all just focus on that :)
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 9, 2008, 7:02 PM
Post #77 of 237
(2920 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
wonderwoman wrote: Why do you care what other people wear? Why not just climb? because when posers start buying up clothes, it causes new, shitty companies to start making clothes just for posers. Look at snowboarding 20 years ago compared to now. Most of the companies now are no more environmentally conscious than BP Amaco. Prana, Patagonia, etc... those companies are responsible. Just wait and see what the next wave of "climbing companies" turns into.
|
|
|
|
|
jeremyash
Sep 9, 2008, 7:19 PM
Post #78 of 237
(2913 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 15, 2007
Posts: 46
|
ckirkwood9 wrote: Try it once... you'll feel the difference. Will you suddenly climb a 5.12, of course not ... BUT you WILL be damn comfortable when you try! I will have to agree with you on this note. I used to run in what ever i woke up in (to include drunkenly in the clothes i blacked out in the night before) until i got a deal on a synthetic athletic shirt. ever since i have run in nothing but that. once i tried to run in cotton and it just didn't work. i felt like i was being suffocated. I haven't tried this approach to climbing. most of the outside stuff i have done has been bouldering in the summer so a nice pair of board shorts has worked just fine. Once i move some where with some "real" cliffs though i think something with a gusetted crotch will be of great value So its not about names for me, but definitely about function. -Jeremy
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 9, 2008, 7:19 PM
Post #79 of 237
(2913 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
rtwilli4 wrote: wonderwoman wrote: Why do you care what other people wear? Why not just climb? because when posers start buying up clothes, it causes new, shitty companies to start making clothes just for posers. Look at snowboarding 20 years ago compared to now. Most of the companies now are no more environmentally conscious than BP Amaco. Prana, Patagonia, etc... those companies are responsible. Just wait and see what the next wave of "climbing companies" turns into. Before NAFTA, consumers had more choice and it was easier to buy 'Made in the USA', which I intentionally sought out due to my concerns for fair trade, the environment and labor regulations. This used to be Prana, and a lot of times is still Gramicci. It's not so easy to find this tag anymore, you have to admit. I don't look down my nose at people who wear name brand, because I assume they just aren't thinking of those things when they are making a purchase. I do, however, talk openly about why I won't buy certain brands and my concerns about child labor and companies that are moving overseas where there aren't labor / environmental regulations. One way is to be judgmental, the other is to engage people in conversations that make them think. For myself? Work and home clothes are mostly hand made or second hand. Climbing clothes are what's on sale and "Made in the USA" where possible. I like to support our economy, but in the free trade world, it's not always possible. By the way, stuff made in Thailand isn't necessarily sweatshop free.
|
|
|
|
|
Maddhatter
Sep 9, 2008, 7:24 PM
Post #80 of 237
(2909 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2008
Posts: 1752
|
wonderwoman wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: wonderwoman wrote: I can't help but think of 'Into the Wild'. Only I hope there's a happier ending! I never said i was going to go live by myself and I certainly won't go burning my money. But I think the guy made some good points. Did you read the book? A long, long time ago... And, rtwilli4 wrote: My point was that I don't like seeing people buy them just to look like a climber and I think we can all agree with that. Why do you care what other people wear? Why not just climb? On a side note here. You really do have some cool Jewelry!! When I have a few extra bucks you will he hearing from me. I think my wife will dig it!
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 9, 2008, 7:29 PM
Post #81 of 237
(2900 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
Maddhatter wrote: wonderwoman wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: wonderwoman wrote: I can't help but think of 'Into the Wild'. Only I hope there's a happier ending! I never said i was going to go live by myself and I certainly won't go burning my money. But I think the guy made some good points. Did you read the book? A long, long time ago... And, rtwilli4 wrote: My point was that I don't like seeing people buy them just to look like a climber and I think we can all agree with that. Why do you care what other people wear? Why not just climb? On a side note here. You really do have some cool Jewelry!! When I have a few extra bucks you will he hearing from me. I think my wife will dig it! Well, thank you very much! They were made in a sweatshop of my very own! I actually just made a necklace made out of BD aid nuts. It's not up there yet, but it's pretty cool!
|
|
|
|
|
macherry
Sep 9, 2008, 7:34 PM
Post #82 of 237
(2892 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848
|
happiegrrrl wrote: I boycott Walmart and their type for nearly all purchases.(I have bought propane, styro coolers/ice and a cheap pillow for destinations I flew to); the pillow is, by tradition, passed on to someone staying at the camp area when I leave, as are any other items that can't get back on the plane, like the fuel and foods that cannot travel). So - even though my income is probably a lot less that many people who shop those stores, I won't use their goods for ethical reasons(I have seen how they come to their retail prices and it is predatory). I can't really afford Prana/North Face/Patagonia, etc. at whim, but I do prefer to have pants that are cut for the flexibility, and so they are my choice when I do purchase. Of course, all those brands sell styles that don't offer that flexibility, and I don't buy those styles. I haven't really been in a clothing store other that the outdoor gear stores in....a few years. Even though I live in the retail mecca of the US, I just cannot stand the energy in most stores. So....those venues are out. Thrift shops - I ain't into the time spent sifting through the thrift. It's very similar to the energy of any retail store, for me, and therefore distasteful. I prefer to spend my time elsewhere(like pecking away at internet boards.....oy veh). Clothes purchasing is sort of done as needed, not as a fix. I actually need a few new items soon, but I don't know if I can spring the cash for them. We'll see. p.s - I like Prana capris on guys. The looseness at the hips, and then the bare lower legs,,,,Show off those sexy calf muscles men! so you don't do wally world and the like, or outdoor stores, or thrift shops, good god woman,,,,,,,,,,,there's no where left to shop. fwiw: i'm the thrift store queen: 2 pairs of almost new carhartts this summer 10 bucks i also get some freebies from work: lots of merino wool tops!!!
|
|
|
|
|
patmay81
Sep 9, 2008, 7:44 PM
Post #83 of 237
(2884 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 3, 2006
Posts: 1081
|
wonderwoman wrote: Why do you care what other people wear? Why not just climb? and WW pulls through again with the precise answer to the entire thread!!! wait that should be in all caps for emphasis: AND WW PULLS THROUGH AGAIN WITH THE PRECISE ANSWER TO THE ENTIRE THREAD!!!
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 9, 2008, 7:45 PM
Post #84 of 237
(2883 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
patmay81 wrote: wonderwoman wrote: Why do you care what other people wear? Why not just climb? and WW pulls through again with the precise answer to the entire thread!!! wait that should be in all caps for emphasis: AND WW PULLS THROUGH AGAIN WITH THE PRECISE ANSWER TO THE ENTIRE THREAD!!! Do I get pancakes?
|
|
|
|
|
climbsomething
Sep 9, 2008, 7:46 PM
Post #85 of 237
(2880 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588
|
rtwilli4 wrote: You know, I'm not trying to say that there is anything wrong with having money, and/or choosing to spend it on nice clothes. I was simply commenting on the guy who we ALL know who busts his ass just to look the part. It's just not what this sport is about. At least it's not what this sport used to be about. What about the guy who goes out of his way to wear rags and wax about The Life so he can pass himself off as a Stone Monkey subbie? There are a LOT of those guys too. I'm not saying you're one of them (I suspect you'd deny it anyway), but they're out there. They're slightly more annoying than the weekend warriors, who are at least clean.
In reply to: I get pissed sometimes and say/write dumb stuff but I think most of the people on here knew what my original post was getting at and decided to give me shit anyways, even if they understood what I was talking about. Actually, I'd put my money (what's left of it, after buying techy pants) on them thinking you think you're too kool for skool.
In reply to: No, I don't buy the cheapest gear possible. I work to get what I want... So do I. My daddy paid for my degree (we should all be so lucky. I know I am.) but I use it. Every two weeks, I get enought scratch to buy a few nice things that I want. Sometimes it's a meal out. Sometimes it's a movie ticket. Sometimes it's a loud pink North Face techy top to wear to the gym. And it's not to look like a climber. I do that when I climb. It's because I like cute pink tops.
|
|
|
|
|
patmay81
Sep 9, 2008, 7:55 PM
Post #86 of 237
(2870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 3, 2006
Posts: 1081
|
wonderwoman wrote: patmay81 wrote: wonderwoman wrote: Why do you care what other people wear? Why not just climb? and WW pulls through again with the precise answer to the entire thread!!! wait that should be in all caps for emphasis: AND WW PULLS THROUGH AGAIN WITH THE PRECISE ANSWER TO THE ENTIRE THREAD!!! Do I get pancakes? Abso-freaking-lutely!
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
Sep 9, 2008, 8:30 PM
Post #87 of 237
(2855 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084
|
rtwilli4 wrote: Just wait and see what the next wave of "climbing companies" turns into. Why does it matter to you? You don't buy from them anyway! BTW - I like wearing a lot of climbing clothes 'cause they make me feel pretty :).
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 9, 2008, 8:44 PM
Post #88 of 237
(2846 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
granite_grrl wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: Just wait and see what the next wave of "climbing companies" turns into. Why does it matter to you? You don't buy from them anyway! BTW - I like wearing a lot of climbing clothes 'cause they make me feel pretty :). It matters to me because the more companies that are around to sell clothes to posers, the less responsible the industry as a whole will be. You think Converse All-Stars were made by people who were getting paid a dollar a day? NOPE. Fast forward.... Nike's? YUP I like to think that climbing is associated with having fun, staying in shape, taking care of the environment, and doing it all with out adding to the human rights violations around the world. BTW, There are just as many, if not more, human rights violations in the usa as there are in Thailand so whoever it was that brought that up, please do a little research.
(This post was edited by rtwilli4 on Sep 9, 2008, 8:47 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 9, 2008, 8:47 PM
Post #89 of 237
(2840 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
I stopped listening when you called me a poser.
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 9, 2008, 8:49 PM
Post #90 of 237
(2835 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
wonderwoman wrote: I stopped listening when you called me a poser. I never called you a poser.... and I never said that everyone who buys name brand clothes is a poser. You know who I'm talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
markc
Sep 9, 2008, 8:49 PM
Post #91 of 237
(2834 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481
|
patmay81 wrote: wonderwoman wrote: patmay81 wrote: wonderwoman wrote: Why do you care what other people wear? Why not just climb? and WW pulls through again with the precise answer to the entire thread!!! wait that should be in all caps for emphasis: AND WW PULLS THROUGH AGAIN WITH THE PRECISE ANSWER TO THE ENTIRE THREAD!!! Do I get pancakes? Abso-freaking-lutely! You know, sometimes you have to treat yourself. I had a stack of three blueberry pancakes this weekend.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 9, 2008, 8:52 PM
Post #92 of 237
(2831 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
markc wrote: patmay81 wrote: wonderwoman wrote: patmay81 wrote: wonderwoman wrote: Why do you care what other people wear? Why not just climb? and WW pulls through again with the precise answer to the entire thread!!! wait that should be in all caps for emphasis: AND WW PULLS THROUGH AGAIN WITH THE PRECISE ANSWER TO THE ENTIRE THREAD!!! Do I get pancakes? Abso-freaking-lutely! You know, sometimes you have to treat yourself. I had a stack of three blueberry pancakes this weekend. I could go for some banana pancakes right about now...
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 9, 2008, 8:58 PM
Post #93 of 237
(2816 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
wonderwoman wrote: markc wrote: patmay81 wrote: wonderwoman wrote: patmay81 wrote: wonderwoman wrote: Why do you care what other people wear? Why not just climb? and WW pulls through again with the precise answer to the entire thread!!! wait that should be in all caps for emphasis: AND WW PULLS THROUGH AGAIN WITH THE PRECISE ANSWER TO THE ENTIRE THREAD!!! Do I get pancakes? Abso-freaking-lutely! You know, sometimes you have to treat yourself. I had a stack of three blueberry pancakes this weekend. I could go for some banana pancakes right about now... This was going perfectly till you pulled nanards into it. Blaeberries or choc chip
|
|
|
|
|
patmay81
Sep 9, 2008, 9:04 PM
Post #94 of 237
(2809 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 3, 2006
Posts: 1081
|
sungam wrote: wonderwoman wrote: markc wrote: patmay81 wrote: wonderwoman wrote: patmay81 wrote: wonderwoman wrote: Why do you care what other people wear? Why not just climb? and WW pulls through again with the precise answer to the entire thread!!! wait that should be in all caps for emphasis: AND WW PULLS THROUGH AGAIN WITH THE PRECISE ANSWER TO THE ENTIRE THREAD!!! Do I get pancakes? Abso-freaking-lutely! You know, sometimes you have to treat yourself. I had a stack of three blueberry pancakes this weekend. I could go for some banana pancakes right about now... This was going perfectly till you pulled nanards into it. Blaeberries or choc chip hey don't be bashing the banana's (they bruise easily). banana/walnut cakes are freaking awesome!
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 9, 2008, 9:07 PM
Post #95 of 237
(2805 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
no doubt. But Banana pankakes r knot.
|
|
|
|
|
quiteatingmysteak
Sep 9, 2008, 9:20 PM
Post #96 of 237
(2797 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804
|
rtwilli4 wrote: asiaclimber wrote: i wear Prana clothes because i like the fact that most of the stuff is organic cotton poly blend, it's comfortable and cut well for climbing, i like the way it looks and because i can buy last years designs for the price of regular clothing. i also don't own any clothes i don't climb in. i like that answer I WARE IT CUZ ITS MADE FROM RECYCLED WIND POWER GENERATED COTTON GREEN.
|
|
|
|
|
quiteatingmysteak
Sep 9, 2008, 9:21 PM
Post #97 of 237
(2797 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804
|
brownie710 wrote: nope. i'd rather spend my cash on cams and ropes i wear whatever, cotton, synth, i rarely do backcountry climbing so the car is usually 30 minutes away at most. i'm married so i don't need to impress the ladies You're married because you can't impress the ladies. I kid.
|
|
|
|
|
ckirkwood9
Sep 9, 2008, 9:22 PM
Post #98 of 237
(2796 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 262
|
dingus wrote: A wee bit defensive? DMT i'm pretty sure no... informed is probably a better word. :) and just trying to pass on info to people who are holdouts like I was. I was a hard head about this too - wasn't going to buy the latest/greatest just because it was the poser brand. However when I discovered that I could get the latest/greatest (minus ONE season) at rei/ems/etc... i gave it a shot and realized the beauty of quality gear... and the stupidity of stubbornness. just let it go.. be comfortable, be happy and just climb. Stop with the silly pride and worrying about what others think.... just use what works for you... but also realize that maybe you aren't aware of options that are better. in my post with the EMS links - i was making a point - that you CAN get the expensive tech gear at junk-gear prices. BUT If a person refuses to buy a product that's functional/comforatble/durable for smilar cost (on sale) as an inferior product JUST BECAUSE IT'S OF A PARTICULAR "POSER" BRAND... that's just retarted. AND is ironically what the OP is accusing the posers of doing... beind aware of what others think of them.
|
|
|
|
|
patmay81
Sep 9, 2008, 9:29 PM
Post #99 of 237
(2785 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 3, 2006
Posts: 1081
|
ckirkwood9 wrote: just let it go.. be comfortable, be happy and just climb. Stop with the silly pride and worrying about what others think.... just use what works for you... but also realize that maybe you aren't aware of options that are better. yes, there probably are better options. but my $10 cargos work great, are durable, comfortable, flexible... If I were more into mountaineering or big walls I would probably go for more high tech clothing, but for the cragging that I love I'll stick to my handme down good will/thrift store clothes. I guess my cajones aren't too big cuz I never have the issue with them being pinched by my pants (and I don't free solo often, and never above 5.9), so I don't see "high tech" crag wear as a necessity, or even better than what I already wear.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 9, 2008, 9:38 PM
Post #100 of 237
(2782 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
When I'm climbing, I like to hear the VOICE of the mountain, it guides my hands and feet inducing me into a balanced and elegant upwards dance. Here's a trick I learnt from Aceto: Sorry Acetoni, couldn't resist... :)
|
Attachments:
|
roflbot.jpg
(95.3 KB)
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Sep 9, 2008, 9:54 PM
Post #101 of 237
(2173 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
climbsomething wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: You know, I'm not trying to say that there is anything wrong with having money, and/or choosing to spend it on nice clothes. I was simply commenting on the guy who we ALL know who busts his ass just to look the part. It's just not what this sport is about. At least it's not what this sport used to be about. What about the guy who goes out of his way to wear rags and wax about The Life so he can pass himself off as a Stone Monkey subbie? There are a LOT of those guys too. I'm not saying you're one of them (I suspect you'd deny it anyway), but they're out there. They're slightly more annoying than the weekend warriors, who are at least clean. In reply to: I get pissed sometimes and say/write dumb stuff but I think most of the people on here knew what my original post was getting at and decided to give me shit anyways, even if they understood what I was talking about. Actually, I'd put my money (what's left of it, after buying techy pants) on them thinking you think you're too kool for skool. In reply to: No, I don't buy the cheapest gear possible. I work to get what I want... So do I. My daddy paid for my degree (we should all be so lucky. I know I am.) but I use it. Every two weeks, I get enought scratch to buy a few nice things that I want. Sometimes it's a meal out. Sometimes it's a movie ticket. Sometimes it's a loud pink North Face techy top to wear to the gym. And it's not to look like a climber. I do that when I climb. It's because I like cute pink tops. Nice post for the win. GO
|
|
|
|
|
Maddhatter
Sep 9, 2008, 10:00 PM
Post #102 of 237
(2169 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2008
Posts: 1752
|
I climbed last week end in blue jeans and a T-shirt!! Does that make me a bad person?
|
|
|
|
|
brownie710
Sep 10, 2008, 12:18 AM
Post #103 of 237
(2139 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 25, 2007
Posts: 531
|
sweet! sad but true, she's a mail order bride from overseas. no speak english
|
|
|
|
|
deltav
Sep 10, 2008, 12:29 AM
Post #104 of 237
(2137 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 597
|
Yes, I wear outdoor clothing. I wear TNF, Prana, Patagonia, Columbia, Mountain Khakis, etc. They all make good quality, rugged clothing. I just don't wear them climbing, I wear them to work, and around town. I don't buy these brands because of the name or because the cool kids are wearing them, I buy them because I like how they fit and how they hld up to the abuse I give them.
|
|
|
|
|
markc
Sep 10, 2008, 12:53 AM
Post #105 of 237
(2129 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481
|
patmay81 wrote: If I were more into mountaineering or big walls I would probably go for more high tech clothing, but for the cragging that I love I'll stick to my handme down good will/thrift store clothes. I guess my cajones aren't too big cuz I never have the issue with them being pinched by my pants (and I don't free solo often, and never above 5.9), so I don't see "high tech" crag wear as a necessity, or even better than what I already wear. For cragging, I think technical clothing is a luxury. For years, I put most of my money into gear, trips, etc. I cragged and climbed multipitch routes at Seneca for a few years before I bought my first pair of tech shorts in the Adirondacks. I still wear cotton on a lot of day trips, especially if temperatures are moderate. On hot days, lightweight shorts that dry quickly are awfully nice.
|
|
|
|
|
mecalekahi-mekahidyho
Sep 10, 2008, 1:19 AM
Post #106 of 237
(2122 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 23, 2008
Posts: 306
|
Generally I will climb with no shirt, and a pair of long john bottoms (without underwear). Or a pair of sweatpants(without underwear) that I cut at the knees using a triangular pattern to look like Peter Pan. So if you see me placing a highstep, I am either getting a foothold, or getting my balls unstuck from my thigh. Oh, and yes, I am sponsored.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Sep 10, 2008, 1:33 AM
Post #107 of 237
(2116 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
Maddhatter wrote: I climbed last week end in blue jeans and a T-shirt!! Does that make me a bad person? Were they designer jeans? Acid-washed, maybe?
|
|
|
|
|
Maddhatter
Sep 10, 2008, 1:35 AM
Post #108 of 237
(2113 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2008
Posts: 1752
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: Maddhatter wrote: I climbed last week end in blue jeans and a T-shirt!! Does that make me a bad person? Were they designer jeans? Acid-washed, maybe? Nope, Just plain old LEE's
(This post was edited by Maddhatter on Sep 10, 2008, 1:45 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Sep 10, 2008, 1:37 AM
Post #109 of 237
(2111 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
rtwilli4 wrote: wonderwoman wrote: Why do you care what other people wear? Why not just climb? because when posers start buying up clothes, it causes new, shitty companies to start making clothes just for posers. Look at snowboarding 20 years ago compared to now. Most of the companies now are no more environmentally conscious than BP Amaco. Prana, Patagonia, etc... those companies are responsible. Just wait and see what the next wave of "climbing companies" turns into. you know rtwilli, I would take you more seriously if you weren't so name-calley. I happen to agree with what your saying just not with your approach. I believe that one of the biggest differences we can make is by what we consume. If we demand more from the companies we buy from, they would have no choice but to provide it for us. The problem is that most people either dont' realize it or don't care. Josh
|
|
|
|
|
Valarc
Sep 10, 2008, 1:42 AM
Post #110 of 237
(2106 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 1473
|
k.l.k wrote: Suck it up, cupcake, and pull yr swami out of the closet. Better yet, tie in with a boac. Nothing screams yuppie gymbo eurotrash poseur worse than a harness. .... I got nothin' I tried, I really tried, but I got nothin'
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 10, 2008, 2:37 AM
Post #111 of 237
(2086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: wonderwoman wrote: Why do you care what other people wear? Why not just climb? because when posers start buying up clothes, it causes new, shitty companies to start making clothes just for posers. Look at snowboarding 20 years ago compared to now. Most of the companies now are no more environmentally conscious than BP Amaco. Prana, Patagonia, etc... those companies are responsible. Just wait and see what the next wave of "climbing companies" turns into. you know rtwilli, I would take you more seriously if you weren't so name-calley. I happen to agree with what your saying just not with your approach. I believe that one of the biggest differences we can make is by what we consume. If we demand more from the companies we buy from, they would have no choice but to provide it for us. The problem is that most people either dont' realize it or don't care. Josh blueeyes I think you have a point. The last 3 or 4 posts that I've started have been nothing but rtwilli bashing, and I've realized that maybe I should pay more attention to diction. What I really am annoyed about.... well, I'm not even that annoyed anymore. I was kinda drunk and bored and in a bad mood yesterday. Anyways, what I was really annoyed about is just ignorant consumerism infiltrating one of the things that I love most: rock climbing. To me, climbing is one of the most pure things a man or woman can do. I was a snowboard instructor, on the way to a decent career, and I gave it up. Partly because my girlfriend was forced to move out of this country, back to London.... but also because snowboarding has become kind of a disgustingly irresponsible sport. Many riders don't care who makes their clothes, or what conditions in which the clothes were made. Moreover, most riders don't care if the lifts, resorts, snowmobiles, or snowcats are environmentally responsible or not. They certainly don't care about polluting the air with their SUV's while they are sitting in gridlock on I 70 after finishing their weekend in Summit County. I've always climbed, but in the last few years I have really embraced it. One of the reasons is that no matter where in the world I am, my carbon footprint as a climber is much better than a snowboarder, or anyone else. I saw the apparel companies take hold of the market in snowboarding, and completely exploit it. I really feel like the same thing is happening in climbing. I know I did a shitty job of explaining that in my original post but I was in a bad mood. Anyways.... I wear fisherman's pants and climbing shoes and that's about it. If I have to wear any more clothes than that then I'd better be climbing some huge mountain or big wall somewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 10, 2008, 3:05 AM
Post #112 of 237
(2070 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
fair weather ciimber?
|
|
|
|
|
Valarc
Sep 10, 2008, 3:10 AM
Post #113 of 237
(2068 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 1473
|
rtwilli4 wrote: The last 3 or 4 posts that I've started have been nothing but rtwilli bashing, and I've realized that maybe I should pay more attention to diction. No, you should stop posting hypocritical crybaby rants and then backpedaling when you get called out on your douchebagerry.
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 10, 2008, 3:17 AM
Post #114 of 237
(2055 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
Valarc wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: The last 3 or 4 posts that I've started have been nothing but rtwilli bashing, and I've realized that maybe I should pay more attention to diction. No, you should stop posting hypocritical crybaby rants and then backpedaling when you get called out on your douchebagerry. fair... but not much fun
|
|
|
|
|
Valarc
Sep 10, 2008, 3:20 AM
Post #115 of 237
(2053 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 1473
|
rtwilli4 wrote: fair... but not much fun And hence the discussion of balls
|
|
|
|
|
climbsomething
Sep 10, 2008, 3:50 AM
Post #116 of 237
(2039 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588
|
Well, rtwilli, since you're explaining yourself in a more intelligent (and slightly self-effacing) way, I'll try to do the same. Folks regularly start threads pissing and moaning about "yuppies" in "poser" clothes, or fat dudes who use real carabiners as keyrings, or preppy girls who wear pink North Face fleeces to class. The tone is almost always an insecure, snivveling droning. Some people's diaper rash just really flares up when they perceive that some "outsider" is hovering around their supposedly exclusive (and most likely new) subculture. These also tend to be the same people who spray about the dirtbag life, because they think it's hardcore, and they want nothing more than to seem hardcore. They really appear to need validation and an identity. Yet a lot of people think those people are needy douchebag tools. I think people associate/d you with that group (I admit that I did), hence the responses you got. Now, as to your given reasons for being anti-trendy-clothes-establishment, well, those are your reasons. I don't share them and probably never will, but they are, at least, more respectable than "OMFG! How dare that Kappa Sig take a Nalgene to his Ultimate Frisbee game! He's not kore like me!" Like many climbers, I drink the haterade too, for lots of silly reasons. But some guy just wearing a rad wicking Prana top doesn't bother me.
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 10, 2008, 4:05 AM
Post #117 of 237
(2028 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
climbsomething wrote: Well, rtwilli, since you're explaining yourself in a more intelligent (and slightly self-effacing) way, I'll try to do the same. Folks regularly start threads pissing and moaning about "yuppies" in "poser" clothes, or fat dudes who use real carabiners as keyrings, or preppy girls who wear pink North Face fleeces to class. The tone is almost always an insecure, snivveling droning. Some people's diaper rash just really flares up when they perceive that some "outsider" is hovering around their supposedly exclusive (and most likely new) subculture. These also tend to be the same people who spray about the dirtbag life, because they think it's hardcore, and they want nothing more than to seem hardcore. They really appear to need validation and an identity. Yet a lot of people think those people are needy douchebag tools. I think people associate/d you with that group (I admit that I did), hence the responses you got. Now, as to your given reasons for being anti-trendy-clothes-establishment, well, those are your reasons. I don't share them and probably never will, but they are, at least, more respectable than "OMFG! How dare that Kappa Sig take a Nalgene to his Ultimate Frisbee game! He's not kore like me!" Like many climbers, I drink the haterade too, for lots of silly reasons. But some guy just wearing a rad wicking Prana top doesn't bother me. thanks for that... but i do hate kappa sig's no seriously... i know I came off as a dick head whining puppy. I don't think I'm hard core. I'm freakin happy and that's that. I guess those people I was bitching about are probably pretty happy too and I should let them be happy.
|
|
|
|
|
brandom
Sep 10, 2008, 4:09 AM
Post #118 of 237
(2026 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 29, 2008
Posts: 8
|
I kinda joined this one late but... first of all, props to the man in the sticky rubber suit :D I laughed my ass off! I have those $150 pants. I climb in them. And I bike to work every day in them. I talk to clients in them. I volunteer in them. They look good, they take a beating, they repel stains, they wash easy, they dry easy, they fold up small, they are breathable, and they last and last and I wear pretty much only these pants for 80% of the time because that's all I need. I have small loads of laundry that don't take much energy. And that's why I spend on my clothes because that's a whole lot more important than nice furniture, a car, trips to the night club, etc. And oh yeah, about being environmentally aware. Let's talk about the gas it takes to get to the crag, and lets talk about the wood we burn in our camp fires, because this all ain't very environmentally friendly. I don't even own a car so that I can say I'm doing my part but it makes me feel kinda crummy to drive half a day so I can get to a decent crag. So I have to plan all the transit out very carefully and share costs and convince people to go because I sure as hell can't afford to do it all on my own. Can't help it though because I * love * the climbing. So reckless consumerism is not a nice thing. But thoughtful consumerism, well now, I think there's nothing wrong with that. I think driving to buy at WalMart represents reckless but we all draw our own lines and get to color wherever we like.
|
|
|
|
|
the_leech
Sep 10, 2008, 4:18 AM
Post #119 of 237
(2022 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 8, 2007
Posts: 392
|
rtwilli4 wrote: climbsomething wrote: Nothing screams "I'm poor" like an American who travels to Thailand to climb rocks. Or a guy who is gonna go on a cruise with his parents and is concerned about the on-ship climbing wall. Yep, you're too poor but most importantly too real for that fruityass backpacker's underwear. I WORK in Thailand bro. I make just enough money to pay for my plane ticket. Then I go work for cash in London to be with my girlfriend and barely pay for that plane ticket. Then I come to the states and do landscaping and barely make enough money to climb a bit while I'm here. Yea... my parents took my family on a cruise but that's their money, not mine. I only went because it was the last family vacation I'll ever have with them. I have a college degree that I (notice how I said I) paid for. I'm not in any debt, and could get a good job whenever I want. Fact is, I don't want to live in this plastic country full of clones and pay taxes to a government that only cares about taking care of their friends and tries to pass it off as being the leader of the free world. Say what you want, but I'm not vacationing... I'm opting out of this fake existence that so many americans blindly fall into. In three years I'll have citizenship in the UK AND the Philippines and living in paradise while most of the people on this site will be working 9 to 5 so they can look cool in their name brands that they got on sale. Someone please bitch-slap this young whippersnapper for his use of the word "bro" in a sentence. That's more annoying than any pair of Pranas at the crag anyday. But seriously, I'm glad you're happy. I also thought that being a poor, dual-citizenship, world-traveler was cool before I hit 30. I also thought my world view would never change. Enjoy it while it lasts. You'll be a "clone" soon enough.
|
|
|
|
|
Maddhatter
Sep 10, 2008, 4:24 AM
Post #120 of 237
(2013 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2008
Posts: 1752
|
"or fat dudes who use real carabiners as keyrings" I do that but there all ones I found. Ones left when someone bailed out and don't trust to climb with.
|
|
|
|
|
raingod
Sep 10, 2008, 4:27 AM
Post #121 of 237
(2008 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2003
Posts: 118
|
Forget gas to get to the crag, or SUVs on the I5, Flights to and from Thailand, London and the States have their own class of environmental impact...
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 10, 2008, 4:32 AM
Post #122 of 237
(2002 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
raingod wrote: Forget gas to get to the crag, or SUVs on the I5, Flights to and from Thailand, London and the States have their own class of environmental impact... three flights a year... i think i offset that by not driving for 9 months out of the year.
|
|
|
|
|
micahd
Sep 10, 2008, 4:47 AM
Post #123 of 237
(1994 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 7, 2007
Posts: 6
|
i wear climbing clothes like arcteryx in general public and climbing. my wardrobe is climbing clothes so therefore i am always ready
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Sep 10, 2008, 5:21 PM
Post #124 of 237
(1935 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: wonderwoman wrote: Why do you care what other people wear? Why not just climb? because when posers start buying up clothes, it causes new, shitty companies to start making clothes just for posers. Look at snowboarding 20 years ago compared to now. Most of the companies now are no more environmentally conscious than BP Amaco. Prana, Patagonia, etc... those companies are responsible. Just wait and see what the next wave of "climbing companies" turns into. you know rtwilli, I would take you more seriously if you weren't so name-calley. I happen to agree with what your saying just not with your approach. I believe that one of the biggest differences we can make is by what we consume. If we demand more from the companies we buy from, they would have no choice but to provide it for us. The problem is that most people either dont' realize it or don't care. Josh Perfect case in point: rtwilli uses BP as his example of a worst-case environmental company. Obviously he doesn't have a clue. He just wants to get drunk and rant. Fine, it's been entertaining! But I don't mind calling him on being as clueless as those who he denigrates. In a very dirty industry, BP is no saint. Pollution, oil spills, involvement with nasty governments like Nigeria. But they recently decided not to toe the party line, and they went against all their colleagues when they pulled out of the BS propaganda machine, instead making a statement that global warming is real, and that oil use plays a big part in it. They followed that slap in the face against the industry by investing heavily in alternative energy, primarily wind and solar. It's a smart businuss strategy (after all, oil *is* running out) but it's also a strong stand to take. Just an fyi... GO
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Sep 10, 2008, 5:39 PM
Post #125 of 237
(1928 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
rtwilli4 wrote: raingod wrote: Forget gas to get to the crag, or SUVs on the I5, Flights to and from Thailand, London and the States have their own class of environmental impact... three flights a year... i think i offset that by not driving for 9 months out of the year. Three round trip flights from say New York to London vs. not driving for nine months (say 8,720 miles) . . .nope they don't offset each other.
|
|
|
|
|
stymingersfink
Sep 10, 2008, 5:52 PM
Post #126 of 237
(3411 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 12, 2003
Posts: 7250
|
rtwilli4 wrote: Do you wear special clothes to climb? I mean the really expensive clothes that make you climb better. not always.
rtwilli4 wrote: So... what do you wear when the weather is good?? Um... gloves and boots?
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Sep 10, 2008, 7:34 PM
Post #127 of 237
(3388 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
This post contains nudity or adult content. To protect the innocent we require that you register and turn off your Adult Content Filter to read it.
|
|
|
|
|
k.l.k
Sep 10, 2008, 8:21 PM
Post #128 of 237
(3368 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 9, 2007
Posts: 1190
|
None of us deserved that.
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 10, 2008, 9:05 PM
Post #129 of 237
(3347 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
chadnsc wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: raingod wrote: Forget gas to get to the crag, or SUVs on the I5, Flights to and from Thailand, London and the States have their own class of environmental impact... three flights a year... i think i offset that by not driving for 9 months out of the year. Three round trip flights from say New York to London vs. not driving for nine months (say 8,720 miles) . . .nope they don't offset each other. No... three flights, as is THREE FLIGHTS... not round trips. I don't really know, but I don't think that driving 2000 miles (I have been in the states since May 15 and put less than 2000 miles on my car) and taking three international flights is worse than driving 13,000 miles (average for an American).
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 10, 2008, 9:10 PM
Post #130 of 237
(3343 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
stymingersfink wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: Do you wear special clothes to climb? I mean the really expensive clothes that make you climb better. not always. rtwilli4 wrote: So... what do you wear when the weather is good?? Um... gloves and boots? That pic is hawt.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 10, 2008, 9:11 PM
Post #131 of 237
(3341 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
rtwilli4 wrote: chadnsc wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: raingod wrote: Forget gas to get to the crag, or SUVs on the I5, Flights to and from Thailand, London and the States have their own class of environmental impact... three flights a year... i think i offset that by not driving for 9 months out of the year. Three round trip flights from say New York to London vs. not driving for nine months (say 8,720 miles) . . .nope they don't offset each other. No... three flights, as is THREE FLIGHTS... not round trips. I don't really know, but I don't think that driving 2000 miles (I have been in the states since May 15 and put less than 2000 miles on my car) and taking three international flights is worse than driving 13,000 miles (average for an American). Sorry, still no.
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Sep 10, 2008, 9:12 PM
Post #132 of 237
(3341 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
I heard in the campground that you got banned...
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Sep 10, 2008, 9:26 PM
Post #133 of 237
(3321 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
sungam wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: chadnsc wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: raingod wrote: Forget gas to get to the crag, or SUVs on the I5, Flights to and from Thailand, London and the States have their own class of environmental impact... three flights a year... i think i offset that by not driving for 9 months out of the year. Three round trip flights from say New York to London vs. not driving for nine months (say 8,720 miles) . . .nope they don't offset each other. No... three flights, as is THREE FLIGHTS... not round trips. I don't really know, but I don't think that driving 2000 miles (I have been in the states since May 15 and put less than 2000 miles on my car) and taking three international flights is worse than driving 13,000 miles (average for an American). Sorry, still no. Yup, what Sug said. Nine month of driving: 8,750 miles (assuming a yearly average of 11,000 miles) Three trips to London from New York: 10,380 miles Driving 8,750 miles = 365 gal. of gas (assuming a 24 mpg average) Flying three times from New York to London = 66,000 gal. of gas (assuming using a Boeing 777)
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Sep 10, 2008, 9:44 PM
Post #134 of 237
(3310 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
chadnsc wrote: sungam wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: chadnsc wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: raingod wrote: Forget gas to get to the crag, or SUVs on the I5, Flights to and from Thailand, London and the States have their own class of environmental impact... three flights a year... i think i offset that by not driving for 9 months out of the year. Three round trip flights from say New York to London vs. not driving for nine months (say 8,720 miles) . . .nope they don't offset each other. No... three flights, as is THREE FLIGHTS... not round trips. I don't really know, but I don't think that driving 2000 miles (I have been in the states since May 15 and put less than 2000 miles on my car) and taking three international flights is worse than driving 13,000 miles (average for an American). Sorry, still no. Yup, what Sug said. Nine month of driving: 8,750 miles (assuming a yearly average of 11,000 miles) Three trips to London from New York: 10,380 miles Driving 8,750 miles = 365 gal. of gas (assuming a 24 mpg average) Flying three times from New York to London = 66,000 gal. of gas (assuming using a Boeing 777) Divide by number of passengers.... let's say 400 = 165 gals of jet fuel. DMT
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
Sep 10, 2008, 9:53 PM
Post #135 of 237
(3304 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084
|
dingus wrote: chadnsc wrote: sungam wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: chadnsc wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: raingod wrote: Forget gas to get to the crag, or SUVs on the I5, Flights to and from Thailand, London and the States have their own class of environmental impact... three flights a year... i think i offset that by not driving for 9 months out of the year. Three round trip flights from say New York to London vs. not driving for nine months (say 8,720 miles) . . .nope they don't offset each other. No... three flights, as is THREE FLIGHTS... not round trips. I don't really know, but I don't think that driving 2000 miles (I have been in the states since May 15 and put less than 2000 miles on my car) and taking three international flights is worse than driving 13,000 miles (average for an American). Sorry, still no. Yup, what Sug said. Nine month of driving: 8,750 miles (assuming a yearly average of 11,000 miles) Three trips to London from New York: 10,380 miles Driving 8,750 miles = 365 gal. of gas (assuming a 24 mpg average) Flying three times from New York to London = 66,000 gal. of gas (assuming using a Boeing 777) Divide by number of passengers.... let's say 400 = 165 gals of jet fuel. DMT Car with reasonalbe gas consumptions (say 30mpg) divided by two passengers =~ 145gal. We could go on like this for days!!!!
(This post was edited by granite_grrl on Sep 11, 2008, 12:06 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 10, 2008, 10:30 PM
Post #136 of 237
(3290 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
Lazlo wrote: I heard in the campground that you got banned... listen better next time. If we are going to take on all factors... didn't he say he drove a little? and the flights were thailand->london->ny. I'm still winning, though.
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 10, 2008, 11:02 PM
Post #137 of 237
(3269 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
sungam wrote: If we are going to take on all factors... didn't he say he drove a little? and the flights were thailand->london->ny. I'm still winning, though. Hey someone got it right... I fly from NY to Bangkok to London... sometimes I come back to the states, sometimes I don't. The way I see it, those flights are gonna happen whether I'm on them or not. That is not the case with my driving habits. If we are really getting technical here... I don't use much electricity in Thailand (5 or 6 months per year), and don't create nearly as much trash as I would here. I don't consume anything there other than fresh food. I could go on....
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Sep 10, 2008, 11:06 PM
Post #138 of 237
(3266 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
granite_grrl wrote: We could go on like this for days!!!! Not with our clothes on we couldn't. DMT
|
|
|
|
|
kranney
Sep 10, 2008, 11:48 PM
Post #139 of 237
(3248 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 28, 2005
Posts: 15
|
I'll bite. I do own, and climb in, clothes that could be considered "climbing clothes". The impetus for my decision to buy the clothes has as much do to with how I choose to spend my money as it does aesthetics. I would rather spend the money for organic cotton or some recycled wicking product than I would for traditional cotton products manufactured in a sweat shop. I would also rather support local gear shops than big box chains or online distributors. Kind of like my food choices. Local and organic is most desirable, then local foods, then the organic stuff shipped in from Cali. The way I see it how I spend my money has as big an effect on my ability to see change within our country as how I vote. |
|
|
|
|
Maddhatter
Sep 11, 2008, 12:32 AM
Post #140 of 237
(3234 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2008
Posts: 1752
|
kranney wrote: I'll bite. I do own, and climb in, clothes that could be considered "climbing clothes". The impetus for my decision to buy the clothes has as much do to with how I choose to spend my money as it does aesthetics. I would rather spend the money for organic cotton or some recycled wicking product than I would for traditional cotton products manufactured in a sweat shop. I would also rather support local gear shops than big box chains or online distributors. Kind of like my food choices. Local and organic is most desirable, then local foods, then the organic stuff shipped in from Cali. The way I see it how I spend my money has as big an effect on my ability to see change within our country as how I vote. You might want to start reading the back of those (orgainic) food bags. You might not like what you see. Very few are from the USA and most other places have no laws to make sure they are what they say. ( just say'n )
(This post was edited by Maddhatter on Sep 11, 2008, 12:33 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 11, 2008, 12:39 AM
Post #141 of 237
(3228 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
haha, madhatter, just saw your sig. He's right though, you may be suprised as to what "organic" really means.
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Sep 11, 2008, 12:40 AM
Post #142 of 237
(3225 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
Maddhatter wrote: sungam wrote: I've still never been quoted in a sig, but maybe that's cuz I don't really post anything worth noticing. (happy now?) I think the quote stands well by itself. It's the self-proclaimation that does it for me. Not be'n mean. Just saying it's funnier that way.
|
|
|
|
|
Maddhatter
Sep 11, 2008, 12:42 AM
Post #143 of 237
(3218 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2008
Posts: 1752
|
Lazlo wrote: Maddhatter wrote: sungam wrote: I've still never been quoted in a sig, but maybe that's cuz I don't really post anything worth noticing. (happy now?) I think the quote stands well by itself. It's the self-proclaimation that does it for me. Not be'n mean. Just saying it's funnier that way. It was in no way ment as an insult. Just thought it was a funny thing to quote! lol
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 11, 2008, 12:43 AM
Post #144 of 237
(3216 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
BTW, mad, if you close the quote box he opened up, or just delete it, you post won't be all cheesetitted like it is.
|
|
|
|
|
kranney
Sep 11, 2008, 2:03 AM
Post #145 of 237
(3194 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 28, 2005
Posts: 15
|
I do read the labels on every food product I buy. Like I said in my initial post local and organic is the most desirable to me, then local, then organic. So i read labels and try to make the best decisions accordingly. I'm not saying I wont eat things that aren't local, organic or any combination there of. The majority of the produce I buy comes from my local farmers market, at least when its in season, but I am guilty of buying avocados from Chile and bananas from costa rica on occasion. I think my point was that I try to be mindful and aware of where my money is being spent.
|
|
|
|
|
Maddhatter
Sep 11, 2008, 2:09 AM
Post #146 of 237
(3189 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2008
Posts: 1752
|
kranney wrote: I do read the labels on every food product I buy. Like I said in my initial post local and organic is the most desirable to me, then local, then organic. So i read labels and try to make the best decisions accordingly. I'm not saying I wont eat things that aren't local, organic or any combination there of. The majority of the produce I buy comes from my local farmers market, at least when its in season, but I am guilty of buying avocados from Chile and bananas from costa rica on occasion. I think my point was that I try to be mindful and aware of where my money is being spent. Right on. As it should be. Most people never even look at the back of the bags to see there from china! lol
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 11, 2008, 9:21 AM
Post #147 of 237
(3157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
on the other end, when I can afford it, my main target is fair trade stuff from abroad. And yes, I know even then the situation is not ideal.
|
|
|
|
|
puerto
Sep 11, 2008, 3:03 PM
Post #148 of 237
(3128 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2005
Posts: 229
|
For such a "rebel", it sure didn't take you very long to backtrack.
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Sep 11, 2008, 3:08 PM
Post #149 of 237
(3125 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
Maddhatter wrote: kranney wrote: I do read the labels on every food product I buy. Like I said in my initial post local and organic is the most desirable to me, then local, then organic. So i read labels and try to make the best decisions accordingly. Right on. As it should be. Most people never even look at the back of the bags to see there from china! lol You can thank democrats for those labels. Republicans fought and continue to fight local, state and national labelling regulations. Most recently they have fought to protect McDonald's ability to sell 1000 calorie milkshakes to unsuspecting customers. Read the label... and thank a democrat. DMT
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Sep 11, 2008, 3:11 PM
Post #150 of 237
(3120 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
PTFTW
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Sep 11, 2008, 3:11 PM
Post #151 of 237
(1706 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
How lame is that?
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Sep 11, 2008, 3:12 PM
Post #152 of 237
(1702 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
I'm going back to work now.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 11, 2008, 4:01 PM
Post #153 of 237
(1684 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
dingus wrote: Maddhatter wrote: kranney wrote: I do read the labels on every food product I buy. Like I said in my initial post local and organic is the most desirable to me, then local, then organic. So i read labels and try to make the best decisions accordingly. Right on. As it should be. Most people never even look at the back of the bags to see there from china! lol You can thank democrats for those labels. Republicans fought and continue to fight local, state and national labelling regulations. Most recently they have fought to protect McDonald's ability to sell 1000 calorie milkshakes to unsuspecting customers. Read the label... and thank a democrat. DMT Or, thank Ralph Nader for that and other many health and safety regulations.
|
|
|
|
|
stymingersfink
Sep 11, 2008, 4:03 PM
Post #154 of 237
(1682 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 12, 2003
Posts: 7250
|
FAIL!!!!!! (keep it in scummunity, you're less likely to get the tarpit!)
|
|
|
|
|
zeke_sf
Sep 11, 2008, 4:04 PM
Post #155 of 237
(1679 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730
|
rtwilli4 wrote: that's kind of the answer i was looking for. we could probably hang out. I hate wal-mart and certainly understand the benefit (to me and the environment) of buying clothes at outdoor shops. "we could probably hang out"? I see, it's all about people meeting the criterion on your cool-o-meter. Geez, I sure hope you bought your karbon kredits (along with the accompanying certificate of eco-thenticity cum catholic absolution) to offset your smoggy footsteps across the sky. You and your friends have been busy sucking each others' junk in front of the beach fire for too long, my friend. Those unaccustomed to the taste may need a sweeter sauce than self-righteousness before they open their ears to what you are saying, much less their mouths.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 11, 2008, 4:05 PM
Post #156 of 237
(1677 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
kranney wrote: I do read the labels on every food product I buy. Like I said in my initial post local and organic is the most desirable to me, then local, then organic. So i read labels and try to make the best decisions accordingly. I'm not saying I wont eat things that aren't local, organic or any combination there of. The majority of the produce I buy comes from my local farmers market, at least when its in season, but I am guilty of buying avocados from Chile and bananas from costa rica on occasion. I think my point was that I try to be mindful and aware of where my money is being spent. I'm with you! We have a share from a local organic farm and it looks like we won't be needing to buy veggies all winter at this rate. Even though we share our share! Also just started baking my own bread, so I know most of the ingredients that I eat and can avoid the high fructose corn syrup that they seem to sneak into everything! I admit to a banana and avacado need, though! Can't get those things in New England. Go figure!
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 11, 2008, 4:12 PM
Post #157 of 237
(1667 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
stymingersfink wrote: FAIL!!!!!! (keep it in scummunity, you're less likely to get the tarpit!) WAIT!!! WAIT!!! Let me try! PTFTW!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 11, 2008, 4:13 PM
Post #158 of 237
(1665 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
wonderwoman wrote: stymingersfink wrote: FAIL!!!!!! (keep it in scummunity, you're less likely to get the tarpit!) WAIT!!! WAIT!!! Let me try! PTFTW!!!! Rats!!!
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Sep 11, 2008, 4:37 PM
Post #159 of 237
(1648 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
wonderwoman wrote: kranney wrote: I do read the labels on every food product I buy. Like I said in my initial post local and organic is the most desirable to me, then local, then organic. So i read labels and try to make the best decisions accordingly. I'm not saying I wont eat things that aren't local, organic or any combination there of. The majority of the produce I buy comes from my local farmers market, at least when its in season, but I am guilty of buying avocados from Chile and bananas from costa rica on occasion. I think my point was that I try to be mindful and aware of where my money is being spent. I'm with you! We have a share from a local organic farm and it looks like we won't be needing to buy veggies all winter at this rate. Even though we share our share! Also just started baking my own bread, so I know most of the ingredients that I eat and can avoid the high fructose corn syrup that they seem to sneak into everything! I admit to a banana and avacado need, though! Can't get those things in New England. Go figure! Yea whats up with high fructose corn syrup in everything? I also admit getting avacados from Cali now and again. Got to have fresh guac, know what I mean.
|
|
|
|
|
kranney
Sep 11, 2008, 9:06 PM
Post #160 of 237
(1618 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 28, 2005
Posts: 15
|
I hate high fructose corn syrup and it seems to work its way into almost every product on the shelves these days. It must be economically viable because it is in everything from bread to soup to most drinks with flavor.
|
|
|
|
|
Maddhatter
Sep 11, 2008, 9:12 PM
Post #161 of 237
(1617 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2008
Posts: 1752
|
It's just a sugar for gods sake. Like anything, To much is a bad thing but it's better then the 100 other things they could use.
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
Sep 11, 2008, 9:47 PM
Post #162 of 237
(1599 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084
|
Maddhatter wrote: It's just a sugar for gods sake. Like anything, To much is a bad thing but it's better then the 100 other things they could use. Its super, highly, highly refined sugar. Amoung other things I have read that it has similar effects as an appatite supressant (would you like to super size that sir?) and has mild addictive qualities (soda junkie?). Its pretty nasty stuff. Now, to make thing difficult in Canada I'm not sure if they don't use the stuff or if its just labeled as something else. But luckly I have heard from my American inlaws how Coke tastes different up here though, and I think it's 'cause Canadian soda doesn't have HFCS (nor do we have caffine in our Mountain Dew).
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 11, 2008, 10:28 PM
Post #163 of 237
(1589 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
Maddhatter wrote: It's just a sugar for gods sake. Like anything, To much is a bad thing but it's better then the 100 other things they could use. If only it were. Your body doesn't know how to digest it like regular sugar. Why do you think us Americans are getting so fat? Just finished 'In Defense of Food' this morning as a follow up to 'Omnivore's Dilemma'. Both great and eye opening reads on the food industry. I've certainly changed my eatin habits, and I thought I was eating pretty healthy to begin with!
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Sep 11, 2008, 10:44 PM
Post #164 of 237
(1582 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
granite_grrl wrote: Maddhatter wrote: It's just a sugar for gods sake. Like anything, To much is a bad thing but it's better then the 100 other things they could use. Its super, highly, highly refined sugar. Amoung other things I have read that it has similar effects as an appatite supressant (would you like to super size that sir?) and has mild addictive qualities (soda junkie?). Its pretty nasty stuff. Now, to make thing difficult in Canada I'm not sure if they don't use the stuff or if its just labeled as something else. But luckly I have heard from my American inlaws how Coke tastes different up here though, and I think it's 'cause Canadian soda doesn't have HFCS (nor do we have caffine in our Mountain Dew). No Caffine in MD? How can that be, MD is one of the highest caffinated sodas. Well it was before all those energy drinks started coming out. Now I'm more of a South Beach kinda guy. Low carb not no carb. Drove my triglycerides down from 340 to 106 mainly by diet, and a little extra walking. So thats why I don't like the HFCS. So I started reading labels, and it freaking everywhere. Everywhere. Since it comes from corn, my understanding is that why its refined more, have to break down all the starches to sugars. I guess that could make it harder to digest, but couldn't say for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
stymingersfink
Sep 11, 2008, 10:45 PM
Post #165 of 237
(1580 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 12, 2003
Posts: 7250
|
wonderwoman wrote: Maddhatter wrote: It's just a sugar for gods sake. Like anything, To much is a bad thing but it's better then the 100 other things they could use. If only it were. Your body doesn't know how to digest it like regular sugar. Why do you think us Americans are getting so fat? Just finished 'In Defense of Food' this morning as a follow up to 'Omnivore's Dilemma'. Both great and eye opening reads on the food industry. I've certainly changed my eatin habits, and I thought I was eating pretty healthy to begin with! Um.. cause so many lazy fat fucks don't know when to quit eating, let alone do something/anything to get off their fat asses and raise their heart rate doing something physical? Yeah, that's what I thought too.
|
|
|
|
|
knieveltech
Sep 11, 2008, 10:48 PM
Post #166 of 237
(1575 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431
|
rtwilli4 wrote: So... what do you wear when the weather is good?? Leopard print lycra tights and a black t-shirt. Fucking awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 11, 2008, 10:55 PM
Post #167 of 237
(1571 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
knieveltech wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: So... what do you wear when the weather is good?? Leopard print lycra tights and a black t-shirt. Fucking awesome. Hell yeah man! I guess I'll know you if I see you when I'm over there.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 11, 2008, 10:56 PM
Post #168 of 237
(1571 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
stymingersfink wrote: wonderwoman wrote: Maddhatter wrote: It's just a sugar for gods sake. Like anything, To much is a bad thing but it's better then the 100 other things they could use. If only it were. Your body doesn't know how to digest it like regular sugar. Why do you think us Americans are getting so fat? Just finished 'In Defense of Food' this morning as a follow up to 'Omnivore's Dilemma'. Both great and eye opening reads on the food industry. I've certainly changed my eatin habits, and I thought I was eating pretty healthy to begin with! Um.. cause so many lazy fat fucks don't know when to quit eating, let alone do something/anything to get off their fat asses and raise their heart rate doing something physical? Yeah, that's what I thought too. That, too. But childhood obesity and diabetes is scary and not as easily dismissed. With all that energy, kids should be able to burn off calories and that's just not the case anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
knieveltech
Sep 11, 2008, 11:06 PM
Post #169 of 237
(1565 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431
|
sungam wrote: knieveltech wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: So... what do you wear when the weather is good?? Leopard print lycra tights and a black t-shirt. Fucking awesome. Hell yeah man! I guess I'll know you if I see you when I'm over there. Maybe so. If the weather is crap I'm dressed like everyone else though so don't count on it. When you headed over and where are you planning to climb?
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Sep 11, 2008, 11:09 PM
Post #170 of 237
(1563 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
rtwilli4 wrote: Hey someone got it right... I fly from NY to Bangkok to London... sometimes I come back to the states, sometimes I don't. The way I see it, those flights are gonna happen whether I'm on them or not. That is not the case with my driving habits. If we are really getting technical here... I don't use much electricity in Thailand (5 or 6 months per year), and don't create nearly as much trash as I would here. I don't consume anything there other than fresh food. I could go on.... Well, you're looking at it from a micro economics supply side view. While true, that flight was going to happen with or with out you, you really need to look at it from demand side point of view. Your booking a ticket created a demand for one more seat, taken with everyone elses all year long, created the demand for the flight to be regularly scheduled. Now if more people asked the question, should I really take that flight and decided not to? The demand for that flight would deminish, and the number of daily and weekly flights drop, and the consumtion of the jet fuel drop. I'm not saying don't fly, but rather you need to think of it from a demand side and part of your impact. Now, where your thought would work, is if your bud was going to drive on vacation to go climbing, with or with out you, period. And he needed a partner and wanted you to come along so he didn't have to spend half his days looking for partners. Then the supply side reasoning works. You going does not create an increase in demand for fuel use. Otherwise, good on you for keeping your use of fuels and electricity low.
|
|
|
|
|
stymingersfink
Sep 11, 2008, 11:15 PM
Post #171 of 237
(1558 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 12, 2003
Posts: 7250
|
wonderwoman wrote: stymingersfink wrote: wonderwoman wrote: Maddhatter wrote: It's just a sugar for gods sake. Like anything, To much is a bad thing but it's better then the 100 other things they could use. If only it were. Your body doesn't know how to digest it like regular sugar. Why do you think us Americans are getting so fat? Just finished 'In Defense of Food' this morning as a follow up to 'Omnivore's Dilemma'. Both great and eye opening reads on the food industry. I've certainly changed my eatin habits, and I thought I was eating pretty healthy to begin with! Um.. cause so many lazy fat fucks don't know when to quit eating, let alone do something/anything to get off their fat asses and raise their heart rate doing something physical? Yeah, that's what I thought too. That, too. But childhood obesity and diabetes is scary and not as easily dismissed. With all that energy, kids should be able to burn off calories and that's just not the case anymore. um... x-box anyone?
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 11, 2008, 11:25 PM
Post #172 of 237
(1554 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
stymingersfink wrote: wonderwoman wrote: stymingersfink wrote: wonderwoman wrote: Maddhatter wrote: It's just a sugar for gods sake. Like anything, To much is a bad thing but it's better then the 100 other things they could use. If only it were. Your body doesn't know how to digest it like regular sugar. Why do you think us Americans are getting so fat? Just finished 'In Defense of Food' this morning as a follow up to 'Omnivore's Dilemma'. Both great and eye opening reads on the food industry. I've certainly changed my eatin habits, and I thought I was eating pretty healthy to begin with! Um.. cause so many lazy fat fucks don't know when to quit eating, let alone do something/anything to get off their fat asses and raise their heart rate doing something physical? Yeah, that's what I thought too. That, too. But childhood obesity and diabetes is scary and not as easily dismissed. With all that energy, kids should be able to burn off calories and that's just not the case anymore. um... x-box anyone? Not every family can afford one of those. And those who can least afford it are the ones becoming obese. It's the crap in the food.
|
|
|
|
|
Maddhatter
Sep 11, 2008, 11:28 PM
Post #173 of 237
(1552 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2008
Posts: 1752
|
wonderwoman wrote: Maddhatter wrote: It's just a sugar for gods sake. Like anything, To much is a bad thing but it's better then the 100 other things they could use. If only it were. Your body doesn't know how to digest it like regular sugar. Why do you think us Americans are getting so fat? Just finished 'In Defense of Food' this morning as a follow up to 'Omnivore's Dilemma'. Both great and eye opening reads on the food industry. I've certainly changed my eatin habits, and I thought I was eating pretty healthy to begin with! All right I will bite. I will look into this more on my own. Thank you for shareing. I'm am a sugar junky but I also work out alot as part of my job as a painter so I don't really gain alot of weight. But there is more to good health then just not being fat.
(This post was edited by Maddhatter on Sep 11, 2008, 11:29 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
stymingersfink
Sep 11, 2008, 11:33 PM
Post #174 of 237
(1548 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 12, 2003
Posts: 7250
|
wonderwoman wrote: stymingersfink wrote: wonderwoman wrote: stymingersfink wrote: wonderwoman wrote: Maddhatter wrote: It's just a sugar for gods sake. Like anything, To much is a bad thing but it's better then the 100 other things they could use. If only it were. Your body doesn't know how to digest it like regular sugar. Why do you think us Americans are getting so fat? Just finished 'In Defense of Food' this morning as a follow up to 'Omnivore's Dilemma'. Both great and eye opening reads on the food industry. I've certainly changed my eatin habits, and I thought I was eating pretty healthy to begin with! Um.. cause so many lazy fat fucks don't know when to quit eating, let alone do something/anything to get off their fat asses and raise their heart rate doing something physical? Yeah, that's what I thought too. That, too. But childhood obesity and diabetes is scary and not as easily dismissed. With all that energy, kids should be able to burn off calories and that's just not the case anymore. um... x-box anyone? Not every family can afford one of those. And those who can least afford it are the ones becoming obese. It's the crap in the food. no, it's the food in the gullet.
|
|
|
|
|
sidepull
Sep 12, 2008, 12:04 AM
Post #175 of 237
(1538 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 11, 2001
Posts: 2335
|
this is what happens when someone starts a mildly on topic thread under the influence - massive drift. now we're debating high fructose corn syrup on a "general" climbing forum. insert profanity here ______. thanks interweb.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 12, 2008, 12:05 AM
Post #176 of 237
(1710 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
Do you think there's high fructose corn syrup in pancakes?
|
|
|
|
|
Maddhatter
Sep 12, 2008, 12:13 AM
Post #177 of 237
(1706 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2008
Posts: 1752
|
sidepull wrote: this is what happens when someone starts a mildly on topic thread under the influence - massive drift. now we're debating high fructose corn syrup on a "general" climbing forum. insert profanity here ______. thanks interweb. And now, You are to! LOL
(This post was edited by Maddhatter on Sep 12, 2008, 12:14 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
onarunning
Sep 12, 2008, 12:27 AM
Post #178 of 237
(1697 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 14, 2007
Posts: 94
|
I wear short shorts. The high school cross country racing type. They make me not want to hang in my harness.
|
|
|
|
|
Toast_in_the_Machine
Sep 12, 2008, 1:59 AM
Post #179 of 237
(1680 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
STFU life n00b!!!! You are so pig ignorant of the world you’re worse than if I took my 40+ year old fat arse to a crag (6 hours away) and talked how “I’m ready to get my send on” and “I got all the right pro, bro” and how “this doesn’t look that much harder than the wall at Dick’s” or even “that crux, dude, looks has the same move as do daily on my woodie”. I’m not stupid enough to do that. (Do other things, not that.) Listen – if you think you are saving the earth, you are wrong, you are, in all likelihood, doing more damage than >99% than of all homo sapiens who have ever lived. If you think “baking my own bread” is good for the earth – wrong – wasting energy. If you think buying local is good for the earth – wrong – wasting energy. If you think buying organic is good for the earth – wrong – uses more land than conventional farming. If you think buying organic is chemical free – wrong – remember ricin and arsenic is a nice and organic chemicals. And If you think you are too good to shop walmart, then you aren’t, your too stupid to shop walmart. Too stupid to shop walmart is like being too drunk to fish. There are people who are, but they shouldn’t be bragging about it. If you want to know if high tech climbing cloths are worth the money – ask away. There are plenty of people with well informed opinions. Otherwise STFU. Oh, and while I’m at it, Aceto – I’ve read Terence McKenna and you sir are no Terence McKenna. 1st POST!
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 12, 2008, 2:07 AM
Post #180 of 237
(1674 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: STFU life n00b!!!! You are so pig ignorant of the world you’re worse than if I took my 40+ year old fat arse to a crag (6 hours away) and talked how “I’m ready to get my send on” and “I got all the right pro, bro” and how “this doesn’t look that much harder than the wall at Dick’s” or even “that crux, dude, looks has the same move as do daily on my woodie”. I’m not stupid enough to do that. (Do other things, not that.) Listen – if you think you are saving the earth, you are wrong, you are, in all likelihood, doing more damage than >99% than of all homo sapiens who have ever lived. If you think “baking my own bread” is good for the earth – wrong – wasting energy. If you think buying local is good for the earth – wrong – wasting energy. If you think buying organic is good for the earth – wrong – uses more land than conventional farming. If you think buying organic is chemical free – wrong – remember ricin and arsenic is a nice and organic chemicals. And If you think you are too good to shop walmart, then you aren’t, your too stupid to shop walmart. Too stupid to shop walmart is like being too drunk to fish. There are people who are, but they shouldn’t be bragging about it. If you want to know if high tech climbing cloths are worth the money – ask away. There are plenty of people with well informed opinions. Otherwise STFU. Oh, and while I’m at it, Aceto – I’ve read Terence McKenna and you sir are no Terence McKenna. 1st POST! Reading this post? Wasting energy!
|
|
|
|
|
kranney
Sep 12, 2008, 2:12 AM
Post #181 of 237
(1672 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 28, 2005
Posts: 15
|
In reply to: STFU life n00b!!!! You are so pig ignorant of the world you’re worse than if I took my 40+ year old fat arse to a crag (6 hours away) and talked how “I’m ready to get my send on” and “I got all the right pro, bro” and how “this doesn’t look that much harder than the wall at Dick’s” or even “that crux, dude, looks has the same move as do daily on my woodie”. I’m not stupid enough to do that. (Do other things, not that.) Listen – if you think you are saving the earth, you are wrong, you are, in all likelihood, doing more damage than >99% than of all homo sapiens who have ever lived. If you think “baking my own bread” is good for the earth – wrong – wasting energy. If you think buying local is good for the earth – wrong – wasting energy. If you think buying organic is good for the earth – wrong – uses more land than conventional farming. If you think buying organic is chemical free – wrong – remember ricin and arsenic is a nice and organic chemicals. And If you think you are too good to shop walmart, then you aren’t, your too stupid to shop walmart. Too stupid to shop walmart is like being too drunk to fish. There are people who are, but they shouldn’t be bragging about it. If you want to know if high tech climbing cloths are worth the money – ask away. There are plenty of people with well informed opinions. Otherwise STFU. Oh, and while I’m at it, Aceto – I’ve read Terence McKenna and you sir are no Terence McKenna. 1st POST! I imagine this is a troll, and for your sake hope so. I do wonder what you suggest as alternatives for attempting to spend my money in a way that is environmentally responsible. I never claimed to "bake my own bread" and never insinuated that I was too good to shop at walmart, hell I never even mentioned walmart. Those are inferences that you made on your own. How is it possible that buying products made or grown near your home consumes more energy than trucking it in from somewhere else? Congrats on the 1st post.
|
|
|
|
|
Maddhatter
Sep 12, 2008, 2:21 AM
Post #182 of 237
(1666 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2008
Posts: 1752
|
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: STFU life n00b!!!! You are so pig ignorant of the world you’re worse than if I took my 40+ year old fat arse to a crag (6 hours away) and talked how “I’m ready to get my send on” and “I got all the right pro, bro” and how “this doesn’t look that much harder than the wall at Dick’s” or even “that crux, dude, looks has the same move as do daily on my woodie”. I’m not stupid enough to do that. (Do other things, not that.) Listen – if you think you are saving the earth, you are wrong, you are, in all likelihood, doing more damage than >99% than of all homo sapiens who have ever lived. If you think “baking my own bread” is good for the earth – wrong – wasting energy. If you think buying local is good for the earth – wrong – wasting energy. If you think buying organic is good for the earth – wrong – uses more land than conventional farming. If you think buying organic is chemical free – wrong – remember ricin and arsenic is a nice and organic chemicals. And If you think you are too good to shop walmart, then you aren’t, your too stupid to shop walmart. Too stupid to shop walmart is like being too drunk to fish. There are people who are, but they shouldn’t be bragging about it. If you want to know if high tech climbing cloths are worth the money – ask away. There are plenty of people with well informed opinions. Otherwise STFU. Oh, and while I’m at it, Aceto – I’ve read Terence McKenna and you sir are no Terence McKenna. 1st POST! Welcome to the forum. Your going to fit right in. The soap box is down at the bottom.
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 12, 2008, 2:33 AM
Post #183 of 237
(1661 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: STFU life n00b!!!! You are so pig ignorant of the world you’re worse than if I took my 40+ year old fat arse to a crag (6 hours away) and talked how “I’m ready to get my send on” and “I got all the right pro, bro” and how “this doesn’t look that much harder than the wall at Dick’s” or even “that crux, dude, looks has the same move as do daily on my woodie”. I’m not stupid enough to do that. (Do other things, not that.) Listen – if you think you are saving the earth, you are wrong, you are, in all likelihood, doing more damage than >99% than of all homo sapiens who have ever lived. If you think “baking my own bread” is good for the earth – wrong – wasting energy. If you think buying local is good for the earth – wrong – wasting energy. If you think buying organic is good for the earth – wrong – uses more land than conventional farming. If you think buying organic is chemical free – wrong – remember ricin and arsenic is a nice and organic chemicals. And If you think you are too good to shop walmart, then you aren’t, your too stupid to shop walmart. Too stupid to shop walmart is like being too drunk to fish. There are people who are, but they shouldn’t be bragging about it. If you want to know if high tech climbing cloths are worth the money – ask away. There are plenty of people with well informed opinions. Otherwise STFU. Oh, and while I’m at it, Aceto – I’ve read Terence McKenna and you sir are no Terence McKenna. 1st POST! Did you sign up just to tell us all that? Now I've taken plenty of criticism for what I wrote but at least it was educated. You sir, are just plain dumb.
|
|
|
|
|
Toast_in_the_Machine
Sep 12, 2008, 2:38 AM
Post #184 of 237
(1659 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
I’m sorry, I must have missed something. I thought that here: 1) You should state everything with a broad brush, ignore facts, and hint, but not directly actually insult, someone who can climb better than you 2) Stake out an position, defend it, then back off it “facts” get in the way 3) Take open pot shots at anything that is not based on climbing best practices I’m sorry, does that make me a troll????? As for energy usage: overall it takes less energy to get an equivalent can of tomatoes from Cali to a super market in Mass (via rail) than it takes to get the same from local farms to the same supermarket via pickup truck. You might have heard of this concept: Economics of scale. Not all that is painted green is good for the “environment”. Ooops did I do it again? (Then spank me one more time)
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 12, 2008, 2:53 AM
Post #185 of 237
(1649 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: I’m sorry, I must have missed something. I thought that here: 1) You should state everything with a broad brush, ignore facts, and hint, but not directly actually insult, someone who can climb better than you 2) Stake out an position, defend it, then back off it “facts” get in the way 3) Take open pot shots at anything that is not based on climbing best practices I’m sorry, does that make me a troll????? As for energy usage: overall it takes less energy to get an equivalent can of tomatoes from Cali to a super market in Mass (via rail) than it takes to get the same from local farms to the same supermarket via pickup truck. You might have heard of this concept: Economics of scale. Not all that is painted green is good for the “environment”. Ooops did I do it again? (Then spank me one more time) Look i never backed off anything because of "the facts." I never got my "facts" wrong... I simply have an opinion that people don't agree with and I expressed it in a way that made it even harder for people to understand and agree with. So I'm not a poet.
|
|
|
|
|
climbsomething
Sep 12, 2008, 2:57 AM
Post #187 of 237
(1641 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588
|
I hope that light bulb was a twisty CFL, lest you be considered a poser!
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Sep 12, 2008, 2:58 AM
Post #188 of 237
(1639 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
climbsomething wrote: I hope that light bulb was a twisty CFL, lest you be considered a poser! It is... But that doesn't mean that I'm not a poser!
|
|
|
|
|
Maddhatter
Sep 12, 2008, 3:05 AM
Post #189 of 237
(1632 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2008
Posts: 1752
|
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: I’m sorry, I must have missed something. I thought that here: 1) You should state everything with a broad brush, ignore facts, and hint, but not directly actually insult, someone who can climb better than you 2) Stake out an position, defend it, then back off it “facts” get in the way 3) Take open pot shots at anything that is not based on climbing best practices I’m sorry, does that make me a troll????? As for energy usage: overall it takes less energy to get an equivalent can of tomatoes from Cali to a super market in Mass (via rail) than it takes to get the same from local farms to the same supermarket via pickup truck. You might have heard of this concept: Economics of scale. Not all that is painted green is good for the “environment”. Ooops did I do it again? (Then spank me one more time) 1 - I kinda like to insult with out all the fluff myself. 2 - My view or anyone view is just that. Right or wrong I like it when people speak there minds. 3- yea that does happen far to much. I hate that troll word it gets used far to much on here. "As for energy usage: overall it takes less energy to get an equivalent can of tomatoes from Cali to a super market in Mass (via rail) than it takes to get the same from local farms to the same supermarket via pickup truck. You might have heard of this concept: Economics of scale. Not all that is painted green is good for the “environment”. " your right but if you want better food you have to pay for it. In the end it's up to the person. Home grown is still best.
|
|
|
|
|
luiyo1200
Sep 12, 2008, 3:19 AM
Post #190 of 237
(1627 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 23, 2008
Posts: 11
|
if you realy like to know, i climb in dancing pants. jazz pants to be exact. but if you going to the crag ill wear something els so you are not unconftrable
|
|
|
|
|
climbsomething
Sep 12, 2008, 3:57 AM
Post #193 of 237
(1613 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588
|
wonderwoman wrote: luiyo1200 wrote: if you realy like to know, i climb in dancing pants. jazz pants to be exact. but if you going to the crag ill wear something els so you are not unconftrable Did you get the invitation to the pants party? Silly wonderwoman. Everybody knows you can't have a party with pants ON!
|
|
|
|
|
asiaclimber
Sep 12, 2008, 3:59 AM
Post #194 of 237
(1613 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 21, 2007
Posts: 214
|
remember those pants that MC Hammer used to wear?
|
|
|
|
|
Toast_in_the_Machine
Sep 12, 2008, 4:05 AM
Post #195 of 237
(1609 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
Actually, I signed up so I can get some climbing advice. Because internet advice is the best advice! I, sir, am not plain dumb. I’m actually far more educated on this than you. In the same way I would not yet question the safety expertise of the major safety posters, you should not assume that I don’t know that of which I speak. My food and environmental cred far outweighs my microscopic climbing cred. As for some of the other comments. Peppers are native to Central America, so outside of that they are an alien species (not to mention highly manipulated by homo sapiens). And organic means no petrochemical pesticides. It does not mean petroleum products were not heavily used to plow, grow or distribute the products. "Further" does not equal less fuel was used, it just means further. Again, back to my example, multiple pickups to and from a food pickup location are identical to consuming bottled water vs. drinking tap water. You’ve heard that is bad, right? Also, I said “green” not “good”. Local food often tastes better, even if it is not better for the overall environment. Ahhhh. Thread drift. Trolling. Am I getting this RC.com thingie yet?
|
|
|
|
|
luiyo1200
Sep 12, 2008, 4:23 AM
Post #196 of 237
(1606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 23, 2008
Posts: 11
|
theres not even a perty if im not there
|
|
|
|
|
stymingersfink
Sep 12, 2008, 4:27 AM
Post #197 of 237
(1603 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 12, 2003
Posts: 7250
|
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: blah, blah, blah... Ahhhh. Thread drift. Trolling. Am I getting this RC.com thingie yet? Sounds like you're coming along swimmingly.
|
|
|
|
|
curt
Sep 12, 2008, 4:38 AM
Post #198 of 237
(1601 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275
|
Maddhatter wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: STFU life n00b!!!! You are so pig ignorant of the world you’re worse than if I took my 40+ year old fat arse to a crag (6 hours away) and talked how “I’m ready to get my send on” and “I got all the right pro, bro” and how “this doesn’t look that much harder than the wall at Dick’s” or even “that crux, dude, looks has the same move as do daily on my woodie”. I’m not stupid enough to do that. (Do other things, not that.) Listen – if you think you are saving the earth, you are wrong, you are, in all likelihood, doing more damage than >99% than of all homo sapiens who have ever lived. If you think “baking my own bread” is good for the earth – wrong – wasting energy. If you think buying local is good for the earth – wrong – wasting energy. If you think buying organic is good for the earth – wrong – uses more land than conventional farming. If you think buying organic is chemical free – wrong – remember ricin and arsenic is a nice and organic chemicals. And If you think you are too good to shop walmart, then you aren’t, your too stupid to shop walmart. Too stupid to shop walmart is like being too drunk to fish. There are people who are, but they shouldn’t be bragging about it. If you want to know if high tech climbing cloths are worth the money – ask away. There are plenty of people with well informed opinions. Otherwise STFU. Oh, and while I’m at it, Aceto – I’ve read Terence McKenna and you sir are no Terence McKenna. 1st POST! Welcome to the forum. Your going to fit right in.... Only if we create a new "short bus" forum, just for the two of you. Curt
|
|
|
|
|
Toast_in_the_Machine
Sep 12, 2008, 11:14 AM
Post #199 of 237
(1582 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
Now if I can only master the skill of short meaningless replies to get the PC up. And then advance to self referential posts, I might, just might, approach what the kids call cool.
|
|
|
|
|
Toast_in_the_Machine
Sep 12, 2008, 11:23 AM
Post #200 of 237
(1581 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
Skipping over the obviously insensitive aspect of people with real mental handicaps (as opposed to those with just a need to quote bad rock songs)… Yellow pants. Does anyone sell actual gear that, while not as “rad” as the pink 80s gear, come in interesting colors? (Oh yeah, I’m hoping someone re-puts: bad 80’s climbing pants, David Lee Roth, Miami U camo with neon orange and / or a guy climbing in “pinky” pants)
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 12, 2008, 12:32 PM
Post #201 of 237
(1880 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
knieveltech wrote: sungam wrote: knieveltech wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: So... what do you wear when the weather is good?? Leopard print lycra tights and a black t-shirt. Fucking awesome. Hell yeah man! I guess I'll know you if I see you when I'm over there. Maybe so. If the weather is crap I'm dressed like everyone else though so don't count on it. When you headed over and where are you planning to climb? Whenever my passport comes through, and I'll be climbing whereever someone is driving I will be the ultimate lift moocher!! (based in chapel hill, btw)
|
|
|
|
|
knieveltech
Sep 12, 2008, 1:39 PM
Post #202 of 237
(1869 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431
|
That's cool. PM me when you're headed over, we'll go climb.
|
|
|
|
|
Climbing_Pink
Sep 12, 2008, 1:54 PM
Post #203 of 237
(1863 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 10, 2008
Posts: 88
|
One word... sale racks, You guys need to learn to shop better. It sucks that guys get to climb without their shirts, less money to spend.. well unless your in Ontario where it's legal to be topless.... ..but then the stareing gets too much
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Sep 12, 2008, 3:20 PM
Post #204 of 237
(1850 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
Hmmm, looks like one of our MIA soap-box-heros has resurrected himself yet again. DMT
|
|
|
|
|
Maddhatter
Sep 12, 2008, 3:57 PM
Post #205 of 237
(1834 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2008
Posts: 1752
|
I find name brand climbing stuff in thrift stores around here all the time for pennies on the dollar. But I do live in the last little bit of hill billy heaven around here with $1,000,000 houses all around me. Just saying you might be shocked at what you can find in thrift stores. Most of what I find is brand new with the tags still on them.
|
|
|
|
|
lucaskrajnik
Sep 12, 2008, 3:57 PM
Post #206 of 237
(1832 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 13, 2007
Posts: 89
|
First of all rtwilli , your on RC.com ..of coarse these ppl wear that waste of money. I have friends that do buy that.. mostly just because they have money.. i would like to also ..but im too busy buying other gear.. that matters more to me..
|
|
|
|
|
stymingersfink
Sep 12, 2008, 4:26 PM
Post #207 of 237
(1821 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 12, 2003
Posts: 7250
|
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: Now if I can only master the skill of short meaningless replies to get the PC up. And then advance to self referential posts, I might, just might, approach what the kids call cool. if short meaningless replies fails to work for you, you can try fondling it while you blow cool gentle breezes over it... it always seems to work on me.
|
|
|
|
|
stymingersfink
Sep 12, 2008, 4:27 PM
Post #208 of 237
(1820 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 12, 2003
Posts: 7250
|
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: Now if I can only master the skill of short meaningless replies to get the PC up. And then advance to self referential posts, I might, just might, approach what the kids call cool. Sty doubts you will ever truly master this aspect of posting. T.i.t.machine just doesn't quite have that ring to it, ya know? Nice visual, but it's missing something...
|
|
|
|
|
Toast_in_the_Machine
Sep 12, 2008, 4:54 PM
Post #209 of 237
(1813 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
stymingersfink wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: Now if I can only master the skill of short meaningless replies to get the PC up. And then advance to self referential posts, I might, just might, approach what the kids call cool. Sty doubts you will ever truly master this aspect of posting. T.i.t.machine just doesn't quite have that ring to it, ya know? Nice visual, but it's missing something... I can try
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Sep 12, 2008, 5:45 PM
Post #211 of 237
(1785 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
cracklover wrote: Nice rant. Let me just wipe all your spittle off my face, and then ask you a question. You state: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: If you think buying local is good for the earth – wrong – wasting energy. Okay, this sure sounds like BS to me. So correct my math if you please. Let's say farmer A lives in New England and runs a good sized orchard. During apple season, he loads up most of his crop and delivers it once a week to a local distributor or a large grocery store. Let's say he: drives 50 miles loads 200 boxes in the back gets 10 mpg (being conservative here - probably <) The cost in gallons of diesel to get those apples to market is 0.025 gallons per box. Farmer B lives in Washington State. He too ships his apples off to New England. Let's say that truck: drives 3000 miles loads 1000 boxes in the back (being generous here, probably <) gets 10 mpg (being generous here, probably <) The cost in gallons of diesel to get those apples to market is 0.3 gallons per box. So the local apples cost less than one tenth the amount of fuel to get to market than the west coast variety. Even if you factor in the local farmer driving his truck back home, the margin is still huge. GO Gabe you forget that the orchard must be maintained all year. There could be a differance in the two's day to day operations, economies of scale might be one. My look at it would be, whatever apples are cheapest at your local stores, are probably the lowest cost to market. Which then is most likely has resulted in the least fuels being burned either directly, indirectly, and subsequently. As long as we're comparing apples to apples of coarse. Which would minimizes demand side variables. Of coarse the the local supplier should have a built in advantage, lower shipping costs. And if his price is competetive, should be the better bet.
|
|
|
|
|
Maddhatter
Sep 12, 2008, 5:52 PM
Post #212 of 237
(1782 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2008
Posts: 1752
|
Wait!! What do apples have to do with cloths again? No one will win this one guys it is always cheaper to grow or make things in mass numbers but most things are better in small numbers with more of a hands on touch. Even apples to apples there not really the same products.
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Sep 12, 2008, 6:20 PM
Post #213 of 237
(1767 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
Maddhatter wrote: Wait!! What do apples have to do with cloths again? No one will win this one guys it is always cheaper to grow or make things in mass numbers but most things are better in small numbers with more of a hands on touch. Even apples to apples there not really the same products. Actually, that fine too. And generally the better in small numbers is true, if you have someone who cares about what they're doing. You can of coarse always think of a counter example, lazy local guy who just doen't care about his work.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Sep 12, 2008, 7:38 PM
Post #214 of 237
(1754 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
donald949 wrote: Gabe you forget that the orchard must be maintained all year. Huh? I didn't forget that - I was asking a quesiton about the fuel it takes to get the product to market.
In reply to: There could be a differance in the two's day to day operations, economies of scale might be one. To some degree. But basically, both hire a mix of skilled and unskilled workers to prune, pick, etc. The prices here aren't radically different by scale.
In reply to: My look at it would be, whatever apples are cheapest at your local stores, are probably the lowest cost to market. Which then is most likely has resulted in the least fuels being burned either directly, indirectly, and subsequently. As long as we're comparing apples to apples of coarse. Which would minimizes demand side variables. Ah, there's the rub. Demand-side usually wins the day here, despite quality, price, or cost-to-market. The biggest issue is this: Customers demand the same produce year round. Plus, it's less of a headache for supermarkets and convenience stores to have one distributor who can regularly give them the same produce year round.
In reply to: Of coarse the the local supplier should have a built in advantage, lower shipping costs. And if his price is competetive, should be the better bet. And in some cases, that lower shipping cost actually *does* win the day. Some big stores (like Wal-Mart) are actually buying locally for exactly that reason. The real issue, though, was that at $2.50/gal diesel, the price differential just wasn't enough to make anyone take notice. With higher oil prices, the market starts looking at fuel consumption through the same eyes as environmentalists. GO
|
|
|
|
|
stymingersfink
Sep 12, 2008, 7:46 PM
Post #215 of 237
(1748 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 12, 2003
Posts: 7250
|
cracklover wrote: The real issue, though, was that at $2.50/gal diesel, the price differential just wasn't enough to make anyone take notice. With higher oil prices, the market starts looking at fuel consumption through the same eyes as environmentalists. GO Which, IMHO, is not a bad thing. One of the few good things to come out of higher oil prices. I hope it comes back to bite those who have gamed the system quite squarely in the ass!
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Sep 12, 2008, 7:49 PM
Post #216 of 237
(1746 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
cracklover wrote: And in some cases, that lower shipping cost actually *does* win the day. Some big stores (like Wal-Mart) are actually buying locally for exactly that reason. The real issue, though, was that at $2.50/gal diesel, the price differential just wasn't enough to make anyone take notice. With higher oil prices, the market starts looking at fuel consumption through the same eyes as environmentalists. GO Which is why $4-5 gas and diesel is not completely a bad thing.
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Sep 12, 2008, 7:51 PM
Post #217 of 237
(1743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
Dang, did sty and just say the same thing. Dang
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Sep 12, 2008, 8:04 PM
Post #220 of 237
(1731 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
sungam wrote: donald949 wrote: Dang, did sty and I just say the same thing. Dang This sentence, if it even is a sentence, makes no sense. unless this "just" character is kicking around somewhere... Thanks, I fixed it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 12, 2008, 8:05 PM
Post #221 of 237
(1728 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
With the drifts that have been going on lately, why bother starting a new thread? H3FTW!!!
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Sep 12, 2008, 8:07 PM
Post #222 of 237
(1725 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
sungam wrote: With the drifts that have been going on lately, why bother starting a new thread? H3FTW!!! I blame the PCI.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 12, 2008, 8:15 PM
Post #223 of 237
(1719 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
donald949 wrote: sungam wrote: With the drifts that have been going on lately, why bother starting a new thread? H3FTW!!! I blamemiss the PCI. Me too...
|
|
|
|
|
Toast_in_the_Machine
Sep 13, 2008, 1:49 AM
Post #224 of 237
(1689 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
Actually, we are discussing climbing clothing, only we are using food as a metaphor for discussing the complexities of the supply chain and their environmental impact as well as the ethical considerations of products, procures and consumer choice. Clothing, like food, is part of a great web of international commerce which is of staggering complexity and is one where value judgments on individual participants can lead to counter-intuitive results. Food tends to be easier to understand and to draw comparisons on because most people not in the “biz” can understand growing something. Understanding the material management, manufacture, and points of distribution of clothing is more difficult due to much of the present / history (sweat shops, USA cotton slavery, etc.) Outside of practical clothing comments (i.e. “wicking prevents ass chapping” and “polyester rubs me the wrong way”), value judgments on clothing – like food – should not be taken on face value. This challenge of the assumptions of value is what makes pages turn on the interweb. Boring? Somewhat. But, like safety advice, if you listen, you might learn something. It might be wrong, but at least with food / clothing it won’t kill you. Unless you are allergic to it, or get salmonella, or choke on it. Well, then it could kill you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 13, 2008, 3:17 AM
Post #226 of 237
(1320 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: And in that lines the best thing for you and the environment is the original human food: SOYLENT GREEN?!?!?
|
|
|
|
|
zeke_sf
Sep 13, 2008, 5:46 AM
Post #227 of 237
(1306 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730
|
sungam wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: And in that lines the best thing for you and the environment is the original human food: SOYLENT GREEN?!?!? Tastes like chikin?
|
|
|
|
|
stymingersfink
Sep 13, 2008, 6:27 AM
Post #228 of 237
(1298 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 12, 2003
Posts: 7250
|
zeke_sf wrote: sungam wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: And in that lines the best thing for you and the environment is the original human food: SOYLENT GREEN?!?!? Tastes like chikin? Mmmm.. chikkin! wharz mi masht 'taters?!!!!!!!!!!1
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 13, 2008, 4:17 PM
Post #229 of 237
(1268 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
stymingersfink wrote: zeke_sf wrote: sungam wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: And in that lines the best thing for you and the environment is the original human food: SOYLENT GREEN?!?!? Tastes like chikin? Mmmm.. chikkin! wharz mi masht 'taters?!!!!!!!!!!1 chikin iz best wen stufed with the haggiz 'nd wraped wif teh bacon. yesh, wiv masht 'taters! 'n a whiskey saws
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Sep 13, 2008, 4:21 PM
Post #230 of 237
(1264 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
sungam wrote: stymingersfink wrote: zeke_sf wrote: sungam wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: And in that lines the best thing for you and the environment is the original human food: SOYLENT GREEN?!?!? Tastes like chikin? Mmmm.. chikkin! wharz mi masht 'taters?!!!!!!!!!!1chikin iz best wen stufed with the haggiz 'nd wraped wif teh bacon. yesh, wiv masht 'taters! 'n a whiskey saws You climb in those clothes?
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Sep 13, 2008, 5:00 PM
Post #231 of 237
(1251 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
Lazlo wrote: sungam wrote: stymingersfink wrote: zeke_sf wrote: sungam wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: And in that lines the best thing for you and the environment is the original human food: SOYLENT GREEN?!?!? Tastes like chikin? Mmmm.. chikkin! wharz mi masht 'taters?!!!!!!!!!!1chikin iz best wen stufed with the haggiz 'nd wraped wif teh bacon. yesh, wiv masht 'taters! 'n a whiskey saws You climb in those clothes? If Happie made a tee with loch leven chiken or haggiz on it, yeah, I'd climb in them.
|
|
|
|
|
evanwish
Sep 14, 2008, 6:26 PM
Post #232 of 237
(1214 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 23, 2007
Posts: 1040
|
rtwilli4 wrote: Sorry, just kind of weird. To me if you have money to spend on climbing, you use it to climb more. Not $70 pairs of pants and $30 beenies. I'll wager the cost of those pants that you'd wear them in an instant if someone bought them for you!
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 14, 2008, 9:40 PM
Post #233 of 237
(1201 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
evanwish wrote: rtwilli4 wrote: Sorry, just kind of weird. To me if you have money to spend on climbing, you use it to climb more. Not $70 pairs of pants and $30 beenies. I'll wager the cost of those pants that you'd wear them in an instant if someone bought them for you! I definitely would! I already said that I have one pair of nice pants... and I never said that they weren't technically better and more comfortable than cheap clothes... I just don't think that weekend warrior sport craggers really need three or four pair, that's all. I've seen people change clothes at lunch time!!!
|
|
|
|
|
wildthing14
Sep 14, 2008, 9:49 PM
Post #234 of 237
(1194 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 21, 2007
Posts: 50
|
i wear whatever is comfortable. (which normally means cheap)
|
|
|
|
|
tradrenn
Sep 15, 2008, 1:15 AM
Post #235 of 237
(1175 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 16, 2005
Posts: 2990
|
rtwilli4 wrote: Do you wear special clothes to climb? By today's standards, I will have to say I'm not, but I do enjoy my blue spandex pants that Chossy gave to me, they are so comfortable, it's like I'm not wearing them at all.
rtwilli4 wrote: If you STILL have money left over, then help finish the purchase of the Pendergrass-Murry Reserve, Quees Creek, or one of the thousand or so climbing areas that will be gone before I die. Please do tell me more about Queens Creek. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Sep 15, 2008, 1:21 AM
Post #236 of 237
(1167 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
I don't know much about Queens Creek other than there is a bunch of copper there and they have been talking about closing if for years.
|
|
|
|
|
zeke_sf
Sep 15, 2008, 2:47 AM
Post #237 of 237
(1155 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730
|
rtwilli4 wrote: I don't know much about Queens Creek other than there is a bunch of copper there and they have been talking about closing if for years. I'm not sure it's the entire shebang. They'll close parts for mining though. I better get me and my pr33na pants there before it closes!
|
|
|
|
|
|