difference between what I teach and quackery is that, as opposed to the hippie dippy, positive affirmation, bullshit that those guys teach, there's a system to my madness,

Another way to put it would be that if you've ever had one of those moments when you've been in the zone, there's a way you were carrying yourself

Another huge component of all of this is bran network functions and how, if one of networks 1-6 is being misused, symptoms will often appear in one's climbing. And this is very common. This misuse often stems from a traumatic event in childhood, which is very common in our society.

To give you an example, until about 15 years ago, a common practice amongst midwives was to cut the umbilical cord too soon, thus making a child's first breath painful -- a traumatic event -- and thereby slightly impede breathing going forward.

He's peddling a panacea. You can use the same technique to get laid more often, climb harder, and do whatever else he can think of that extract money from gullible people.

http://www.meetup.com/charmistry-philly/

Jay

Try selling your products elsewhere. You will be rightfully flamed here. You have talked about many things your system is not. You have provided no detail about what it is.

To give you an example, until about 15 years ago, a common practice amongst midwives was to cut the umbilical cord too soon, thus making a child's first breath painful -- a traumatic event -- and thereby slightly impede breathing going forward. One of many examples.


Be well,
Peter

Well, Peter, it seems you have opened the door regarding making the content of pm's public . I have communicated with Peter on the private side a bit, and if anybody's interested, I'll put the contents here. If it's time to let it die, I'll leave it alone.

I typically respect your opinion and paborden does sound like he's selling a bridge coated in snake-oil... but your subsequent emails crossed a line that he, as best I can tell, did not: publishing others' pms. Specifically, he published a message which he sent to you as an offer to discuss things further. It's pretty clear to me that this does not constitute "opening the door regarding making the contents of pms public." While he may be publishing an IM, it is the first IM he sent to you, and contains absolutely no sensitive information.

It's a big step from his publication of that message (which, again, is one that he wrote and sent to you) to your posting of a fairly extensive correspondence. You may think this guy's a snake-oil salesman, and frankly that's the obvious thing to think, given his posts, but you gave away the moral high ground when you tried to justify posting a bunch of private correspondence with the rationale that "he opened the door."

Public posting of PMs is not against TOS or forum rules. It's generally looked upon as bad forum.

remember kids, it's the internet and just like e-mails, private messages cannot be taken back once they're out there.