|
|
|
|
theooze
Aug 14, 2003, 7:01 PM
Post #151 of 266
(16783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 18, 2003
Posts: 619
|
In reply to: Not totally true... Mods have always been able to delete, but we frown on deleting anything which may have historical value. No matter how trivial... SPAM does not have this value. You are "splitting hairs" dude, as outright SPAM should be deleted, I think even you would agree to that. I am done here Stu... You being a lawyer, I am disappointed in you, as your logic is unreasonable, and you simply want to "split hairs". Split them by yourself. If you have a reasonable concern, I will gladly discuss it with you... But I have more patience with my 3 year old niece asking me "why ???", than I do a man in his 40's doing it just to be a pill. You like challenges - show me a case prior to December 2002 where a post was deliberately deleted by anyone other than the poster. It never happened, I betcha. Spam or otherwise. And we're not talking about spam anyway, for christ sake. You are lying. You created the archives specifically to "hide" objectionable material because it could not be deleted: "RC.com Archives Since we don't like to delete anything... This is where we take out the trash. Moderator rrradam"
|
|
|
|
|
theooze
Aug 14, 2003, 7:17 PM
Post #153 of 266
(16783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 18, 2003
Posts: 619
|
In reply to: How would you propose I show you a deleted thread ??? Ummm, maybe if it happened it might have been discussed in other posts? Fact is, it would have caused a big reaction. Like it did this time. Was your request reasonable? To find a time I didn't throw a tantrum? What the fuck does that have to do with the subject matter of this thread? You are ridiculous. I need to start a clean thread on my suggestion about limiting the power of mods. You guys keep hijacking this thread. You claim to want input on the TOS, but any time someone makes a suggestion you blow it off and start calling names. You are ignorant little boys.
|
|
|
|
|
rrrADAM
Aug 14, 2003, 7:27 PM
Post #154 of 266
(16783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17553
|
OK Stu... I'll give you what you asked for first: http://www.rockclimbing.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4189 From November 2001. Another "case" where threads have been deleted prior to Dec 2002 is when redundant posts have been made to many different Forums by the same user. Now that I have accomplished your challenge, won't you try mine ??? :wink: Ooops, I'm off the clock now, c ya.
|
|
|
|
|
billcoe_
Aug 14, 2003, 7:45 PM
Post #155 of 266
(16783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694
|
As the "GAWD" is a MFing Jackass thread got locked, let me add to this thread that judging from his actions alone, Gawd is a lowly piece of shit beyond belief. How the hell he can look at himself in the am is beyond me. I would continue on in this vein but theres been at least 500 other identical posts and I don't want to just be a "me to" kind of guy. But me too: It is beyond reason what a MFer gawd. Bill
|
|
|
|
|
theooze
Aug 14, 2003, 7:54 PM
Post #156 of 266
(16783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 18, 2003
Posts: 619
|
In reply to: OK Stu... I'll give you what you asked for first: http://www.rockclimbing.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4189 From November 2001. Another "case" where threads have been deleted prior to Dec 2002 is when redundant posts have been made to many different Forums by the same user. Your link has nothing to do with deleting posts, you idiot.
In reply to: Now that I have accomplished your challenge, won't you try mine ??? :wink: Fuck no. It's stupid and OT. You are a dick.
|
|
|
|
|
ronamick
Aug 14, 2003, 8:17 PM
Post #157 of 266
(16783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 28, 2002
Posts: 476
|
In reply to: hey ron - call me out all you like. you can even say i have a little dick and i don't really care! i never once moderated out of spite, and i've thoroughly enjoyed some of your posts. now that i am thank god retired as a jackbooted thug, i am enjoying myself by calling bs on self important sexist, bigoted, inaccurate, embarrassing, unbelievably sexist, misogynist, unbelievably self-important, immature bastards like pete. much as i would have loved to do nasty things to him and other idiots that posted to the forums i looked after, i never did. now i can go back to being like you, and talk poo without any responsibility or accountability. its like being on vacation! I too know the aggravation of waist-band degradation of the undershorts, when the elastic is too stetched out to keep them in place, and the natural clinching and pulling action of your ass cheeks pulls more and more of the garment into your crack as you go about your business of the day, and you try to ignore the discomfort and gut it out, but by day's end the entire issue is up your crack except for the leg holes, which are twisted around your now painfully inflammed 'nads, causing the label press deeply into your beanbag and move to and fro with the slightest motion, like a crosscut saw bent on bisecting your scrotum. I understand how that kind of irritation can make a fella grouchy, so I don't begrudge you answering my wise and benevolent observations with what amounts to a stream of ranting, foaming bile, vitriol and hate. I have sent you the number of a top clothier who specializes in helping people like you. God speed young man. I'm skeptical as to any inherent message in the arrangement of words you have concocted, but I will nonetheless undertake to provide rejoinder to each issue, just in case. 1- I did'nt "call you out", I called you an a-hole. There's a difference. 2- As to the relative dimension of your penis, I am not inclined to investigate nor speculate, but just the same wouldn't characterize you as "small" for fear of the hurt that may inflict. 3- YOU were the one who introduced the issue (yea, threat- whether in jest or not) of malicious editing, so don't try to to turn it around and act like I made an accusation. I reacted to YOUR post, remember? 4- What are "jackboots"? Sounds kind of weird when you think about it. And you have to earn the distinction of "thug" based on real thuggery. It's not something you do with a computer, unless you're sticking it up a helpless cripple's ass. 5- Do "nasty things to Pete?" Whoa, I'm not EVEN going there. Your choice of lifestyles is entirely up to you, but don't think you can titillate me into your brand of depravery! 6- You can't be like me. I can't even be like me. It's just a darn good thing that I AM me, because I guarantee you that nobody else would want it. I'm a mess. If you din't believe me, ask someone down the steet. That is all
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Aug 14, 2003, 8:46 PM
Post #158 of 266
(16783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
In reply to: I too know the aggravation of waist-band degradation of the undershorts, when the elastic is too stetched out to keep them in place, and the natural clinching and pulling action of your ass cheeks pulls more and more of the garment into your crack as you go about your business of the day, and you try to ignore the discomfort and gut it out, but by day's end the entire issue is up your crack except for the leg holes, which are twisted around your now painfully inflammed 'nads, causing the label press deeply into your beanbag and move to and fro with the slightest motion, like a crosscut saw bent on bisecting your scrotum. (snip) That is all That is all? THAT'S ALL??? You don't think you can come in here and hit us with what, 7 commas and a period and just WALK OUT AGAIN, DO YA??? Do YA??? No no no my friend it is not that easy. See, you got me started with the beer bouldering guide (which I must admit to having practiced extensively in the recent past). Now you go and write of one of the modern curses of civilization, the single most important factor for middle aged white male lower back pain, a frightening topic in parlors throughout Marin County, an article of clothing so abused, so maligned, so unspeakable, as to be considered a bathing suit by German tourists in Death Valley, yeh, a garment guarenteed to produce run on sentences the world over of course, I speak of underwear. Dude, you got the gift of the word. That was a beautiful sentence you wrote up there. I demand you RIGHT MORE! DMT
|
|
|
|
|
murf
Aug 14, 2003, 9:04 PM
Post #159 of 266
(16783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 15, 2002
Posts: 1150
|
In reply to: I too know the aggravation of waist-band degradation of the undershorts, when the elastic is too stetched out to keep them in place, and the natural clinching and pulling action of your ass cheeks pulls more and more of the garment into your crack as you go about your business of the day, and you try to ignore the discomfort and gut it out, but by day's end the entire issue is up your crack except for the leg holes, which are twisted around your now painfully inflammed 'nads, causing the label press deeply into your beanbag and move to and fro with the slightest motion, like a crosscut saw bent on bisecting your scrotum Brilliance!
|
|
|
|
|
sauron
Aug 14, 2003, 11:52 PM
Post #160 of 266
(16783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 15, 2001
Posts: 1859
|
In reply to: You like challenges - show me a case prior to December 2002 where a post was deliberately deleted by anyone other than the poster. It never happened, I betcha. Spam or otherwise. And we're not talking about spam anyway, for christ sake. I did, on numerous occations delete posts prior to December 2002 - however, they were all either duplicate, or empty posts...
In reply to: "RC.com Archives Since we don't like to delete anything... This is where we take out the trash. Trevor is the one who said he did not want to delete threads/posts - it had absolutely nothing to do with not being able to do so... - d.
|
|
|
|
|
justsendingits
Aug 15, 2003, 12:33 AM
Post #161 of 266
(16783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 29, 2001
Posts: 1070
|
This concludes the end of our broadcast day,tune in tomorrow where the central scrutinizer and Tipper Gore call em like they see um. Thank you,good night.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
philbox
Moderator
Aug 15, 2003, 3:07 AM
Post #163 of 266
(16783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 27, 2002
Posts: 13105
|
In reply to: In reply to: I too know the aggravation of waist-band degradation of the undershorts, when the elastic is too stetched out to keep them in place, and the natural clinching and pulling action of your ass cheeks pulls more and more of the garment into your crack as you go about your business of the day, and you try to ignore the discomfort and gut it out, but by day's end the entire issue is up your crack except for the leg holes, which are twisted around your now painfully inflammed 'nads, causing the label press deeply into your beanbag and move to and fro with the slightest motion, like a crosscut saw bent on bisecting your scrotum. I understand how that kind of irritation can make a fella grouchy, so I don't begrudge you answering my wise and benevolent observations with what amounts to a stream of ranting, foaming bile, vitriol and hate. Why don't women have this problem? Or is the answer so ridiculously obvious? :shock: Arr well now women generally have two bums to worry about so you guys are twice as hard up.
|
|
|
|
|
alpnclmbr1
Aug 15, 2003, 6:02 AM
Post #164 of 266
(16783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 10, 2002
Posts: 3060
|
Adam wrote this yesterday
In reply to: Whe it is determined exactly what happened, we will reply to this thread, with an explanation of what happened, and exactly what will be done to avoid it in the future. Today at 1:30 he wrote in the mod powers thread
In reply to: There is a process for examining the Moderation to make sure that it is fair, and discussion is open, honest and frank about it in the M+E Forum. Mods have ackowledged and reversed their "poor judgement", and have learned from it... Even as recent as today. :wink: Is this just coincidence?
|
|
|
|
|
sixter
Aug 15, 2003, 6:05 AM
Post #165 of 266
(16783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 25, 2003
Posts: 262
|
In reply to: Wow,thanks for the tip on neoprene seals(do they have baby seals?),that could be huge ifin my car breaks down on hyw. 50 in Nevada.Tell me,should I upgrade to neoprene baby seals on my spooge collector?? Baby seals work great, they are harder to find, and sometimes they do need to be hammered a little to make them fit. You should stay with natural latex rubber seals with your spooge collector, and I don't reccomend them in baby seals, unless you really need the smaller sizes.
|
|
|
|
|
rrrADAM
Aug 15, 2003, 12:13 PM
Post #166 of 266
(16783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17553
|
In reply to: Adam wrote this yesterday In reply to: Whe it is determined exactly what happened, we will reply to this thread, with an explanation of what happened, and exactly what will be done to avoid it in the future. Today at 1:30 he wrote in the mod powers thread In reply to: There is a process for examining the Moderation to make sure that it is fair, and discussion is open, honest and frank about it in the M+E Forum. Mods have ackowledged and reversed their "poor judgement", and have learned from it... Even as recent as today. :wink: Is this just coincidence? Still waiting on the exact info from Tim... he does have a day job, that sometimes takes him into the night hours. The "recent" thing is in reference to the Bouldering Forum. Not coincidence... apples and oranges.
|
|
|
|
|
alpnclmbr1
Aug 15, 2003, 3:54 PM
Post #167 of 266
(16783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 10, 2002
Posts: 3060
|
In reply to: [ Still waiting on the exact info from Tim... he does have a day job, that sometimes takes him into the night hours. The "recent" thing is in reference to the Bouldering Forum. Not coincidence... apples and oranges. Thanks Adam, I have a suspicious mind when it comes to "Authority figures" and things getting swept under the rug. Hopefully unjustified.
|
|
|
|
|
rrrADAM
Aug 15, 2003, 4:02 PM
Post #168 of 266
(16783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17553
|
No worries... Ironic that many are on our backs, even more than the conspiracey theorists accuse us of being on their backs. :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
passthepitonspete
Aug 15, 2003, 4:09 PM
Post #169 of 266
(16783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 10, 2001
Posts: 2183
|
I was about to post a "C'mon guys, it's been FIFTY-SEVEN FRICKIN' HOURS since I asked you guys to look into it, and there's STILL no answer?!" post, but I guess I won't.
|
|
|
|
|
passthepitonspete
Aug 15, 2003, 5:35 PM
Post #170 of 266
(16783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 10, 2001
Posts: 2183
|
deleted as per request below
|
|
|
|
|
rrrADAM
Aug 15, 2003, 6:57 PM
Post #171 of 266
(16783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17553
|
In reply to: I just got an email from gawd, the person around whom this whole debacle began. You can click here to read where I've been threatened by gawd! Pete... You are aware that you asked people to stay "on topic" in this thread, so why does this not apply to you ??? I think the fact that you can post an edited and incomplete version orsomeone's private email to you, when you said you would keep it between you and him shows that there is no censorship here. Especially when you wrote a rant on how you "Emphatically oppose making PMs public". I did not read in that rant where it only applied to PMs or emails from you. PLEASE Pete... For the peace of the site... Stop injecting all this drama. I'm asking poiltely, especially since you agreed to "tone it down" a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
rrrADAM
Aug 15, 2003, 8:03 PM
Post #172 of 266
(16783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17553
|
What am I thinking... Asking Pete to delete something that draws attention to him ?!?!?!? I am a rrrETARD. :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
passthepitonspete
Aug 15, 2003, 8:05 PM
Post #173 of 266
(16778 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 10, 2001
Posts: 2183
|
Done. You are.
|
|
|
|
|
passthepitonspete
Aug 18, 2003, 7:22 PM
Post #174 of 266
(16778 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 10, 2001
Posts: 2183
|
C'mon guys, it's been freaking days! You're turning me into a Conspiracy Theorist! WHAT IS THE SCOOP? Was this post deleted on purpose, or accidentally? If so, how and why? How do we prevent it happening again. You promised us answers DAYS ago. What's the delay?
|
|
|
|
|
alpnclmbr1
Aug 18, 2003, 7:31 PM
Post #175 of 266
(16778 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 10, 2002
Posts: 3060
|
Ditto That!
|
|
|
|
|
|